. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222.25. Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Contribution of learner–instructor interaction to sense of community in graduate online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(4).26. Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 1-440.27. Kittur, J. & Tuti, S. (2024). Conducting Qualitative Research Study: A Step-by-Step Process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 28. Chakraborty, M., & Muyia Nafukho, F. (2014
intervention aimed at exposing underrepresentedfourth and fifth-grade students and their families to hands-on STEM experiences. In addition to being a professor,Henderson is the Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES, pronounced “promise”), aprogram aimed at increasing engineering student achievement, engagement, and graduation rates. His research interestsare in engineering identity development among Black males. He was most recently recognized by INSIGHT IntoDiversity Magazine as an Inspiring STEM Leader, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with the College ofLiberal Arts & Sciences (LAS) Outstanding Young Alumni Award, and Career Communications Group with a BlackEngineer of the Year Award for college-level
York Danielle Usinski is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She is currently in her final year and is set to graduate with her Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering in May 2024. Next year, she will be graduating with her Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering in May 2025. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Putting Affect in Context: Meta-Affect, Beliefs, & Engineering IdentityAbstractIn this research paper, we sought to understand how meta-affect influences the strength ofengineering identity in first-year students, since strong engineering
, Supplemental instruction’s impact in two freshmanchemistry classes: research, modes of operation, and anecdotes. Research & Teaching inDevelopmental Education, 21 (2), p. 43-64.Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, 1999, The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education:a review. D, Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), p. 331-350Donelan, M., Wallace, J., 1998, Peer support programmes - a truly co-operative initiative. In Dolan, J.,Castley, A.J.: Students supporting students. SEDA Paper 105, Birmingham, Staff and EducationalDevelopment Association, p. 11-22.Draper, S.W., 2005, The Hawthorne, Pygmalion, placebo and other expectancy effects: some notes.URL: http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/hawth.html (visited February 2009)Goodlad, S., Hirst
2006-1481: ASSESSING STUDENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE LEARNINGOBJECTIVESJoanne Mathews, Illinois Institute of TechnologyDaniel Ferguson, Illinois Institute of Technology Senior Lecturer, Interprofessional Studies Program (IPRO), Il Institute of TechnologyMargaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of TechnologyAbhinav Pamulaparthy, Illinois Institute of Technology IPRO Team Project Manager; major in MMAE Page 11.240.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Assessing Student Acquisition of Knowledge of Learning Objectives for an Interprofessional Projects ProgramAbstractThe Interprofessional Projects Program
learned and future research directions found as a result of preparing this case study.MethodsSetting and ParticipantsENGR 126, Problem Solving and Computer Tools, is an introductory service course covering awide array of topics, including general problem solving strategies and MATLAB programming.During a fall semester, the course contains primarily first-semester engineering studentsinterested in all of the engineering disciplines offered at Purdue. It is broken into four largelectures taught by faculty members each containing approximately 400 students that meet for 50minutes twice per week. Students also attend one 110-minute lab section once per week taughtby one of the 19 graduate teaching assistants. Each lab division contains a maximum of
is Professor and Vice Chair of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Wesley Collier, University of Wisconsin-Madison Wesley Collier is a graduate student in learning sciences in the Epistemic Games research group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison working on the Epistemic Network Analysis tool. He is interested in how games and simulations can be assessed using discourse analysis.Jeff Linderoth, University of Wisconsin-Madison
concentrates on the relationship be- tween educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co-developer of the Re- formed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1600 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State UniversityProf. James A. Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering
Institute for Studies in Education and has a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto.Dr. Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto Serhiy Kovalchuk is a research associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto.Dr. Qin Liu, University of Toronto Dr. Qin Liu is a research associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream, in the Department of Mechanical & Indus- trial Engineering and the Institute for Leadership Education in
researchers a pathway for bringing their research findings to market.Outside of business schools, the growth of and interest in entrepreneurship education has beenfacilitated by Venture Well (formerly the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance(NCIIA; [2]), the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN; [3]) established by theKern Family Foundation, and Epicenter, the National Center for Engineering Pathways toInnovation, an NSF-funded center at Stanford University that aspired to advanceentrepreneurship education and research on entrepreneurship education in engineering ([4]).Entrepreneurship education usually falls under the purview of business schools, centeringprimarily on case studies and management skills. However, knowledge
Paper ID #42465The Impact of Diaries and Reflection on Self-Assessments of Learning in aFirst-Year Undergraduate Engineering Design CourseSerena Mao, Harvey Mudd CollegeDavid Chen, Harvey Mudd CollegeMagdalena Jones, Harvey Mudd College Magdalena, a senior at Harvey Mudd College studying Computer Science and Mathematics is dedicated to working at the intersection of many fields. This project was a treat to work on and she is very proud to have been a part of it!Aye Mon Htut-Rosales, Harvey Mudd CollegeDr. Laura Palucki Blake Laura Palucki Blake is the Director of Institutional Research and Effectiveness at Harvey Mudd
it was like to be interviewed, what thoughts you had about reflection during the interview and whether it changed your prior perspective, and what’s happened since. To the extent possible, also try to connect your essay to one larger issue/challenge in engineering education. Yes, you could address more than one issue, but we anticipate there would be more depth if you chose to focus on one issue.The essays represent phenomenological accounts [2]. Researchers have used thephenomenological approach to understand experiences of students and educators; the approach isapplicable for our work with engineering educators’ experiences. For example, thephenomenological approach was used in Martin’s 2009 study exploring the
courses.Possible questions to investigate in a later study include: Are students who start in the extendedCalculus 1 course retained at a higher rate than their counterparts who start in the conventionalCalculus 1 course? How do their graduation rates compare? Does the amount of time tograduate differ between the two groups? These concerns center on issues of course sequence and“flow” to graduation. The additional semester of math required in the freshman year may impactthe course selections available to the student in the second and third semesters due to pre- andco-requisite requirements, which may affect overall success and retention.Based on the results of this study, the extended, two-semester, Calculus 1 course appears to be aneffective way to
activity systems approach [17] to problematize this understanding ofstudent and faculty resistance to reform pedagogy. It builds on previous work in our group in whichan activity systems lens has been used to understand student participation in clubs [18], rote versusconceptual learning [19], and an instructional reform initiative [20]. In the present study, weinterview eight members of the faculty and student activity systems encompassing twoconcurrently-required core courses within an engineering department at a research university andcharacterize participants’ understanding of these systems. In our analysis, we find that bothstudents and faculty share two objects which are in contradiction. One object, transactionalschooling, aligns with the
research interests include modeling and simulation of high speed circuits, signal and power integrity analysis of electronic packages, and uncertainty quantification of microwave/ RF circuits. Dr. Roy is a recipient of the Vice-Chancellors Gold Medal at the undergraduate level in 2006, the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology in 2012, and the Ontario Graduate Schol- arship in 2012. He currently serves as the reviewer for IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, IEEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS, PACKAGING AND c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
needs.IntroductionThe engineering education environment has seen many changes in the past twenty years.Advances in computers, networks, and technology have made a wealth of information andcomputational tools accessible to students like never before. Course web sites give studentsaccess to supplemental learning materials1, an ability to dialog with other students and faculty onforums2, and even tutorial movies ranging from working through homework problems to usingmodeling or computational programs related to the course3. In addition, there has been a flood ofinterest in and funding of engineering education research. One would assume that with all ofthese advances and focused attention that student academic success would be growingexponentially. In fact, many
Paper ID #11911Achieving High Functioning Teams Using Team Based Learning in FlippedClassroomsDr. Jennifer Mott, California Polytechnic State University Jennifer Mott is faculty in Mechanical Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Her research interests include using Team Based Learning in engineering courses and first year engineering programs.Dr. Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Steffen Peuker holds the James L. Bartlett, Jr. Assistant Professor position in the Mechanical Engi- neering Department at the California State University in San Luis Obispo. He is teaching courses, includ- ing
received a BSE from Princeton in 1992 and PhD from MIT in 1997. He has worked in commercial software development and run his own company. He is currently an assistant professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering department at Iowa State University, as well as Associate Director of ISU’s Virtual Reality Application Center and its Graduate Program in Human Com- puter Interaction. His research focuses on technology to advance cognition, including interface design, intelligent tutoring systems, and cognitive engineering.Dr. John Jackman, Iowa State University John Jackman is an associate professor of industrial and manufacturing systems engineering at Iowa State University. His research interests
to the STEM mentoring research base.In summary, the findings so far shows that mentoring plays a critical role in helping STEMstudents successfully complete their undergraduate studies and prepares them for graduate studyand/or entrance into the STEM workforce. Having a well-designed mentoring program at PennState Harrisburg, students appreciate and understand science, mathematics, and engineeringmore completely, gain skills and confidence, and often achieve improved academic work andperformance. Future work should focus on testing the impact on students of various mentoringactivities provided, such as meetings, participating in off-campus experiences, and also activitieson campus.References[1] Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy
Paper ID #41440Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Experiences of Faculty RecognitionDr. Kelsey Scalaro, University of Nevada, Reno Kelsey is a recent PhD graduate from the Engineering Education program at the University of Nevada, Reno. She has a BS and MS in mechanical engineering and worked in the aerospace industry for four years before returning to academia to complete her doctoral degree. Her research focusses are in undergraduate engineering identity and is interested in exploring how it can be equitably supported through pedagogical practices.Dr. Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno Dr. Chatterjee has
treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Tech- nology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork
AC 2011-1771: LEARNING IN CONTEXT: RECOGNIZING CHALLENGESAND REWARDS OF ENGINEERING CURRICULUM REFORMAlison A. Dingwall, Howard University Alison Dingwall is a Ph.D. candidate in Social Psychology at Howard University. She earned a Masters in Public Health from The George Washington University and a Master of Science in ocial psychology from Howard University. Her baccalaureate studies were completed at American University. Ms. Dingwall is a graduate research assistant with the Department of Civil Engineering at Howard University. Her research interests include engineering education, social rejection and program evaluation.Lorraine N. Fleming, Howard University Lorraine N. Fleming is a Professor of Civil Engineering
the Young’s modulus of poly (methyl methacrylate). Inlab module 2, students hypothesized that acidic swelling fluid would result in less swelling thanmore neutral swelling fluid using research studies linking hydrogels for drug delivery tophysiological pHs. For lab module 3, students hypothesized that Cobalt particles would be resultin higher levels of toxicity than Nickel particles. Finally, in lab module 4, students hypothesizedthat gelatin and poly L-lysine would increase cell adhesion as compared to cell adhesion onuncoated glass coverslips. Laboratory handouts, list of materials, and student value survey areavailable through the authors.Validity and Reliability of SLIGSFactor and reliability analysis demonstrated that both scientific
and Systems (IDEEAS) Lab.Kai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Kai Jun ”KJ” Chew is an assistant professor in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He is passionate about teaching and research, and he strives to produce knowledge that informs better teaching. His research intersects assessment and evaluation, motivation, and equity. His research goal is to promote engineering as a way to advance social justice causes.Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the
full text. 2. Studies focusing on non-higher education populations, specifically primary, secondary, and high school students, were excluded to maintain the research scope within the undergraduate and graduate student demographic.Data Management and Selection Process We utilized Google Drive for effective data management, enabling our team to organize,share, manage, and preserve records and data collaboratively. We reviewed the titles andabstracts of each article to ensure they met our inclusion standards. Once we identified articlesthat were potentially relevant, we saved them in a shared folder. The ensuing phase involvedextracting data, evaluating the full texts for eligibility, and performing inter-rater
industryinternships, leadership in class projects, and enrollment in external technical courses are ana-lyzed. The findings reveal that students who set realistic goals with moderate ambition levelstend to achieve higher completion rates, while those with overly ambitious plans often strug-gle to meet their objectives. Specific trends are identified in the competencies of the NACE,with Teamwork and Professionalism consistently exhibiting high completion rates, while ar-eas like Global Diversity & Awareness and Critical Thinking present opportunities for targetedimprovement. The study validation is supported by faculty observations and students’ resultssuch as attainment of internships and undergraduate research positions.Additionally, the PFE program
been customized to meet the needs of St. Denis Secondary School in Uganda, Africa. The on-line program was developed by two master level graduate students in computer science attending Colorado School of Mines. Both students were enrolled in an independent study which was designed to support the acquisition of advanced computing and design skills while exploring humanitarian applications in another country. The targeted high school students have had limited laboratory and computer experience. This paper describes the resultant online experiment which adheres to the curriculum while appealing to students‟ cultural experiences. The user interface is designed to support a comfortable learning experience while facilitating the acquisition
obtained his undergraduate diploma in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the National Technical University of Athens, Greece. His current research interests are in the areas of security and privacy, networking, and wireless communications, focusing on identification, modeling and mitigation of network security vulnerabilities, visualization of network threats, and analysis of network performance.Prof. Roman Lysecky, University of Arizona Roman Lysecky is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Arizona. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of California, Riverside in 2005. His research interests include embedded systems, runtime optimization, non
to find information from your paper, theywill not delve straight into the contents of the paper to look for them. Instead, the first thing theydo is to read the abstract and see whether your paper is relevant to their field of studies orresearch. This means the abstract is the very first impression you are going to make to thepeople. It is similar to an elevator pitch, only to be written formally on paper. Also, the abstractis usually the last part of the paper that is written, since by then you will be knowledgeable andcomfortable with the materials you have researched.”These changes were implemented with the expectation that providing more information aboutabstract writing could potentially improve the abstracts written
2006-1580: AN INVESTIGATION ON DESIGN EFFECTIVENESS ANDEFFICIENCY OF TEAMS EQUIPPED WITH DESIGN INFORMATION SUPPORTTOOL (DIST)Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University Gül E. Okudan is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design at The Pennsylvania State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla. Her research interests include intelligent shop floor control, manufacturing strategy modeling and measurement, solid modeling, product design, and product design teams. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Engineering Design, Design Studies, Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of Engineering Education and Technovation. She is a member of ASEE