acknowledge.Typically in the club context, the economic aspects are prioritized due to the scarcity of funds,and social acceptability is a major factor in design, however levels of awareness among clubmembers vary considerably. The non-technical course provides an opportunity to read and reflecton what makes a project successful in the long-term. The emphasis has been on the social,including economic, aspects of sustainability. Environmental sustainability is also discussed, butwith less emphasis on mechanism due to differences in student programs and backgroundunderstanding. The classroom setting provides common content that can be used as the basis fordiscussion of issues and assessment of sustainability, but the EWB project provides a powerfulmotivation to
“broad review”, and thesecond was “deep understanding”, which was an in-depth discussion on a specific topic relatedto the knowledge learned.In our department the class size is pretty small, so grading the summaries didn’t take too muchtime. If the class size is large, it could become a heavy burden. Graduate teaching assistants cando a good job in grading homework problems, but they are less qualified in grading thesummaries. One option is grading a subset of the summaries, which are selected randomly. Theposted sample summaries are helpful in providing feedback to all the students.Student SurveyAt the end of the semester, an anonymous survey was taken and two questions on the summarywere asked: (1) writing the weekly summary and (2) reading
- 1. Obligation to promote student lectures and readings ject is to seek and to state municate knowledge to students, learning/ engagement/curiosity should reflect the truth as they see it. Pro- colleagues and the community at 2. Limits of our knowledge advancement of fessors seek above all to large. This mission depends upon 3. Stay up-to-date knowledge in a field
Paper ID #6798Introducing Nanoelectronics into the Electrical Engineering CurriculumProf. David H Hoe, University of Texas, Tyler Dr. David Hoe is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering department at the University of Texas at Tyler since 2008. Page 23.821.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Introducing Nanoelectronics into the Electrical Engineering CurriculumAbstractEngineering programs that have introduced
. The remainingitems make the package more complete. We used the HELP kits for the first time in 2008. Page 25.1386.4The final development in our HELP kits is the inclusion of a small robot platform. The robotswere used within in the experimental program in 2009 and 2010. This paper reports on the use ofand development of the HELP kit to facilitate off-campus practicals. We present our work for thethree years 2008-2010.The Lab CourseThe lab experiments ran in the context of a first-year electronics course. The pre-requisite wasintroductory physics (which covered the basics of DC electric circuits, but not AC circuits).Delivered July-October
with the transparent cover in place.The PolyVent Educational Platform is a positive pressure ventilator (Figure 3) designed to offerclassroom experiences as educational modules. Intentional educational design features of thedevice include: 1. Free and open design. The design is licensed with reciprocal open-source licenses that allow anyone to legally duplicate, repair, modify, and extend the design, as long as they do not attempt to monopolize it. 2. Large footprint to facilitate identification and repair. Due to the space constraints of clinical facilities, devices can be small and difficult to repair. The PolyVent was designed with a spacious “footprint” so that components are easy to identify, assemble, repair and
48responses from all of the students participating in an ME capstone project, 587 survey responsesfrom students in the ME program across all ME courses taken that semester, and over 20,000responses from students across the institution in all of their courses that term. The followingscale based upon a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (Table 1) was used for the students’ survey: Table 1: Assessment Scale 1 2 3 4 5 strongly disagree disagree neutral agree strongly agreeThe following assessments address the objective ratings above. Student comments anddiscussion on the student surveys
not have initially considered signing up for.Given the expansive range of possibilities makerspaces offer, the use cases theyaccommodate are equally diverse. To effectively cater to each need, the Makerspace'smission has been delineated into three distinct user categories:• PRO: This category targets student entrepreneurs engaged in prototyping ventures, as wellas small companies seeking to leverage our student population for their prototypingendeavors. To support them, we provided pro-related events focusing on entrepreneurshipin collaboration with Welch College of Business and Technology faculty. SHU InnovationChallenge, a three-week program, offered student entrepreneurs faculty presentations andguidance on entrepreneurship, project
findings underscore the complex andmultifaceted nature of developing intercultural competence among educators.Limitations and Future Work:In addition to significant programmatic adjustments and project delays that impacted the dataand made it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding program outcomes, a small samplesize, and significant differences in participant experiences coming into the program were alsolimitations of this study.The primary goal of this work was to provide the teachers with the tools and knowledge to fostermore inclusive STEM classrooms. The study focused on the impact this program had on theparticipants. A follow-on study could be conducted to assess if this program also impacted theSTEM interest of the students in
research on the transfer student experience mostly focuses on large researchuniversities, while a majority of community colleges are smaller in comparison and have student-focused environments.This study focuses on community college transfer students who graduated from the Electricaland Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at Seattle University, a teaching-focused four-year institution in the Pacific Northwest Region, between Spring 2012 and Spring 2022. SeattleUniversity has received national recognition among four-year institutions for its work inattracting and supporting community college transfer students. The percentage of transfersamong students admitted to the ECE program has varied from 25% to 79% in recent years.The goal of this study is
power quality issues caused by a large-size DC to ACinverter connecting the DG modules to the AC grid. This curriculum implementation provides aninnovative opportunity for future engineering technology students to gain necessary up-to-datecompetencies in a smart grid environment.IntroductionThe need for a knowledgeable workforce in fast innovating next generation power griddevelopment and implementation is essential. As the baby boomers employed in the electricalpower systems fields have started to retire, there is an urgent need to recruit and graduate anincreasing number of well-educated and well-trained next generation professionals from bothAssociate degree and Bachelor ’s degree programs. The fast pace of innovations in electrical
choose a focus program to implement at the school. Theprincipal and lead teacher, after investigating various models, decided to implement engineering,using a new curriculum from the Museum of Science Boston as a way to engage all students. Atthe same time, Elizabeth Parry at North Carolina State University (NCSU) had been working inK-12 classrooms directing a large National Science Foundation GK-12 project. Engineering isElementary (EiE) was one of the tools her team used in both in and out of classroom settings, soshe had been trained in the curriculum. The Museum of Science connected the two and the teamformed a plan for a school that would use engineering as the integrator of all subjects, with everyteacher and student participating. The
13% are chemical engineering students. Table 1 belowcorrelates the electrical engineering program outcomes to the course content using the followingscale: 1 2 3 4 5 No Small Average Large Very large Page 14.1016.4 contribution contribution contribution contribution contribution Table 1. Relationship of Course to Electrical Engineering Program Outcome COURSE
clearly emphasizeprofessional skills and ABET program outcomes (Criteria 3 d, f, g, h, i,). With shared goalsof providing undergraduates with a rich educational experience in which research,communication and critical thinking are central to achievement and to the development ofintegrity in engineering, such collaborations produce an instructional program that readiesstudents for the requirements of continuous learning and complex analysis essential to asuccessful, principled engineering career. This paper will describe the contributions toundergraduate engineering education that non-engineering faculty and academic departmentshave brought to the Pitt freshman engineering experience. Through the description of thecurricula and strategies developed
mathematical bases oftechnology more specifically engineering. In short engineering has been seen to be an activitybased on the applications of science on both sides of the Atlantic not with-standing the attentionin the United States to the provision of liberal studies for engineers [7]. This consensus has inrecent years been challenged by several reports and one major study in the US [8]. Challengingthough they may be, such reports they remain within the convergent focus and will undoubtedlycause many minor innovations. To a large extent policy has been governed by the regularly reported predictions that there is andwill be a shortage of engineers and scientists, and that the pool of students available to pursuethese occupations is too small and
Page 7.1275.1was deliberately designed with two seats per workstation so as to encourage cooperativework among small teams of students [1,2]. During these sessions the course instructorProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3430and GTA circulate around the classroom answering and asking classes of the teams asthey work on their assignments.Much of the studio session centers on a set of modules that we have developed locally foruse in our undergraduate and graduate heat transfer courses (See Ref. 3, which includes ascreen shot and
practices used in training secondary educators onsupply chain management topics, including simulation and game-based instruction. It will alsodescribe the secondary to post-secondary educational pathway, a career opportunity matrix andpresent associated curriculum and articulation agreements.IntroductionIndiana has long been recognized as the “Crossroads of America” due to the large number ofcompanies involved in logistics and manufacturing operations. Indiana’s position is beingchallenged, however, due to the inability of companies (especially small and medium-sizedcompanies) to find qualified workers. A 2012 survey showed that this is a primary concern forcompanies. “For the first time in the history of this survey, human resource development
grab tweets from twitter feeds, andrun these tweets against a dictionary and categorize the tweets as positive, negative, andneutral by a number from a scale of 0-10 . The program will then generate a report of thefeedback, and if properly analysed and assessed, companies will be able to improve on theirservices and/or products. The initial part of the project is establishing a start-up (LLC),subsequently looking out for and signing clients in order to assess the quality of product beingdeveloped, and to help small business owners improve their service or product.Identification and Significance of Study Focus Area: R is a language and programming environment for statistical computing and graphics. R is a GNU project which is parallel
Science & Engineering Library homepage as well as our Digital ScienceCenter homepage. The extension of this campaign to our digital presence online made sense inthat we have a large community of users that use our resources online. Figure 6. Example of “Free for You” Webpage Spotlight Box The preparation and organization for this campaign happens over the summer months.We reach out to our vendor representatives and ask if they would be willing to participate byproviding high resolution logos and a small amount of giveaways. This is usually met with aresounding yes and appreciation for promoting their resources. In addition, since this prep workis done over the summer months there is little to do during the busy
allowed students to vote their preference for the comments posted on the discussion forumbased on their perceived value. Students can now identify the posts that have the highest numberof likes and use that information to decide which are most useful, thus improving the efficiencyand value of using the discussion forum.Another early example of MEERCat’s on-going research-to-practice cycle is the integration ofscalable teaming experiences to our large-enrollment courses, as enabled by CATME (whatbegan as the “Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness”). CATME is a web-based tool that enables instructors to implement best practices in managing student teams [11].The RED team has worked with capstone design instructors, whose collective
program evaluator. He recently completed a five- year tour as the USMA Environmental Program Director. His research has been focused on engineering education and advancements in the field of environmental engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Green Escape Room: Part 2 – Teaching Students Professional Engineering Ethics by Applying Environmental Engineering Principles and Deciphering Clues and PuzzlesAbstractEscape rooms use a sequence of related clues and puzzles to lead participants to a final answer.While escape rooms have been used in technical aspects of engineering education as an
://www.chronicle.com/article/why-campus-life-fell-apart.27. Hylton, J.B. and B.A. Hays. Modifying the value rubrics to assess the entrepreneurial mind-set. in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference. 2019. Tampa, FL. DOI:28. Beichner, R.J., J.M. Saul, D.S. Abbott, J.J. Morse, D. Deardorff, R.J. Allain, S.W. Bonham, M.H. Dancy, and J.S. Risley, The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-based reform of university physics, 2007. 1(1): p. 2-39. DOI: https://www.academia.edu/download/32837058/Chapter.pdf29. Hylton, B.J., D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. LeBlanc, Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy
institutions, whichcollectively educate a large number of undergraduate engineering students in various contexts.Therefore, this study focuses on the implementation of an instructional innovation in a liberalarts institution that started a new engineering program to educate a regional engineeringworkforce. This qualitative study documented the experiences of one engineering instructor whoadopted and adapted a blended learning environment for undergraduate dynamics designed topromote active and collaborative learning in undergraduate engineering courses. We analyzedinterviews, documents, artifacts, visual materials, and field notes to examine the propagation ofthe instructional system in context with cultural features in local institution settings. Our
. in Mathematics, and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics. Prior to joining the TAMU CSE faculty Dr.Hammond taught for five years at Columbia University and was a telecom analyst for four years at Gold-man Sachs. Dr Hammond is the 2011-2012 recipient of the Charles H. Barclay, Jr. ’45 Faculty FellowAward. The Barclay Award is given to professors and associate professors who have been nominated fortheir overall contributions to the Engineering Program through classroom instruction, scholarly activities,and professional service. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix PedagogyAbstractIntroductory engineering courses at large universities often number over a
electrical (EET), mechanical (MET), and materials joiningengineering technology (MJET).An emphasis on design projects is a historical strength in the LeTourneau school of engineering,and has been developed especially well in the last 10 to 15 years as senior design projects have Page 15.1161.3become more ambitious and have also expanded to include significant applied research projects.In addition, underclass courses have also embraced the project experience to a large degree. Thisproject orientation is a defining strength of the program, providing a distinct educationaladvantage for students.Senior design initially consisted of one-semester
Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst. He was then a Senior Sensors Engineer with the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA from 2011 to 2013. Since 2013 he has been an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. His research interests include ultrawideband antenna arrays, electrically small antennas, Radar systems, analog circuits, and engineering education.Dr. Jennifer L Bonniwell, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Jennifer L. Bonniwell joined the Milwaukee School of Engineering faculty as an assistant professor in 2016. She earned her BS in Electrical Engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and her MS and PhD in Electrical
communication cards, cables and network operating system or manage a population of networked PCs to an acceptable commercial standard without further extensive training. It is noteworthy that none of the students interviewed had ever opened a PC. It is significant that all those interviewed for this study had successfully completed all the units on computer architecture and communication engineering’ 1.Interviews conducted with five ECU graduates employed in computer and network supportclearly indicated that they were, to a large degree, self-taught in many of the skills theyneeded to perform their job. It should be noted that all the students interviewed hadsuccessfully
successfulstudent outcomes, including academic achievement, persistence, and critical thinking [2].Engagement constructs are typically positioned in domain general learning models as mediatorsbetween instruction and outcome variables. Accordingly, faculty in higher education areregularly encouraged to improve their instruction by using instructional strategies to improvestudent engagement, under the prevailing assumption that it will improve learning, achievement,and other important educational targets [3]. Despite the popularity of engagement research,extant findings suggest that the impact of instruction on student engagement, and the impact ofengagement on student outcomes, is statistically small [4].We have argued in our previous work that to improve
FabricationAbstractThis paper seeks to evaluate the challenges and successes in incorporating a beam fabricationmodule into a Concrete 1 engineering design class for Architecture and ArchitecturalEngineering students. While this class is usually taught in a lecture format, the inclusion of ahands-on activity aimed to accomplish the following goals: • Student learning about principles of flexure and shear through hands-on exercises • Engage students in course material by giving the first-hand experiences with concrete construction • Structure task to encourage competition between small groups • Prompt students to consider multiple solutions to a given problem • Involve other learning settings to give students a more well-rounded
evidence and intuition-based opinions are just as valuable, if coming from experienced educators, as the latest survey statistics, which are often based upon small ensembles and time periods, and can sometimes be massaged to yield a variety of conclusions. NEE need to be aware that SEE may not be enamored by the supposed need to prove every observation on engineering education by numbers, and may not be enthusiastic about every new pedagogical fad that comes along based upon such.9. ABET EC 2000: Similar statements apply to the relatively recent assessment-based ABET EC 2000 accreditation criteria for engineering programs. Although the intentions were valid, many engineering faculty feel that the comprehensive learning objectives