Online (out-of-class) Content o Start early – creating digital content takes much longer than writing notes on a board. You will need to re-record audio or video files multiple times. Consider transitioning to a flipped classroom over multiple semesters, if desired. o Provide additional scaffolding since material will be viewed asynchronously. o Design your own content to fit your teaching style and your course objectives. o Audio quality is paramount. Find a quiet place to record and invest in a good microphone, if possible. Practice speaking level, distance from device, speed and enunciation. 2. Keeping video length short o It takes careful planning to
Paper ID #10737Critical Thinking, Reflective Practice, and Adaptive Expertise in EngineeringNathan Hicks, University of Florida Current graduate student in materials science and engineering at the University of Florida. Spent three years teaching high school math and science before returning to graduate school for an advanced degree.Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of FloridaDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Associate Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Dean’s Fellow for Engi- neering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. He conducts research
argued that the maintenance of technological progress is dependent on the ampleuse of science and, the educational system that provides the qualified men and women toinitiate this utilisation. It is evident that the British were very slow to realise the practicalpossibilities of scientific discoveries. For example it took forty years for Faraday’sdiscoveries to be realised in the dynamo. Lilley cites the case of the synthetic dye industrywhere British discoveries were taken over by the Germans and a large chemical industryestablished. One of the reasons given for this was the academic attainment of and the largenumbers of people working with appropriate qualifications in German industry [9, p61 ff].But writes Lilley, the origins of German pre
first year. In their book chapter onthe use of personal narratives as an analytical research tool, Tedder and Biesta write: “Narrativesthus reveal why it was necessary [...] the life had gone in a particular way. This means thatnarration is not only about the construction of a particular ‘version’ of one’s life; it is at the sametime a construction of a particular ‘version’ of the self” [41]. In rewriting his prior idealistic self,Corvin may be revealing a discomfort he currently feels about the changes he has undergoneduring his four years of college. As a senior, he has a good job lined up with a company and isexcited about doing work that he feels is important and interesting. Yet he is not directlychanging the world by working in clean
Engineering Leadership Academy. She also provides oversight for student professional development curriculum and programs, including the Fundamentals of Engineering exam. She is founder and co-chair of the college’s Strategic Planning and Assessment Resource Team and is a key member of the University’s Institutional Effectiveness Oversight Committee. As a founding member of the Academic Affairs Assessment Team, she was instrumental in helping to develop campus-wide tools that enhance the efficiency of data collection and reporting. As co-PI on several projects, including four current NSF projects, Patricia contributes her expertise in the areas of the freshman-year experience
of Pittsburgh, Karen Bursic, University of Pittsburgh, Sam Spiegel, University of Pittsburgh, Kacey G. Marra, University of Pittsburgh.Dr. Nur Ozge Ozaltin ¨ Nur Ozge ¨ Ozaltin received her master’s degree and Ph.d. in the Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her B.S. in industrial engineering at Bogazici University in Turkey. She studies improving innovation through modeling the design process. Her methods include Bayesian network modeling, statistical and qualitative data analysis.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate Professor and Fulton C. Noss Faculty Fellow in Industrial
2.7 administration fundamentals Understanding of the role of the leader and 3.8 1.5 4 2.7 leadership principles and attitudes Understanding of the profession I plan to pursue 2.0 1.9 2 4.2 This course prepared me for my chosen career 2.2 1.9 2 4.3Despite the low popularity of the course, a number of the targeted learning outcomes wereachieved, based on student ratings. Toward assessment for ABET, the departmental goal is tohave at least three courses with ratings of four or higher for each A-K outcome. Based onaverage student ratings, this course met those goals in two areas; using median ratings, the
. Faculty conducting research are notaccustomed to rigid schedules or timelines on a daily basis as one cannot predict exactly whenthe research will yield substantial results or when one is inspired to write for research papers topeer-reviewed publication. Teachers work by a daily structure with detailed lesson plans, periodsand bell schedules meeting prescribed local, state or national standards. In turn, the RETprogram provided a much more detailed schedule with activities and tasks to be carried outduring the day (e.g., reading research papers for 1 hour followed by 30 minutes discussion) withsome flexibility to be carried out at the teachers’ discretion.Defining lesson plans versus research findings. This program was not structured like
have also used different strategies to organize my lectures Teaching the Metric system in the context of nanotechnology. The students learned and were successful in quantitative units conversion problems. I have increased discussion of energy efficient electronics science in my Materials Science course. This reaches 30 students per year. Students seem to appreciate the material. I have introduced new material on electricity grid fundamentals/challenges/opportunities, etc related to renewable energy. We use the electricity grid simulator from my RET project. Students love visualizing and interacting with the grid in a more tangible manner. The feedback is very positive, and students
, and capabilities. Like literacy in other areas, the goal of technological literacy is to providepeople with tools to participate intelligently and thoughtfully in the world around them. Post-Secondary Technological Literacy Classes and Curriculum Compiling information about technological literacy classes (TLCs) for liberal arts majorsat fifteen institutions was intended to provide resources to faculty interested in developingcourses3. The paper briefly traced the history of TLCs through 1959 through the 1990’s anddeveloped a working definition of technological literacy of The ability to understand, intelligently discuss and appropriately use concepts, procedures and terminology fundamental to work of (and typically
AC 2010-1537: IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: DEFINING AND STUDYINGINTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONLisa Lattuca, Pennsylvania State UniversityDavid Knight, The Pennsylvania State University David Knight is a doctoral student in the Higher Education Program and a graduate research assistant in the Center for the Study of Higher Education at Penn State. Page 15.710.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 In the Eye of the Beholder: Defining and Studying Interdisciplinarity in Engineering EducationAbstractThe philosophical, practical, and empirical literature on interdisciplinarity
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20697Strengthening Community College Engineering Programs through Alterna-tive Learning Strategies: Developing Resources for Flexible Delivery of a Ma-terials Science CourseDr. Erik N Dunmire, College of Marin Erik Dunmire is a professor of engineering and chemistry at College of Marin. He received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from University of California, Davis. His research interests include broadening access to and improving success in lower-division STEM education.Mr. Thomas Rebold, Monterey Peninsula
Paper ID #29715A Model for a Faculty Development Course Redesign Summer Working GroupDr. Michelle M Blum, Syracuse University Dr. Blum is interested in research in improving undergraduate engineering education; including develop- ment of inquiry based activities for first year engineering courses, improvement of student design projects, hands-on activities, professional skills development and inclusion and outreach activities. Dr. Blum also specializes in high performance materials development and characterization for tribological (friction and wear), structural, and biomedical applications.Dr. Katie D. Cadwell, Syracuse
the lab and going to our work area. And this is the whole of the canoe which concrete gets placed on. And then that's how the canoe is created. So, I think this glimpse made me feel like an engineer because throughout my college career so far, most of our work has been just very ... Like writing, you don't actually get to see real-world applications.”Under theme 2, students described spaces where they were able to get together with other students tosocialize and plan outside of the classroom setting such as crafting projects, club meetings, and potlucks.One University B student described her crafting project, Figure 4: Cider made by RedShirt student to unwind after a test. “I was like in a quiz
Paper ID #33070A University-designed Middle School Remote Summer Engineering AcademyMrs. Zahraa Krayem Stuart, Stony Brook University Zahraa Krayem Stuart received Bachelor of Engineering in Electrical Engineering from Stony Brook University in 2016. In 2017, she joined the PhD program in Electrical Engineering Statistical Signal Processing. Zahraa designs, develops, and instructs engineering teaching laboratories for both high school and middle school students since 2016.Dr. Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University M´onica F. Bugallo is the Vice Provost of Faculty Affairs and Diversity, Equity & Inclusion and Professor
Paper ID #13243Self-Directed Summer Design Experience Across Disciplines and the GlobeDr. Christopher Joseph Lombardo, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Dr. Christopher Lombardo is an Assistant Director of Undergraduate Studies and Lecturer at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Dr. Lombardo received Bachelor of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering and Physics from the University of Maryland at College Park and a Master of Science and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Electrical Engineering from the The University of Texas at Austin. Outside of the classroom, Dr. Lombardo
research projects, working towardssignificant findings, and delivering oral and written presentations of the results [19].On the other hand, research conducted within a laboratory is typically confined to hands-onexperiments and the subsequent writing of lab reports. The scholars pressed that this distinctionis crucial to avoid conflating the broader research experience with the specific activities carriedout in a research laboratory setting [19]. Such insights underscore the importance of recognizingthat research experiences can encompass various activities beyond traditional lab work,contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the research landscape thatundergraduates navigate.MethodsThe approach used in this study employed
supportable, aninteresting contradiction emerges. Despite the fact that it should be easier, and arguably morevalid, to compare programs than universities, the authors found significantly fewer studies and orsystems to do so. Notably, some high volume programs, such as the MBA, have engendereddisciplinary based comparison/ranking schemes [15], but there are considerably fewer of thesethan there are of university comparisons [16, 17]. One possible reason for this might be a lack ofconsensus as to the metrics used to evaluate programs. Leaders in our various fields of studyseem to have difficulty in reaching a consensus on criteria and how to create a ranking systemfor their discipline. This challenge is direct evidence of the fundamental observation
to gain insight into the motivations andconceptions of the authors and their audiences, but most of the evidence produced so far by our 2 analysis is quantitative.Although advocates of the T-shaped ideal often mention global competitiveness as a motivationfor developing T-shaped professions, it is not clear to what extent the discussion is aninternational versus a distinctively American phenomenon. To get some sense of the scope of theconversation, we compared publications on the topic in English and in German, the languages inwhich we write, read, and publish. To get a sense of the distribution of national affiliationswithin the ASEE corpus
Paper ID #38817A comparison of shared mental model measurement techniques used inundergraduate engineering contexts: A systematic reviewMr. Gregory Litster, University of Toronto Greg Litster is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto in the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice. He received his MASc degree in Man- agement Sciences (2022) and a Bachelor of Knowledge Integration degree (2020), both from the Univer- sity of Waterloo. His research interests are focused on mental models for engineering design teams, group dynamics and how collaboration
Paper ID #38939Character Development in the Engineering Classroom: An Exploratory,Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student Perspectives on CultivatingCharacterDr. Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University Dr. Jessica Koehler is a Visiting Scholar of Leadership and Character for the Wake Forest Department of Engineering supporting with the development and assessment of character and ethics education in the engineering program.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is Founding Chair and Professor of the new Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University - a private, liberal arts, research
pedagogicalpractice are remedial education and so called “developmental education,” a practice commonlyoccurring in community colleges. Moss and Yeaton define remediation as a practice that isguided by learning theory and includes non-credit courses that address fundamental skills thatstudents lack that is determined by college placement examinations.25 Alternatively, per Mossand Yeaton, developmental education considers the life experiences of the students in addition totheir entering skill level. Developmental education emphasizes the need for students to becomeindependent and have self-regulation in their learning, rather than focusing on a deficitperspective of education, as is the case with remediation. As an illustration of this type ofpedagogical
related content (i.e., lectures, homework assignments) intheir traditional curricular courses (i.e., reaction engineering). The introduction of new content orthe proposal of new courses always face the constraint of the limited availability of time in awell-packed traditional curriculum. Chemical engineering students at our institution follow arigid sequence of six pillar semester courses after the common first-year engineering courses.These pillar courses provide for the career fundamentals (mass and energy balances,thermodynamics, transport phenomena, reaction engineering, process control and processdesign). These lecture courses are reinforced with simultaneous specific laboratory courses. Thecurriculum is enriched with additional mathematical
Paper ID #38917Applying a Competency-Based Education Approach for Designing a UniqueInterdisciplinary Graduate Program: A Case Study for a SystemsEngineering ProgramDr. Amy Thompson, University of Connecticut Dr. Amy Thompson joined UConn in August 2017 as an Associate Professor-In-Residence of Systems Engineering and as the Associate Director for the Institute for Advanced Systems Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She currently teaches graduate-level engineering courses in model-based sys- tems engineering and systems engineering fundamentals, and coordinates the online graduate programs in Advanced Systems
Laboratories, where he led teams in reviews of projects and taught courses in design and creativity to newly forming teams. At NCR Corporation he was a manager and consulting analyst in software development projects. He has a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering from Wright State University, Dayton, OH and has attended HBDI workshops.Monika Lumsdaine, E&M Lumsdaine Solar Consultants, Inc. Monika Lumsdaine is management consultant for corporate behavior, with a B.S. degree in mathematics. She won a national design award for the design of a passive solar home from DOE/HUD. She has extensive technical writing experience in solar energy, product quality, and engineering design, including co
Paper ID #38594Exploring the Use of Social Media in Engineering Education—PreliminaryFindings from a Systematic Literature ReviewMr. Khondhaker Al Momin, University of Oklahoma Khondhaker Al Momin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Civil Engineering at Daffodil Interna- tional University in Dhaka, Bangladesh. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) and Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree in Civil Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology (BUET). He is pursuing a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Transportation Engineering at the University of Okla- homa (OU) in Norman, USA. Alongside his
. Bryman 7 suggests that more attention be paid to the writing of mixed methods articles,going a step further to suggest that the “fundamental issue of the degree to which mixed methodsresearchers genuinely integrate their findings has not been addressed (p.8).” A study byengineering education researchers in 2009 discussed the ways that engineering educationresearchers could utilize educational research methods 8. Their results indicate that engineeringeducation researchers could address their methods and evaluation criteria for their methods moreexplicitly. If engineering educations researchers are to maximize the impact of the data theycollect, we argue that quantitative and qualitative data must be both integrated and reported in a
engineering students. The results indicate students who had taken one or moreentrepreneurship courses were more likely to have the desire to start their own business or workfor a small business or startup. They were also significantly more confident in specificentrepreneurial self-efficacy measures including their ability to ‘write a clear and completebusiness plan’ and ‘recognize when an idea is good enough to support a major business venture’.These students also possessed statistically significant higher levels of risk tolerance. Another recent quantitative study called the Entrepreneurship Education Projectinvestigates the motivational processes of three groups of undergraduate students participating inentrepreneurship (entrepreneurship
both technical and non-technical skills were important for a person to besuccessful in ML/AI. First, all participants identified programming as an obvious technicalrequirement, as well as math and statistics fundamentals. In terms of non-technical skills,communication, particularly to a non-technical audience, was emphasised, “being able tocommunicate is really important...because of how difficult it can be to get people to understand what[AI] really is…many people just view it as a magic box that solves their problems and [it’s] soimportant to communicate that that’s not what it is.”Students also discussed the skill of understanding how technology fits into the bigger picture. Thiswas described as being “socially conscious,” “well rounded
practicethat can inform efforts to bring the realities of engineering work into engineering courses andcurricula, while also helping orient students to key challenges and issues they may face as theytransition from school to work.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.125423. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors also wish to acknowledge “Andrew,” our anonymous subject, as thispaper would have been impossible to write without his candid and thoughtful participation.References1. Wulf, W. (2003). 2003 annual meeting