23 21 25 Considered Students Retained 13 19 19 Percent Retained 57% 90% 76%Table 2. First to Second Year Retention of Students taking EGR 140.Although the sample size is fairly small, this is a large increase in retention of students into thesophomore year, which is a key retention barrier. Although there may be other factors involvedin the increased retention, it appears that the use of pair programming certainly did not hurtretention. Note that the students considered here are first year students participating in EGR 140,which is taught in the Spring
related decisions. This process identified eighteen customers.Phase II - Program Objectives and Outcomes - Program outcomes were developed in linewith program objectives and stakeholder requirements. Twenty-four areas of skill, knowledge,attitude and ability (SKAA’s) were developed.Phase III – QFD Implementation - Five QFD Matrices were decided upon: (1) Stakeholder vs.SKAA, (2) SKAA vs. Core Course (for each major), (3) SKAA vs. Methodology, (4) SKAA vs.Assessment Tool, and (5) Assessment Tools vs. Core Courses (for each major). Changes weremade to many courses by adding components to bolster SKAA’s and removing material that wasnot customer oriented. Department strategy was developed for implementing department-widefeedback, developing
interests include teaching and learning in engineering, STEM education policy, and diversity and equity in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Measuring differences in performance by varying formative assessment construction guided by learning style preferencesAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, the relationship between assessment design guided bylearning style preferences and student performance in a programming course is investigated. Oneof the National Academy of Engineering’s 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering is to tailor anddifferentiate instruction to improve the reliability of learning. A manner in which thisdifferentiation may be accomplished is through attention to
Real Exam (lab session 2). Students are asked to answer multiple-choice questions (10-30% of the grade) and to provide a programming solution to an assignedproblem (70-90% of the grade). Students plan their time accordingly within the one-hour classtime to complete both. Another approach is to use the first lab session as a small-class review,encouraging the students to be more vocal than they might in a large lecture. Students areencouraged to prepare for the review session and bring pertinent questions from their studies.Practice exams are reviewed, with rationale given for the answers. The second lab session isbroken down into a short (20-30 questions) multiple-choice / short-answer section online and alonger programming portion on paper
assessment focused on collecting data from two educators who reviewed thecourse syllabus, provided written analyses and suggestions, and met with the coursedesigner regarding modifications. The audit team consisted of two selected STEMeducators—one, a retired secondary science educator, adjunct university faculty, NSFgrant evaluator, and information education consultant for the Science Museum ofMinnesota; and two, a former science teacher and program coordinator, and currentAerospace and STEM Coordinator for an urban school in a large metropolitan schooldistrict. The audit team provided feedback on the course syllabus.The second assessment included qualitative research methods that were employed tocollect data from two semi-structured focus groups
related to the course in generalwhen compared with a traditional assessment (2 during the term exams and final exam). Thiscould occur due to a greater sense of accomplishment through the mastery-based approach, aswell as the frequent testing and retesting freedom available to students.(2) Students will have a greater sense of belonging in the course and program compared witha traditional assessment. This could occur from a greater sense of accomplishment with mastery.However, a lesser sense of belonging could arise as students that are not excelling see othersmoving through the coursework at a faster pace.To study the effect of MBL on classroom anxiety and belonging, surveys will be given tostudents enrolled in circuit analysis courses
22% [1]. Going forward, allprocessors (except some small embedded processors for specialized devices) will have multiplecores in their central processing units (CPUs). Moreover, attached GPU cards with largenumbers of cores have become very attractive for high performance computing and can provideorders of magnitude speedup over using the CPU alone [2, 3]. To address this space, Intel hasrolled out its Many Integrated Core (MIC) architecture [4]. Systems with a small number ofcores such as present multicore processors can use a shared memory model whereas as thenumber of cores increase, hierarchical user-managed memory and distributed memory modelscan be expected. Undergraduate programming has yet to address this major transition from
indicated that having to work on common curriculumelements, such as common foundational courses in the first and second year of new programs,with multiple departments or colleges created issues with program development. Beyondfocusing on buy-in from other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)departments in the process, strategies for forming closer connections with other units in order todevelop shared goals and common instructional and assessment methods were discussed. Theseincluded large-scale decisions, such as choosing to merge an engineering college with the collegeof science at the institution to better support the collaborative curriculum initiatives that wereneeded.Planning for the future, allocation of resourcesItems 6
and Global Competence In 2008, the university at large began to explore ‗ongoing assessment.‘ Each academicprogram was asked to identify individual, specific outcomes, and methods to assess thoseoutcomes on a regular basis. Academic units all across campus were encouraged to thinkcritically about what knowledge, skills and attitudes successful students displayed. Identifyingthose traits then allowed faculty to create a set of traits or skills that all students within theprogram should attain by the time they graduate. Those skills or traits then were set as outcomesthat each program could strive for. In the Department of Technology Systems, one of the skillsfaculty identified as important for students was the ability to communicate
scholars graduate, some replacements are made, but most replacements occur in the Fall. Makeup of Scholars. Most of our scholars tend to be transfer students (typically approaching 80%). The rest are non-transfers (i.e. native). Our new transfers usually number around 20%. Most scholars tend to be in-state (over 90%) with over 40% from our 9 partnering Arizona CCs. Our program attrition is typically very small (<2% per year). Attrition usually occurs because of medical issues or family emergencies. It is rare to have a scholar leave ENG. This has remained the case for many years [32]-[47]. An increasing number of our students are continuing for an accelerated 4+1 MS. This program typically requires a minimum gpa of 3.5
perceptions towards seeking a profession in technical sales.IntroductionRoughly half dozen schools, including Penn State-Erie1 and the University of Florida,2 offerprograms in sales engineering or technical sales for engineers. Additionally, Texas A&MUniversity (id.tamu.edu/) and Purdue University(www.tech.purdue.edu/TLI/academics/undergraduate/ID/) offer programs in industrialdistribution that train students in technical sales and/or sales engineering. In this study, wepresent preliminary results assessing the impact on learning outcomes for Industrial Engineeringstudents taking the first of two sales engineering courses offered as a minor in sales engineeringat Iowa State University, a large land-grant university.This course is called Technical
AC 2012-5416: ”WE’RE ALL IN THE SAME BOAT”: ACHIEVING ANINSTITUTIONAL CULTURE OF ASSESSMENTDr. Sandra A. Yost, University of Detroit Mercy Sandra A. Yost is a professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy, where she is active in institutional and engineering program assessment. She teaches in the areas of design, E.E. fundamentals, linear systems theory, mechatronics, control systems, and signal processing. She is currently serving on the ASEE Board of Directors as the Vice President for External Relations.Dr. Laurie A. Britt-Smith, University of Detroit Mercy Laurie Britt-Smith is an Assistant Professor in the English Department at UDM. She is the Director of the writing
Examples of Rubrics Used to Assess ABET Student Outcomes in a Capstone Course Byron Garry South Dakota State UniversityIntroductionIn our Electronics Engineering Technology (EET) program, we are continually re-evaluating thestudent outcomes and how they are measured by the assessment process. We have defined, withthe approval of alumni and our industrial advisory board, sixteen Student Outcomes labeled (a) -(p). These begin with the ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomes (a) - (k)1 , and then add theProgram Criteria for Electrical/Electronics Engineering Technology, and some universityrequired student learning outcomes, which are labeled
the density ofelements in the matrix understanding that there is no reason why the matrix should be completelyfilled. The right side of the table shows the average number of stakeholders listed by the team,the average number of value types listed, and the average density of the matrix. There are nosignificant differences evident between pre- and post-assessment for the most recent cohort,which makes some sense as the teams could look back at their prior version when creating thesecond one. The difference between cohorts is small when looking at rubric scores but is morenoticeable when considering the number of stakeholders and value types listed. This may reflectthe increased emphasis on teaching EM in the most recent year, but the sample
noindication of their attitudes. The 10 participants in my study were taking third- and fourth-yearcourses and all believed that technical writing is important, although they had not taken courseswith explicitly embedded writing instruction and assessment. The contexts and participant poolsfor the two research projects differed, but both were conducted in computer science departmentsin large, research-intensive Canadian universities. Neither study examined shifts in attitude asstudents progress through a computer science program, but this could be an interesting avenue offuture research. Ten of Zhang et al.’s 135 survey respondents reported that writing helped thembetter understand both their code and the related computer science concepts that they
Paper ID #26819Teaching and Assessment of Innovation and Creativity in Civil Engineering:Why? How? Now!Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, En- vironmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn
graduation of minority students in engineering, sciences and technology areas [4,5]The College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) at the University of Michigan-Dearborn (UM-D) has had a very small percent of minority students enrolled in its undergraduateprograms up until early part of 1990s. Although the campus is located within a close proximityof the city of Detroit, which produces the largest number of minority high school graduates in thestate, the CECS did not have even a representative number of minority students in its program. Adecision was made, supported by the Michigan Mandate, to increase, retain and graduate moreminority students in engineering and very closely related disciplines. This paper discussesapproaches used and the
and faculty housing,equipping the classroom, and planning excursions to local sites in Rome as well as two largerexcursions to Florence and to Venice. This allowed the professor (namely me) to concentrate onthe academics of the program and not which trains to book, how to get museum tickets, arrangebus drivers, or how to arrange for different tour guides. The AIA staff were extremely friendly toboth students and faculty, and provided invaluable insights into individual travel planning, Italianculture, and great local restaurants.RecruitmentEven though we had a potential pool of nearly 1000 students, we only had 14 applicants whenwe tried to run the program in 2021. We attribute this in large part to residual COVID anxiety,plus I was just
the student to discover but should be explicitly taught due to therelatively complexity of the new problems. Learning these tools will help students diagnose andfix their own coding mistakes.Conclusions This paper presents an updated curriculum centered on problem-based learning and just-in-time teaching for a weekly, one-credit programming laboratory course. The class must supporta wide variety of engineering majors while reinforcing programming fundamentals from lecture.The labs were designed to peak student interest while forcing students to practice currentconcepts with questions that challenged their understanding. Assessments and student feedbackshow the changes are largely successful, with students strongly recommending the
) Program. His research and teaching interests include K-12 STEM education impact on post-secondary success, assessment and evaluation, DBER, and embedded systems software design. Professor Zion received his B.S. and M.S. from Rochester Institute of Technology and his Ph.D. in Cur- riculum and Instruction from the University at Buffalo. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessment of discrete concept knowledge and integrated understanding in introductory networking coursesAbstractTraditionally, the instructional approach to introductory courses in networking and networkingtechnologies has been to start with an explanation of each of the layers in either the
quality of the pools resulted in highinterest among the faculty and Provost to hire more than just one faculty member from eachsearch. Upon request, the Provost Swan approved additional hires from ADVANCE applicantpools with additional university funds. The recruitment piece has been a very successful part ofthis program, resulting not only in female hires, but increased awareness about how effectivesearches can yield surprising results.Faculty Development ActivitiesAfter faculty are recruited to URI, their experiences during the first few years play a large role indetermining whether they stay at the university and enjoy a successful career and fulfillingpersonal life. The ADVANCE program has undertaken a number of activities designed toenhance
team activityIn addition to questionnaire and observational measures, skin electrical activity is obtained to gainaccess to the subjective experiences of students during the learning experience. This is achievedthrough the system proposed in Fig. 4, which measures the psychoneurosis effect. The reason forselecting this method is as follows.(1) This indicator has been used in a relatively classical manner, and hence, there are many relatedstudies and it is easy to obtain evidence.(2) To measure reactions during work and conversation, it is desirable to use a small device ratherthan a large one.(3) It is desirable to be able to construct a wearable system at a low cost to simultaneously recordmultiple devices.(4) As it is desirable to obtain
Engineering. His research operates at the intersection of Computer Science Education, Learning Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence, focusing on enhancing programming education through innovative technologies and pedagogical approaches. He is currently developing AI-powered tools for student assistance and assessment in large programming courses. He holds a Master’s in Computer Science and Management from the University of Florida and a Bachelor’s in Computer Science and Engineering from Jaypee University of Information Technology, India. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Investigating Factors Influencing Performance in an Introductory Programming
modernization of computing infrastructure, addition of power circuitsand ventilation, and widening doors in the maker space to allow acquisition of large items such asa laser cutter and a CNC router.Given the age and structure of the available buildings for addition of engineering at High PointUniversity, some desired changes are not possible. While Electrical and Computer Engineeringrequire relatively small physical equipment, other types of engineering, such as Mechanical andCivil, are not possible. Structural constraints make eliminating walls, strengthening floors, andadding high bays prohibitively expensive; thus these programs must be postponed until a newbuilding can be designed and constructed.Engineering is the first undergraduate professional
show correlations between theresults and other technical assignments.Key words: Team dynamics, cross-disciplinary Teams, multi-source Feedback INTRODUCTION Many engineering students do not know how to approach large complex systems due to theirexposure to idealistic examples (ASCE 2004). Additionally they not capable of providing criticalFALL 2017 1 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Survey Tools for Faculty to Quickly Assess Multidisciplinary Team Dynamics in Capstone
University Housing) § Development of proposals for external funding (in conjunction with the WISE Advisory and Administrative Councils) § Coordination of program assessment o K-12 Outreach § Coordination of WISE outreach activities (such as the establishment of WISE High School chapters) § Assist COE Director of Women in Engineering and Outreach Programs Page 9.1280.8 with K-12 outreach activities Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
1.5 4.5 p < 0.001Conclusions and Future WorkThe results of this concept map assessment lead to the following conclusions. • The large and statistically-significant gain in the number of technical links indicates that the course is helping students to see connections between the technical areas of civil en- gineering and infrastructure. Helping students to see these connections was a primary Page 24.216.7 goal of the course. • The statistically-significant increase in the number of non-technical aspects of infrastruc
Future Growth of Software Engineering Baccalaureate Programs in the United States Donald J. Bagert, Stephen V. Chenoweth Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Abstract Despite the large current number of software engineering professionals in the United States,as well as projections that it is one of the largest-growing fields in the nation for the currentdecade, growth in the number of Bachelor’s degree programs in the United States has recentlydeclined. There are currently only about thirty schools in the United States that offer abaccalaureate degree in software engineering (including several
.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10945/51935.[9] P. F. A. Di Donato, P. E. Gaskell, and E. M. Atkins, “Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Project-Based Engineering Education,” 2017, doi: 10.2514/6.2017-1377.[10] C. T. Kendall and R. C. Rhett Yates, “Assessment of unmanned aerial systems programs in collegiate aviation.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html.[11] R. T. Ogan, “Educating the next generation engineers for Unmanned Aircraft Systems applications and challenges,” Conf. Proc. - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON, vol. 2015-June, no. June, pp. 1–7, 2015, doi: 10.1109/SECON.2015.7132931.[12] A. C. Watts, V. G. Ambrosia, and E. A
study, which utilized EEG and various physiological sensing technologies [11],both our interesting and boring video samples were observed to evoke distinct states of bothboredom and engagement as determined by self-reported survey data.To assess the eye tracking features associated with engagement and boredom, the eye trackingdata and synchronized videos were reviewed to qualitatively determine whether any patterns orvariations in visual focus were observed as different across our three video samples. To this end,the pupil dilation and gaze location for each eye (X/Y coordinates) were measured in real time ata sampling rate of 120 Hz [13]. The data was then synchronized with the videos using the open-source application programming interfaces