Airport design and planning Transport systems design Telecommunications network design Aviation security systems design Advanced weather systems design Navigation and satellite systems design and implementationGovernment careers in aviation are also expected to grow. The 1992 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)work force in fiscal 1992 had a budget of $4.3 billion for aviation operations, $1.9 billion for airport improvementprograms, and $2.7 billion for engineering projects. The FAA had a full-time complement of 52,320 employeesin 1992 in the following areas: 1. Air traffic (25,299) 2. Electronics (6>82) 3. Engineering (3,054) 4. Aviation-safety inspection (3,068) 5. Technical
. Page 9.220.13Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationRONALD J. BENNETT PhD is Director and Chair of the Engineering Programs at the University of St. Thomas.He holds a Ph.D. in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA. With a background of 20 years in industry, Bennettteaches and publishes on diverse topics including materials engineering, technical innovation, technology transferand engineering education. He is an EAC of ABET program evaluator and is currently Chair of the GraduateStudies Division of ASEE.DEBRA RICCI PhD serves St. Thomas’ engineering department as a technical
Professor of Physics at Carthage College. After a career at Science Applications International Corporation as head of the Applied Physics and Engineering Division, Dr. Arion conceived, started, and directs the ScienceWorks: Entrepreneurial Studies program at Carthage. This program has for the last twelve years successfully integrated entrepreneurship and career training into the undergraduate science and technology curriculum. He works extensively with regional business development groups and municipal organizations, combining academic activities with new business creation and business revitalization. He is also technical director at the Center for Advanced Technology and Innovation, a
as a group are more highly represented than lecturersin our sample.Distribution of responses by age is shown in figure 3.The gender division in the sample is shown in figure 4. Not unexpectedly women constituteonly thirty percent of the sample. This is not unusual in higher education in science andtechnology in Western countries, where women have traditionally been under-represented.The option of no answer/other was added in the 2012 survey.Respondents identified the levels of the courses they normally taught. A good cross sectionof teachers teaching at all year levels from first year to PhD courses responded both in 2009and 2012. Only about 20% of the respondents primarily teach at just one level of courses,such as master level. Most
Session Number: 1430 Implementing Institutional Change to Increase Engineering Diversity Christine L. Andrews, J.D. and Leslie Wilkins Maui Economic Development Board, Inc.AbstractThe barriers to gender equity in engineering are daunting in an environment where boys and girlsonly 9 years old have internalized gender stereotypes that dictate that physical-science andtechnology are for boys and that life science is for girls. In a world where minorities areprojected to make up more than 40% of new workforce entrants by 2008, it is unacceptable thatwhite high school students are four times more likely than African American students to
. Discussion7.1. Action Plans to Help Students Satisfy Prerequisites: As Section 6 and Table A.3. show, thestudents may fail to fulfill multiple computational thinking prerequisites as well as other themesof prerequisites to participate in robotics-based lessons in middle schools. It may be treated asusual because the students were not formally trained for this purpose. Their informal knowledgeand skills made them able to fulfill many other prerequisites. We propose to implement thefollowing action plans by concerned schools/teachers before they start teaching STEM lessons tostudents through the use of robotics kits.1. Arrange some training sessions with the students who are to be taught math and science using robotics. During the training sessions
. Receiving phenomena 1. Perception 2. Comprehension 2. Responding to phenomena 2. Set 3. Guided response Intermediate 3. Application 3. Valuing 4. Mechanism 4. Analysis 5. Complex overt response Advanced 5. Evaluation 4. Organizing values into 6. Adaptation 6. Creation problems 7. Origination 5. Internalizing
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006.[17] A. Jiang and M. C. Loui, “What should I do next? How advanced engineering students decide their post- baccalaureate plans,” in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, October 3-6, 2012.[18] J. Margolis and D. Kotys-Schwartz, “The post-graduation attrition of engineering students: An exploratory study on influential career choice factors,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Lake Buena Vista, FL, November 13-19, 2009.[19] J. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “Family roles in engineering undergraduate academic and
technical literature from Cincinnati and Iowa State andidentified the best practices from each. The Purdue College of Engineering had recently been through a strategic processthat identified the competencies that it wished to incorporate into the Purdue Engineer ofthe Future 4. Many of these attributes are the same as the Cincinnati categories and theIowa State competencies. Some values were identified from the NAE 3 Engineer of 2020publication, and additionally, some distinct items were suggested by Purdue’s industrialpartners. This resulted in a set of 24 competencies in three distinct groupings ofAbilities, Knowledges, and Traits. Table 1 identifies the Purdue sets of competencies,and the Purdue mapping of these competencies into the ABET
session heldduring the 2007 conference by the International Council on Technology in CollegiateMathematics (ICTCM) where mathematics classes and millennial students were topics discussed.This led to a K-State at Salina campus wide panel discussion, led by Professor Heublein, onmillennial college students. One pedagogical challenge discussed was meeting the coursecontent expectations of the mathematics department on the main campus while still seamlesslyteaching an engineering trigonometry course to aviation students. This group of students will notuse most of the mathematics material and skills developed which are necessary to successfullycomplete this course. The workshop and the panel discussion have continued to stimulate aninterest and
expertise in relevant areas and a demonstrated commitment to participating in meetings and curriculum improvements. Consider one-year membership terms to replace inactive members and foster active engagement.3. Document Advising Processes: Clearly define advising structures, incorporating both general and major-specific components. Utilize digital tools to track student progress, advising sessions, and interventions, ensuring measurable evidence of student support. Maintain thorough documentation to demonstrate ABET alignment and institutional commitment to student success.4. Integrate Career Guidance: Incorporate career advising into faculty models, emphasizing discipline-specific opportunities and strengthening
. Kremer is Dean-elect of Engineering at University of Dayton. Kremer served as chair of the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering (2016-2021) and Senior Director Presidential Projects (2021-2022), in addition to past leadership roles at Penn State. Dr. Kremer has degrees in industrial engineering from Yildiz Technical University, a masters in business from Istanbul University, and a PhD in Engineering Management from Missouri University of Science and Technology. She was a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow in the Human Effectiveness Directorate (2002-2004), a Fulbright Scholar (2010-2011), and Program Director in NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education (2013-2016). Dr
. We can help them by designing graduate engineering education thatbuilds on the richness of multiple disciplines using a range of experiential catalysts. This is notsimply the wish of a social scientist trying to elbow her way into the engineering curriculum.Socio-technical bridging is an empirically confirmed engineering phenomenon. Our careerhistory research in engineering workplaces demonstrated that one of the most powerfulleadership development paths was carved by “boundary spanners” [31], engineers with deepexperience in multiple divisions, departments, and organizational communities who learned toblend their technical training with iterative social development. These engineers were fantasticleaders, not only because they had mastered
proposals. This hardware has uncertain factors that drive thelife cycle cost, such as, reliability, support approach, and support investment cost.The best approach to dealing with these issues is to standardize the life cycle costcalculations by utilizing industry standard tools.3. Support cost componentsThe support cost portion of life cycle cost is divided into three major categories:Support Investment Costs, Annual Fixed Costs and Repair Activity Costs. SupportInvestment Cost is the cost of starting up a total system support structure. Test andsupport equipment, repair material lay-in, depot level spares, shop replaceablespares, and initial technical data costs are included in this cost. Annual Fixed Costsare the sustaining labor, equipment
this K-12 program, educational kits of an EAP-based actuator that mimics the basiccontractile mechanism of a muscle cell have been developed. Using these kits, 15-20minute hands-on sessions for 3~4 student groups were offered as a part of Cardiovascularand Tissue Mechanics Laboratory experience for the participants of WIMS for Teens andWomen in Engineering, both of which emphasize participation of groups Page 15.715.4underrepresented in STEM areas. 33. Biomimetic DeviceThe biomimetic device was based on the function of the sarcomere, the basic contractileunit of a
Session 1661 Technology 21 – A Course on Technology for Non-Technologists Albert J. Rosa, Paul K. Predecki, George Edwards University of Denver, Department of EngineeringAbstractThere is a need to prepare non-technologists to assume senior management, political and otherleadership roles in a highly technological world. Many non-technical college students have afear and distrust of learning things mathematical, scientific or technical. At the University ofDenver we have created a successful three-quarter long course called Technology 21 that hasbeen offered for fourteen years to non-engineering and non-science students as a means to meettheir
. Fonash, “Nanotechnology in Undergraduate Education Workshop: A Report and Recommendations Based on a Workshop Held on Sept. 11-12, 2002 at the National Science Foundation,” (2002).3. M. Uddin and A. R. Chowdhury, “Integration of Nanotechnology into the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum,” presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, Oslo, Norway, 2001 (unpublished).4. S. J. Fonash, “Education and Training of the Nanotechnology Workforce,” J. Nanoparticle Research 3 (1), 79-82 (2001).5. A. B. Ellis, T. F. Kuech, G. C. Lisensky, D. J. Campbell, S. M. Condren, and K. J. Nordell, “Making the Nanoworld Comprehensible: Instructional Materials for Schools and Outreach,” J
provide a standard set of project management materials for use ina course or to be used independently by students who are interested in strengthening their skills. Teams will be expected to follow the standard team operating procedures outlined for thesophomore year. In the junior year, instructors may choose to be less involved in reviewing teamnorms and meeting records.3. Senior Course: Professional Design Problem Core Concepts Projects require vision Projects require innovation Team Activities Very open structure Multi-disciplinary skills Division of work on team Encourage a team
running the workshops.References 1. Brown, D. E., & Scherer, W. T. (2000). A Comparison of Systems Engineering Programs in the United States. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 30(2), 204-212. 2. Fabrycky, W. J. & McCrae, E. A. (2005). Systems Engineering Degree Programs in the United States. INCOSE International Symposium 15(1), 833-847. 3. Squires, A. & Cloutier R. (2010). Evolving the INCOSE Reference Curriculum for a Graduate Program in Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering 13(4), 381-388. 4. International Council on Systems Engineering, & Stevens Institute of Technology Systems Engineering Research Center. (2015). 2016
. One session is called “The Making of theAutomobile” and is coordinated by students in Mechanical Engineering. The othersession is titled “Learning New Ways of Making Things” and is taught by students in theProgram in Manufacturing (PIM) and students in the ERC. We have several masters anddoctoral students in the ERC who were first introduced to the University of Michigan andto the ERC through the DAPCEP program.Science Club. ERC students have, for several years, volunteered their time to work withsmall groups of children (usually 1:2 or 1:3) on science projects at the PattengillElementary School.SE Michigan Science Fair. One of the most prestigious high school science fairs in thecountry is the Southeast Michigan Science Fair in Ann Arbor
B.S./M.S./Ph.D.degrees in 9 Engineering disciplines (Aerospace, Architecture, Biomedical, Chemical, Civil,Computer, Electrical, Environmental, and Mechanical), a B.S./M.S./Ph.D. in Computer Science,and B.S. degrees in 6 Engineering Technology programs (Architecture, ConstructionManagement, Electrical, Fire and Safety, and Mechanical). All CEAS degree programs are 5-years in duration, because of a mandatory paid cooperative (co-op) education requirement.Through co-op, students alternate semesters of classwork and industry for the middle 3 years,gaining over 1.5 years of full-time work experience. Also, UC’s CEAS includes the ACCEND(ACCelerated Engineering Degree) program, which offers these students the opportunity tocomplete both a B.S. and
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering”Design Simulation, Dynamic Designer, or both. As with the other projects, prototyping is also arequirement (see Figure 11).Figure 10 - Student product design project Figure 11 - 3D print of corkscrew designResearchIn 2003 the Autodesk Manufacturing Systems Division agreed to a proposal, submitted by theauthor, requesting funding and technical support. This support is being used to developinstructional materials demonstrating ways in which Autodesk and downstream partner softwarecan be employed to integrate a modern engineering mechanics curriculum. As part of thisagreement, any materials developed in the course
Process Industry", Advance in Environmental Research, vol. 8, no. 2, 2003.15 Bagajewicz M, Rodera H., and Savelski M. J., "Energy Efficient Water Utilization Systems in Process Plants", Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 26, no. 1, 2002.16 Rodera H., Savelski M. J., and Bagajewicz M., "Energy Retrofit with Simultaneous Optimization for a Crude Fractionation Unit", Latin American Applied Research, vol. 31, no. 5, 2001.17 Farrell S., Hesketh R. P., Savelski M. J., and Slater C. S., “A model for collaboration between academia and industry”, Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering, Session B4, Prague, Czech Republic, August 2004.18 Farrell, S. Hesketh, R.P., Savelski, M.J., Dahm, K., Slater, C
significantly different in its educa-tional, financial and administrative approaches to the operation of the university. Some ofthese differences are unique to AAU, but many are common to the Danish educational systemand others to the European educational systems [1], [3].The university will have grown approximately six fold in the first 30 years. Few doctorateinstitutions can claim this degree of success, and AAU is one of only two technical universi- Page 9.943.1“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copy- right 2004, American Society for Engineering
inthe population mix. The uncontrolled and high birthrates of last decades have yielded a crop ofmillions of demanding jobless and barred-from-universities. Studies in new internationalsituations have shown that the only way to overcome this crisis is achievement of technologicaldevelopment, so that internal needs are satisfied and high-tech exports of technical andengineering services with high added-value are increased"IT" is one of the technologies that can play a significant role in this scene. Development of thistechnology will greatly affect the development of other technologies, increased productivity,improvement of services, and reduction of unemployment with a diverse set of various new jobs.The main difference between this technology
holds a temporary faculty appointment with the U.S. Navy Naval Surface Warfare Center at Crane, Indiana and has worked with Naval Postgraduate School, John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU-APL), the United States Missile Defense Agency, and Honeywell Aerospace. He holds a BSc. and MSc. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a Ph.D. in Aero- nautics and Astronautics from Purdue University. He is a co-chair of International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Complex Systems Working Group and a Certified Systems Engineering Profes- sional (CSEP). He is also a senior member of the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) and Institute of Electrical and
), Dissertation Abstracts International, DAI-B, 63(03), 1512.4. Huxley, M. (2003). Pro/E Wildfire: Intuitive, scalable. CADalyst, 20(2), 30-36.5. Rong, Y. and Bai, Y. (1997). Automated generation of fixture configuration design. Journalof Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 119, 208-219.6. Newman, W. and Lamming, M. (1995). Interactive system design. New York:Addison-Wesley Publishers.7. O’Charoen, V., Kashef, A., and Gilpin. A. (2002). ToolTRAIN: An Interactive ComputerizedMultimedia Tutorial for Modular Fixturing Design Instruction. Proceedings of the 56th AnnualMid-Year Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD), ASEE, Berkeley,CA, 133-138.8. Gay, L. (1996). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application
school’s computer laboratory, capable of multimediapresentations, and giving each participant a workstation to use if necessary.The topics comprising the sessions, as they occurred in chronological order during the workshop,were: 1. The looming problem: a shortage of scientists and engineers. 2. What is engineering, and how is it different from science? 3. The engineering design process. 4. Calculations, significant figures, and scientific notation. 5. Collecting and reporting data. Accuracy vs. precision. Sources of error. 6. Physical units and dimensions. How can these guide you in solving a problem? 7. Estimation problems, and reasonableness/validity checks. Visualizing the magnitude of a result of a computation or
analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Program Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2022 ASEE conference.Titiksha Singh © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comExploring how students attend to the nature and dynamics of complexity in their design problemsAbstractAuthentic design problems necessarily reflect the complexity of real-world dynamic, open systems thathave numerous components and nonobvious connections across different systems or
Engineering. He teachesundergraduate courses in machine design and statics as well as advises senior engineering student teams working onindustrially sponsored capstone design projects. He also teaches a senior-level undergraduate international designproject course and has taught graduate-level courses in innovation and technology management.Mark Urban-Lurain is Director of Instructional Technology Research and Development in the Division of Scienceand Mathematics Education at Michigan State University. He is responsible for providing vision, direction, planningand implementation for using technology mathematics and science education and developed several introductorycomputer science courses for non-computer science students serving 2000 students per