-training (EIT) or engineer intern (EI), (b) monetary rewards since many employers recognize theadded value of the EI, and (c) opportunities to take the Principles and Practice of Engineering(PE) examination. However, prospective students seldom ask how the graduation requirementsmatch the competence elements required to pass the FE and PE examinations. The authorbelieves that prospective students need to know the implication of enrolling in a technologydegree program if their primary objective is to obtain professional engineering registration.College Students in Four-Year Degree ProgramsSome engineering technology students consider opportunities for graduate studies. A significantfactor in their consideration is the type of available
involved assessments andprototype designs not yet ready for clinical adoption.During the interviews, students cited several examples of increased awareness of training anddelivery of rehabilitation products and services. These gains were based on their researchexperiences, discussions with their research mentors and graduate students, clinical rotationobservations, and their case study reports. Students were particularly enthusiastic about whatthey had learned about products and services when they were able to see patient interactions.None of the assessment tools demonstrated increased knowledge of the repair or technicalsupport of these rehabilitative healthcare products and services.Some improvements were noted with respect to sensitivity to
) Global Outstanding Advising Award for Faculty. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Landsharks to Astronauts: Towards a new STEM Culture of ExcellenceAbstractHerein, we present the results of a preliminary study of our proposed holistic approach to STEMoutreach, education, and research facilitates. The "STEM Culture of Excellence" is based onproviding opportunities for high school, undergraduate, and graduate students to interact in arobust research environment with industry and federal professionals through education andtraining. This work contains preliminary data towards addressing the following research question:Will holistically incorporating STEM outreach
research team determines that they have acquired sufficient data for their study.Many researchers have used different variations of the Delphi technique to rank and rate therelative importance of the desired attributes and characteristics of university graduates9, toidentify the competent curriculum contents and topics for undergraduate and graduate educationprograms 5,4,3,6,7 and even both 8. For example, Shah (2003, 2004) recently did an extensiveresearch study to discover and describe the competency areas considered most important in thediscipline of Engineering Management to update and validate the curriculum for the Master ofScience in Engineering Management degree at Eastern Michigan University. In another study,Snoke and Underwood (1999
given to a sample of 90 engineeringtechnology students. Qualitative results from this instrument were derived from a directedcontent analysis research methodology.This research is intended to provide insight into student perception and acceptance of the use ofcases in the engineering and technology classroom. This study examines students’ personalviews of their attitudes through qualitative content analysis. Research will be supported by thick,rich description drawn from students’ own words to gain further insight into student perceptionof both innovation education and case-based instruction.Need for innovation educationTraditional engineering curriculum creates people who are efficient researchers and highlyproductive, but this approach does
Shao-kang and Deng Xiao-yang to resolve coal preparation designspecifications and analyze classic design cases for seniors. Engineering design innovativeideas of experts and masters play a tremendous role in innovative sense and creativeenthusiasm among college students. Thirdly, we insist on walking out in three and graduationdesign of some students, and penetrate into workshop of coal and mineral processing factory,especially in graduated internship links, ask the students to study and practice with task andtheir own design subject. Meanwhile, we also encourage graduate design (thesis) topics torelate engineering practice, so that the entire course of design or research process can beconducted out of school with external experts’ guidance
ASEE ERC Conference, Washington, DC, 6-8 March 2017 Overview and Findings of the Chicago Conference for Associate Deans of Research at Small and Mid-Sized Engineering Schools University of Illinois, Chicago October 11-12, 2016Kenneth Brezinsky Vahid MotevalliAssociate Dean for Research & Associate Dean for Research &Graduate Studies Innovation ASEE ERC Conference, Washington, DC, 6-8 March 2017 Acknowledgement:Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transportation Systems (CBET) Award 1646808 Background – Overall Concerns for ADRs in Small to medium Colleges
about a wide variety of topics both within and outside ofengineering and appreciated that research provided opportunities to apply and deepen theirknowledge. They frequently encountered uncertainty and responded by independently seekingresources or consulting a mentor, most often a graduate student. These findings can help informhow professors in both classroom and lab settings can cultivate and encourage their students’curiosity and help them respond to uncertainty.Keywords: Curiosity, undergraduate research experience, motivation, active learning This qualitative research paper is part of a larger mixed-methods study that investigatesthe role of engineering research experiences in undergraduates’ education, and how students’curiosity
. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her
over 120 jobs relatedto engineering education. 8 As the field of engineering education continues to grow and expand,it is important to understand where engineering education graduates are working, what their jobsearch processes were like, and how the job search process has evolved over time.Past researchers have explored this topic, most notably Adams and Cummings-Bond3 andBorrego.4 While the scope and focus of our study is different than past research, their findingshelp build an understanding of the development of the job market in engineering education andaid in understanding if progress has occurred. In 2004, Adams and Cummings-Bond3 wrote amanuscript detailing the career trajectories of three groups of researchers involved in
the service learning, learning community and study abroad program because theymight not see the importance of these activities to their goal of completing their degree. A plausiblereason for the low participation of engaging in research with a faculty member might be that hadthe opportunity to participate in research during their process of completing their program or seniorE/CS student do not plan to conduct further research in the program of study in a graduate school.FemaleMale Fig III: Participation in HIEP by gender characteristics for first-year E/CS students Fig IV: Participation in HIEP by gender characteristics for senior year E/CS studentsFig III shows that the participation of HIEP of E/CS
Ocean Engineering must complete all of theundergraduate topics and exams listed above for 22.486 Ocean Engineering. In addition, eachgraduate student must complete an independent research study on some aspect of oceanengineering at a level beyond that covered in the course, and submit a written summary report aswell as give an oral presentation on the topic to the class. Also, graduate students will be givenan additional project on calculation of wave interference using computer programs availableon-line through the web. For graduate students, the grade distribution listed above will bechanged to Two exams worth 22 ½ % each 45% of total grade Independent research study 15
writing arerequired for this course. For students in the nanotechnology track, requirements are the same, butan emphasis will be placed on nanotechnology (e.g. safety, reliability, economics, and aestheticson nanosystems, nanoelectromechanical systems, nano-optical systems, nanomaterials/devicesfor renewable energy applications).Research Modules in Nanotechnology: Research modules are designed to attract students to theINEC program and encourage the pursuit in graduate studies following the completion of theirBachelor of Science degrees. The following are new research modules that nanotechnology trackstudents will pursue: Research modules are combined into one comprehensive research project that students may start working on it during
Graduate and Professional Programs (An Overview 2000) obtained entries from 127institutions, each advertising their graduate programs in the area of Computer Engineering.Within this category, only 23% offer a master’s as their highest available degree. Of these, mere 1,2handfuls offer the Master of Science degree pertaining to Computer Engineering Technology .Why so few?It is partly because teaching is very different from research. Many believe that the quality of 3research is a standard indicator of the quality of a graduate school . In other words, under thisapproach, if you want quality
Success Class, and their evaluation of the course done at the end of the course. Sixty-four of the 66 students in the class completed the evaluation. Of particular interest will be if thehaving a scholarship has influenced their decisions to consider and to attend graduate school,helped with study skills, and helped them learn about research. The students were also asked iflearning about the “imposter syndrome,” “transfer shock,” and networking have benefited themas students. We also compare the percentage of students in each group who have had internshipsand done research, and note comments by the students on how the course influenced them.I.IntroductionSince 2002, workshops on academic success and professional development have been offered
. The reality of this requirement is that CET graduates gain ampletraining in CE field and practice operations, whereas CE graduates gain more theory and aretherefore better suited to move on to graduate programs and research and development. Thequestion that rises in this authors mind, is which of these two types of graduates, if only onegroup were to be chosen, would be best suited to become professionally registered practicingengineers? This question will be addressed in more depth later in this paper.Thus far, we have offered no real definition for CET other than to offer the perceptive differencethat CET programs are practice oriented, as opposed to CE programs which are more researchand development oriented. At this point it seems CET and
Paper ID #42169Board 244: Do DEI Efforts Count in Tenure Evaluations? An Experiment inTwo STEM fieldsDr. Damani White-Lewis, University of Pennsylvania Damani White-Lewis is an assistant professor of higher education in the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania. He studies racial inequality in academic careers and contexts using theories and methods from organizational behavior and social psychology. His work has been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Science Foundation (NSF), and has appeared in The Journal of Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, The Review
Paper ID #33021Investigating Professional Shame as Experienced by Engineering StudentsWho are Minoritized in their ProgramsMrs. Mackenzie Claire Sharbine, Harding University I am a Post-Baccalaureate Research Associate working full-time on an NSF grant. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr. James
engineering degree actually complete it, retention has recentlydrawn a lot of attention and study. Over the past 10-20 years, an increased emphasis has beenplaced on supportive freshman programs as an answer to “weed-out courses.” As freshmanretention has increased, attention has turned to the next highest dropout point for engineeringstudents which is during or after their sophomore year. Sophomore retention programs arebecoming popular. As the need for more engineers continues, another area which has receivedincreased attention is the recruitment of engineering students from community colleges.Although some upper division transfer students are able to graduate in two years, many takethree years or more. Although classified as juniors, the students
purposes of this research andthe program, we review the existing literature about three primary pathways: graduate school,internship or industry profession, and entrepreneurship.Pursuing a graduate degree in computing is sought after by individuals seeking advancedknowledge and specialization [1], [2], [3]. Kapoor & Gardener-McCune [1] delve into themotivations behind students’ choices to pursue graduate education in computing, where theystudied how students weigh career goals, industry demands, financial considerations, andpersonal interests when pursuing a higher degree. Another study revealed that there is also alooming ambiguity around how financial aid works while pursuing graduate degrees sinceeconomic stability is particularly important
student graduating from the program has beenemployed in their chosen career within six months of graduation. While several students have leftthe program for full-time employment in computing, continuing their graduate studies part-time,these should be viewed as program successes. Finally, student feedback has been entirely positive,and all students in the first cohort have seen improvement in the opportunities for which they havebeen eligible, including internship, employment, and research opportunities.By including four universities with very different missions, serving similar but different populations,we are seeing often underrepresented minority groups more strongly represented. In the first twocohorts, totaling 12 students, have four
differences. The mean values in Figure 2 point to theconclusion that the most significant information source is the internet followed by word-of-mouth recommendation, open house events and educational fairs.Figure 1: Survey results about study program marketing, freshmen 2008-2010 answers Page 25.1298.5Figure 2: Survey results about study program marketing, freshmen 2008-2010 answers, meanvaluesSeveral previous investigations show that nowadays young people research study programsextensively but they select those that they apply for in different ways. Generally speaking,male applicants tend to be more subject focused whereas female applicants are much
seem generalizable to any doctoral degree program, this study onlyfocused on degrees and research in engineering education. The findings from this paper aremeant to help guide new graduate students pursuing engineering education degrees whenchoosing a committee. These characteristics will vary from student to student, but we hope toprovide an overview based on previous students’ experiences.This study can also aid departments with students who are interested in pursuing engineeringeducation PhDs. If the department has an orientation program, this study can help to frame aconversation with new students about forming a successful committee. Or if a potential advisoris approached by a student looking to pursue engineering education, this paper
student population (19%). Overall retention rates for the five STEM majors whoparticipated in HAIS ranged from 96.0% to 100%. Graduation rates ranged from 89.7% to95.7%. Non-HAIS students in the same five STEM majors had retention rates that were 22-23%lower than HAIS scholars across time. From the beginning of HAIS (fall 2018) until the end ofthe last academic year (spring 2023), the program has served a total of 63 students, with 54students graduating with either an undergraduate or a graduate degree to date. HAISprogramming consists of a three-pronged approach, including a weekly seminar, a research teamled by a faculty mentor, and a study hall. Research teams comprised students in the same majoror a diverse group of students from various
and computer engineering majors during the 2012-2016 period inthree cohorts. The scholarships were distributed among the disciplines based on enrollments.Identifying deficiencies before entering the program, monitoring scholars’ academic work afterjoining the program, helping them to succeed and retaining them through degree completionwere critical areas of consideration. Outstanding activities of the project included mentoring, 1-credit seminar, research, senior design, summer internships, tutoring, field trips and conferenceparticipation.MentoringEach scholar was assigned a faculty mentor, a graduate assistant, and senior undergraduatestudent peers in his/her major. The faculty mentor prepared a study plan with the scholar and metthe
An Accelerated Dual-Degree BS/MS Program – Experience with the First Three Years Douglas A. Christensen, Kenneth W. Horch Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UTAbstract – We have initiated a pilot program that accelerates the studies of a small group of highlyqualified students early in their college careers and allows them to earn both a bachelor's degreeand a master's degree in about four years after starting college. It does this by introducing themearly to research, taking advantage of their considerable high school AP credit, enrolling them ina closely monitored cohort environment, and asking them to take at least two summers
notableincrease in their ability to discuss research at professional meetings and conferences.Additionally, participants expressed heightened confidence in pursuing graduate studies inSTEM fields, further solidifying the program’s role in shaping future biomedical innovators. Theprogram’s emphasis on inclusion has proven essential in cultivating a diverse talent pipelineready to address the healthcare needs of tomorrow.IntroductionUndergraduate research has been shown to have positive impacts in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education including increasing students’ self-efficacy,interest in STEM, and retention within STEM[1]. Participating in undergraduate research at anexternal institution, like participating in a Research
a vital preliminary step towards building equitable systems, and the underrepresentation and inequitable outcomes of women and studentsof color is indeed a welldocumented problem. However, building on the theoretical foundationof critical theory, we argue that there exists another substantial sector of the population that iscurrently marginalized within aerospace engineering: the working class. As income inequalitycontinues to grow both nationally and globally, the population of students who are not comingfrom highly affluent backgrounds are at a continually growing disadvantage within educationalspaces.This quantitative study takes place at a large, highly selective public research university. Working class Americans account for the
economic or environmental goals. He recognizes that educators consider changesto be delicate. He proposes that instead of cloning their faculties, science and engineering graduate schools should bepreparing their Ph.D. students for a variety of possible roles. Although basic research is essential, this collective expertisealone is insufficient for our society to achieve its economic and environmental goals since R&D represents less than 5percent of the process by which wealth and jobs are created. Work Experience Outside of Academe During Ph.D Study Adding work experience outside of academe is a viable small process substitution to address contemporary needs.This and a shorter study period to complete the
, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and was responsible for developing, coordinating, and executing an integrated na- tional plan and investment strategy for maintenance and recapitalization that improved reliability and minimized the risk of more than $200 billion in water resource infrastructure assets critical to the United States. S´anchez has more than 10 years experience as a research hydraulic engineer in CHL, responsible for planning, conducting, and reporting on a variety of complex hydraulic investigations utilizing both physical and numerical models. The majority of studies focused on navigation lock filling and emptying system evaluation, design, surface and groundwater hydrology, and computational fluid