; Design communication; engineering students worked design communication; problem identification and on engineering prototype design needs finding; brainstorming controls; experimental testing solution concepts; articulating of engineering prototype; design controls; design end-of-semester presentation; review presentations and design review presentations documentation including and documentation including intellectual property review, intellectual property review, regulatory pathway
become impractical or less impactful. In Fall 2017, Countless previous studies have shown that similar Statics student projects involving force sensors were learning outcomes can be achieved in a variety of delivery converted to classroom demonstrations since remote formats, however, the research methodologies, sample sizes, students did not have access to the same equipment. and accountancy of outside variables is often inconsistent or o Some distance learners may feel uncomfortable facing inadequate in these types of work24-25, making it difficult to a camera that records all their movements. generalize the results. Instead, engagement and satisfaction
. Page 23.1314.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Using Energy Modules to Introduce Sustainable Engineering and Improve Retention of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate StudentsAbstractIn the present economy, state appropriations are beginning to be tied more closely withstudent retention and graduation. This can have a big impact on engineering programsin particular, where student engagement can be an important component in improvingretention. At Mississippi State University, we are using active learning with energymodules for hydrogen production or hydrogen use in fuel cells, solar energy, andalternative energy carriers in the classroom.The introduction of energy technology provides a
Pennsylvania in 2020. Meagan conducted research on the biomechanics and physiology of chronic pain for her doctorate degree and has experience teaching undergraduate first-year engineering and mid-level biomechanics courses. Meagan is currently working with the KEEN partnership at OSU, integrating her interests in STEM edu- cation, entrepreneurial partnerships, and community engagement. Meagan values authenticity, connection with others, & integrity and prioritizes these values as an educator, bioengineer, and scientist.Laine Rumreich, Ohio State University Laine Rumreich is a graduate student studying Computer Science and Engineering at The Ohio State University. She completed her undergraduate research thesis in the
organizations, and industry partners / potential employers.Unfortunately, the perspectives of the foremost of these stakeholders have largely been ignoredin conversations of cultivating a BME identity as no previous study has examined howundergraduate students define BME. Therefore, to contribute another important voice to these on-going conversations, thispaper presents a qualitative analysis of definitions of BME written by 115 undergraduatestudents at a large R1 public university in the Midwest. In vivo qualitative coding andcategorization revealed five main features of these definitions exemplified by “impact”,“design”, “apply/use”, “understand/combination”, and “undefined” labels. Comparison of pre-BME students (those who had not previously
Creativity in Academic and Research EnvironmentsAbstractThe purpose of this full research paper is to understand the creative climate of graduate-levelengineering education by exploring engineering graduate students’ perceptions of creativity inacademic and research environments. At its core, the profession of engineering is focused ondeveloping creative solutions to complex problems. Despite increasing calls for engineeringeducation to engage students in curricula that foster creativity, literature shows that in actuality,students do not feel that engineering programs place a high value on fostering creativity. Whileseveral studies on creativity at the undergraduate level have attempted to address thisdiscrepancy, there is little
ended problems, the students are challenged to define the corefunctional requirements and relevant constraints prior to applying solution principles. Thedifficulty many students experience when trying to apply single-answer techniques to open-ended design problems can be significant and should not be underestimated2. To facilitate theseprojects, the IE capstone course is structured as a set of workshops which emulate industrialtraining workshops to introduce or reinforce key project and design related concepts. Samples ofthe workshops are: “team building and communication”, “project management”, “tools andinstrumentation”, “how to do a presentation”, and “understanding sustainable design challenges”.This paper focuses on the “sustainable design
process, but also expected of any program desiring accreditation.In the light of the above, many engineering courses and curricula have been influenced by EC2000 criteria, and instructors were urged to make a special effort in addressing such guidelines.As a result, EC 2000 has had a profound impact on the structure and content of an engineeringcourse. Instructors, in addition to focusing on a design and an end product, must revisit how thecourse contributes to students’ achievement of EC 2000 outcomes. At Kettering University,course-level correlation of course learning objectives to EC 2000 outcomes was performed foreach course. A basic course in Machine Design, which is one of the subject matters in thecontext of this paper, tends to be
for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightÓ 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”communication facilities at UM. Faculty Mentors will provide orientations to their laboratoriesand research projects. In this context, students complete structured experiments or laboratoryexercises in small teams. Students will also participate in a series of “Lunch and Learn” sessionswhere Faculty Mentors and practicing engineers and scientists discuss their personal experiencesin science and engineering.Because the orientation program is developed around a team environment, participants willreceive training in team and professional skills. The emphasis of the training focuses theincoming student on learning about her own
Paper ID #18453Retention and Persistence among STEM Students: A Comparison of DirectAdmit and Transfer Students across Engineering and ScienceOmaima Almatrafi, George Mason UniversityDr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Associate Professor in the department of Information Sciences & Technology. Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge shar- ing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in supporting distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging
two of those scholars to participate in proposal writing activities. Further,several REU scholars have started graduate programs in materials science and engineeringnationwide, with two scholars starting their research at OSU and another scholar applying to ourgraduate program for Fall 2020. One of the significant impacts of this program was in groomingundergraduate engineering and science students to pursue interdisciplinary research with astrong-base in materials science and engineering. We believe that this is critical for developing aworkforce to address global grand challenges in energy, aerospace, medicine, environmentalsustainability and maintain technological leadership position of developed and developingcountries in the 21st
education, her research interests include engineering education, particularly as related to innovation, professional identity development, and supporting the recruitment and persistence of underrepresented students within engineering.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those
are able to learn faster, approach designs from many angles, andultimately grow as a team to produce more efficient and professional designs.Student-oriented space projects at Penn State began with the NASA Get Away Special (GAS)payloads designed to fly in the payload bay of NASA’s Space Shuttle (see Fig. 1). Penn Statestudents produced three GAS payloads, which launched aboard the Shuttle in 1986, 1996, and2001. These payloads focused on various objectives from recording orbital debris impacts toseed germination in space. Figure 1 Timeline of SSPL Programs and ProjectsBeginning in 1997, Penn State students saw the addition of sounding rockets with the initiationof the SPIRIT (Student Projects Involving Rocket
excel in the course. The coursecontent may be perceived as too advanced or challenging for their current level ofexpertise. This lack of confidence in their abilities could lead to insecurity or frustrationamong students, impacting their engagement and performance on the course.Approximately 50% of students agree with a couple of items. Item 13: “The contents of thiscourse are very relevant to my future professional plans,” and item 14: “I have a high levelof interest in the topic of the course.” The fact that approximately 50% of students agreewith item 13 suggests a mixed perception regarding the relevance of the course content totheir future professional goals. While a significant portion of students see some relevance,the other half may not
Paper ID #49551NeuralStorm: Training Graduate Students to Take Neuroengineering by StormDr. Xianglong Wang, University of California, Davis Dr. Xianglong Wang is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Biomedical Engineering (BME) at the University of California, Davis, and the program coordinator of the BME Quarter at Aggie Square clinical immersion program. Dr. Wang leads the cube3 lab, an engineering educational lab focused on community building and pedagogical innovations in BME. As a steering committee member, he helps shape the educational programs offered by the Center of Neuroengineering and Medicine at UC Davis
study returning graduate students in engineering master’s programs.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms
possible.Traditional activities like face-to-face meetings are being altered and even replaced by a suite ofsynchronous and asynchronous tools that integrate communications, brainstorming, scheduling,project management, and many other aspects of the design process. The University of Dayton,with three partner schools in Ohio, is preparing students to effectively respond to the new andunique challenges of these environments. One goal of this work is a course featuringinterdisciplinary, multi-university engineering design projects with strong emphases on bothmodern internet-based collaboration tools and successful distributed design.Between the 5th and 14th of July, 2000, we executed a pilot design project implementing ageographically dispersed collaborative
Page 8.391.7 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationConclusionBy optimizing the use of resources that are already available on campus, the MIE Programprovides services that will ultimately have an impact on the persistence of science andengineering students. The joint efforts of ACES, REU, and CircLES provide aninnovative way of collaborating, training, and developing student leaders. As studentsparticipate and become involved in MIE activities, they develop technical, research, andprofessional skills to which they might not have been exposed. These experiences promoteprofessional growth and make students
hub, with additional campuses spreadthroughout Florida. Guided by a dedication to quality teaching, learning, and research, KeiserUniversity is steadfast in its commitment to equipping students with the knowledge,understanding, and skills essential for successful employment. With a foundational belief in a"students first" philosophy, Keiser University prides itself on preparing graduates for careersacross a spectrum of disciplines, including business, health care, engineering, informationtechnology, education, and career-focused general studies. Central to the university's mission is acommitment to community service, realized through partnerships, engagement with diverseconstituencies, and various continuing education initiatives. As of the
of using a facetedtaxonomy to examine information sources used by students has been piloted by two studies.Leeder, Markey, and Yakel [6] sought to create a standardized assessment tool that was flexibleenough to include online sources that students use. They found fault with the criteria used byprevious citation analyses: currency, relevance, the correctness of citation format, quality, andscholarliness. Instead, they developed a faceted taxonomy that included the information format,the literary content, the author identity, the editorial process, and the publication purpose. Theyalso assigned ranked scores to each facet. They used the taxonomy to assess the impact of anonline game by using the taxonomy on a student research assignment
instructors should know about her military status, she affirmed, “not reallybecause I feel like I want to be as normal as possible. You wanna blend in, you don’t wanna stickout all the time.” Thus, their identities as student veterans, though listed as central to theirpersona on the identity circle, were deemphasized in communication with faculty.Mary indicated her veteran identity and engineering identity were “most representative of mypersonality,” but qualified the statement indicating “I don’t really like to greatly self-identifymyself as a veteran solely because I think I’m not a combat veteran.” (Men interviewed for thisstudy similarly minimized their veteran status when they had not been engaged in combat.) Marydid not indicate whether she
Likewise, the National Academies report on technological literacy states, “Thetechnical community—especially engineers and scientists in industry—is largely responsible forthe amount and quality of communication and outreach to the public on technological issues.”2One of the editors of that report, Pearson, has elsewhere discussed the need for the engineeringprofession to become more engaged with the technological literacy effort.3 For a more specificexample, engineers Ollis and Krupczak have proposed that at the college level engineeringdesign faculty could be the primary providers of general technological literacy courses.4But the engineering profession has not been entirely absent when it comes to popularizing anunderstanding of engineering and
one employer over the course oftheir degree program.The specific essay prompt was developed by a mechanical engineering professor, with inputfrom a communication professor in the Department of Liberal Studies with experience indesigning reflective writing assignments. Students were instructed to describe their co-opemployer and work assignment, discuss class content from the Statics course, and then reflect onthe relationship between the two. The essay prompt, included in the Appendix, stated that theycould discuss both connections through the class content and the general problem-solving skillsthat they learned in the course. The small number of students who had not yet experienced a co-op term were instructed to select some other type of
implications for futureextension of the program to include a greater number of teachers, across a wider range ofgeographical areas.Methodology & MeasurementsThe first three years of the program (Autumn 2012 – Spring 2015) tested different tools todetermine a program with components best equipped to educate the participating teachers, createa professional learning community, and impact teacher practice. Based on established researchand the program’s theoretical model, this would empower the participants to teach materialsscience concepts effectively to their students. Twenty to thirty teachers have participatedannually. Additionally, treatment teachers can participate in the program for multiple years. The2016-2017 iteration of the program has been
helping students to catch up academically, we designed most ofthe Program elements to build community and belonging among the at-risk cohort (Tinto’s socialintegration factor), while introducing them to the available resources and giving them a guide forhow they can graduate in four years despite starting college in pre-calculus. We also designed thesocial integration component to focus on improving students’ self-efficacy. Tinto (2015, p. 2)notes that “the impact of student college experiences on persistence can be understood as theoutcome of the interaction among student goals, self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and perceivedworth or relevance of the curriculum.” We included a professional integration component fromthe beginning and learned
mayhave far going positive implications.Study participants expected their institution to be more communicative with them. They expectedthe institution to more actively provide students with information about dealing with MHW issues,engaging in more hands-on experiences, and their courses for better academic and personaloutcomes. Dissemination of course-related information appeared to be most important to thestudents. One participant expressed her feeling as below: 8 “I would say to help have more of a positive experience is giving out more information. Think about classes (like when you sign up for classes like what's being provided and
1technologies throughout the curricula; and (4) creation of continuous opportunities for technicalcommunication3, to develop this project.Some goals of the project are to: - generate excitement among undergraduate students by integrating sports and engineering, - engage students and improve learning through novel hands-on experimentation, - provide undergraduate students with the opportunity to work on projects related to sports and sports technologyThe purpose of this paper is to introduce modules that were developed and the courses in whichthey were implemented. Since participation in and even viewing of sports activities arerelatively common among the students, we wanted to use this familiar context of sports in hands-on laboratory
graduates, objectives of this course were decided as: (1) prepare students to beeffective in presenting their abilities and accomplishments to prospective employers; (2) preparestudents to communicate with others properly and effectively in a professional businessenvironment; (3) instill a basic understanding of proper professional conduct and ethical behavior.(4) provide students with an introduction to the variety of career paths available and develop anunderstanding of the potential processes and importance of professional development and on-goinglearning. (5) encourage a practice of critical analysis of ideas, concepts and information. Aligningwith the course objectives, a set of learning outcomes were decided, which includes: (i) a well
the excitement of cutting edge research intoevery course, and that faculty adopt pedagogy that develops communication, teamwork, andcritical thinking skills. 4 Curricular reforms to engage a more diverse student body by engaging Page 9.697.4students in hands-on assignments that include real-world applications have had a positive impact Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationon both recruitment and retention at Smith College and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.17Curricular reform has been
achieving students may have a slightly more favorable view of AI, the [8]M. Zawacki-Richter et al., "Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education –Research by Holstein et al. [9] highlights how AI-enhanced educational where are the educators?," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 19-37, 2019. Economic Impact Assessment: Educational Benefits Calculation