education; however, historically, it has a deeplineage and debate among the social sciences. Researchers have investigated various perspectivesof agency through multiple lenses such as the structure agency dialectic prioritized by sociologists,which is often rejected by psychologists who support the idea of personal agency where individualsinfluence their actions [5], [6]. Often, anthropologists straddle the line between an individualizedand dialectic conceptualization of agency [7]. These fundamental understandings of agency havebeen extended into research areas in STEM education to understand student learning, engagement,equitable learning experiences, and critical agency [8]. Only recently have engineering educationresearchers begun to explore
their preferred teaching style, but that teachingstyle often does not align with the needs of the class or take into consideration the changingnature of their student demographics. Furthermore, new educators are often encouraged to use anactive learning pedagogy, particularly in STEM fields, where students learn best by constructingtheir own knowledge about a particular subject, but these instructors may have no priorexperience in implementing these strategies effectively.This paper is centered around lessons learnt in the implementation of an introductory electricityand electronics class, which covers various topics including: fundamentals concepts such asvoltage, current and Ohm’s Law; use of mathematical skills to solve circuits; hands-on
engineering since it enables the students to evaluate their solutions and adjust them if needed. This is one of the most important stages of the students’ learning process because often they experience that the perfect solution that they developed using computer based tools may not be what they expect in the real world. These mock-ups also allow for heuristic evaluation feedback from the Human Factors team members. Finally, the students have the opportunity to validate their final design in the lab using the engine/vehicle dynamometer and circuit testing for vehicle wiring and electronics. Technical Writing. To record the design specifications, solution space and the design process, the students document and illustrate their finding and
functionality.3. Related Research Work3.1 TPACK ImplementationInnovation on design and implementation of TPACK framework in education is an active area ofresearch. A few recent works on TPACK framework have been reported in the literature thoughthe volume of research works on the TPACK framework seems to be too little as compared to theexpected volume. In [2], Mishra and Koehler presented the fundamentals of the technologicalpedagogical content knowledge. Ferdig highlighted the assessment of technologies for teachingand learning, and also emphasized on the understanding of the importance of technologicalpedagogical content knowledge in [3]. In [4], Mishra and Koehler also discussed the ways ofconfronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology
needed individual assistance simultaneously. At first, the instructors communicated directly with students Page 12.659.8 through writing on the board or on sheets of paper, but they gradually learned basic ASL and began signing to students. This not only enhanced the line of communication, but gave students a sense of warmness and welcome, and definitely improved their learning process. 4. The course was relatively difficult: Learning Electrical Engineering, regardless of how much simplification is made to the material, is expected to be a hard task for high school freshmen. Moreover, as mentioned earlier, the reading
ability to visualize and interpret location, distance,direction, relationships, movement and change through space is fundamental to contentunderstanding and problem solving. Learning to think spatially is a form of learning how tolearn8.” The National Academies Press published a report in 2005 likens spatial literacy to‘writing across the curriculum’, a curricular subject not belonging to one discipline1.GIS education in engineering disciplines has involved scaffolding across multiple courses3,5, aswell as adding modules to already-existing courses4,6. These studies argue that it is difficult to fita GIS course into an already-crowded curriculum. This paper presents one way to fold GIS into asingle, already-existing undergraduate Environmental
Page 26.1330.14afforded by "opening the window" is seldom available to building occupants. In Germany, everymulti-story building we entered had operable windows in use.”22 All of these culturalobservations led to much discussion amongst the participants; several also discussed ways toincorporate and facilitate this type of discussion in their classrooms.There were, of course, many other areas of interest and many other observations made during thecourse of this project. Some of these involved the adoption or adaption of German practices suchas boosting environmental literacy by contextualizing environmental topics in writing, readingand the arts (in addition to within STEM courses); welcoming very young students (K-2) intopost-secondary labs
ourexistence.3 On an average day, most, if not all, of our interactions involve some variant oftechnology, whether it’s driving to work, using an elevator, or sipping from a water bottle.During the initial explosion of consumer technology, technology as social progress was a“fundamental belief,” continuing a perspective advanced during the Enlightenment. “Science isprogressive,” Thomas Jefferson declared in a letter to John Adams.4 In the early 19th century, theview shifted to technocracy, the belief that “scientific and technological innovation [is] thebasis for general progress,”4 as epitomized in the mass production system introduced byHenry Ford. In the past few decades, however, the belief that technological progress more orless guarantees social
facultymember from these disciplines who are actively involved in each weekly class session. Theweekly 3-hour class sessions are taught as a “laboratory” experience with students mainlyinvolved in active learning of fundamental principles for effective interdisciplinary collaboration.Students work in mixed teams toward a tangible solution to a community health challenge as partof the course project for the duration of the semester. The class is taught in a MakerSpace; anovel instructional space developed according to constructivist learning principles26 in whichparticipants co-learn and co-create27. The MakerSpace is an essential element of the course, as itfacilitates students’ problem solving through prototyping and testing a solution with
Paper ID #21399Student Learning About Engineering and Corporate Social Responsibility: AComparison Across Engineering and Liberal Arts CoursesDr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica Smith is Co-Director of Humanitarian Engineering and Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines. As an anthropologist, her research interests focus around the mining and energy industries, with particular emphasis in corporate social responsibility, engineers, labor and gender. She is the author of Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West, which was funded by the National
operations. However, theseactions all come with a cost in terms of capital, personnel, and time. For many smallorganizations classified as job shops, this may limit their choices to a few actions that must work.However, how is performance monitored and measured? To answer that question a study wasconducted in 2008 into one basic type of job shop; the American tool and die shops that fabricatemolds, dies, and tools fundamental to the production process. The intent was to understand issuescrucial to their existence while they work to improve performance in terms of quality products,satisfied customers, and profits. These are criteria used to judge success for all organizations andas a result, practices from other small businesses may be applicable and
be a new concept toengineering education researchers who were exclusively trained in quantitative research methods[18], it has recently been shown to “impact six fundamental aspects of research: research topic,epistemology, ontology, methodology, relation to participants, and communication” in engineeringeducation research [19]. Though this process can be time-consuming [20], successful completionof Phase 0 is essential to producing high quality RTA results as result quality relies upon theresearcher’s understanding of their own perspectives and subjectivity [12]. It is also important torecognize that this reflexive process of understanding oneself is never truly completed and newinsights may emerge at any point in time [12].Phase 1
knowledge: Crowded engineering curricula may neglect some fundamental tools that should be a part of undergraduate learning. Students can learn simultaneously if the learning process is carefully planned. Though use of failure case Page 12.276.5 studies, students will learn Obj. a. the process of failure analysis, Obj. b. engineering ethics, Obj. c. engineers’ role in and value to society 2. Greater depth of knowledge: Mastery of engineering tools requires depth. Deepening knowledge demands a “supercharged” learning process, driving students more quickly to use higher level learning
engineering. would raise further questions)Abstract Writing (g), (j) -Present scientific information in a Abstracts too format that is easily understood by technical – not technical and non-technical personnel. written for general -Identify and describe contemporary audience issues impacting biomedical engineering.Peer Evaluation (g) -Evaluate oral and/or written Providing critical presentations for
can be done through a course that focuses on teaching the conceptsand skills, or it can be embedded within the engineering classroom experience. For example, areview of growth mindset approaches identified effective interventions including courses andother learning experiences like workshops, discussions, reflective writing, online tutorials, andcourse-embedded tutors [10]. Metacognitive strategies are also commonly taught outside theclassroom through campus teaching and learning centers. There is an emerging focus onmetacognition and self-regulated learning embedded within STEM classrooms [14], [15], [16].Proactive identification and advising of studentsProactive advising, built on the concept of intrusive advising [17], [18], involves
theamount of time that would be devoted to coding. One of these respondents wrote, “runninginto errors is innately frustrating.” Two more students (7%) were put off by the piecemealprocess, with one explaining that it was hard to stay excited about the project when it is spreadout across several semesters. One student (4%) was nervous about continuing the project,writing, “it's intimidating to learn so much about something that used to be ‘untouchable’ forme.”Students’ responses to the StRIP Instrument are detailed in Table 1. The four StRIP subscaleswere considered at the beginning of semester 5 and at week 8 of semester 5, after thecardiograph lab was completed. Overall, these findings demonstrated that students are engagedin the engineering
LUT with main research interests re- lated to technology and society, gender diversity and engineering education.Dr. Hanna Niemel¨a, Hanna Niemel¨a received the M.A. and PhD degrees in translation studies from University of Helsinki in 1993 and 2003, respectively. She is currently working as an associate professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering at Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland. Her professional experience ranges from translating to teaching and language consulting. Her interests include electrical engineering, scientific writing and special languages. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
change triggered by technology; to understand other cultures, especially the societal elements of these cultures; to work effectively in multinational teams; to communicate effectively—both orally and in writing—in the international business language of English; to recognize and understand issues of Page 13.600.2 sustainability; to understand the importance of transparency while working with local populations; and to understand public policy issues around the world and in the country in which one is working. It will be these fundamental capacities that will enable 21st- century engineers to develop into
. Studentsare often drawn to engineering by a desire to benefit mankind. For example, faculty andundergraduate students at the Colorado School of Mines are helping EMI to evaluate thefeasibility of small-scale solar-powered UV water disinfection systems. The authors assert thatstudents are motivated to take part in research that helps people in developing countries improvethe quality of their lives.IntroductionMaterial science and testing is a fundamental component of undergraduate education for multipleengineering disciplines, including civil and mechanical. As undergraduate engineering studentsprogress through their curricula, they gain the ability and the opportunity to participate inresearch. Many engineering programs encourage, if not require, a
and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building communities of engineering faculty, staff, and students engaged in educational
Paper ID #21211Advancing Critical Building Code Education through Modularized LecturesDr. Ryan L. Solonsky P.E., Pennsylvania State University, University Park Ryan Solnosky is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park. Dr. Solnosky started at Penn State in July of 2013 and has taught courses for Architectural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Pre-Major Freshman in Engineering. He received his integrated Professional Bachelor of Architectural Engineering/Master of Architectural Engineering (BAE/MAE) degrees in architectural
Paper ID #15994Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Innovation for Engineering and Busi-ness Student TeamsDavid G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
, musicinformation retrieval, music recording and production, transduction of audio signals usingspeakers, and a grounding in the fundamental wave-based nature of sound.The SMT program is heading into its 10th iteration in 2015 and has enrolled over 200 high schoolstudents to date. Each year, the curriculum is revised with new material, including significantcontributions from graduate and undergraduate engineering students. These revisions areprimarily based on student feedback and instructor observations during the activities. Studentparticipants fill out surveys after each activity, providing feedback on how interesting and difficultthe activity was, as well as how much the students feel they’ve learned.2 BackgroundThere exists a growing body of
from the Reflective and Perceptual sub-scales of the instrument.14• Moral Disengagement: 24 item scale that measures eight interrelated moral disengagement mechanisms.15Engineering Ethics Scenarios: • Ethics Knowledge Questions: We are using the same five knowledge/scenario questions that were employed in the earlier SEED research project.16-17 The format of these items is similar to questions that appear on the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. They are multiple- choice format; each has a preferred answer. • Engineering Ethics Scenarios: We have adapted three situational-judgement situations focused on ethical issues in engineering practice adapted from prior work by Jesiek et al.18 Each multiple-choice question
the design review presentation was one of the easier parts of the project.”“Coming up with a design that was different from the others.”“Working with my teammate.” 2. What was the most difficult part of the catapult design project?“Carrying out the design properly and getting everything to fit.”“Figuring out the tolerance for the holes, for the parts to assembly correctly.”“Making things fit in the build plate.” 3. What did you learn about design during this project?“I learned a lot about how things fit together in real life (it’s a lot different thanSOLIDWORKS).”“A knowledge of the materials being used is important.”“I need to think more about the size of parts.” This freshman level course teaches students the fundamentals of
integrated into Engineering Systems Laboratory, a ten-laboratory course that will be taken by all engineering students in the second semester of theirsecond year in the School of Engineering at Nazarbayev University. The aim of this course wasto teach students how to analyze experimental data and interpret results. At the successfulcompletion of the course, students are expected to be able to: analyze a problem, state an experimental objective, develop and implement an experimental plan, analyze data for statistical significance, draw conclusions from experimental data, and write a technical report.Engineering in Society is an elective course that was first offered in the fall semester of thesecond academic year
Paper ID #33574Assessing Drawing Self-efficacy: A Validation Study Using ExploratoryFactor Analysis (EFA) for the Drawing Self-efficacy Instrument (DSEI)Ms. Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University Donna Jaison is a PhD student under Dr. Karan Watson and Dr. Tracy Hammond in the Multidisciplinary Engineering Department at Texas A&M University, College Station. She is a Graduate research assistant at the Institute of Engineering Education and Innovation (IEEI) at Texas A&M University under director Dr. Tracy Hammond. She completed her MEng. in Computer Engineering with specialization in VLSI from Texas A&M
Paper ID #19121WannABET? Historical and Organizational Perspectives on Governance inEngineering EducationMs. Stephanie M. Matos, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Stephanie is a Gradaute Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She has a BS in Industrial Organizational Psychology, a BA in Sociology, and a Certification in Women and Gender Studies. She is a Virginia Tech Pratt Fellow and a Virginia Tech Graduate McNair Scholar. Her research interest are in Engineering Culture, Institutional Behavior, Women & Racial Minorities in Engi- neering, Responsible Civic
: “Engineering programs required science and mathematics, but drafting and laboratory and fieldwork remained integral parts of the curriculum through the end of the Second World War [4].”It is worth noting that this is one of the few references to “fieldwork” in the engineeringeducation literature. Where it does appear, the term tends to refer to surveying.The changes in engineering education that flowed from the Grinter report in the mid-1950smeant that laboratory instruction, like the curriculum more generally, took on a more theoryrather than practice orientation. The ascendancy of the fundamentals and theoretical knowledgemeant that engineering graduates did not acquire the practical understanding of how thingsworked, something that
, but felt the need to start from where she is now, not where she was inthe early stages of her career. Page 22.1431.10 I needed a place that would respect what I brought to the program as a returning graduate student. A school that seemed to say, you know what, I don’t care what you know, you’re going to be treated like you’re a 22-year-old and, you know, and there’s no advantage whatsoever to what you bring, you’ll be grunt labor and you’ll be my whipping child… You know, I’ll make you do all my grunt work and write my papers for me for the next several years – was not a place that was going to be conducive