instruction by providing an organizational framework of current motivation principles. A validated and reliable survey instrument, the MUSIC Inventory, was developed that was based on the MUSIC Model. Although not widely used in Engineering programs, this instrument may have increasing utility in coming years given the strong emphasis on student engagement. In Spring Semester 2022, we gave the MUSIC Inventory to 35 first-year engineering students at Michigan Technological University using a pre/post course method. As described in a forthcoming paper in Frontiers in Education 2022, the preceding semester we had a larger sample size (n = 300) but utilized a post-course only assessment to validate the motivation model factor
. This has been a very successful experience and more opportunities areunder discussion for more advance collaboration at a senior and graduate level.Dual Degree ProgramsThe European Commission, under the Erasmus Mundus28 project, has approved a large numberof Dual-Degree Masters in economically and strategically important areas of study. Theprograms are designed to permit a student to start studying in an institution in one country andconclude their studies in another institution in another country, and receive a degree from bothinstitutions. Some programs permit a third institution to be involved. The degrees organize theprogram across as many as five institutions. The student is expected to learn more than onelanguage, some require the
abilities59 meshes well with the concept that some degree ofbackground knowledge is necessary before engaged thinking can truly take place. In many cases,REU participants arrive without any previous experience and have to spend a large portion of thebeginning stages of the project gaining comfort with the topic. Taking proper steps before aresearch participant begins a project to familiarize that participant with the vernacular of thedomain area and some of the key concepts can vastly improve the amount of time the participantwill be able to conduct higher level thinking on the project. This could be as simple as contactingthe student a month before the program begins to provide the student with literature related to theproject. Additional contact
guess Answering/reasoning structure* Real time helps Give score and hints (video and text) spontaneously Core mechanics Depends on the specific course material Constitutive rules Operational rules Implicit rules Background Depends on the specific course material Maximum tries Limited to 3 tries Challenges and rewards Scores in playing modules Small challenges Grades in the course Large challenges The final challenges Explicit challenges Implicit challenges Game settings Currently no sound Graphics, sound, story Limited time for each question Time
Peru.The popular class has traditionally involved students from Mechanical, Chemical, Civil andEnvironmental, and Electrical and Computer Engineering programs, as well as students fromtechnology disciplines. Assessments from the various years have demonstrated that studentslearn skills and attributes that are not easily taught in a campus setting. Over the years, lessonshave been learned regarding the importance of social constraints related to the design andimplementation of projects.Recently, material related to social constraints has been implemented in the course to strengthenthe incorporation of social constraints in the design and implementation process. Specifically,student learning related to social constraints has involved a) a review of
very proud to show them, letting first-hand experiencebuild enthusiasm for a career path enabling an independent and prosperous adult life. Observingbig and small engineering works raises interest, e.g., seeing the awesome scale of a 1,000 MWpower generator or watching a pipefitter annealing copper tubing by heating it to a glow andrapidly quenching in cold water. Hard copper magically becoming malleably soft. Today’s bestanalog are the robotics-mechatronics programs, which provide a limited bandwidth that ought tobe much broader. With appropriate planning and supervision, middle and high school agestudents holding interest in engineering need to experience more than science projects, and seereal things being made.Although the most significant
a genericstructure before starting the program. Some of the decisions included in the development of ageneric structure include: • the length of the program, • how many times the industry partners will provide feedback to the students, • whether the students are working individually or in a team, • the role industry partner feedback plays in grading and assessment (if any) • how frequently students’ complete reflections and what is the target of the reflection point (e.g., Career exploration and non-academic skill development)Once these decisions are made, Practera is set up to automate and streamline these processes andmonitor each student, team, and employer partner as they progress through the program. Each ofthese
necessary. Therefore, it will be essential toassess continuous improvement to ensure its effectiveness and implement adjustments orimprovements as needed. This involves examining the effects on student learning, feedback fromall teachers involved, and feedback from stakeholders externally to certify quality andpreeminence. In summary, the execution of a successful training program requires meticulousorganization, efficient implementation, and continuous assessment to ensure that the pedagogicalobjectives are achieved and the expectations of the students and society at large are met.ResultsThe main goal of this research project is to contribute to the students of the Sea Entrepreneurprogram to achieve relevant skills and knowledge of statistical
freeing students from being formulae-driven (2) Instructors need to create a climate founded on understanding and synthesis rather than memorization (3) Students need to adjust to solving real problems versus small homework problems (4) Students need to practice further in sorting through information from multiple sources and in becoming organized (5) Self-seeking knowledge/concepts, along with homework, is frustrating to students (6) Working in groups presents a challenge to students (7) Authenticity and open-ended nature of the problems maybe overwhelming to some students (8) Assessment: When PBL assessment is done it is recommended that one use the following methods: (1) ability to
Dodd Gallogly College of Engineering, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of OklahomaThe dual-submission homework method (DSHM) has become an increasingly popular form ofself-assessment in recent years due to its low-stress engagement for students and the reduction ofworkload on instructors and students alike. However, to date, qualitative studies have been theprimary form of investigation to ascertain the effectiveness of the DSHM. The purpose of thisstudy is to investigate, with quantitative data, whether the dual-submission homework methodleads to an increase in learning comprehension and retention of the material by the participantsinvolved. Data
as a part of their courses. The content is typically broken down into the smallestkernel possible, in order to best serve a large community of educators who will pick and choosenuggets for what they constitute as a course. For example, the ILMs are being used in basicengineering classes at Rensselaer, in distance learning classes, and in adult training classes. We also Page 4.336.10are developing modules that can be used in K-12 environments to feed the pipelines and further allowcommunity colleges to offer technical degrees and certificate programs in direct response to rapid
implement real-world electronic MICROCONTROLLERSsystems, and learning something of how the hardware and A microcontroller (MC) is essentially a small computer on asoftware components work together to create the desired “chip” (a microelectronic integrated circuit) [6]-[7]. Itfunctionality (a simplified voltmeter in this case). In contains digital logic circuits—including memory blocks andaddition, students indicated a lot of interest in learning and peripheral circuits plus inputs and outputs (I/O)—whichpracticing soldering skills in building both of these projects. enable it to run software programs that are designed to have The spiral model approach, in a broader sense, is also
class, IMSE 680 offered at Kansas State University, is a core course in theMasters of Engineering Management and an introductory course to the Masters of Science inOperations Research. The class is offered every semester and has about 25 students enrollingover the course of a year. The class began in 2005. The author taught the class in a lecture format without studentsand the videos were recorded and uploaded online. In 2014, with the help of a small grant fromKansas State University’s distance program, the author changed this class to a lecture basedtutoring format. Since the class is only offered to distance students, the grant paid to have sixstudents attend the class. These students were sophomore and junior industrial
comparingscores on the exam, and homework mastery. Figure 2, shows the average and standard deviation ofthe scores for the three topics assessed during the second exam of the semester. The first two topicswere taught using the lecture-lecture-active learning session approach, while the third topic wastaught using the flipped classroom approach. The average score on this third exam problem wasslightly lower than the other two questions. Of greater concern to the instructor was the shape ofthe grade distribution. Though problem three and one had similarly large deviation in the scores,the student scores for problem one created a left skewed distribution and the student scores for thethird problem produced a bimodal distribution centered around the highest
(Florida NASA Business Incubation Center), SATOP (Space AllianceTechnology Outreach Program), Small Business Development Center (SBDC), EconomicDevelopment Commission of the Space Coast, NASA Office of Technology Commercializationat KSC, and other local partners, neighboring universities and colleges, plans to dramaticallyreduce this problem by methodical research and facilitation of best practices for technologytransfer and commercialization leveraging a unique educational program in experientialentrepreneurship and technology commercialization.SCION Objectives:The SCION Partnership objectives are to:1) Develop education and experiential entrepreneurship programs to promote technologycommercialization and entrepreneurship awareness
, Duoduo Liao1, Larisa Olesova2, Mihai Boicu1, Harry Foxwell1 1 George Mason University, 2University of FloridaAbstractGraduate Engineering students must apply concepts and methods of research when they enter theengineering workforce. This study developed research learning modules to guide students inapplied research. The modules were implemented in the Master of Science program and exploredengineering students' perceived cognitive presence as they completed them. Additionally, itexamined whether students perceived that the modules helped them apply research concepts andmethods at the end of the course. A post-course self-assessment survey about perceived
undergraduate studies, Mr. Baptiste also completed a workshop at NASA in Wallops Island, VA. The week-long workshop afforded himself and fellow par- ticipants the opportunity to build small scientific instrument payloads which were flown on a NASA sounding rocket. The experiments included a battery of sensors that captured environmental readings dur- ing flight. In addition to the workshop, Mr. Baptiste completed an internship with Booz Allen Hamilton in Linthicum Heights, MD. At Booz Allen Hamilton he performed research, test and analyses of Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) portable communication radios. Furthermore, he constructed, assembled and tested N-type coaxial cables for Rapydconnex communication system for
necessitates taking the contextsof action into account in instructional design. From the perspective of assessment, “ethics inaction” is problematic for instructors who encounter students only in the classroom context. It isnonetheless quite useful because it provides an integrative, non-hierarchical framework thatallows us to think about engineering ethics education on a larger scale than we ordinarily do. Italso opens up the possibility of recognizing the structural factors that have made it difficult tointegrate ethics into the engineering curriculum on a systematic basis.Despite an abundance of resources available to support engineering ethics instruction, includingcases provided through the Online Ethics Center (OEC), “the engineering literature
mechanical engineering courses, thefaculty reinforced material and computations the students were also seeing in Physics andChemistry, such as projectile motion and stoichiometry. Through these freshman engineeringinitiatives, students were able to see themselves as a mechanical engineering student andunderstand the types of knowledge and abilities essential to succeed. The objectives of thispaper are to explain these readiness initiatives, to assess the first year program resultsquantitatively and qualitatively through retention data and surveys, and to discuss the futurepotential of the program.IntroductionThe basis for the program was created with the student development theory of Tinto’s Model ofStudent Retention in mind. Tinto’s model is formed
environmental engineering’ course often is called upon toaccomplish multiple objectives in a single offering, including: 1) serving as a ‘point of entry’ forstudents pursuing a baccalaureate course of study in a program of ‘environmental engineering’;2) serving as a ‘survey’ for students in another field of engineering (i.e., civil engineering,architectural engineering, chemical engineering, etc.); 3) serving as an ‘interdisciplinaryinterface’ for students in fields of science, health, or various aspects of sustainability (i.e.,environmental science, environmental health, or ‘sustainability science, technology, policy,communication, etc.’); or 4) serving as an ‘opportunity for engagement’ or an ‘opportunity forrecruitment’ for students early in their
and compete in an indoor Bocce game,utilizing knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines, including mechanical engineering,electrical engineering, and computer engineering. The project has practical implications and usedsome novel techniques such as the fun Bocce game competition and the wiki site contribution toinspire the students to learn and do their best work in a team environment. The learningobjectives were assessed using the results of the Bocce game, student contribution to the wikisite, and student comments in the project reports. Based on the information we collect, weconsider that all learning objectives were achieved. We hope the setting used in this project canprovide insight to other programs and courses in engineering on
, professional guidance, and community engagement.The 2TO4 network of community colleges (CCs) consists of 20 sub-networks built around the 20HBCUs, HSIs and TCUs that form the core membership of IEC. Generally, a small number (1-3)of CCs located near a core member educate a few students who transfer to the local 4-year MSIECE program. Some IEC core members have well-developed relationships with their local CCsand see much larger numbers of transfer students. The vision of 2TO4 is to at least double thetotal number of students following this pathway to their BS degree in ECE by sharing bestpractices and providing a robust transition support infrastructure and increased financial supportfor those students who should have MSIs on their radar as they
traditionally comefrom small farming towns that are dehydrated from educational and occupational resources(Klutter, 1980). These areas remain economically disenfranchised and environmentallyneglected. Virginia’s higher education and health institutions acknowledge the plights ofAppalachian communities and develop community-based projects embedded in their researchand courses to serve and meet their needs as well as similar underserved communities (GobblerConnect, n.d.). Similarly, institutions are embedding additional support structures for Blackcommunities [especially along the coastal areas of Virginia] that are navigating anti-Blackracism, environmental issues regarding rising sea levels, financial strain due to significant wealthgaps, and more
learning, reducing or eliminating traditional lecturing. Interdisciplinary teams ofstudents work together in generating ideas for product development, creating the business andoperational plans of an enterprise that delivers a product or service to its customer base.Throughout the sequence, the teams are encouraged and required to use EMILE and othersupport facilities to insure that they integrate technology from conception to operation. EMILE’smain hub is a 3,143 square-foot high-bay mini-factory whose equipment and resources are beingconfigured and enhanced for production and to induce active learning. To insure proper progressand continuous improvement the team-designed assessment plan spans program evaluation tostakeholders’ opinions, to class
and globally connected regions of our nation, SanFrancisco State University has grown over the past 40 years to become a nationally andinternationally renowned, comprehensive public institution. Of SFSU’s total enrollment ofaround 29,200 students in 2004, about 60% are female and 40% are male. As is typical ofcomprehensive urban institutions, a large percentage of SFSU students work full or part timewhile pursuing their education. Many are re-entry students, returning to college after anextended absence, either to complete their original degree program or to obtain education andtraining in another field.Reflecting the ethnically diverse composition of the urban area in which it is located, SFSUserves a significant number of minority students
tointegrate disparate learning throughout their entire university experience as they progressthrough the program. This leverages the strengths of traditional courses in existing programswhile making the connections between courses explicit in this curricular innovation.The implementation of this approach to a continuously integrated curriculum at the University ofGeorgia (UGA) involves the design and implementation of the Synthesis and Design StudioSeries in an Environmental Engineering program;13 the first iteration of this new course havingbeen completed in the Fall of 2009. The following describes both the theoretical curriculummodel and the pedagogical characteristics to achieve curriculum integration and subsequentlyexplores how these were
casesprovide literal replication via multiple ME programs and theoretical replication via both theengineering science program and the inclusion of two schools serving underrepresentedpopulations.The research sites range in size from a very small program graduating 20-30 students annually toa larger program with well over 350 graduates per year. All include at least a full-year of seniordesign; one has a 4-semester design sequence that begins in students’ junior year. All includeindustry- sponsored projects, though most also include faculty-sponsored ones as options.Finally, all use a course coordinator coupled with individual faculty and/or industry mentors foreach team. Team sizes are general 4-6 students. The sites are also geographically diverse
levels--were paired to work on a project thathighlighted the dynamic nature of professionalism.The project also promoted the development of many of the outcomes put forth in the ABET 2000Engineering Criteria. In particular, the project work fostered students’ growth in a number of theareas listed under Criterion 3, Program Outcomes and Assessment. These include (d) an abilityto function on multi-disciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solveengineering problems; (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) anability to communicate effectively; (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global and society context; (I) a recognition of the need for, and
AC 2011-454: EXCHANGE THE NNIN OUTREACH DEMONSTRATIONGUIDE: A SET OF NANOTECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS FOR UP-PER ELEMENTARY THROUGH HIGH SCHOOL.Nancy Healy, Georgia Institute of Technology Nancy Healy is the Education and Outreach Coordinator for the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN). NNIN is an NSF-funded user support network of 14 universities which also provides nano-education outreach activities and programs. NNIN provides informal and formal activities to a K-gray age span. Her office is located at Georgia Institute of Technology, Nanotechnology Research Center. Prior to joining the NNIN in 2004, she was a program manager at the S.C. Commission on Higher Education. At SCCHE she was active in
. Teams have been key organizational elementsin the design and execution of strategic management initiatives1. Page 3.542.1 2 The Wall Street Journal reported in April, 1995, that 67 percent of large Americancompanies assign workers to teams, compared with 28 percent in 1987 15. USA Today reportedin February, 1997 that every company in the Fortune 500 has some version of team on it’sroster11. The most popular type of team in the last decade has been the work team. Work teamsconsist of individuals working together, on an ongoing, full-time basis