, Concrete Technology and Formwork, Heavy Civil Construction Methods, Residential Construction Methods, and Building Systems. Page 22.1388.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Energy Efficiency Fundamentals in Construction Education: Project REDUCEAbstractIn recent years, energy efficiency has resurfaced as an important topic in construction education.Finding the appropriate location in the curriculum can be a challenge for construction educatorsas other topics prevail through requirements previously set forth by accreditations review
, and implementationsaccomplished via this workshop.The State of the Art The mission for all instructors is to educate their students the best way possible.Their teaching techniques should challenge, educate, and promote the students'innovative thinking1. The lecture-based format of teaching, which predominates inengineering education, may not be best to achieve these technical learning goals2.Through the lecture method, an instructor introduces students to course work byproducing notes on a chalkboard or overhead projector. The instructor then hopes thatstudents can regurgitate this collected information on their homework or exams. Someclasses, if students are lucky, have accompanied laboratory practices where they can gainhands-on
Retention“Maturing of a Multidisciplinary Cohort of STEM Scholars: Year Three” Nebojsa Jaksic, Jeff Piquette, Melvin Druelinger, David Lehmpuhl, Helen Caprioglio, Juyun Cho, Paul Chacon, & Michael Mincic.......................................................................................... 121“Improving the Participation and Retention of Minority Students in Science and Engineering through Summer Enrichment Programs” Amelito Enriquez .................................................................................................................................... 132“Student Recruitment by Faculty Phone-a-Thons” Debra Larson & Marissa Mourer
” were observed in writingpedagogy; however, instructors reported that these were minor changes independent of ourmodules.This finding was reinforced during the June 2023 focus group, as the instructor stated that theyhad been using many of the skills presented in the guides before being exposed to the Instructor’sGuide and thus had not changed their approach beyond making the student’s guides available.3.2.5 WSUV’s ECE 214 Logic CircuitsControl (Fall 2020):The instructor of ECE 214 gave a PowerPoint presentation, “How to Write a Lab Report,” to theclass at the beginning of the semester and then posted the presentation on the course website forstudents’ reference. This “How to…” presentation was based on the typical IMRDC organizationand
Learn.” These modules describe learning strategies you can useregression with forward selection was used to build the with our course materials...prediction model, and the problem of overfitting was Both resources can be found on the [LMS] site at the STEM Learningexamined through 10-fold cross-validation. The k-fold cross Enrichments link in the left panel.validation is a process in which original data is divided into I hope you find that these resources help you to learn and perform well!k pieces with the same size, and among k pieces, one piece isused for testing the model, and rest (k-1) of them used
,through, and beyond their undergraduate institutions. Data were collected from students at eachof four institutions (pseudonyms are used here): Technical Public Institution (TPUB), a publicuniversity specializing in teaching engineering and technology; Urban Private University(UPRI), a private historically black mid-Atlantic institution; Large Public University (LPUB), alarge public university in the northwest U.S.; and Suburban Private University (SPRI), amedium-sized private university on the west coast of the United States.The APS uses a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design, in which both qualitative andquantitative methods are employed to collect and analyze data. The integration of results occursduring the interpretation phase
opportunity for a university to respond to calls for greater accountability andoutcomes-based accreditation. While students gather evidence of their own learning, ideally theywill go through the steps described earlier 9, starting with questioning and organizing, and endingwith adapting.E-portfolio construction contributes to students’ development and internalization of activelearning processes. Because these processes are needed to support life-long learning, portfolioshave the potential to contribute to professional development well beyond the college years. Withthe current generation of students being greatly influenced by information technology 19
to solicit participation from theseinstitutions is shared through papers and presentations disseminating the activities, most of thebest practices and accumulated wisdom about how to manage data collection across multiplesites is not widely shared. To remedy this, the authors synthesize their many years' experiencecoordinating data collection for engineering education research projects and address siteselection, local contacts, recruiting, collaboration agreements, and IRB coordination.IntroductionThere are a variety of reasons why collecting research data at multiple institutions or acrossmultiple programs can strengthen a study in engineering education or a related field. Perhaps themost commonly cited reason is that it increases the
introduction to engineering design course.We draw from a pilot project that used writing/communication assignments to improvethe teaching of engineering design. We based our approach on the “writing across thecurriculum” (WAC) movement’s premise that verbal composition is an analog forthinking and that communication artifacts can be used to infer student learning incomplex problem-solving situations.CPR™ -- as an advanced form of educational technology -- partners both with the studentand with the instructor to monitor learning through formative assessment. In this project,through the vehicle of CPR™, we were able to implement assignments that fully utilizethe WAC pedagogy, without overly increasing the workload for instructors. Furthermore,CPR™’s
success in a “cluster” approach includes but goes beyond the successin them finding a good job in their chosen field. To me, though success in highereducation is hard to measure, there are two goals that are worth driving toward. The firstgoal is a more or less impersonal simple acquisition of knowledge. We want our studentsto “know more” facts, have better skills in problem solving, to have come into contactwith more ideas, and to be deeper thinkers. Progress toward this goal is traditionallyachieved through lectures and labs or through discussions with the professor in the officeusing conventional education methods. We measure the success of reaching this goal byhomework scores, test scores, and report scores. The results here indicate that
our approach.II.B. Literature and Product Review: Although there is a clear lack of quantitative researchon how robots can increase STEM achievement in students, and some of the research findingsare inconclusive5, most of the studies have shown positive correlation between the use of robotsand students motivation towards STEM careers. Robotics is recognized by NSF to be anexcellent vehicle for education and involving students in science and engineering, and, with theproper initiative, motivate promising students to pursue career tracks in mathematics and itsapplications6.Robots also promote learning of scientific and mathematic principles through experimentation7.Bringing robots into the classrooms will have lasting benefits. When students
wereabundant challenges associated with assigning students with a semester-long design projectfocused on analogical design utilizing cross-disciplinary information. For this reason,correlating student experience on the design project with environmental ethics was not feasible.The encountered challenges pertaining to student design behavior are not the focus of this article,but they will be described elsewhere.There was no explicit emphasis within the class on environmental issues. The reason for thiswas that the intention of this initial study was to establish whether BID education by itself couldimpact environmental ethics through the aforementioned mechanisms. Adding an explicitemphasis on sustainability in future iterations of the course will be
environment.All fibers were spun using 1% (w/w) PEO/CHCl3. Fibers were spun onto a microscope slideand measurements were done with a confocal microscope. Measurements of fiber diameter weredone with computer software (SPOT v4.0.9, Diagnostic Instruments Inc.) Statistical analysiswas done using GraphPad Prism. Concentration as a Process Parameter for Fiber DiameterThree solutions were formulated with different concentrations. It was observed that increasingthe polymer concentration beyond 1% would be counter-intuitive to optimize and reduce fiberdiameter. With large molecular weight, it would not be optimal to have a higher concentration,as this would most definitely lead to a higher surface tension and viscosity, preventingappropriate Taylor cone
]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A57. 2. Brent, M. (2002). Selecting A Distance Education School. Retrieved from: http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/APR02_Issue/article05.html 3. Kadiyala, M & Crynes, B. L. (2000). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education, Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 177- 189. 4. Coleman, J. N., Kinniment, D. J., Burns, F. P., & Kolemans, A. M. (1998). Effectiveness of computer-aided learning as a direct replacement for lecturing in degree-level electronics, IEEE Transaction on Education, 41(3), 177-184. 5. Zywano, M. S. & Waalen, J. K. (2001). Student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enables and traditional
schools. This process has beendocumented through the materials associated with the faculty’s academic retreats, the WSOEAdvisory Board meetings, and the minutes of the WSOE Curriculum Committee (Table 3).2. Integrate Criterion 8 and ABET 3a-3k when formulating the Program Outcomes.… “We had the eight criteria pretty well covered as I recall, but it was the Program Criteria thatnearly did us in.”… Page 12.1210.6Criterion 3 states that “engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain:” whichis followed by outcomes (a) through (k).6 The simplest way to demonstrate fulfillment of thisrequirement is to begin with the ABET-defined
this study based on the raw outcomes forsimplicity. The data visualization framework presented remains valid. This matter may beaddressed in a future study.Looking ahead beyond 2020 [3], in the ACM/IEEE Computing Curricula 2020 Paradigms forGlobal Computing Education (CC2020) [6], the joint task force of these professionalassociations does not prescribe specific CE curricula but rather defines the core competencies ofgraduates from next-generation computing programs. CC2020 details thirty-four competenciesfor CE graduates that are streamlined into six knowledge areas: Hardware, Systems Architectureand Infrastructure, Software Fundamentals, Software Development, Systems Modeling, andSystems and Organizations; a welcome departure from the over
different grading process than thosethat have an easily defined solution. This paper explains how, through the use of a blendedcriteria and norm based assessment and evaluation process, to clearly communicate standardsand outcomes, fairly grade dissimilar designs, and effectively encourage continuousimprovement of design products. Evidence of these outcomes will be assessed through thestatistical analysis of student feedback from the United States Military Academy.Introduction United States Military Academy (USMA) civil engineering majors are required tocomplete a one-semester capstone design project as a requirement for graduation. The capstonedesign provides the best integrated experience to assess student performance on the USMA
directconnection between the students’ home neighborhoods and the data being collected, fostersstudent investment and curiosity in their analysis.KeywordsAir quality, modelingMotivationIn chemical engineering curricula, it can often be difficult to identify relevant and meaningfulexamples that relate beyond the realm of traditional process engineering. Environmentally-oriented coursework often employs examples within the natural world’s subsystems (i.e., theatmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere) to demonstrate principles of masstransport, material and energy balances, and chemical kinetic phenomena. Notably, climate andatmospheric systems have provided a consistently topical and well-documented source ofinformation from which inspiration for
for large classrooms and developing K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization.Prof. Nathan Delson, University of California at San Diego Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research inter- ests include robotics, biomedical devices, and engineering education. He teaches introductory design, mechanics, mechatronics, capstone design, medical devices, and product design & entrepreneurship. His interests in design education include increasing student motivation, teamwork, hands-on projects, and integration of theory into design projects. In 1999 he co-founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides
of the course is to help studentsbecome more aware of the engineered world around them while developing some of the skillsneeded to be successful in engineering. Through this course students will: Improve their ability to reason spatially; Visually communicate how engineered systems work; and Critically evaluate their own work and that of their peers.Research Questions and ApproachThis paper describes a study aimed at answering the following questions:• How are students’ spatial reasoning skills changed by taking The Way Things Work?• How are students’ visual communication skills changed by taking The Way Things Work?• Do students’ spatial reasoning and visual communication skills vary by gender?The ability to reason spatially is
Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of K-12, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include assessment, team development, outreach and education research for DC Col- orado’s hands-on initiatives. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Perceptions of an Ethics Intervention
the mid-term exams, Jeopardy-style questions were used, which required studentsto display mastery of key engineering economy concepts that goes beyond simple memorization.Category topics for the Jeopardy game included: time value of money, capitalized costs,depreciation, internal rate of return, and benefit-cost ratio. To review for the final exam, studentswere asked to create engineering economy crossword puzzles in their collaborative groups.Once constructed, the puzzles had to be solved by other groups in the class. The use of thegames in the course truly encouraged students to take a greater degree of responsibility for theirlearning 14, 15. Students were also asked to write a test question related to one of the learningobjectives with
Learning and Cognitive Load Theory to Enhance Computer Programming for Mechanical Engineers: Qualitative Assessment, Thomas J. Impelluso 70 15. A Junior Level FPGA Course in Digital Design Using Verilog HDL and Altera DE-2 Board For Engineering Technology Students, Tariq Qayyum 80 16. Design, Fabrication, and Analysis of Photodynamic Therapy Monitoring System for use in Esophageal Carcinoma, Gemunu Happawana, Amaranath Premasiri and Arye Rosen 89 17. SimzLab - Interactive simulations of physical systems for active individual and team learning, Richard K. Herz and Gregory E. Ogden
Bachelors of Arts degree in International Development Studies at UCLA, she began a successful career in banking and finance at Bank of America, Merrill Lynch. She has completed various post baccalaureate certifications through UCLA Anderson and the Harvard Business School; most recently, she completed her MPA at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and MBA at Cornell Tech. She has published in multiple academic journals including ASEE, ROPPA, and AP- PAM. Additionally, her scholarly work has been featured in Forbes magazine. She believes that research can inform diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and programs to one day have a workforce that is representative of the society it aims to
Paper ID #42317Exploring Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Perspectives on LaboratoryLearning: Comparing Hands-On, Remote, and Virtual EnvironmentsDr. Yanyao Deng, University of Exeter Yanyao Deng, Ph.D., is a researcher and schloar with a diverse background spanning education, technology, and linguistic. Holding a master and a Ph.D. in Education from the University of Exeter, she also did a master in educational technology from Beijing Institute of Technology. Her research expertise lies in engineering education and business innovation, showcased through significant contributions to academic publications and conference
vortex-induced bladeless turbines [10].equidistant from each other. Tests will be performed to The axle linked to the turbine model was coupled to theobserve amount of power generation by these designs in a short shaft of a 0.5-V DC motor, which is used as an electricsmall-scale water flow. generator, through a hard plastic tubing with an internal The bladed turbines use drag and lift forces generated by diameter of 2 mm. The DC motor was then mounted in a 3D-the water flow interacting with the blades to rotate about its printed enclosure
IntelligentSystems and Computing, pp. 433–445, 2016.[9] N. Nikolakis, G. Siaterlis, and K. Alexopoulos, “A machine learning approach for improvedshop-floor operator support using a two-level collaborative filtering and gamification features,”Procedia CIRP, vol. 93, pp. 455–460, 2020.[10] M. Liu, Y. Huang, and D. Zhang, “Gamification's impact on manufacturing: Enhancing JobMotivation, satisfaction and operational performance with smartphone-based gamified jobdesign,” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, vol. 28, no. 1,pp. 38–51, 2017.[11] G. Zichermann and C. Cunningham, .”Gamification by design: Implementing gamemechanics in web and mobile apps.”, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2011.[12] Y.-K. Chou, Actionable gamification: Beyond
too far from being true in undergraduate education in the United States wherein students arememorizing their way through most of the curriculum. In an US News and World Reportarticle2, “High School Students Need to Think, Not Memorize”, an Advanced Placement biologyteacher is quoted “Students go through the motions of their lab assignments without graspingwhy, and ‘the exam is largely a vocabulary test’”.David Perkins3, co-director of Harvard Project Zero, a research center for cognitivedevelopment, and senior research associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, pointsout several observations in his article on “Teaching for Understanding”. (1) “The student mightsimply be parroting the test and following memorized routines for stock
, and database knowledge on SQL and NoSQL, respectively, wereincorporated in the curriculum.Additionally, four new Cooperative Education in Engineering Technology courses were createdsolely for students who are accepted into the apprenticeship program. ET931 and ET932 areworth 3 credits each and represent the time students spend working at the company sites, whileET991 and ET992 are each 1 credit seminar courses, where students meet with a professor oncampus to support and evaluate their apprenticeship performance. Their performance and gradesin these four apprenticeship courses are assessed through a combination of weekly journaling,mid- and end- of semester student presentation to both professors and corporate managers, anddirect feedback
a graduate specialization in East Asian art history. During the 1997- 1998 academic year she was a research fellow at Visual Understanding in Education (VUE), the non-profit that developed the Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) curriculum, museum teaching protocols, and teacher professional development programs. Duke worked with VTS founders Dr. Abigail Housen and Philip Yenawine, assisting with early research and development of K-12 curricula and teacher training in the late 1990s. She was a pioneer in adapting VTS protocols beyond the K-12 setting, experimenting with its use in medical education and other adult learning programs. She collaborates with science researchers, using VTS to help graduate students