readily developed that emphasize those connections.In the FIGS program, writing instructors strive to use course materials that pique the interest ofscience and technology oriented students and that also provide excellent models of literacy.Instructors have thus developed a wide range of materials, ranging from historical perspectives todigital literacy2 as well as biomechanics, the science behind science fiction, and technology-based controversies. These courses have developed a reputation for success, for breaking downsome of the barriers between the humanists and the engineers, and—most important—preparingengineering students for the demanding levels of literacy required both for university courseworkand the workplace.During the summer 2009
current at 5 second intervals and the software displays green highlights for answers within the allowed range, stripped red fortutorial (at their own pace) the students took a post-test. The data outside that range and yellow after three tries, at which point the softwarecomplex components used in tooling applications and the enters a calculated answer.subtle differences in their application make computer graphicsbased instruction an attractive teaching tool. This limited casestudy involved advanced manufacturing students in industrialtechnology and has shown that students achieved an increaseissues (Internet connection), and content mismatch for some
engineering program and continue work in engineering education. Prior to entering UGA, Chris worked in education as a business manager, an IT adviser, and special topics instructor in a local high school. He also volunteered as a SAT math instructor, a science and math tutor, and a robotics team coach. Chris worked for various corporations for over 20 years in microprocessor architecture, error correcting codes, and system architecture. Chris holds 21 patents, participated in many industry standard specification groups including PCI and SDRAM, presented at many conferences and proceedings including Comdex, CeBIT, CES, US Patent Office, IEEE Micro, and others. Chris has a bachelor’s (with highest honors) and master’s degree
Urbana-Champaign Bhavya is a Ph.D. student in Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign advised by Dr. Chengxiang Zhai. Her research interests are in novel applications of text mining, machine learning, and human-machine collaboration, particularly for improving education and health care.Prof. Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Lawrence Angrave is an award winning Fellow and Teaching Professor at the department of computer science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). His interests include (but are not limited to) joyful teaching, empirically-sound educational research, campus and online courses, computer science, engaging underrepresented students
social aspects of engineering. 4. The addition of more items related to the technical side of engineering [e.g., 55] would increase the number of items in Factor 6; guidelines recommend having more than two items in one factor [84, 85]. 5. Redundancies between some of the skills questions and the corresponding attitude items should be eliminated: a. Q22 and Q26_6 both concern the importance of ethics in engineering. b. Q20 and Q26_7 both concern the influence of societal context in engineering. c. Q19 asks students about the importance of creativity in engineering and one of the skills included in Q26_4 (Professional Skills) is creativity.This questionnaire has potential applications
Paper ID #35616The New Normal: Student Perspectives on Supportive University Policiesduring COVID and BeyondMaimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University Maimuna Begum Kali is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering and Computing Education program at Florida International University (FIU), in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Ed- ucation (SUCCEED). She completed her B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) in Bangladesh. She began her Ph.D. study in Com- puter Science but changed her program to Engineering and Computing
-school and out-of-school settings. At The Hill school, she has been developing integrated and multidisciplinary engineering and computer science programs and training teachers. She has over 7 years experience of conducting research in pre-college engineering education research, with over 50 publications and presentations. Her research focus includes exploring the engineering learning of children, including those on the autism spectrum, and ways to make connections between in-school engineering learning and out-of-school learning. Her research has been recognized several times through dissertation fellowship and Outstanding Research Award from Purdue university and national awards from American Society for Engineering
machine shop tools, laser cutters, and 3D printers. Students were graded ontheir robot’s design and performance, and they were assessed at various milestones throughout thequarter. A technical report that described the robot and provided an analysis on its capabilities,was required upon completion. Unlike many undergraduate engineering courses, this course was designed for students to bothgain knowledge in engineering theory, as well as to acquire design experience in a hands-on teamsetting. When classes were transitioned to operating in a fully remote setting, the instructional teamdecided to develop a hardware kit to enable an at-home version of the design course. Through acompetitive application process, we received an instructional
pedagogical journal papers, 46 refereed research and pedagogical conference articles. As PI or Co-PI, Traum has attracted over $865 K in funding for research and education. Prior to founding Engineer Inc., Dr. Traum was an Associate Professor and Director of Engineering Programs at Philadelphia University. He previously served on the MSOE faculty as well as co-founding the Mechanical & Energy Engineering Department at the University of North Texas – Denton. Traum received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in me- chanical engineering from MIT, and he holds two B.S. from the UC Irvine in mechanical and aerospace engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education
numberof awards. In 2003 this program won the Alan Blizzard Award for Collaborative Education. Thisaward is presented to one program in Canada each year by the Society for Teaching andLearning in Higher Education and includes the publication of a monograph describing thephilosophy of the course by McGraw-Hill Publishers. At the American Society for EngineeringEducation Conference in Salt Lake City in 2004, a paper describing the familiarization,functionality and testing components of the course won the PIC V best paper award, the bestpaper in its category out of 2500 papers. In addition the course won the Curriculum InnovationAward from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers resulting in a presentation at the2006 ASME Beijing conference
technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and making processes to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational path- ways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University. He was previously an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering programs and Tooker Professor for Effective STEM Education at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Paper ID #26283Panel Session: Targeted Harassment in Engineering Education: What ItLooks Like, Why Now, and What Is at StakeDr. Alice L Pawley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Alice L. Pawley is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. Prof. Pawley’s goal through her work at Purdue is to help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more
project, groupdiscussions, and self-assessments. The results support the general belief that a learning-centerededucational paradigm will produce greater learning and skill gains than a teaching-centeredparadigm in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) disciplines. The techniquesused and the outcomes from the course have implications for not only future curriculumdevelopment but also ABET accreditation, which requires accredited ET programs to demonstratethat their graduates develop 11 competencies. This case study analyzes four of the 11 competenciesand provides educators an active learning resource with classroom instructional materials for afirst-year engineering design course.IntroductionFor over a decade, Michael Prince’s article
removedefense research institutes from campuses during the Vietnam War; to establish and sustainwomen’s and ethnic studies programs; to divest from South African apartheid or from the fossilfuel industry; to extricate universities from relationships with sweatshop labor, waterprivatization, or exploitive food vendors; and to abandon vestiges of racism in campus mascotsor monuments. These are campaigns led by students, faculty, and administrators, and whileenacted through the institution’s structural policies and resource allocations, such campaigns alsohave a great impact on the campus climate and the knowledge-production practices both enactedby and available to students and faculty. Demonstrative of cross-group collaborations, studentswill take up
parts of the video capture thatwere edited or resequenced. All audio was automatically transcribed by the University videostreaming application and the Instructional Designer manually edited to correct errors forimproved accessibility.Additional visuals were created to match audio by the Instructional Designer with the help of theMedia Producer. This included screenshots, voiceovers, photographs, clip art, and filmedvideos. Popup text, and images were used for emphasis and reinforcement. We also addedsidebars with key points. The division of content into sections with links and sidebars withimportant points meant that the user could be actively engaged by browsing, moving betweensections, following links, and returning to sections. Video clips
framework.Dr. Deniz Eseryel, North Carolina State University Deniz Eseryel joined North Carolina State University as a Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program clus- ter hire in the Digital Transformation of Education. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Counselor Education specializing in Digital Learning and Teaching. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. The important but little understood question that has motivated her program of research is: How can we effectively and ef- ficiently promote cyberlearning in complex knowledge domains such as STEM (science, technology, en- gineering and mathematics)? Towards this direction, she
Dr. Rajiv Ramnath is Director of Practice at the Collaborative for Enterprise Transformation and Innova- tion (CETI), and an evangelist for AweSim, a consortium that seeks to bring high-performance comput- ing based modelling and simulation to small and medium enterprises in the Midwest. He was formerly Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Concentus Technology Corp., in Columbus, Ohio, and led product-development and government-funded R&D – notably through the National Information In- frastructure Integration Protocols program funded by Vice President Gore’s ATP initiative. He is now engaged in developing industry-facing programs of applied R&D, classroom and professional education and technology
Transportation Center and conducted research in warehouse design and operations, transportation security, and inland waterways security. She has taught in both the Industrial Engineering and Civil Engineering departments, and currently teaches Engineering Economic Analysis, Ergonomics, and Introduction to Operations Management.Ms. Shelly Walters, University of Arkansas Shelly Walters is an instructional designer at the University of Arkansas Global Campus and is in the Ed.D. program in Educational Technology at Boise State. She has a Master of Educational Technology from Boise State University. Page 26.979.1
asjust a formula and the visual aspect helped”. One student mentioned that the CompressionFunction module was a little confusing due to a “deep nesting” structure; however, this studentalso agreed that this was the nature of the algorithm. Page 26.1371.12Students agreed that the Practice mode was effective and indicated “I liked that you are able tostep through the process”, “Clearly marked + Straightforward”, “Great way to learn”, “Welllaid out and easy to follow”, “Most effective component”, “Useful as an application ofprinciples”, and “It helped me understand SHA”. Some improvements were mentioned, such asadding a hint button to provide a brief
Content options for either stand-alone courses orintegrated instruction may include professional engineering ethical codes, theoretical reasoningand moral theories, humanist readings, case studies, ethical heuristics, or service learning4.LeClair and Ferrell propose that although lectures are the most common methods of ethicstraining, they represent a passive learning experience which may not be the best method forethical training transfer3. A more effective method is to provide students with ethical situationsand then require them to think about their feelings on the issue.5 A meta-analysis of 26 ethicsprograms in the sciences found that the most successful ethics training programs were case-basedand interactive. These programs allowed
in the area of electrical engineering, he has gained new perspectives on teaching and learning. He has developed and delivered numerous workshops on student-centered learn- ing and online-learning-related topics during his service in Indonesia. Dr. Lawanto’s research interests include cognition, learning, and instruction, and online learning.Mr. Harry B Santoso, Utah State University Harry B. Santoso is a faculty member at Faculty of Computer Science, University of Indonesia. He re- ceived a BS and MS from Universitas Indonesia (UI) in Computer Science. Before pursuing his Ph.D. program majoring Engineering Education at Department of Engineering Education, Utah State Univer- sity, he taught some courses at UI (e.g
13% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0% White 10 63% Choose not to Disclose 0 0% # of Courses completed n % One course in progress 1 6% Completed one course 9 56% Completed two courses 6 38% Year in Degree Program n % 1st year 0 0
products. It is markedly different from the traditional productdevelopment process, which focuses on optimized designs for individual products. This is arelatively new development in engineering design, which is not typically a part of an engineer’seducation. Furthermore, it is different from traditional engineering topics in that it requires anintegration of principles from both management and engineering design. All this makes for anew and different topic for which educational material needs to be developed. This paperpresents and describes an online learning tool that includes a tutorial, cases, and a glossary in amultimedia format hosted on the Internet. The tutorial presents the basic concepts as well ascurrent research on planning and
day of classes, Itook him to the registrar’s office to add his math course and stood in line with him to make surethat he didn’t encounter any problems (I was unsure that they would let him register for the mathclass without taking the placement exam himself, and would have taken him to the testing center,if this had been the case). In my office, I showed him how to access my computer and printer,the Internet, and how to get an outside phone line (he already knew how to get soft drinks out ofmy refrigerator). Over the first couple days, I tried to answer his questions (or anticipate hisquestions) about what his different instructors would expect. I reviewed his syllabi, helped himto plan out his study time, and this was about the extent of
practices in supporting engineering undergraduates as they transition from student to professional.Lisa Retzlaff, North Carolina State UniversityDr. Laine Schrewe, Otterbein University Dr. Laine Schrewe is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering, Computer Science, and Physics at Otterbein University. Before transitioning to this role, Laine designed engines for Honda Research and Development for 9 years and then transitioned to education to develop a high school engineering program that she taught for 8 years. She is passionate about improving the educational experience of diverse populations in engineering programs and about utilizing instructional strategies that better connect engineering coursework to
were the most commonly used type of homeworkquestions, with just under 94% reporting that they used problems in assignments. Very few(< 2%) included true/false questions. Figure 4 shows the grading weight of each of various typesof questions, using average weights reported for a typical homework assignment. Based on theseaverages, 85% of a homework assignment grade would be allocated to problems. Multiple choiceand true/false on average make up a much smaller percentage, with true/false only a tenth of apercent. The “other” type of problems were described as programming or online work. A fewrespondents assigned only short answers, only essays or long answers, or only problems for theirhomework assignments. In fact, over half (51%) indicated
Paper ID #43199My Code Isn’t Working! Mathematics Teachers’ Adaptive Behaviors Duringan Engineering Design Challenge (Fundamental)Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University Emily M. Haluschak is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Emily is interested in leveraging integrated curriculum development in K-12 settings to positively impact underserved populations in the field of engineering. She utilizes past experiences in STEM program evaluation, education policy, and chemical engineering research.Melissa Colonis PhD, Purdue University Melissa is a mathematics teacher at Jefferson High School
their own… another common concern about online courses. That course was notoffered online at that institution again after the 2014 offering mentioned above (at least throughthe time of writing this paper).The landscape of higher education is changing, however. A quick internet search now reveals aplethora of online undergraduate and graduate course and even degree offerings from a widearray of institutions (community colleges, small and large 4-year colleges and universities, ivyleague schools, international technical universities, etc.). Undergraduate science and engineeringcourses and degrees are right up there with liberal arts programs, MBA programs, healthadministration, etc. among the online offerings. At the time of writing this paper
Paper ID #36807“Man, I am a Black Engineer”: The Co-development ofTransformational Resistance and Engineering IdentityAnne Marguerite Mcalister (Anne McAlister) Anne is a doctoral student at University of Virginia, and will start as a postdoctoral fellow at University at Buffalo in the fall.Jessica L McDermott Jessica McDermott is a PhD student studying higher education at the University of Virginia. She is also an experienced educator whose most recent full-time position was Director of First Year Programs at a STEM-focused university. Jessica is dedicated to supporting students from all backgrounds.Juan
principles: 1.) Model Construction: Requires the development of a model or decision algorithm. 2.) Reality: The MEA must be set to a relevant engineering application. 3.) Generalizability: The resulting model should apply to other similar applications. 4.) Self-Assessment: The students must be able to verify the quality of their own work. 5.) Model Documentation: Requires a response or memo describing the model. 6.) Effective Prototype: Ensures the involvement of key concepts usable in future work. Page 22.1519.3These principles are maintained to ensure that the MEA research is consistent and effective. Forthe research in this paper, the