researchers of the discipline(physics or mathematics) working in academic departments at universities, and are based onrigorous research that has been documented to improve student learning through the use of thesestrategies.Description of ACE Page 23.133.3The ACE classroom was funded by internal resources from both the Research Chair in PhysicsInnovation and Research and the University President; and external support granted by Hewlett-Packard through their HP Innovations in Education project. This company provided much of theequipment of the room, and the University remodeled the space and provided the rest of theequipment. Instructors have invested a
://strategy.asee.org/34992 [8] B. Maheswaran, A. A. Aziz, E. Alexander, L. Brigandi, and C. Branagan, "Power Generation Through Small-scale Wind Turbine". 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online, 2020, June. ASEE Conferences, 2020. https://peer.asee.org/35064 [9] S. Hibbard, C. Lafleur, J. Leong, J. Ringberg, D. Artis, and B. Maheswaran, "OSCILLUS: Harnessing Wave Energy". 2020 Northeast Section Meeting, Online, 2021, May. ASEE Conferences, 2021. https://peer.asee.org/36255 [10] A. Pocquette, N. Angelino, S. Allegretti, K. Reusch, A. A. Aziz, and B. Maheswaran, "Water Recycling and Filtration". 2020 Northeast Section Meeting, Online, 2021, May. ASEE Conferences, 2021. https
color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 206–245, 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21417.[9] K. A. Griffin, “Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of women and men of color in the professoriate: looking beyond the pipeline,” High. Educ. Handb. Theory Res. Vol. 35, pp. 1–73, 2019.[10] K. A. Griffin, “Achieving Diversity at the Intersection of STEM Culture and Campus Climate,” 2019.[11] E. A. Armstrong and L. T. Hamilton, Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Harvard University Press, 2013. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu/stable
Paper ID #47850Pilot Study of Gen Z Candidates For Successful Employment on the U.S. JobMarketDr. Edwige F. Songong, Pittsburg State University Dr. Edwige F. Songong is a passionate champion of STEM education, committed to fostering innovation and excellence. She holds a PhD from the University of Cape Town and an MS from Pittsburg State University. Beyond her academic achievements, Dr. Songong is dedicated to guiding the next generation of STEM professionals. Through her leadership and mentorship, she inspires students to explore, innovate, and succeed, playing a key role in shaping the future of engineering education
of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of K-12, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include assessment, team development, outreach and education research for DC Col- orado’s hands-on initiatives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Push and Pull: Integrating Industry Across the Student ExperienceAbstractThis work-in-progress paper focuses on
in K-12 education — for the firsttime in a traditional higher education engineering curriculum. Block scheduling, in its simplestform, is transforming multi-semester courses into a single-semester course via extended, con-centrated contact time. These courses have considerably longer contact hours than a traditionaluniversity course so that: (1) students may gain systems insight through integration of theircore knowledge across traditional course and discipline boundaries; (2) the instructors have thetime to include truly multi-scale (from molecular to continuum to macroscopic) descriptionsof chemical engineering content; and (3) the instructors have the flexibility to accommodatediverse learning styles and incorporate active learning more
until it has a way to disperse it through either an electrical arc to the ground if it gets high enough. Or, someone touching the vending machine or anything like that.” ~Bryan “I think if he stays still, nothing will happen because he is grounded. So, he has not taken part in the circuit. But then he lifts his leg or whatever and reapplies it so then he is, then, then he gets electrocuted. It is kind of like when you drag your feet on the floor, and you shock somebody. You are dragging your feet, and you have all that electricity built up, and then, until
Perception and Learning OutcomesIntroductionCourses in a large majority of science and engineering curricula are often complemented bylaboratories which provide a learning environment different from a traditional lecture. Theselaboratories promote student engagement through problem-based learning, resulting in increasedstudent performance, increased student confidence in the subject material [1], and greaterenjoyment of the subject material by the students [2]. The lecture courses which theselaboratories supplement are often substantially different in size, with one lecture linked tomultiple smaller laboratory sections. The connection between these lectures and laboratories haslong been observed to play a vital role in the effectiveness of many
and experiential learning1,2. Through peer interactionand collaboration student’s are able to synthesize and evaluate their ideas collectively3,4,5 and areforced to reflect upon and reason about their ideas at greater depth than when workingindividually6.In contrast, there are numerous studies that show the difficulty students experience working inteams. Student’s frequently cite that they have little influence and no control over their team-mates; they believe their grade will not reflect their contribution or competence; and thetransaction cost of scheduling meetings, and working collaboratively are not worth the rewards,of which they see few7. These bad team experiences can have a profound impact on thosestudents who are subsequently
to including students in curricular design, however, islimited to focusing on the sole output of something adoptable by instructors while ignoringpotential other benefits to providing students the opportunity to design their own learningactivities or aids. For example, the benefits of learning through teaching are well known [17-18]and instructors develop a much richer and deeper understanding of the material they teachthrough their curriculum design process [1-3, 5, 9-10, 19]. Therefore, the authors believe it isworthwhile to provide students opportunities to develop their own learning activities or aids tofoster student growth in understanding of previously learned content. If the students happen todevelop something worthwhile of adoption
Clemson and the University of Kentucky. He has been active in curriculum and course development over the past 20 years. He received his BS in Civil Engineering from NC State University and his MS and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Duke University.Marisa Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is a doctoral candidate in the Mechanical Engineering program at Clemson University. She is a research assistant in the Department of Engineering and Science Education and is a member of the inaugural class of the Engineering and Science Education Certificate at Clemson University. As an Endowed Teaching Fellow, she received the Departmental Outstanding Teaching Assistant Award for teaching Integrated
into the engineering practice expectedof students in undergraduate Senior Design courses through the work of a sociologist“embedded” in a College of Engineering. We identify and describe our intellectual framework,instructional methods, student assignments, and report early evaluations based on objectivemeasures and student comments.Status Quo: Needs, Processes, Gaps, Prospective SolutionsIn undergraduate education, engineering ethics is often taught in titular courses by individualswith advanced degrees in engineering. It is not common to find that such individuals also havesubstantive academic or professional preparation in topics related to ethics. Perhaps because it isoften not considered to be part of the core of engineering education
product development cycle. Students and practitioners that possess adeeper appreciation of the manufacturing process can often design parts that consider the capa-bility of the manufacturing method. In many schools, colleges and universities the availability ofpractical, hands-on interaction with computer numerical controlled machines (CNC machines) islimited due to the expense and operational complexity of these machines. Many of the higher endCNC machines are reserved for expert machinists. As a result, students do not experience mod-ern manufacturing beyond the “black-box” interactions with a machinist. The goal of this paperis to present the implementation of a CNC laboratory comprising inexpensive, hobbyist CNCmachines.This paper presents
initiated at ASU. The courses of this program aredesigned to be taken by students from all engineering disciplines and other sciences (e.g.,physics, chemistry and mathematics). The courses are offered on-campus and simultaneouslyrecorded to streaming video for distance-learning via the Internet. The Fulton School ofEngineering presently delivers over 100 online courses annually to thousands of students acrossthe U.S. and beyond. We also anticipate the opportunity to partner with other institutions todistribute these course materials to fill gaps in nuclear and other engineering programsnationwide. Beside online delivery, the course video and documentation can be packaged inDVD format for dissemination to such audiences.Part of the rationale for a
Education Committee and as a member of the American Society ofCivil Engineers (ASCE) Committee on Education and Committee on Faculty Development. A portion of his cadetdevelopment is dedicated to serving as an Officer Representative for Women’s Volleyball and Men’s Basketball, and as asmall group leader within Officer Christian Fellowship. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the state of Virginia anda Project Management Professional. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Forming Trusted Professionals: Student Perceptions of Project-Based LearningAbstractProject-based course experiences enhance the student learning atmosphere through
graphic and disturbing formany viewers.(2) Doctors currently use literature, diagrams, and physical models to explain theprocedure to their patients which often leaves them feeling uninformed and in need of moreinformation before pursuing the operation.In order for potential patients to make informed decisions regarding joint replacement options,they need to be able to review material, do in depth research, and learn from other individualswho have been through the experience of joint replacement. They would also benefit fromunderstanding what happens during the operation, expected challenges, potential complications,and anticipated results. A more simplified graphical representation or simulation of joint
. Our university has a 128-node cluster of computers funded through NSF to be used forundergraduate education and research. We and other colleagues from our department haveattended several workshops conducted by National Computational Science Institute, a majororganization involved in developing national initiatives to promote computational science in theK-12 and undergraduate curriculum 1. Our department had also sponsored some of thesesummer workshops. These workshops introduce resources and modeling and simulation toolslike Stella 12, Agentsheets, MATLAB, and Madonna to K-12 teachers and college faculty to helpstudents acquire computational thinking, abstraction and modeling skills that are essential tosolve real-world application problems
% Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly disagree agree Figure 1: Prefer Using Class Time for Problem Solving? (flipped sections)In the evaluation survey, we asked the respondents to report the percentage of videos theywatched. In our partially-flipped ENGR 20 course, the respondents indicated having watched87% of the available videos, with 89% of the respondents having watched them before (versusafter) the class session for which they were assigned. This indicates a high level of responsibilityfor the self-directed portion of the flipped classroom. In comparison, across our fully-flippedsophomore through senior courses in the school, respondents reported having
. The public emphasis on cultivating energy literacy hasconsistently paralleled energy vulnerabilities derived from geopolitical and eco-environmentalmotivations rather than at level of households which is where much of the energy literacy scholarship issituated (Adams, Kenner, Leone et al., 2022; Day & Walker, 2013). These public energy governanceinitiatives can be traced to the 1973 Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) oil embargothat caused the energy crisis of the 1970s, which is when energy conservation became a national priorityin the US and was implemented in K-12 schools through public policy.Many of the nationally organized energy conservation initiatives were based on the premise that whenpeople have higher levels
modules, each had its completionobjectives and milestones. Long term Computer Engineering design projects were reported at [8]- [9]. The former involved the breaking down of traditional course boundaries, and theirreplacement with a progression of modules, in order to better explore diverse facets of System-On-Chip technology. The latter involved core courses curriculum alteration to assure that studentscan relate key digital circuit design principles to chips and circuits technologies.Much has been done to enhance students’ design experience through capstone engineeringprojects. Promoting practical and real-world projects within capstone design has been an activeresearch topic in engineering education. For instance, at the Colleges of
Thailand.AcknowledgementsThis project was funded in part by a grant by the Department of State through a programadministered by Partners of the Americas.References[1] Rajala, S., "Beyond 2020: Preparing Engineers for the Future", Proc. IEEE, vol. 100, Centennial Special Issue, May 13, 2012.[2] Parkinson, Alan (2007) "Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best Practices," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education: Vol. 2: Iss. 2, Article 2.[3] Wulf, W., “An Urgent Need to Change,” The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, Fall 2004.[4] DeWinter, Urbain J., “Science and Engineering Education Abroad: An Overview”, Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, v3 n2 p181-97 Fall 1997[5] Miller, R. K
, multiple forms of problem representation, and multiple solution methods5. Thus,exclusively teaching engineering students to solve well-structured problems does not adequatelyprepare them to contribute to address the complex, challenging, and urgent problems that societyfaces today. In other words, much of engineering education today is characterized by a mismatchbetween what students need to learn to contribute to sustainable development and the actualeducational practice.A widely used approach to ensure that educational practice matches educational goals isconstructive alignment9,10. Constructive alignment is an outcomes-based approach to teaching inwhich pre-formulated intended learning outcomes (ILOs) play a central role. Through theprocess of
theproject.Protein Production ProjectDuring the final five weeks of the semester, students work in the laboratory to produce a colorfulprotein through recombinant DNA methods. During the early weeks of the project, studentsbecome familiar with the basic skills required in the laboratory and are free to performexperiments to optimize protein expression and purification. The course instructor is availablefor consultation and assistance in the lab. The final week is production week, where studentshave one chance to produce and purify a protein for a grade.Graduate students are required to participate in the project, and perform the project individually.Undergraduate students have the option of participating in the project, and perform the project aspart of a
in, they soon discover that the field is vast, asare available resources. This paper offers suggestions, from the perspective of what studentsreally need to know as they begin their professional careers, for technical instructors new to thefield of ethics, focusing on the following: resources, approaches, and case methodology.ContextWhile many colleges and universities offer ethics classes through specialized departments, thispaper advocates an “ethics across the curriculum” (EAC) approach. Similar to the writing acrossthe curriculum movement of years past, EAC proponents integrate the study of ethics intocourses in the major, rather than farming it out to a philosophy department. As Cruz and Frey,University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, note
groups, K-12 outreach, and accreditation activities. Her technical interests are in the areas of Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, and Energy Systems.Dr. Charles D. Eggleton, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Charles Dionisio Eggleton is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Maryland Baltimore County. He has twenty-two years of experience teaching theoretical and laboratory courses in thermo-fluids to undergraduate students and was Department Chair from 2011 - 2017. Dr. Eggleton earned his M.S. and Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Stanford University and his B.S. in Naval Architecture from the University of California.Dr. Mariajose Castellanos, University of
been previously created, refined, tested, and validated at a southeastern land-grant institution in a first year engineering program. The survey items were originally designed to assess student persistence in engineering, through students’ perceptions of present actions (“Present”), futures as engineers (“Future”), and their expectations of successfully completing tasks in their engineering studies (“Expectancy”). Additional Motivations and Attitudes in Engineering items focus on assessing student perceptions of their metacognition (a proxy for problem solving) and goal orientations. The construct of metacognition was not included in the present study as it was beyond the scope of the research question, which related more specifically to FTP
instructors to coordinate major deadlines.References[1] B. J. Beatty, Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing Student-Directed Hybrid Classes.EdTech Books, 2020. [Ebook] Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex[2] J. B. Miller, M. D. Risser, and R. P. Griffiths, “Student Choice, Instructor Flexibility:Moving Beyond the Blended Instructional Model,” Issues and Trends in EducationalTechnology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8-24, May 2013.[3] S. S. H. Kazmi, K. Hasan, S. Talib, and S. Saxena, “COVID-19 and Lockdown: A Study onthe Impact on Mental Health,” SSRN, April 15, 2020. Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3577515 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3577515 [AccessedFebruary 25, 2021].[4] J. M. Twenge, A. B. Cooper, T. E. Joiner, M. E. Duffy
words, whatlearners are going to learn. In essence, it provides a formalized schema for the teacher, whothen particularizes it to enable students to adapt from their existing framework of knowledgeand skills to accommodate further knowledge and skills [2]. Pedagogy is the structuring of thelearning in accordance with the curriculum, by the teacher to guide the learner through tasksthat are just beyond current capability, and thereby building additional knowledge and skill.Pedagogical models vary from place to place and depends on the nature of the subject,background of students and facilities available among others. The Pedagogical Model byVictoria State Government [3] provides an overview of the learning cycle, and breaks it downinto five
students’ abilities and willingness to collaborate in the learningprocess, especially to being open during classroom interactions, collaborating with others, anddealing with unstructured situations, like ill-structured problems which are common inengineering.The power distance and uncertainty avoidance constructs underlie the learning process andclassroom interaction between students and teachers. The learning process involves theacquisition of new knowledge, skills, and attitudes through change-promoting interactions [16].Culture defines the interactions, and experiences in the classroom shared between students andteachers, which is a significant component of the learning process. In a diverse studentenvironment such as the U.S., the students
: Ecological,Social, Economic, or Technical. Student preferences emerged through scores demonstratingdepth in one or two sustainability categories but not much breadth across categories. Forexample, as a group, participants’ concepts represented 41% Ecological, 21% Social, 7%Economic, and 31% Technical. Individual student responses revealed that one participant’sbreakdown may be 72% Ecological, 16% Social, 0% Economic, and 12% Technical whereasanother’s may be 7% Ecological, 19% Social, 15% Economic, and 59% Technical [11].For the rubric study, comparing the individual and team consensus scores showed a shift inscores indicating that the consensus process introduced team members to new considerations.The quantitative observation is supported by