AC 2009-1072: PURDUE'S ENGINEER OF 2020: THE JOURNEYJames Jones, Purdue University James D. Jones is the Associate Head and Associate Professor of the School of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Jones is co-director of the Purdue's Engineer of 2020 committee. He earned a BS degree from Tennessee Technological University and MS and PhD degrees from Virginia Polytechnic and State University. His research interests include cooperative learning, acoustics, vibrations,smart materials and intelligent structures.Peter Meckl, Purdue University Professor Meckl is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Chair of the Purdue's Engineering of 2020 Committee. As part of that committee, he helped organize the
. Local constraints toimplementation have to be addressed and situating the professional development content in alocal context is important to teachers’ perceptions that they will be able to implement what theylearned. Teachers are also more interested in the professional development activities when theysee direct links with their existing curricula. These are fundamentals in adult learning theory.In almost every case, teachers are fully involved in the STEM and problem-solving processesthat are targeted to be implemented in the schools. The focus is on process rather than onmemorization. The real-life, hands-on, context provides authenticity, relevancy, and motivationto learn. Teachers are helped to reflect on what they are learning, the
unnecessary. In hindsight, this appears to be a correct decision asthe majority of our students have been fully engaged in the program without adding traditionalquizzes to this non-traditional course.Assessment of ProgramThe overarching goal of this program is to increase the cultural competence of engineering studentsthrough an abroad experience. Based on lessons learned from the American University Center ofProvence (AUCP), the eight fundamental elements of an abroad program that were found to havethe most impact on student intercultural learning are:6 1. Clarity of purpose 2. Clarity of learning goals 3. Cultural immersion 4. Holistic design 5. Challenge and support 6. Reflection and analysis 7. Student accountability
Paper ID #27122Best Practices for Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: Perspec-tives of Academic LibrariansDr. Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jeanine Williamson is the engineering librarian and a professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Dr. Natalie Rice, University of TennesseeProf. Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Carol Tenopir is a Chancellor’s Professor in the School of Information Sciences, College of Communica- tion and Information, University of Tennessee.Ms. Jordan Kaufman Research Associate for the Center for Information and Communication Studies with an
: Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 7.440.10 Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationAn ENGINE in a new car can be turned ON if:(The KEY is ON) AND (BATTERY is ON) AND (The A/C is OFF OR The LIGHTS are OFF)Use smallest number of NAND and NOT Gates to implement the “ENGINE ON” function.This example relates to dimensionality, modification, similarity, and experimentation strategies.b2.3) Computer Science exampleFind the general solution to the “Tower of Hanoi” problem. Write a program that will producethe solution for N disks (N< 10
information to other participants (instructor, students, practitioners, etc), necessitate use of appropriate language and presentation methods. This aspect of case handling would invariably improve students’ communication skills and help in building self-confidence.Finally, one of the fundamental principles underlying the case study approach is: thenontraditional role of the instructor, whose role is not so much to teach students as to encouragelearning. His/her role is more of a facilitator, and he/she has to be both a teacher and apractitioner.The Specifics of the ExperienceAt an international university, the author introduced a case study/ case history course in the areaof geotechnical/foundation engineering to Civil Engineering
graduation requirements for both institutions; similarly 3+1 dual degree programshave been arranged through homologation. Many Latin American and Caribbean (LAC)engineering program require 5 years or more, where the last year the student is writes a SeniorThesis. Similar 3+2 and 4+1 programs have been arranged. Also 4+2 programs have beenarranged that result in an undergraduate degree from the LAC institution, and a Masters Degreefrom the US.Faculty Development, Graduate Scholarships and ExchangesTo help LAC institutions increase the proportions of their faculty with PhD degrees, severalInstitutional Members have developed special faculty development programs for other LACCEIInstitutional Members. These programs are aimed at establishing a long-term
definitely like to see simulation results showing you know, this is the correct answer, if you do this then this is happening, or do this then this is happening, kind of rather than just telling me, you know these are the two factors which affect the DIBL, which affect the DIBL most, so that wouldn't tell me anything, So if he could give me like plots saying like see if you do this then this is what’s happening, because we were asked to do that in the homework. It's not like I could just Google it and say ok these two affect the most and then I could just write that. That is not how we do homework right, we need to explain what we are doing and need to really understand, so it really, if I really want
Paper ID #37123Dean’s Racial Justice Curriculum Challenge (WIP)Paula Rees (Assistant Dean for Diversity) Assistant Dean UMass Amherst.Scott A Civjan (Professor)Erin Baker (Professor)Promise MchengaHannah WhartonJacqueline E Thornton (Software Developer)Lia Marie CiemnyEsha Ayman UddinSamantha WojdaShannon Roberts Dr. Shannon C. Roberts is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department and the co- director of the Human Performance Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Amherst (UMass). Prior to joining UMass, she was a technical staff member at MIT Lincoln Laboratory in the Cyber
, the term depicted manufacturing assisted by the latestconvergence of technologies such as computers and automation and improved through the use ofintelligent and autonomous systems supported by data and machine learning. Since then, theterm has been appropriated to refer to a new industrial age and this present use is consistent withhow the first three Industrial Revolution eras have been defined by historians. Indeed, during thislast decade and continuing today, fundamental shifts have been taking place in how globalproduction and supply chain networks operate through an ongoing automation of traditionalmanufacturing and industrial practices, using modern smart technology, large scale machine-to-machine (M2M) communication, and the Internet
Fall 2018 visitedthe same Duke Energy hydroelectric generation facility mentioned above, and received a powerplant tour from one of their engineers. During the Spring 2020 semester, students visited andtoured the Eaton corporation facility located in Arden, NC. A project personnel chaperoned thescholarship recipients during this trip.For all field trips, NRC scholars were asked to write reports highlighting their technicalobservations. The following is a reflection excerpt by one scholar after the tour of Oconeenuclear station: “The immense size and convolution of the operation of the plant is astounding. There is a certain pressure felt while standing in the control center. It is seemingly my own experience that tells me I
Paper ID #29979”Because I’m not always constantly getting everything right”: GenderDifferences in Engineering Identity Formation in Elementary Students(FUNDAMENTAL)Ms. Annmarie Elizabeth Hoch, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Annmarie Hoch is an undergraduate researcher pursuing her BA in Community Health at Tufts University. She is interested in education, social inequities and public health.Ms. Karen Miel, Tufts University Karen Miel is a PhD student in STEM Education at Tufts University. Karen served as the Director of Research and Innovation at the science center CuriOdyssey and the Education Director of
once peracademic year. Students who are unable to enroll in a required course during the quarter inwhich it is offered, must delay graduation by one full year. As a result, there is a strongdisincentive for Chemical Engineering undergraduates to participate in the co-op program in anyquarter other than Summer.Heat transfer was the first course selected for our new distance-learning program because it is theonly course required for Chemical Engineering juniors in Spring Quarter. By offering thiscourse at a distance, students could work a Spring or Spring-Summer co-op assignment withoutdelaying graduation for a full year. The Co-op students enrolled in the course were both on
matters. (p. 123)A separate but related phenomena to creativity is innovation. Specifically, based on extensiveinterviews with serial innovators, Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen (the authors of theInnovator’s) DNA postulate that innovators tend to be avid questioners, observers,experimenters, and idea networkers. They framed these four phenomena as the “behavioraltendencies” of serial innovators. In alignment with the Innovator’s DNA, we identify innovationas much more than a function of the brain but also a function of behaviors [7]. In the context ofengineering design, to be an innovative engineer requires the act of doing or creating.We recognize that behavior is fundamentally contingent upon one’s inner drives, motivations,values, self
solving, with an emphasis on collaborative problem solving. For rather challengingtopics, videos were also created on extra practice questions as supplemental resources.4.2.1 Lightboard lecture videosFigure 4.2 shows a screenshot of a video for extra practice questions where the instructor worksthrough the problem to thoroughly explain the process. Lightboard also suits well for recordingproblem solving videos as it allows easy writing with colorful fluorescent marker that glowsbrightly on the board. Moreover, at the author’sinstitution, the lightboard is facilitated by theFaculty Multimedia Center with all relevantdevices such as camera and microphone readyto use, and hence requires zero setup work fromthe instructor. The instructor just needs
. engineering researchers to conduct research in China. Chang has been an active NAFSA member for over 10 years. Currently, she serves as the 2009 network leader of the Inter- national Education Leadership Development network of NAFSA. She has organized numerous workshops and conferences with National Science Foundation, American Society of Engineering Education, and the Colloquium of International Engineering Education. In the past, she served on the Board of Trustees (2002-06) of the Cooperative Center for Study Abroad, as Fulbright Advisor, and as a Selection Panelist for the national-level scholarship program for International Institute of Education. Chang research inter- est is a derivative from her professional
Paper ID #9056Creation of a Co-Terminal BS/MS Civil Engineering Degree ProgramDr. Charles E Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley teaches across the curriculum and at all levels from the freshman experience, mechanics se- quence, structural analysis and design, sustainability, and graduate structures and mechanics. His back- ground is in highway bridge design and rating and structural mechanics. He has been honored with the 2012 ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Teaching Award and the 2013 Beer and Johnston Out- standing New Mechanics Educator Award from the ASEE Mechanics Division.Dr. Roger V Lindgren, Oregon
aims toidentify trends, consensus, and discrepancy amongst high quality studies in the field [1], [2], [3],[4]. SLRs differ from typical ‘narrative’ literature review (borrowing Borrego’s terminology) inthat it employs “transparent, methodical, and reproducible procedures” [1]. SLR is anappropriate technique for addressing our research question because it provides a systematicmethod for selecting and synthesizing the results of high quality studies from a large database.Furthermore, the field of research in pedagogical techniques for teaching introductory circuits ismature enough to warrant such a review, an important criteria for carrying out a successful SLR[1].Writing about SLRs presents semantic challenges which necessitate clarity and
ofdetailed, personalized and immediate feedback from the instructor and peers.Due to cultural reasons, not all TAMUQ students attend office hours. When they do, studentsmay attend in pairs or small groups though not often in mixed-gender groups. Faculty mayaddress the same question more than once. The idea of “Virtual Office Hours” can facilitatemore “attendance” in office hours or post facto and provide another forum for IE.Assessment MethodologySubjective and objective measures were planned to assess the impact of the proposed model onstudent learning and long-term retention of basic concepts. At the time of this writing, however,the only data that was available is that resulting from student surveys. The data sought by thesurveys pertained to
AC 2011-539: PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING: A STUDENT PERSPEC-TIVE ON THE ROLE OF THE FACILITATORHolly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Matusovich has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science with a concentration in Metallurgy. Additionally Dr. Matusovich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experi- ence in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Dr. Matusovich’s research interests include the role of motivation in learning
proposal stated that each section’s enrollment shall be limited. Twenty-four studentsper instructor is manageable and divides easily into student teams of 2, 3, 4, or 6 (assuming fullsections).The name of the multi-discipline course was to be “EGE 1001 Fundamentals of EngineeringDesign Projects.” The discipline-specific course name is at the discretion of each department.Once the proposal was approved, the prerequisites for the course were determined. While thecourse does not involve any advanced mathematics, the committee wanted to ensure a standardbase education level of each student. We also wanted to ensure that any student in the coursewas prepared to launch into subsequent engineering courses (e.g., statics or engineeringgraphics) without a
was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and hopes to continue her research in entrepreneurial mindset assessment using narrative inquiry.Kevin D. Dahm (Professor of Chemical Engineering) Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1992 and his Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1998. He is an author of the textbook Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, and is an Associate Editor for the journals Advances in Engineering Education and Education for Chemical Engineers.Kaitlin Mallouk (Assistant Professor) Kaitlin Mallouk is an Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Program
Paper ID #16929Exploring ABET Self-Studies: A Look at Pedagogy, Assessment, and Evalu-ation of Life-Long LearningNathan M. Hicks, University of Florida Nathan M. Hicks is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida and taught high school math and science for three years.Mr. Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette Richard J. Aleong is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his Master’s of Applied Science in Mechanical and Materials
Paper ID #6286Insights into the Process of Building a Presentation Scoring System for Engi-neersDr. Tristan T. Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is a Senior Academic Professional in the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning and is Assistant Director for the Scholarship and Assessment of Teaching and Learning at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Formerly, he was a tenured Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig has regularly published and presented work on a variety of topics including assessment instruments and methodologies
. in industrial/organizational psychology and advanced minor in research methodology and is a member of the Association for Aviation Psychol- ogy, the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Applied Experimental and Engineering Psychology, the Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology, and the American Psychological Association.Prof. Dawn D. Laux, Purdue University Dawn Laux is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University. She has been with the University since 2007 and is responsible for teaching database fundamentals and introductory technology courses. Laux earned her M.S. degree from Iowa State University in information systems in
elements: concepts, directed lines connecting concepts and linking words describingthe connection. These three elements create a fundamental unit of meaning or aproposition. For example, “engineering leads to experimentation” is a proposition.Figures 1 and 2 represent two different concept maps structures. Figure 1 is a hierarchicalstructure with a superordinate concept and tiers of increasingly subordinate ideas andexamples [2]. This map is read “top-down.” Figure 2 is a non-hierarchical array. Theformer superordinate concept “concept maps” is directly linked to multiple conceptssimultaneously.Figure 1. Example of hierarchical concept map [2]. Page
students said that they did not like writing on the story boards, but thesewere the only two things that students said they did not like about Studio STEM. As a measureof their motivation towards participating in the project, two students said that they wanted moretime to participate each week.Video AnalysisThe first level of the video analysis is large-grained and holistic; we call this the VideoNarrative. While watching the video, the analyst composed a written narrative marked frequentlywith time stamps. This written narrative provided a detailed description of the action in the videoby topics, speakers, objects, and technology. These descriptions focused on dialogue and action
agreed that part of being anengineer was to solve problems creatively. Dr. Jane stated, “. . . And in solving problems, astudent needs to be aware or have an approach to solving problems and, developing good criticalthinking skills will allow them to develop a process by which they can solve problemseffectively or efficiently.” Dr. Smith suggested, “As an engineer, fundamentally they should beable to solve problems. Critical thinking is a major component for them to be able to solveproblems, and it is vital; and critical thinking should be included in all the programs.” The link to critical thinking was made through Dr. Jane’s expectations of the studentsasking her several questions for clarity and understanding. “Another thing that I am
. More importantly, a consistent scale will better facilitate the calculation and comparison of average mean factor scores when the survey is implemented. 2. Several items can be improved with better rewording: a. Q18 - separate the terms “teamwork” and “collaboration” into individual items. This may help improve the item’s low discrimination index. b. Re-write negatively worded items to be the exact opposite, or antonym, of a positively worded item [83], thereby creating positive/negative item pairs. For example, positively worded item: “Engineering decisions are influenced by the societal context in which they take place”; negatively worded antonym: “Engineering
action plan consists of four major tasks: (i) redesign and write new lab manuals and createdatasheets, (ii) develop LTspice-based pre-labs and video tutorials, (iii) develop “design andapplication”-oriented labs with handouts, and (iv) create introductory videos for in-lab exercises.In task 1, our goal is to fully revise the legacy lab manuals and redesign, reorganize, and rewritethem. In this process, we applied coherent formatting among all labs for improved readability. Inaddition, we created Microsoft Word-based structured data entry forms for in-lab and pre-lab datacollection, data analysis and lab report submission. Each datasheet is specifically designed for aspecific lab and they contain electronic forms or tables for experimental data