Paper ID #30157A Mechanical Engineering Technology Baccalaureate Degree via the ”3+1”PathwayDr. David I. Spang, Rowan College at Burlington County Dr. David Spang is the Sr. Vice President and Provost at Rowan College at Burlington County in Mt. Laurel, NJ. Prior to being named Sr. Vice President and Provost, Dr. Spang served as Interim President, Provost, Vice President of Academic Programs and Dean of the Science, Mathematics, and Technology division. Dr. Spang holds a PhD degree in Materials Science and Engineering and a MBA degree, with a concentration in Innovation and Technology Management. Prior to joining academia
of flow diagram; second, how to mechanically write syntactically correct code. Werealize the abstraction of logic is the key to successful coding. Typically students rush to codedirectly without comprehending the logic. Therefore, they lack a clear definition of the problemthey are trying to solve and a plan of action for how to solve the problem. As one instructionalmethod, we ask students to generate diagram of their logic. Then, we introduce pseudo peerdiagrams to reinforce the construction of visual representations as a roadmap to coding. Weconjecture that pseudo peer diagrams are an effective tool to foster students’ self-check strategywhich reduces instructors’ need to process large amount information generated by students inreal time
sentiment analysis Its value comes fromanalyzing large amounts of text data [2]. For example, its applications have been used to analyzesocial media posts to track public opinion and identify trends (e.g., O’Connor [8]). In the field ofeducation, it has been applied to the analysis of student essays to provide feedback, teamworkreview analysis, and students’ feedback loop [1], [3], [9]. Another application is in the generationof natural language text (e.g., machine translation systems use NLP to translate text from onelanguage to another) [10]. In addition, it has been used to generate feedback on student writing [11] and to createpersonalized study materials [12]. It also can facilitate more personalized and effectiveinstruction [13]. By
DepoliticizationA number of authors have argued for the value of understanding the discipline andprofession of engineering as a culture4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Cech,2 expressing this perspective,writes: Engineering, like other professions, is not just a collection of knowledge, skills, and practices grouped into a set of jobs. Professions have rich and historically- rooted cultures that are built into and around their knowledge, skills, and practices. Professional cultures are the sets of beliefs, myths, and rituals that give meaning to the intellectual content and practices of a profession. (p. 69)Cech goes on to argue that integral to engineering culture are its “cultural ideologies,”that is, “ways of understanding society and
).The winds of change in engineering education have been blowing for some time, and thequestion arises “Why hasn’t more change occurred faster?” Wulf’s (2002) “hypothesis is simplythat the faculty don't believe that change is needed. They are following the wise adage, 'if it ain'tbroke, don't fix it.' If one hasn't had recent experience in industry, …, and if the change is amosaic in multiple dimensions whose pattern is hard to discern, then the fact that it's 'broke' isnot easy to see." This allegation of resistance from faculty is ironic given Koen’s (2003) claimthat change is fundamental to engineering; in fact it is an integral part of his definition of theengineering method – “the use of heuristics to cause the best possible change in a
andfeel. The harmonious arrangement of information helps us convey the content more effectively,and for the audience to understand it quickly. Everything an instructor chooses to write on thewhiteboard and where it is placed should convey an underlying alignment. Arranging content theway in which we normally access content – moving from left to right, and from top to bottomand across – can keep the focus on the content. Intentionally leaving gaps or blanks at strategicplaces on the board can serve as a powerful mechanism for encouraging the viewer to fill in theinformation and thus be more engaged in learning the content.We are wired to solve puzzles, and this can be leveraged to have students reach for their pensand calculators to solve a given
Foundation,is a collaborative project between the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona StateUniversity and five community colleges in the Maricopa County Community College District.The project has two main goals. The first is to increase the interest in engineering and computerscience by students (especially women and underrepresented minorities) at the communitycolleges, to ease the transition of such students from the community college to the university,and to retain and to graduate engineering community college transfer students through events onall six campuses. The second goal is to build a model collaboration between a university and acommunity college system for engineering students.This paper will describe the activities that have
ofchange. In doing so, potentials for scholarship, concientização, and praxis via labor organizing inengineering are elucidated in order to provide direction toward liberation.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering is a field that both shapes and is itself shaped by oppression and inequitable powerdynamics. Engineering education researchers have sought to study facets and intersections ofracism [1-8], heteropatriarchy [4-10], capitalism [5, 6, 10], and militarism and colonization [8,11] within engineering. In many ways, engineering education researchers have shown how thesefacets are fundamental to what is currently considered engineering epistemology. Owing to thathistory, peoples marginalized along many and varied axes of interlocking systems of
working to facilitatecollaborative learning build upon five fundamental principles: positive interdependence,individual accountability, interpersonal skills, team building, and evaluation andreflection. [18] In this approach, “both facilitators and learners become activeparticipants in the educational process; the hierarchy between facilitators and learners iseliminated; a sense of community is created; knowledge is created, not transferred; [and]knowledge is considered to be located in the community rather than the individual.” [19]Closely aligned with this is cooperative learning, the “instructional use of small groupsthrough which students work together to maximize their own and each other’s learning.”[20] It typically relies upon formal short
engineeringproblem solving in support of students’ project planning and progress and as a scaffold forprofessional competency reflection [4].Based on our own first hand experiences and the broader literature investigating the nature ofengineering work [5]–[7], and studies focused on the novice to expert progression [8]–[11], weknow it is critical that students have opportunities to practice and reflect on solving ill-structuredproblems. Such opportunities are fundamental to the development of students’ ways of thinkingand knowing that help them to prepare for the profession. The growth of problem and project basedlearning (PBL) and other active learning experiences speaks to broad acceptance that ill-structuredproblem solving experiences are valuable to
AC 2008-2356: EXPERIENCES IMPLEMENTING AN UNDERGRADUATE CIVILENGINEERING COURSE IN BIMMatthew Dupuis, University of Wisconsin - MadisonBenjamin Thompson, University of Wisconsin - MadisonLawrence Bank, University of Wisconsin - MadisonJohn Herridge, Autodesk Page 13.589.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Experiences Implementing an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Course in BIMIntroductionThe use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) is causing fundamental changes in the AEC(Architecture/Engineering/Construction) industry1,2. Numerous organizations are putting forththeir definitions of BIM3,4,5 and multiple software vendors
Paper ID #11812Using Pre-Lesson Materials and Quizzes to Improve Student Readiness andPerformanceMs. Mary A. Fraley, Michigan Technological University Mary Fraley is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online/blended learning methods, first-year engineering courses and program development.Dr. A. J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technolog- ical University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include
presentation of the engineering design process in engineeringtextbooks has undergone subtle changes. While the majority of model diagrams remain linear,some departures can be seen—for example, cyclical diagrams in textbooks by Burghardt5 (p.33)and by Eide, Jenison, Mashaw, and Northrup 6 (p.81) (see Figure 2). The circular arrangement ofsteps does not fundamentally alter the steps’ content, but underscores the central role of iterationin design. While the nonlinear, flexible nature of design is long-established,7 it is increasinglyforegrounded in introductory textbooks, along with communication and concurrent engineering.Teamwork is presented as both an asset and reality of work today. Burghardt describes theteaming of everyone involved in the
instead of EZB. 2 Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright©2023, American Society for Engineering EducationCourse Description for the In-Sight (Cognex) Spreadsheet first course is given here:“In-Sight Spreadsheets Standard (TRN-IS-CGNX-STD) gives new or potential In-Sight usersa 2 day overview of the hardware and software used by In-Sight vision systems. With the focuson getting the most from the In-Sight Explorer Spreadsheets interface, users learn how to walkthrough the process of setting up a vision application using spreadsheet programming bestpractices.Expected Outcomes:At
student’s success are summarized and presented inthis paper.1. IntroductionDynamics is a fundamental course in the critical graduation path of almost every engineeringmajor. This is an important pre-requisite class as it lays the foundational concepts for otheradvanced courses such as Mechanical Vibrations, Feedback Controls and Intermediate SystemDynamics. In addition, At the University X, the failing (DFW) rate for Dynamics have beenaround 21% in average for the past 10 years (this translate in around 200 students failing peryear), reaching sometimes even 37% (Figure 1). High failure rates have adverse consequencessuch as delay in many students’ graduation timeline, dropping from engineering majors and thusreducing the university 4-year
field’s foundations in algorithmic problem solving, and takes a brief foray intomachine organization and low-level machine languages. In the remainder of the course, studentsuse C programming language to explore the fundamental concepts, constructs, and techniques ofmodern computer programming, including variables, arrays, conditionals, iteration, pointers, datastructures, debugging, and software engineering. A primary aim of this course is to give studentsa taste of the field of computer science, and to get the students comfortable with computerprogramming.ParticipantsParticipants in this study were a convenient sampling of 111 volunteering students enrolled in an
universities. As Lasch writes in the foreword to David Noble’s America By Design,“the professionalization of engineering and the establishment of engineering education as arecognized branch of higher learning forged a link between the corporation and the universitythat remains unbroken to this day,” [11]. It has been well documented that engineering collegeand university programs significantly constrains sociopolitical understandings amongstengineering students through a focus on technical education to meet the demands of industry (seefor example [1]; [3]; [12]; [13]; [14]). One element of this touched on within the groupinterviews presented here is a significant absence of labor education and in turn, the relativerarity of unionized engineers and low
- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering edu- cation, the professional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 New Directions from Theory: Implications for Diversity
formats and to write and orally present technical reports to a variety of audiences.188189 For each Team Challenge report, student teams provide an outcomes assessment ed to the learning190 objec ves (Table 2).191 Table 2. Team Outcomes Assessment Describe the degree to which this Team Challenge enabled your team to… 1. Apply the principles of engineering to solve problems. 2. Apply the engineering design cycle [This is a systema c model presented to the student teams with each Team Challenge] to produce solu ons while considering outside factors including: Environmental Economic Safety Public Health
model the learningoutcomes for the course remain the same for all who enroll regardless of the mode of attendance. Our HyFlex SQA approach consists of lectures (in class, with video recordings), face-to-face activities, as well as group assignments, group projects, and exams all facilitated through anonline campus management system. During the lecture period, the instructor delivers content inthe form of lecture slides and writing on a whiteboard. This poses significant challenges for theinstructor, as the learning outcomes have to be delivered in different modalities, but with the samequality. This is particularly difficult in SQA courses, as these require instruction in formal methodsas well as systematic justification of engineering
community (p 5). Other researchers have emphasized the importance ofcommunity in fostering a successful program15, 16. Golde and Walker (2006) present the conceptof a “steward of the discipline” as a scholar who will “creatively generate new knowledge … andresponsibly transform those understandings through writing, teaching, and application (pg 5)”.They go on to make the point that stewardship is not an innate quality, but one that can bedeveloped, and therefore the fundamental mission of doctoral education should be to developthese stewards of the discipline. There are differing opinions on what type of training should begiven to doctoral candidates during their course of study. Stacy (2006), in her essay published in17 , states that graduate
AC 2012-5456: GAMIFICATION AS A STRATEGY FOR PROMOTINGDEEPER INVESTIGATION IN A REVERSE ENGINEERING ACTIVITYMr. Jason A. Foster, University of Toronto Jason Foster is the Senior Lecturer in engineering design education within the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. Trained as a Systems Design Engineer and with industry experi- ence in software development and management consulting, he currently teaches engineering design at the corner- and capstone levels. His research focus in on scaling innovative engineering pedagogies to suit large classes, and his teaching integrates the theories of Vygotsky, Kolb, Papert, Perry, and Pugh.Ms. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Patricia
US will serve as consultants for designteams in Botswana. The emphasis is on creating an immersive experience that utilizes mixedreality for the students using AR technology, enabling them to participate in activities thatinvolve decision-making, object design, basic assembly and the mentality of “modify and re-define”. The ABLE project represents an innovative approach to engineering education thatleverages technology and cross-cultural collaboration to prepare students for real-worldproblem-solving, using 3D Modeling along with AR technology. Deliverables for the projectinclude a 3-D model of the original device, 3-D model of modified model utilizing ARtechnology, 3-D printed examples of final products and a 2-page write up detailing
AC 2009-2037: INVESTIGATION OF THE SUCCESSFUL EFFORT TO CHANGEEDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS IN MASSACHUSETTS TOINCLUDE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYNataliia Perova, Tufts University Nataliia got her M.S. in Mathematics, Science, Technology and Engineering education from Tufts University in 2008 and M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 2005 from Tufts University and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Suffolk University. Nataliia is currently a research assistant at Harvard Graduate School of Education where she is involved in the research project on mathematics education. She is also doing research on using engineering approaches to teach science to college students.Chris Rogers, Tufts
, student-organization offices, informal spaces, etc. — should be thoughtof in terms of whether they allow students, no matter their focus within engineering,to develop boundary-spanning abilities like experimenting, writing, speaking, andcollaborating. Then they should be connected in a way that maximizes these functions.At Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, commonly known as VirginiaTech, the SmithGroupJJR-designed Institute for Critical Technology and AppliedScience II is organized expressly around the concept of interdisciplinary research. The42,189-square-foot building completed in 2010 includes state-of-the-art laboratoriesand auxiliary spaces that support both applied and fundamental research. Oakland University School of
Paper ID #15699A Chemical Engineering Success Course for Transfer StudentsDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Bayles, Ph.D., is a NTS Professor of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Petroleum Engi- neering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A
approachencourages collaborative and multidisciplinary learning for the students and helps them acquirethe knowledge and skills necessary to compete in the global market and to contribute to the NSNTfield in an environment that is reflective of today’s workplace.II CoursesFor this project, the collaborators developed and offered two NSNT courses that satisfy electiverequirements for mechanical, chemical, and electrical engineering Bachelor of Science (BS)degrees as well as for chemistry and physics BS degrees. The first course, “Nanoengineering andNanoscience” (cross-listed course numbers: CHEM 431; EE490; ME490; PHYS492) was offeredduring Fall 2015. It covered the fundamentals of nanoscience and nanoparticles based on theirphysical and electronic
AC 2010-1243: INNOVATIVE AND TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNINGENVIRONMENTS IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENTEDUCATIONNamhun Lee, East Carolina UniversityEddy Rojas, University of Washington Page 15.740.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Innovative and Transformative Learning Environments in Construction Engineering and Management EducationAbstractMost of today’s students have grown up with technology including computers, theInternet, video games, digital recorders or players, and mobile phones.Consequently, it can be argued these students are fundamentally different fromprevious generations in how they learn. Today’s students prefer instantly seeing
AC 2011-889: INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONSOF NANOTECHNOLOGY IN THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYCURRICULAAhmed S. Khan, DeVry University,Addison, Illinois Dr. AHMED S. KHAN is a senior Professor in the College of Engineering and Information Sciences, De- Vry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optic Com- munications, Faculty Development, Nanotechnology, Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education, and impact of Technology on
workshops would benefit them faculty member or staff member ifchosen to participate. The leadership team then chose the participants for the workshop askingthat everyone commit to attend all sessions. Finalists were notified at the beginning ofDecember, 2011.Each chosen participant was then asked to complete the Myers-Briggs Personality Inventoryduring December and to write a one paragraph biography that would be shared with the otherparticipants. These biographies were placed in the WLI notebooks along with a welcome letterfrom the university President. Page 25.1485.6Program TopicsThe WLI is divided up into six different areas. The following will