Session 2242 A Design Project Management Course at RIT E. C. Hensel, P. H. Stiebitz Mechanical Engineering / Industrial and Systems Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 14623-5604Abstract Rochester Institute of Technology is currently implementing a college-wide initiative toincorporate multi-disciplinary design as a central theme for all students in the capstone designsequence. For several years, the Kate Gleason College of Engineering has supported a number ofmulti-disciplinary design teams
Paper ID #26352Factors Influencing the Interest Levels of Male versus Female Students goinginto STEM Fields (Evaluation)Dr. Murad Musa Mahmoud, Wartburg College Murad is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. Research interests include recruitment into STEM, diversity in STEM as well pedagogy and instruction.Ms. Jessica Marie Faber, Wartburg College Jessica is a student at Wartburg College studying Engineering Science with a minor in Creative Writing and Mathematics. She is active with soccer at Wartburg and works
& Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Students submitted bi-weekly technical progress reports and made presentations, which in theend were condensed to a Technical Report, a Power Point presentation, and a Poster. On the lastday, each team gave a one-hour presentation, which along with the technical report and posterwas, judged by an invited panel of professional civil engineers, and a faculty member from theFine Arts who had the expertise to judge visual aspects of the presentation. Thus, the REU Site provided the students with experience in using state-of-the-art testing anddata recording equipment, and a "total" experience of: learning, research, report writing
Cooper is Professor and Associate Head for Graduate Programs in the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in Physics from the University of Virginia in 1982, his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Illinois in 1988, and he was a postdoctoral research associate at AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1988-1990. His research interests include optical spectroscopic studies of novel magnetic and superconducting materials at high pressures, high magnetic fields, and low temperatures. Since 2013, he has co-taught (with Celia Elliott) a graduate-level technical writing course each spring to physics and engineering graduate students.Dr. Lynford Goddard, University of Illinois
emphasis on context-- there was a discussion of current bridge evaluation practices, but I feel it might be more effective to learn more about current bridge evaluation techniques first. Let us write our own hypothesis before we see the data (maybe read a prompt and come in with a hypothesis), to have some measuring stick. Required reading is tricky at Oregon Tech, though. You seem to have a lot listed, which is overwhelming and arguably dismissable. Then let us ask our own questions to explore, perhaps
possiblecauses, the troubleshooter might select one cause to test. Based on the results of that test, thetroubleshooter will either conclude they found the cause of the error and proceed to repair it ordecide that is not the cause and test another option. The observed themes in this study areorganized according to these four basic tasks.In two studies from an undergraduate electronics lab, Dounas-Frazer et al. [5] and Van DeBogart et al. [6] promote the ability to troubleshoot as a fundamental skill. There is a lack ofmethods to assess troubleshooting. Van De Bogart et al. [6] addressed this by designing atroubleshooting exercise in which pairs of students had to identify and correct two faults in anelectric circuit and ‘think aloud’ as they did so. By
taking notesfrom a chalkboard in a lecture hall, and then doing homework assignments on their own usingthe material they took notes on in class, students in a flipped (or inverted) class watch pre-recorded video lectures before attending class, and during class they use the material theyalready learned about in the video lectures to complete active-learning exercises with theirclassmates under the guidance of their instructor. According to Strelan and Osborn [1] “whatdistinguishes a flipped classroom from traditional teaching is not so much that information ispre-recorded, or that students engage with fundamental information using technology outside thelecture theatre but, rather, that students have an opportunity to engage in active learning
AC 2012-4115: PRACTICING NEEDS-BASED, HUMAN-CENTERED DE-SIGN FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROJECT COURSE INNOVA-TIONDr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University Shawn Jordan is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University, where he teaches junior- and senior-level project-based electrical engineering courses.Mr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University, where he teaches undergraduate, human-centered design-focused, project-based engineering courses
graduate student agency.IntroductionThe first year of graduate school is not only a time of intense learning and skill development, butis also often a time for rapid identity growth and change for students. In the first year, studentsundertake a fundamental identity shift from student to researcher [1] and this can producefeelings of uncertainty leading to frustration, aka "angst"[4]. Graduate students may also becontinuing their important transition to a professional disciplinary identity as expected inundergraduate programs [3]. Erickson's model of identity development emphasized theimportance of points of tension as opportunities for individuals to deepen or clarify their sense ofidentity [5]. Identity development studies show that
Paper ID #44352Enabling K-14 Educators in Developing and Deploying Advanced ManufacturingCurriculaDr. MD B. Sarder, Bowling Green State University Dr. Sarder is a professor & director of the School of Engineering at Bowling Green State University (BGSU). Prior to joining BGSU, he worked at the U.S. Air Force Academy as a distinguished research fellow. He served as an associate professor, and graduate director of the logistics, trade, and transportation program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). Dr. Sarder has a record of excellence in research, teaching, and services as evidenced by the number of funded
describe all the elements to be considered that should be modeled into thesimulator (e.g., number of servers).Step 3: Please thoroughly describe how you would go about solving this task (your strategy forfinding the solution to this problem). Also, please describe why you made each decision.Examples of things you can consider in your solution are: - Inputs and outputs of the simulator - What would be the rules of the simulator - Type of data structure to be used (if required)Step 4: Describe your potential solution using a model (or models).Note: It is not required from you to implement the solution, nor to write the code in paper. Whatwe are interested in is on how you understand the problem and how would you approach
at Virginia Tech University is approximately 30,000 (on- andoff-campus). Out of these, 10,000 belong to the College of Engineering and within that, 550 areCivil and Environmental Engineering majors. As a requirement for graduation, CivilEngineering majors have to take seven out of eight Fundamental courses, one of which isIntroduction to Geotechnical Engineering. Almost 100% of the Civil Engineering majors takethis course, yielding a total of 100 students per semester, split in two or three sections, dependingon the number of available instructors. Furthermore, they need to complete four advancedclasses within three specialty areas (seven in total). Other advanced undergraduate geotechnicalcourses offered are: Methods in Geotechnical
experimental measurement is taken. The module required students to perform some fundamental soldering. It also required the introduction and use of an analog to digital converter (ADC). Prior modules could all be done with digital signal information.Module 5: Temperature. This module introduces the fundamentals of temperature measurements. Several temperature measurement sensors were introduced including, resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), thermistors, infrared temperature sensors, thermocouples, and silicon bandgap sensors. The students selected a minimum of two sensor experiments. For remote safety considerations, the thermal testing was restricted to temperatures between the limits of ice-water to boiling water. This module required a
the US has been impacted by the 2020 COVID epidemic, resulting in amassive shift to online instruction. Although some universities have managed to keep somenumber of students on campus on a rotating basis, many courses had to switch with little noticeto a virtual format. While this is reasonably easy to do for a lecture-only course, laboratorycourses by their nature are difficult to switch to an online only version. Past research has manyexamples of attempts to deliver laboratory experiences in a remote or virtual format, but theselabs may fall short of providing a thorough laboratory experience and are not designed to allowremote and non-remote students to collaborate.Feisel and Rosa established the fundamental goals of engineering teaching
Paper ID #8936Teamwork, Innovation, and Student Engagement in Technology Entrepreneur-ship – A Case StudyDr. Anthony Joseph, Pace University Page 24.1177.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Teamwork, Innovation, and Student Engagement in Technology Entrepreneurship – A Case StudyAbstractHardly any evidence exists to support purposeful innovation and entrepreneurship educationspecifically targeted to computing students in comparison to engineering students. Becausecomputing is closely
Paper ID #25694The 5Ws of the Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of KnowledgeDr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a dedicated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Leadership Award
Paper ID #38333Problem Based Learning as a Framework for a ResearchExperience for TeachersStephanie Philipp (Assistant Professor) Stephanie Philipp, Ph.D. is an assistant professor of science education at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. She serves as a the Interim Director of the STEM Education Program and is a liaison between STEM departments and education for professional development and educational research. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Problem Based Learning as a Framework
Paper ID #32789A Comprehensive Professional Development Program for K-8 Teachers toTeach Computer ScienceProf. Leen-Kiat Soh, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Leen-Kiat Soh is a Professor at the Computer Science and Engineering Department at the Univer- sity of Nebraska. His research interests are in multiagent systems, computer-aided education, computer science education, and intelligent image analysis. He has applied his research to smart grids, computer- supported collaborative learning, survey informatics, geospatial intelligence, and intelligent systems. He is a member of IEEE, ACM, and AAAI.Dr. Gwen Nugent
Resources DesignAbstractA first semester, senior level civil and environmental engineering course, Water ResourcesDesign is, for most, the first experience for students at Florida Gulf Coast University in workingwith non-trivial design projects. To make the course experience as transferable as possible tofuture graduate engineering employment, students learn and apply hydraulic software to projectdevelopment and execution. The course takes an innovative case study approach with 5 designprojects required with rotating teams assigned to each project. The projects are taken from "realworld" engineering problem assignments which impart to students an appreciation of theconstraints and uncertainties inherent in the design process. Project 1 necessitates
from “totally agree” to “totally disagree”. The facilitator would then invite sharing ofperspectives along the spectrum, to engage the group in social knowledge construction. Students could beasked to breakout into small groups and craft pitches on portable whiteboards, and a facilitator wouldinvite a few groups to pitch the audience on their ideas for startups.As the Harvard education strategist Tony Wagner writes “The world doesn’t care what you know, it caresabout what you can do with what you know”[15]. There is clear opportunity for university libraries toform partnerships to develop a new layer of experiences focused on entrepreneurship that go beyondcontent delivery. The work herein reflects a collaborative partnership between two
on the effectiveness of the service as well as its impact on theirpersonality and academic achievement.In the realm of academic achievement, tutors stated that tutoring is not only beneficial for thetutees but the tutor as well. They indicated that it specifically helped them solidify theirunderstanding of fundamental Engineering principles and allowed them to perform well in jobs’interviews. A couple of students felt their involvement in the center helped them improve theircommunication skills.In their evaluation of the students’ involvement and participation, all tutors agreed that the centerwas well received and had increased participation throughout the semester. Students indicatedthat tutored students’ benefits were not limited to the
Paper ID #30104Measuring student computational thinking in engineering and mathematics:Development and validation of a non-programming assessmentMr. Timothy Ryan Duckett, The University of Toledo T. Ryan Duckett is a research associate with Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC., a program evalu- ation and grant writing company that specializes in STEM and early childhood education. He is a PhD student in the Research and Measurement department at the University of Toledo.Dr. Gale A Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC Gale A. Mentzer, PhD, the owner and director of Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC, has been a pro
slowed, and course outcomes made less ambitious.2.2.1 Syllabus changesThe outcomes changed significantly to reflect the reduction in design. The goal was to at leastprovide the students with the fundamentals of programming necessary for future courses and co-op work terms. So much of (software) design instruction requires time, and good communicationbetween learner and teacher; and importantly requires repeated practice with expert feedback,which is very difficult to implement remotely. For the course outcomes given below, the part inbold was for both 2019 and 2020, and all other parts were for 2019 only. At the end of this course students will have demonstrated their abilities to: Solve software design problems at an introductory
Paper ID #43129Design Iterations as Material Culture Artifacts: A Qualitative Methodologyfor Design Education ResearchDr. Grant Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Grant A. Fore, Ph.D. is the Assistant Director of Research and Evaluation in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. As a trained anthropologist, he possesses expertise in qualitative methods and ethnographic writing. His primary research interest is in the teaching and learning of ethics in higher education through community-engaged and place-based pedagogies. ©American Society for
) passed the course.This group had a Semester GPA of 3.26 and 46.67% of the students made the semester Dean’sList. It is easy to see that this group vastly outperformed Group #4, thus leading credibility to the“intervention eligibility cutoff” score of “75 or below.” Data from Groups #4 and #5 were testedfor statistical significance. It was found that Exam 1 Grade, Grade in Course, and Semester GPAwere all statistically different (at the .001 level). Thus, there are fundamental variables thatsegregate these two groups. Clearly, setting the “at-risk” level at a score of 75 on the first examproduces these two populations and lends credibility to the use of this level in the future.Conclusions and Discussion: The College of Engineering at NC State is
expectation of whatwould happen in graduate school. Senge’s theory of the learning organization hypothesizes thatin any pursuit of higher education, the individual must undergo a fundamental shift of mind inorder to grasp a deeper meaning learning [30]. For Ricky, he achieved that mindset shift after heencountered his first major setback in graduate school, which was failing his qualifying exam,the first milestone in the Doctoral degree process. If the student underestimates what is necessaryto be successful in their new position because they are unaware of their expectations, as was thecase for Ricky when he first entered his doctoral program, the student will be unable to properlycarry out their responsibilities to the best of their ability
Paper ID #29580Examining the Role of LEGO Robots as Artifacts in STEM Classrooms(Fundamental)Dr. Shramana Ghosh, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Shramana Ghosh received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University of California, Irvine in 2017, her Masters in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2013, and her Bachelors in Manufacturing Processes and Automation Engineering from University of Delhi in 2011. She is currently working as a postdoctoral associate at the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, NY, USA. In this role she supports
) 5. Synthesize and Integrate the Best Evidence into a Joint Position: The four members of the group drop all advocacy to synthesize and integrate what they learned. Each group creates a synthesis of what is now known; our experience is that they do not have difficulty with this, possibly because of the dual perspectives they have taken. They summarize a joint position to which both sides agreed. Subsequently, they (a) prepare a cooperative report with each member of the group selecting a topic supporting the synthesis and writing a paragraph supported by the research; (b) combine their paragraphs into a single paper and refine the flow of the paper; (c) present their conclusions to the class
a professor in my department who has been able to write me several letters of recommendation that have successfully helped me obtain scholarships.2. My high school junior and senior year summer breaks were full of the engineering camps run by past Ambassadors at the University of Utah. This was my first interaction with engineering and the university, which played a fundamental part in my pursuit of Civil Engineering. Through past Ambassadors I felt connected to the university and the College of Engineering. During my second semester I became a part of the Ambassador team which helped me feel like I contributed by sharing my passion for engineering with prospective students. I have also gained leadership skills through
, natural andsocial sciences, humanities and writing. The authors estimated that these constraints limitengineering education to roughly 2 to 2 ½ years in a typical baccalaureate degree plan.In subsequent articles2-5, the above observations were expanded upon and two curricular modelswere proposed that would utilize current resources available in engineering and engineeringtechnology programs to address some of the issues they describe while also fulfilling Departmentof Education requirements for a first professional degree. The first option revolves around a two-year common curriculum for all engineering and engineering technology students while thesecond is based on the idea of a professional degree in engineering analogous to law or medicine.In