Paper ID #8189EXCEED: Excellence in Your Engineering Education Summer TransitionProgramProf. Stacy Holander Gleixner, San Jose State University Dr. Stacy Gleixner is a Professor in Biomedical, Chemical and Materials Engineering. She is the direc- tor of San Jose State’s Microscale Process Engineering Center and Associate Chair of the Biomedical, Chemical and Materials Engineering Department. Dr. Gleixner has an active research program related to the fabrication and reliability solar cells, MEMS (micro electro mechanical systems), and microelectron- ics. She teaches a broad range of engineering classes in renewable energy
identity, (2) the engineering curriculum and what happens in the classroom, and (3)fundamental components of engineering practice. Downey and Lucena 3 affirm that not onlyengineering identity and what counts as engineering knowledge are closely related, but also bothengineering identity and engineering knowledge are tied to national identity and priorities of thetime. Moreover, epistemology and its pedagogical implications are critically important in thediscussion of systemic change and transformation of engineering education. For example, Olson 4and Riley 5,6 have offered an epistemological critique of outcome-based paradigm to show why asa viable program of change it is self-defeating, partly, due to epistemic rigidity.The main goal of this
research interests are learning design supported by technology, innovation in engineering education, sustainability in cloud computing, technological infrastructure.Ruben Orlando Baeza, Accion Integra An Industrial Manufacturing and Design Engineer with a Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering specializing in Data Science. He has experience as a Flutter software developer, excelling in creating innovative and efficient solutions. Additionally, he is the co-founder of Corporaci´on Acci´on Integra, an organization dedicated to supporting individuals within the autism spectrum, and has served as a university lecturer, sharing his knowledge and passion for engineering and technology with future generations.Dr. Luis Rojas
400 students will work concurrently on approximately 60projects. This paper discusses the educational objectives, structure, and management of thismultidisciplinary capstone program.IntroductionDuring the 2002-2003 academic year, the Kate Gleason College of Engineering (KGCOE) tookanother step to strengthen multidisciplinary design in the curricula. The extant capstoneexperiences in the Electrical, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering departments have beenconsolidated into a three quarter design program. Now in the second year, this pilot programinvolves 200 students, from these departments working on 28 projects. When fully deployed,approximately 400 students from the College’s five academic disciplines (MechanicalEngineering, Electrical
engineering doctoral students in the United States.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation’s Innovations inEngineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure program, under Grant No. 0935039. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Table 1: Skills Included on the Survey of Potential Ph.D. Candidates Learn independently Create proposals Work in teams Follow safety regulations Communicate in writing Provide technical support Communicate orally Optimize products/processes Solve problems
engineer at Boeing on the Joint Un- manned Combat Air Systems (JUCAS) program. Her research areas of interest include piezoelectrics, nanomanufacturing, optical measuring techniques, and intercultural design.Dr. Mario Simoni, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mario Simoni is Department Head and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Development of Enhanced Value, Feature, and Stakeholder Views for a Model-Based Design ApproachThe increasing complexity of the workplace that engineering students find upon graduationsuggests that they must be not only technical problem solvers
Paper ID #45418The Impact of Systems Thinking Education on Engineering Students’ Approachto Real-World ChallengesAmin Azad, University of Toronto Amin is a doctoral student at the University of Toronto’s Department of Chemical Engineering, pursuing a collaborative specialization in Engineering Education. Amin focuses on applying Systems Thinking Principles to Engineering Education and assessing its learning outcomes when solving wicked problems, especially in the field of Entrepreneurship through his research and teachings. Amin obtained his MASc. and BASc from the University of Toronto, both in Industrial Engineering, and
Conference, Vol. 6, ASME, 2010, pp. 647-659. 6. M. Frank and D. Elata, Developing the capacity for Engineering Systems thinking (CEST) of freshman engineering students, Systems Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2005, pp. 187-195. 7. M. Gorman, Turning students in to professionals, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2002, pp. 327-331. 8. International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE List of SE Programs July 2013, https://www.incose.org/educationcareers/academicprogramdirectory.aspx. 9. C. Jalain - D. Lafore, J. Chevalier and S. Banguet, Teaching systems engineering: a multidisciplinary project based feed-back on a pedagogic experiment: "EasyKawa 2004" project, 2005 European
Paper ID #37863Work in Progress: Moving Beyond Research: Supporting Engineering andComputing Identity Development for Latina StudentsDr. Sarah Rodriguez, Virginia Tech Sarah L. Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. In her research, she concentrates on identifying and asking urgent questions about systemic inequities such as racism, sexism, and classism that marginal- ized communities experience as they transition to and through their engineering and computing higher education experiences
bedrooms, kitchenette, living/dini ng area andprivate bath. Each is furnished with cooking utensils, incoming telephone and color television. The flats aremanaged and maintained by Vienna Hotels who provide a weekly cleaning and change of bed linen.Administration Page 7.1041.2Two tenured professors jointly administer the program, with offices in the Notre Dame Centre. The Centre'sexisting administrative/secretarial staff provides programmatic support. Two Resident Assistants, chosen because Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
, Data Mining, eGovernment and Personal Data Privacy. Page 12.1191.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Programming Games to Learn AlgorithmsAbstractThis paper discusses using the creation of computer games as a Computer Science coursecurriculum. It illustrates the benefits of such a curriculum, being that it would be a fun andengaging learning environment, it would attract new Computer Science students, and it wouldprovide a solid foundation for the understanding of how to create algorithms. It goes on tosuggest different kinds of games that could be assigned in a course, as well as the kinds ofalgorithms
degree and master’s of science degree in electrical engi- neering from Morgan State University and is presently working on his doctorate degree in STEM educa- tion. Martin has worked at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as a Power System Engineer. He has taught high school mathematics in the Baltimore City Public School System as well as mathematics at several colleges and universities. Just before coming to BDJ, Martin worked for the Maryland State Department of Education as a Regional Coordinator for Career and Technology Education, where he assisted many local school systems with their implementation and management of pre-engineering and technology programs. Martin is also
. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in Learning Objectives based Education Material Design and Development. Acharya is a co-author of ”Discrete Mathematics Applications for Information Systems Professionals- 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall”. He is a member of Nepal Engineering Association and is also a member of ASEE, and ACM. Acharya was the Principal Investigator of the 2007 HP grant for Higher Education at RMU. In 2013 Acharya received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant for developing course materials through an industry-academia
customized modules from Emona Instruments. TIMS isalso pricey ($100,000 for one basic setup), especially considering that more modules will beneeded to support a series of core courses in a wireless engineering curriculum.The transition of instruction from traditional wireless transmission to software radio transmissionhas already been noticed and is being pursued by institutions of higher education. For example,Professor C. Richard Johnson of Cornell University and Professor William A. Sethares ofUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison have written a new communication textbook entitledTelecommunication Breakdown: Concepts of Communication Transmitted via Software-DefinedRadio, in which they teach communication theory via building a software radio based
focuses on how students can consistently develop their talent throughout their educational experiences and how parents, school, and community support students, s ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Caregivers’ Roles in Supporting Children’s Engagement in Engineering Activities at Home (Fundamental)AbstractWe began this project with three goals: (1) engage families in engineering activities, (2) increasethe awareness of kids and caregivers as to what engineering is, and (3) increase children’ interestin engineering. We focused on caregivers and home environments because of the important rolethat at-home experiences with STEM play in triggering interest for many
. Page 11.1269.2Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2006, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1. Team Composition and ProcessAt a high level, the team is organized into 6 distinct areas. The Chemistry subject matterexperts (SME) and game designers primarily focus on the creation of educational andnon-educational conceptual content. The work from those two teams is fed to a conceptartist who is responsible for creating a visual represntation of all of the necessary mediaassets needed to implement the game. The visualizations from the concept artist are thenused by the art team, technical director, and programers to actually create
2006-979: REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS: UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITEDPOWER OF TITLE IX TO TRANSFORM STEM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMSCatherine Pieronek, University of Notre Dame Catherine Pieronek, J.D., is Assistant Director of Academic Programs and Director of the Women’s Engineering Program at the University of Notre Dame College of Engineering. She has worked as a senior systems engineer on NASA spacecraft projects at TRW Space & Defense Sector, and as Director of External Relations for the Notre Dame Law School. She serves as a faculty advisor and editorial referee for the Journal of College of University Law, a student-edited legal journal published by the Notre Dame Law School and the National
afairly complex schematic diagram, convert it to a printed circuit board, solder the electriccomponents into it, and test the board for application. Meanwhile, the project was conceived and conducted as a multidisciplinary project.The device is a mechatronic system, the interface and control requires a significantamount of programming, while the application is biological and environmental. Besidestwo professors from the Biological Sciences department, one Biology student was alsoinvolved to interact with the Mechanical Engineering students in developing the system.Therefore, the students needed to not only interact with professors from their owndisciplines, but also interact with faculty and students from other majors. In fact, theengineering
Ziaeefard is a PhD student and research assistant with Nonlinear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NASLab) in the Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include engineering education, control and navigation of autonomous underwater vehicles.Amy Joy Patterson, Michigan Technological University I am an undergraduate student at Michigan Technological University studying Psychology. I work as a research assistant for a number of departments at my university.Jacob Bailey, Nonlinear Autonomous Systems Laboratory c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Adding Meaningful Context to Robotics Program (Work in
AC 2010-1447: AN EXPERIENCE WITH CLOUD COMPUTING IN THECLASSROOMSusan Miertschin, University of Houston Susan L. Miertschin is an Associate Professor in Computer Information Systems at the University of Houston. She began her career in higher education teaching applied mathematics for engineering technology students. She demonstrated consistent interest in the application of information and communication technologies to instruction. This interest plus demonstrated depth of knowledge of computer applications and systems caused her to change her teaching focus to computer information systems in 2000. Recently, she has completed graduate course work in the area of Medical Informatics in order
sustainability education at thesystems engineering degree programs in US. The list of systems engineering academic programshas been obtained from the International Council on Systems Engineers[20]. Table 1 belowsummarizes our findings about these programs and the current state of their sustainability-relatedcoverage based on the program and university web pages.As seen in this table, out of the 47 programs 13 of them offer a BS degree in SystemsEngineering, 41 of them offer an MS and 14 of them offer PhD degrees in Systems Engineering.The web research showed that sustainability coverage is relatively rare in systems engineeringprograms: It seems that none of the systems engineering undergraduate programs offersustainability-related courses. There are
Advanced Materials and Smart Structures. He received his Ph.D. from Lehigh University. He conducts research and teaches courses related to advanced materials. Page 12.970.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Introducing Nanotechnology Education within Industrial Engineering Curriculum1. IntroductionIndustrial engineering (IE) programs are concerned with the design, improvement andinstallation of integrated systems of people, materials, information, equipment and energy [1]. Animportant part of industrial engineering curriculum focuses on product/process design
university. Ideally, this wouldallow for the demographics of the university to reflect the area it serves. As a system, the CSUhas ABET accredited engineering programs at 16 of its 23 regional campuses. These programstrail the national average for degree attainment by women in engineering. System-wide onlyabout 17% of degrees in engineering are awarded to women [3]. The low rate of women attainingengineering degrees at CSU campuses is influenced by several factors. Bowman highlightscompetition between the UC and CSU systems for students, a heavy reliance on communitycollege transfers, and a limited range of locally available degrees, all of which can restrictwomen’s participation at CSU [1]. With a system wide decrease of over 20,000 students
AC 2011-335: USING AN EXTENSION SERVICES MODEL TO INCREASEGENDER EQUITY IN ENGINEERINGElizabeth T. Cady, National Academy of Engineering Elizabeth T. Cady is a Program Officer at the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education of the National Academy of Engineering in Washington, DC.Norman L. Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering (Washington) Dr. Norman L. Fortenberry is the founding Director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). CASEE facilitates research on and deployment of, innovative policies, practices, and tools designed to enhance the effective- ness and efficiency of systems for the formal
Paper ID #47945Toward the Use of LLMs to Support Curriculum Mapping to EstablishedFrameworksMr. Eric L Brown, Tennessee Technological University Eric L. Brown is an education leader with over 28 years of experience in higher education, currently serving as the Associate Director of Workforce Development for the Cybersecurity, Education, Research, and Outreach Center at Tennessee Tech University. As a senior lecturer in the Computer Science department, Eric teaches various cybersecurity courses and agile-focused software engineering. His prior experiences include serving as a District Solutions Advocate for the Tennessee
Professor) Assistant Research Professor: My current responsibilities are managing National Science Foundation-funded engineering education projects. The focus is on graduating more underrepresented students and low-income students in Engineering.Aaron Mattingly Dr. Aaron Mattingly is currently the Assistant Director of the Multicultural Engineering Program at The Pennsylvania State University. He obtained his undergraduate degree at Vriginia Tech and Ph.D. at the University of California, San Francisco. He is passionate about equity and inclusion in STEM and supporting those underrepresented in the field.Tonya L. Peeples Tonya L. Peeples is the Penn State College of Engineering Associate Dean for Equity and Inclusion and a
Automotive Systems Engineering (ASE) Program at The Ohio State University has beenformulated as a “graduate specialization” (indicated as such on the student’s transcript) and isadministered by the Center for Automotive Research (CAR) at Ohio State. The primary objectiveof this program is to provide interdisciplinary graduate education and training in the engineeringdiscipline of primary interest to the student, while focusing on the application area of automotivesystems.Currently, the Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering participate inthe interdisciplinary ASE, with other departments in the College of Engineering to join in thefuture. Since CAR is not a degree granting entity, students wishing to participate in the
preparation for the ABET accreditation under the Engineering Criteria2000 (EC-2000)1, a set of educational objectives and outcome statements for each program wasfirst developed in 1999 and refined in 20022-4. The program objectives are in line with themissions of the department, college of engineering, and the institution. In addition theseobjectives are consistent with the requirements for ABET accreditation under the EngineeringCriteria 2000. These objectives have been reviewed and approved by the major constituencies ofeach department. A process is in place for systematic evaluation and updating of eachdepartment’s undergraduate educational objectives and outcomes and the engineering faculty aredirectly involved in the assessment process
provide real-time C++ code compilation and testing, we seek to ensure adequatecomprehension of the material presented in an introductory engineering/programming course.We have gathered statistically significant evidence that suggests a strong correlation between astudent’s performance on our automated gateway system and their upcoming exam performance.This indicates that the gateway assessment performance is indicative of overall courseperformance. We also present ideas for further adoption of our gateway system throughout theengineering education community.1. IntroductionCommon across many engineering schools, entering students are expected to complete a set ofcore courses, consisting of mathematics, science, physics, and computer programming
and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2006.8 T. L. Friedman. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2005.9 J. M. Grandin. The international engineering program at the University of Rhode Island. In Proceedings of the Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ, 1998.10 K. W. Hipel, N. Okada, and K. Fukuyama. The internationalization of engineering education: A tale of two countries. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C, 33(1), February 2003.11 F. Walbaum and H. Rogers. The impact of globalization on student preparation in Germany and the United States