University. She is currently a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Divi- sion of Undergraduate Education. Her expertise and interests focus on diversity and inclusion, engineer identity, PBL, innovative learning-centered pedagogies, assessment of student learning, engineering de- sign, capstone design, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. She holds a BS and MS in Engineering Mechanics and a PhD in Biomedical Engi- neering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Robin D. Anderson, James Madison University Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in
oxide membranes and teaching reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. She is now a Teaching Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at CSM. Her primary research focus is in pedagogy, specifically in utilizing tablets and other technology and different teaching methods to increase student engagement and reduce/eliminate lecturing in the classroom. She likes to play with her kids, play racquetball, run, bike, swim, and play pool in her free time.Dr. Jason C. Ganley, Colorado School of Mines c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices in Teaching unit operations: the “Field Session” Lab Experience at
ability to recognize, manage, and negotiate conflict [4], [5]. Asengineering students develop their technical expertise through undergraduate coursework andprofessional experience, it is also vitally important to engineering students’ professionalprospects and personal well-being to develop proficient conflict negotiation skills [5]. As a matter of fact, professional skills have been identified among the fundamentallyrequired skills by Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) by the time theengineering students graduate with an engineering degree, as such skills are captured in at leasttwo out of the seven Student Outcomes under Criterion 3, identified for the 2019-2020, and2020-2021 accreditation cycles. These relevant
skilled in Embedded Devices, Software Engineering, and Electronics. Ex- tremely motivated and self-reliant with a great believe in autonomy, new ways to solve problems and ROWE approaches. Team player and devoted to create superb working environments through dedication and team culture. Strong information technology professional with two MSc’s and working on a Doctor of Philosophy - PhD focused in Electrical Engineering from North Dakota State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Innovation-Based Learning: Enhancing Innovative Problem Solving and Higher-Order Thinking in Education through Multidisciplinary CollaborationAbstractThis paper
introductory physics classes at theinner-city university, (2) involve undergraduate science majors in the implementation,assessment, and creation of innovative teaching materials, and (3) document the effectiveness ofthe implementation in promoting student learning through the use of multiple assessmentinstruments.Almost all students enrolled in these introductory courses are majors in the science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. In order for these students to succeed as theymove through their academic and professional careers, they require preparation that goes wellbeyond what the traditionally taught physics course often provides. Rather than developing askill set that involves pattern matching and formula manipulation
electrical and computer engineering curriculum will producegraduates who are able to design components and systems."Program Objective D : " The electrical and computer engineering curriculum will producegraduates who have broad laboratory skills, including extensive teamwork and hands-onpractical abilities."Program Objective E : " The electrical and computer engineering curriculum will producegraduates who are aware of current and emerging technologies and professional engineeringpractices." Page 12.1281.17Appendix 2Course Objectives1:1. Develop a basic understanding of the theory of semiconductors and electronic devices [A]2. Develop the skills necessary to
their alumni. One metric used by many institutions as a method of external review is theamount of external funding that is received for support of their faculty and their researchinterests.As in any enterprise, academic administrators are also interested in limiting the liability of theirprograms and in the efficient use of their resources including physical facilities. Spaceutilization is often a critical metric in academia for determining program cost and efficiency.Good public relations is another key aspect of value to academic administrators.Latent StakeholdersThere are a number of additional stakeholders and needs at each institution and often all of thesestakeholders and their respective needs do not emerge until a program becomes
impact ofGradTrack program completion on the success of students during their first semester to year ingraduate school. We will discuss what topics and structures within the program were helpful forunderserved undergraduate students during their matriculation into graduate school. We will alsodiscuss what additional needs students experienced that were not addressed. Results of this studywill inform the continued enhancements of the GradTrack program and could lend additionalinsights and suggestions of best practices into other transition and first-year graduate successprograms.IntroductionDespite the increase in the number of doctoral degrees conferred upon historicallyunderrepresented populations in engineering over the years, the student
adult inform their research work.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and approaches for teaching and assessing systems thinking skills. Kirsten holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education, M.S. in Systems Engineering, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Virginia Tech.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is
Paper ID #43703Work in Progress: A Collaborative Reflection Exploring the Teaching Motivationand Identity Development for International Graduate Students in EngineeringSruthi Dasika, Purdue University Sruthi is a Ph.D. candidate in Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University, focusing her research on developing cost-effective drinking water test methods for underserved communities in the developing world. She earned an M.S. in Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue and a B.E. in Civil Engineering from Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore. Sruthi has accrued extensive graduate teaching
factors that influence the actual choice ofgraduate school plans by students, and provides faculty members the information necessary torecruit more highly-qualified engineering students to engineering graduate school.Introduction Maintaining a competitive lead in science, technology, mathematics, and engineering(STEM) education has proven to be a challenge for the United States despite significant effortsto improve the recruitment and retention of STEM students. Fears of increasing globalcompetition compound the perception that there has been a large decline in the supply of humanresources in the STEM graduate education. Many other countries are increasing the number ofSTEM graduates who receive master’s and Ph.D. degrees, while U.S
AC 2010-948: HELPING ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE STUDENTS FIND THEIRVOICE: RADIO PRODUCTION AS A WAY TO ENHANCE STUDENTS'COMMUNICATION SKILLS AND THEIR COMPETENCE AT PLACINGENGINEERING AND SCIENCE IN A BROADER SOCIETAL CONTEXTAri Epstein, MIT ARI W. EPSTEIN is a lecturer in the MIT Terrascope program, and also in the MIT Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. He is the lead developer and instructor of Terrascope Radio and serves as the director of Terrascope Youth Radio. He is particularly interested in team-oriented, project-based learning, and in bridging the gap between learning in formal academic settings and learning in "free-choice" or "informal" settings, such as museums, media
is not at all new and has been in practice for a verylong time. The author would also like to cite Walter Barbe, a nationally known authority in thefields of reading and learning disabilities, who has shown that perceptual modality styles doindeed provide an indication of an individual’s dominant learning mode (Barbe & Milone, 1980). Fallon, Hammons, Brown and Wann (Fallon, 1997) define authentic assessment tasksare those that(a) are meaningful to both students and the teacher,(b) are individual to each student’s experience in order to demonstrate his or her achievement,(c) require students to locate and analyze information as well as to draw conclusions about it,(d) require students to communicate results clearly, and
. Her research interests center on interdisciplinary learning and teaching, technology-integrated STEM teaching practices, and assessment development and validation in STEM education.Dr. Daniel S. Puperi, The University of Texas at Austin Daniel is an assistant professor of instruction in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Texas at Austin. Dan received a BS in aerospace engineering from Purdue University and then worked at NASA Johnson Space Center for 15 years before pursuing a PhD in Bioengineering from Rice University. In 2016, Dan graduated from Rice and began teaching four design/laboratory courses required for all undergraduate BME students at UT Austin.Thomas E. Lindsay, The University
Lethality Analysis, Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Au- tonomous Systems. Dr. Rodriguez received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. Personal Web site: http://aar.faculty.asu.edu/Ms. Anita Grierson, Arizona State University Anita Grierson is the Director of the METS Center in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She guides the activities of the METS Center and oversees its staff of engineering transfer students. Ms. Grierson has over 12 years corporate experience in Program Management, Business Page 23.1371.1 Development
experiences.Paris Eisenman, University of New MexicoEthan Kapp, University of New MexicoCarl Lyle Abadam, University of New MexicoDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department.Prof. Anjali Mulchandani, University of New Mexico Dr. Anjali Mulchandani is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of New Mexico. She leads the Environmental Resource Sustainability group, which studies themes related to environmental and water resources engineering
thedark about important aspect of the disciplines within which they are studying: The students have no sense of who might be important in a particular field… They do not have the benefit of knowing anyone who actually does research in the discipline (except for their professor) and so do not have a notion of something as intangible as the informal Page 23.380.2 scholarly network.Developing a general sense of how a discipline works is essential to gaining expertise and beingsituated within a community helps to enable this. Lave and Wenger suggested that whereindividuals are socialized in an environment that is co
options for curriculum design in first-year programs.Background and ObjectivesIn the mid-2000’s, a call went out to integrate the teaching of science, technology, engineering,and mathematics into what we now collectively refer to as STEM [1]. Since that time, additionalinitiatives have suggested that it might be even more beneficial to integrate the arts into STEMlearning, creating STEAM. Some even argue that it should be pushed even further, addingadditional study of the societal implications of STEAM research and work, further lengtheningthe acronym to STEAMS [2]. For this paper, the focus will remain on STEAM and itsimplications for the first-year engineering curriculum.Students’ experiences in their first-year engineering (FYE) classes are
. Based on the African American Male Theory (AAMT) [4], our research team examinedthe three students’ experiences in the context of the interconnected environmental systems(microsystem, mesosystem, exosystemic, macrosystem, chronosystem). Highlighting theconcepts of “resilience,” “resistance,” and “pursuit of social justice” in AAMT, the authorsexplored the three students’ multiple-layered social and professional identities as emerging Blackmale engineering professionals.Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Bush and Bush’s African American Male Theory [4], which providesan effective analytic framework to understand the unique facets of Black males’ experiencessituated in various educational, academic, and community contexts. Like other
cause variations in the results giving openness tofurther research. All surveys were administered to students at the Universidad SanFrancisco de Quito USFQ, in Spanish, and reviewed by native speakers. The resultsprovided statistical information on the significant differences in cultural dimensionsbetween engineers and architects so that it was possible to discuss the possible causes ofthe creation of the gap between the two branches of construction as well as tounderstand variations in pre-pandemic and post-pandemic student outcomes andrecommendations that can be taken to reduce barriers to cooperation between civilengineers and architects.IntroductionBefore the 19th century, infrastructure was carried out by a single professional, whoplayed
describes how student research and industry projects can benefit through jointuniversity-industry collaboration by introducing new technology for replacing inefficient andoutdated systems and software. This research project involves development of a fullycustomizable, user-defined hardware-software suite for automated signal routing with an openended functionality profile. This intelligent switching system can be customized and employed inany industry where there is a need for programmable, timed, and/or simultaneous routing ofanalog or digital signals between devices. Potential applications of these automated switchingsystems include, but are not limited to: demarcation points, test floors, redundant backupsystems, remote maintenance, etc. This
sequential designs within a mixed methods approach[4], a variety of research techniques was employed to elicit students’ views and attitudes. Afocus group of five Latino/Hispanic students was asked about their perceptions and attitudesregarding the climate within an engineering college. From their responses emerged 10 themes,collapsed into six dimensions; these were later used to construct a nine-item survey instrumentdeployed to over 150 Latino/Hispanic engineering students. In asking whether Latino/Hispanicengineering students felt disconnected to the general student population and to the engineeringdiscipline, the study also investigated the extent to which self-segregation occurred across otherethnic/racial groups. Questions were primarily
studentsmay directly contact the designer/creator/developer for additional information or clarification evenif s/he is no longer a member of the UCCRP.Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) The main objective of the UCCRP is to create a learning environment for students and engagethem in activities when executed properly would lead to a deeper learning experience of manyof the engineering theories and concepts. As a result, when the students progress in the proj-ect, their learning outcomes display an increasing structural complexity quantitatively as wellas qualitatively. In other words, the amount of details in their responses to specific questions in-creases and more coherent solution patterns for parts of the UCCRP start to emerge
studentsmay directly contact the designer/creator/developer for additional information or clarification evenif s/he is no longer a member of the UCCRP.Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) The main objective of the UCCRP is to create a learning environment for students and engagethem in activities when executed properly would lead to a deeper learning experience of manyof the engineering theories and concepts. As a result, when the students progress in the proj-ect, their learning outcomes display an increasing structural complexity quantitatively as wellas qualitatively. In other words, the amount of details in their responses to specific questions in-creases and more coherent solution patterns for parts of the UCCRP start to emerge
Åkerlind48, 53. Interviewstranscribed verbatim become the focus of the phenomenographic analysis when interviews havebeen used as the primary means of data collection. The set of transcripts represent a ‘snapshot’ ofsome of the experiences of a group of people with a particular aspect of the world in response to aparticular set of questions at a particular time49. When data collection has relied only oninterviews, no other evidence exists beyond the transcripts to inform the analysis process43.The analysis process is both one of ‘discovery’54 as well as one of ‘construction’55. The resultsare not known in advance and tested in the study, but must be discovered, or emerge fromtranscripts, and constructed in an iterative way from the transcripts. In
, Reno.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 First Generation
Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on struc- tural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Dr. Canney taught in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Seattle University for four years and now works in private consulting. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Faculty Perceptions of Challenges to Educating Engineering and Computing Students About Ethics and Societal ImpactsAbstractEvaluating ethics and societal impacts (ESI) is an integral part of engineering in anincreasingly globalized and technology dependent world. Despite the recognized
Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Prof. Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the
a survey instrument designed to measure self-efficacyin engineering, feelings of inclusion and outcomes expectations, and collected responses fromundergraduate women studying engineering at four institutions: Penn State University (PSU),Georgia Institute of Technology (GA Tech), University of Texas – Austin (UT Austin) andRensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI).The paper describes the development process for ensuring reliability and validity and also reportsthe preliminary results of the analysis to answer the following research questions. 1. Do students’ feelings of self-efficacy vary from one institution to another? 2. Do students with different year-standings answer the module items differently regardless of institution? 3
definitions and interpretations of effectuation, and theeffectual heuristics, that are as close to those created by Sarasvathy as possible. For thosedefinitions, we used the most recent publication of basic effectuation information as posted onthe website of the society for effectual action, run by the original researchers 34. The body ofresearch on effectuation is generally consistent and intentional about making use of the originallyproposed definition.Use of the most current work published by the original researchers is appropriate because theoriginal theory developers are actively engaged in continuing to develop the theory 35, and thetheory is in an emergent stage 36. Therefore, we adopted and will operationalize the definition ofeffectuation as