highest possible knowledge in theirfield. On the contrary, it only gives a person the keys to the vault of knowledge: to question all,to “think out of the box” and to learn continually. In the course of obtaining a doctorate degree,an individual does not necessarily acquire all the skills to be an effective teacher, activeresearcher and good academic citizen1: expectations of any new faculty member. The road tobecoming an efficient and effective professor is a deliberate one that requires planning.However, some essential skills can be picked up during graduate studies such as research skills 2through RA assignments and a few teaching skills through
lack of pragmatic metrology/NDI-related knowledge and skills in their incoming workforce. Over the past three years, a total of 30REU students progressed through and completed the program. During each summer, the REUcohorts were immersed in hands-on research experiences comprising of a transformativeresearch project, capsulated technical sessions and complementary lab practice, field tours,research seminars, and professional development workshops. Following the REU program, a 1-year follow-up was instituted with each individual participant for continued interaction, growth,and guidance of the students for pursuing advanced study/careers.An external evaluator was tasked to appraise the following – did this site meet its recruitmentgoals (% of
illustrating the common mistakes found in the engineeringliterature.IntroductionFor scientific publications to contribute to the advancement of knowledge, it isnecessary that researchers be objective, complete, fair, and accurate in reporting theresults of their work, and to act with integrity throughout the publishing process. Theauthors of scholarly publications bear the responsibility for adhering to ethical norms,including those related to authorship and attribution, disclosure of conflict of interest,and the integrity of the peer-review process. As many graduate engineering programsrequire journal publications and/or conference presentations for graduation, it is criticalthat students learn about best practices in scholarly communications and are
Paper ID #37283Board 111: A Systematic Review of Instruments Used to Evaluate theEffectiveness of the Entering Mentoring CurriculumMs. Ha Pho, University of Massachusetts Lowell Ha Pho is the Program Director for the Public Health Informatics and Technology (PHIT) Workforce De- velopment program at the University of Massachusetts Lowell (UMass Lowell). In this role, she oversees a $3.2 million federal-funded program aimed at creating and training undergraduate and graduate students in PHIT. In research, Ha is an integral member of the team, responsible for designing and implementing AMPP, a mentorship training for faculty
. In addition to purposive sampling, we used snowball sampling, and askedparticipants to let their friends know about our study. After contacting us to indicate their interestin participating in our research, students were asked to complete an online pre-interview surveycontaining demographic questions and scheduled the interview.Of the 20 individuals who volunteered to participate in our study, 4 were rising juniors, 10 wererising seniors, and 5 were December and May 2020 graduates. There were 4 first generationstudents. Five participants self-identified as men and 15 as women; 9 self-identified asBlack/African American, 8 as White, and 3 as Asian. Four students pursued ComputerEngineering, 1 student was enrolled In Electrical Engineering, 11
Project (full-time research, no classes) Fall 2: two graduate classes, Practicum Project Spring 2: two graduate classes, CapstoneThe Practicum Rotation allows students to spend one month each in three different researchlabs/groups, with the goal of identifying the one research lab/group where students want tocomplete their Practicum Project. This three-semester Practicum Project offers students theopportunity to work collaboratively with faculty and other students as they gain deep experiencein the challenges of working with messy, real-world data in an application area related to theirundergraduate studies in STEM. The Capstone is a graduate course that allows students tosynthesize what they have learned and prepares them for success
geographic and culturalassets and needs, the inclusion of multi-institutional data, pre-transfer student focus, datadisaggregation by subpopulations, and disciplinary focus on engineering. This research will alsoinform institutional supports, pathways, and resources needed for increased transfer studentcapital, stimulate the interaction of researchers and practitioners with policymakers and thepublic, and expand stakeholder capacity to support and engage diverse populations in STEMeducation through new partnerships. In the first year, this research has focused on gathering data in a mixed methods study tocreate new knowledge to increase engineering transfer numbers and preparedness more broadlythrough investigating the geographic and cultural
internship programs (e.g., some universities have one term or one year internshipsfor Ph.D. students). Continuing education courses, such as those offered by the NationalHighway Institute (NHI), are excellent sources for teaching aids and case studies. It was alsonoted that the National Science Foundation (NSF) has at least four programs that may facilitateand fund these activities: Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI),Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT), Industry UniversityCollaborative Research Centers, and Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU).Third, we can promote the profession among colleagues, decision-makers, and the generalpublic. This goal can be achieved through collaborations
Hendrix College and his M.S.M.E. and Ph.D. were earned at the University of Arkansas.Aric Martin Gillispie, University of Central OklahomaMr. Adam Dorety, University of Central Oklahoma Adam Dorety is currently a senior at the University of Central Oklahoma (UCO). He is involved in Fluid dynamics research observing entropy loss through tee junctions for low viscosity and reynolds numbers fluids. He is also a past UCO chapter of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers chair, vice-chair and treasurer. He began his research on the Underwater Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) as well as an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). He hopes to graduate in 2016 and join the workforce. His experience with undergraduate research has
.” Page 13.171.2This research will use a hybrid approach in which quantitative data related to self-efficacy,learning preferences, and structured interviews will be combined in an attempt to identify traitsof successful female students enrolled in Engineering Technology programs at a large land-grantuniversity in the Midwest. Hazzan and colleagues (10) writing about the advantages of usingqualitative research in some studies, notably computer science education, noted that: … in many cases, CSE research deals with topics related to learners’ mental, cultural and social processes. Such processes, by nature, are rich, consisting of many details and perspectives. Accordingly, it is reasonable to assume that if we approach
Paper ID #20197Promoting academic and career success for Raleigh Future Scholars at NCStateDr. Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University Cheryl Cass is a teaching assistant professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at North Carolina State University where she has served as the Director of Undergraduate Programs since 2011. Her research focuses on the intersection of science and engineering identity in post-secondary and graduate level programs.Prof. Leda Lunardi, North Carolina State University Leda Lunardi received the BS and MS from University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), S˜ao Paulo, Brazil, and Ph.D
-Milwaukee.Dr. April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh April Dukes (aprila@pitt.edu) is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Inte- gration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. April studied at Winthrop University, earning a BS degree in Chemistry and BA degree in Psychology in 2000. She then completed her PhD in 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh, studying oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and
(Ex- CEEd) Fellowship, Aggies Commit to Professional Student Educational Experiences, Graduate Teaching Lecturer Fellowship, and Climate Award. She was also the only academic recipient of the Texas and Louisiana Engineering News Record (ENR) Top Young Professional Award in 2017. Dr. Kermanshachi is currently directing a very vibrant construction engineering and education research group and advising several Ph.D. and Master’s students c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Innovative Higher Education Teaching and Learning Techniques: Implementation Trends and Assessment ApproachesMr. Piyush Taneja, University of Texas at Arlington Graduate Student, Department of
Paper ID #8625Pictorial Visual Rotation Ability of Engineering Design Graphics StudentsDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in Integrative STEM Education. Jeremy specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development experiences in technology, engineering, and design education.Dr. Diarmaid Lane
journey. This necessitates a considerationof research studies that have focused on these aspects, which build upon the foundation ofidentity development to provide a more holistic understanding of the transfer student experience.In a research study by Craig [18], the significant graduation gap between traditional students andthose transitioning into ET programs is uncovered. This disparity underscores the intricateacademic landscape that transfer students must traverse, a terrain that could be made lessdaunting through enriched immersion sections and Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) sessions[19]. However, this journey is not without its tumultuous phases. 'Transfer shock,' which wasalso mentioned in the earlier part of this review is a concept
specific characters or networks that were included in the process and were not included inthis table.Special Session Analogy Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5CharactersAdvisor Advisor Advisor Advisor Advisor Other Grad students inFellow graduate students Other students Research group members Cohort Army departmentMore senior graduate student "mentors"; "helpers
underrepresented STEM students and community college STEM transfer students.The second goal of Phase V was to increase socialization in STEM by providing experientiallearning and this goal had three vital domains. The first domain includes providing domestic andinternational research opportunities for students. Research studies have substantiated that earlyaccess and opportunity for undergraduate student research experiences have increased success inSTEM programs and lowers barriers for transition to graduate school [13]. The second domain isto increase students’ STEM professional skills and experience. Researchers have noted thatsocialization opportunities have been shown to be crucial to underrepresented student success[9], [7], [10], [18]. The last
students in areas of progression and transition from undergraduate to graduate studies, research, and study abroad. Her research agenda and commitment to intellectual growth is driven by her life experience. While com- pleting her Master’s degree and for several years after, she worked in a family owned manufacturing firm. As a doctoral student, Shirl was recognized as an AGEP scholar and received the Bilsland Fellowship. Outstandingly, she collaborated in the creation of an innovation course and taught the initial offering. Un- til August 2014, she was a post-doctoral fellow researching entrepreneurship, innovation, and diversity. Today Dr. Donaldson’s research interests include entrepreneurship, innovation
. MethodologyThis study involved a single case descriptive and correlational study of an engineering RET forK-5 teachers that focused explicitly on the summer research experience. Participants includedteachers from the local school district (N=20) working in pairs, each assigned to a pair of full-time engineering graduate student researchers (N=20) (henceforth, GAs). Data were derivedfrom two years of implementation with different participants, from the years 2018 and 2019.Participant perspectives were captured in a series of daily activity logs. The teacher activity logasked them to: 1) describe their work in the lab, 2) indicate the number of hours they worked, 3)rate their involvement in the work (4pt; 1-minimally to 4-extensively), and 4) rate
array of engineering students in bothundergraduate and graduate engineering at six major research universities. A total of 493students participated in this study. Equal numbers of undergraduate and graduate engineeringstudents were included in the sample with 14% of the students self identifying as internationalstudents and a 34-66 percentage split between female and male students, respectively. Thispopuation diversity was deliberately achieved (in other words, a purposeful sampling ofundergraduates and graduates from across universities was completed) with the intention oftesting diverse variables associated with global preparedness during the study. Figures 1-4(below) illustrate the study populations’ socio-demographic makeup and
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceOverview of the ProgramThe MDaS initiatives, many adapted from current College of Engineering activities, are basedfirmly in empirical evidence, having been shown to increase retention and graduation rates forlow-income and other underrepresented students. Key areas that inform the MDaS designinclude: peer bonding (e.g., social support systems, inclusion activities), academic supportsystems (e.g., learning communities, tutoring, mentoring), professional advising, and financialsupport (to decrease need for concurrent employment and to increase participation in unpaidinternships, research opportunities, and study abroad programs). The MDaS
resourcesarticulated by nine focal participants in their decision to pursue engineering/CS: affinity,aspirational, positional, and relational [9]. The current paper expands this earlier analysis toinclude all 27 students participating in our study, with a focus on the resources that theyidentified as being supportive of their persistence to graduation. Research Context and MethodologyThis paper presents the findings from a two-year, NSF-funded ethnographic study of Latinxstudents’ trajectories through undergraduate engineering and computer science studies andinto the profession. The study took place at a large, public, research-intensive HSI on theMexico-US border with an explicit student success framework focused on equity and
Paper ID #28372Geographical Inequities in Accessing Engineering and Computer Science: AState-wide Analysis of Undergraduate Enrollments Across High SchoolsDr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering educa- tion can become more
(second foreignlanguage) before enrollment.Export engineering is sometimes also named global business engineering.Bridgwood et al.1 give a detailed description of Danish engineering education, while Woolstonand Dickey2 present the Danish educational system in general. Krogh3 explains the differentaspects of internationalisation of CUCE.Objectives of the study programQuotation from the curriculum:“The purpose of the program for a degree in export engineering is to qualify students to carry outnational and international business functions in which they will:1. Convert and combine technical and commercial research and scientific, technical, and commercial knowledge into practical applications in development projects by resolving technical and/or
“Introduction to the coastal environment” at three levels: the generalpublic and high-school students, sixth-twelve grade math and science teachers, and practicingcivil engineers [10 ] . The integrated educational program from K-12 to graduate studies willenhance ocean-related education and attract K-12 students to the field of ocean science in generaland to the profession of coastal engineering in particular. The need for such an integratedprogram has been specifically emphasized by the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy in 2004, theNational Research Council in1999, and the National Science Board in 2004. Hurricane Katrina(2005) has shown the urgency and importance of establishing and enhancing coastal engineeringeducation in the hurricane-prone Gulf
individualidentification.Instruments and MeasuresAll students that volunteered to participate were provided a survey at the start of the semester thataddressed the following topics:1) most recent type of school attended, 2) year of graduation fromhigh school, 3) place of graduation (state or country), 4) programming experience prior to college,and 5) programming languages used. In terms of measuring performance, the scores on the firstlab practicum as well as the final course grade were collected.Assumptions and LimitationsThis is a correlational research study that commenced over three semesters. The programmingcourse used as a tool for measurement had up to six different instructors for a given semester. Theinstructors used shared resources as well as common assessments
. She has led and co-led numerous grants from corporate foundations and state and federal agencies, and has numerous publications in refereed journals and edited books. Her research interests include communities of practice, gender, transformative learning, and identity.Christina Convertino ConvertinoDr. Erika Mein, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Erika Mein is an Associate Professor of Literacy/Biliteracy Education and Associate Dean of Under- graduate Studies and Educator Preparation at the University of Texas at El Paso. Her scholarship focuses on disciplinary literacies in postsecondary contexts, with a particular emphasis on engineering identities and literacies among English Learners and bilingual students
. Leveraging data from a National Science Foundation(NSF) Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) project, we analyzepatterns in graduate student success, retention, and postdoctoral career trajectories in STEMdisciplines at TSU. Our findings reveal differences in faculty development participation,financial support, and degree completion rates, highlighting systemic challenges andopportunities for improvement. This study provides data-driven recommendations for TSUspecifically and for similar institutions, aiming to strengthen research capacity and enhancegraduate student outcomes1. IntroductionThe goal of the NSF’s AGEP program is to “increase the number of historically underrepresentedminority faculty in STEM” [1]. TSU partnered
., and Gregerman, S.R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study . Journal of College Student Development , 43 , 614-631. Page 25.73.10
), and the total numberof faculty (1). The U.S. News and World Report, in its annual rankings of graduate programs,considers reputation ranks by academics, engineers and recruiters, the average Graduate RecordExam (GRE) and Standard Aptitude Test (SAT) scores of admitted students, student acceptancerates, the number of Ph.D. students per faculty member, the percent of faculty in the NationalAcademy of Sciences, total research expenditures (total and per faculty member), and thenumber Ph.D.s granted (2). Angus et al. (3) evaluated chemical engineering programs using fourmeasures of quality: the number of publications by department faculty, the number of citations oftheir work, research funding, and faculty honors. This study, in contrast