effective means for University faculty to commercialize technology throughlicensing and strategic partnerships. Located adjacent to the UCF campus in East Orlando, theIncubator consists of over 70,000 square feet space with the addition of its new Center forEntrepreneurship located in Downtown Orlando.The local economic downturn in the tourism industry following the 9/11 terrorist attacks hashighlighted a strong need to diversify, build a strong technology base and make this region a hubof high tech entrepreneurial activity. The Central Florida region has many of the key componentsnecessary for technology innovation, commercialization and entrepreneurship. These elementsinclude research university systems with steeples of excellence in technology
as faculty advisor for the above programs as well as professor forseveral of the courses within the programs. Judging from these experiences, we see newopportunities to partner for success in systems engineering as well as other fields. Suchopportunities are being continuously explored by this author and his colleagues. Thesepartnerships have proven their value to all concerned parties and serve as a model for thedevelopment and delivery of future graduate programs at the University.HOWARD EISNER serves as Distinguished Research Professor and Professor of EngineeringManagement and Systems Engineering at The George Washington University. He spent 30 years inindustry, working mainly in command, control, communications and intelligence
professional responsibilities inengineering situations, and make informed judgements...” [1]. Typically, ethics education issummarized into four main goals: 1) to make students aware of professional expectations, 2) tosensitize students to potential ethical issues that may arise, 3) to improve the students’ ethicaldecision making, and 4) to motivate them to behave ethically [2].The recent unscrupulous activity at high profile companies like Volkswagen [3] and Boeing [4]underscores the need to better prepare students for their professional practice. Unfortunately,effectively forming ethically-minded students is challenging due to credit hour limitations in theengineering curriculum, low student engagement, and a lack of perceived value in the
Paper ID #31621Evaluation of Open Educational Resources (OER) Use in ConstructionManagement Technology CoursesDr. Michael Shenoda, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale Michael Shenoda is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Architecture and Construction Management at Farmingdale State College in New York. He has previously served as a faculty member at other institutions, totaling over 13 years in civil engineering and construction management education. Michael is a member of several professional organizations, including American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Institute of
circuits-for-nonmajorsAbstractWORK IN PROGRESS PAPER: Many non-electrical engineering students take an electriccircuits course. These courses present challenges for the instructor; students may arrive with littlemotivation to engage with content outside their chosen major. Previous research has alreadyexamined motivational issues in this and other service courses, such physics-for-life-scientists,mathematics-for-engineers, and chemistry-for-nonscientists. The author taughtcircuits-for-nonmajors following a strictly applied approach. All circuits analyzed in class or onhomework were circuits for disciplinarily authentic devices, such as household wiring,electrostatic precipitators, resistance thermometers, roadway lighting, or hydrogen fuel cells
scarcity of information describing the benefits of home automation applications limits thepossibilities for innovation; however, users are starting to realize the potential benefits ofautomation to achieve sustainability goals. As this awareness grows, the demand for networkingproducts for home automation applications will increase [17].As we are living in the era of information, security issues are important to address, given thepossibility of networking and connectivity compromising user privacy. Furthermore, theinnovative technology used in home automation could introduce new security gaps not facedbefore. Thus, an additional opportunity for improvement is the utilization of sensors andnetworking to address such safety and privacy issues, along
subassembly and then component.Our approach helps the engineering team to work through an analytical, quantitative, open-source computational model, to understand the problems process planning engineers, linemanagers and process operators face, then see the solutions they have come up with, andthen apply the learned problem solving skills to other, new challenges by understandingsome of the following concerns: • What could go wrong with the product or the processes involved when disassembling the product, or one or more of its components? • How badly might it go wrong, and what could the financial loss be? • Which are the highest risk processes / operations when working on the product? • What needs to be done to prevent
are also necessary when trying to implement a proof-of-the-concept processor during live tests for a new product or technology. Consequently, it is important for mechanicalengineering students to conduct physical experiments so that they have hands-on experience withthe types of tools used in instrumentation and measurement. By doing these activities, students cangain knowledge about issues such as what measurements to use, how to develop a feasibility studyprogram, how to conduct computer-based data acquisition and analysis processes, how to validateexperimental data for both deterministic and random processes, how to design experiments, how toapply both statistical and deterministic tools for data analysis, and how to disseminate
similar studies done in related fields; the studies that are performed on thetopic are generally restricted to a very specific demographic, and are not easily applicable to theentire population of engineering technology students and professionals. However, whatinformation does exist suggests that this lack of research impedes the professional growth ofthose who are involved in engineering technology, including restricting the ability of faculty torecruit students interested in engineering technology programs, decreasing the effectiveness ofguidance available to those students through advisors and outside programs, and preventinginequities currently present in the engineering field as a whole from being addressed. Byacknowledging the gaps in
studies where they explore how multiple engineering disciplines can lead to a career in a specific industry area, helping them expand their thinking about the possibilities related to disciplines they may not have previously considered. It is through these events that departments now have an additional year to recruit students. When General Engineering was implemented in 2014, many faculty members in engineering technology were concerned it would have a negative impact on program enrollment. For the first two years (Figure 2), the department did not see any substantial changes in how enrollment changed from year-to-year. However, starting in 2018 and every year since then the engineering programs have
understand how to complete the missions. At the end of thecourse, students submit a working prototype and a presentation to the faculty who pose as Page 7.958.1the corporation. The results of these efforts were enlightening and educational at the same Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ® 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationtime. This paper discusses a typical project—one of many—in which students had todesign software for a courier service. This project is representative of ten differentprojects that were assigned to different student teams and
students. The NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET)program supports collaboration between colleges and universities and K-12 teachers orcommunity college faculty by providing funding for their participation in engineering research.The RET proposal solicitation2 asserts that, “Encouraging active participation of teachers in NSFprojects is an excellent way to reach broadly into the teacher talent pool of the U.S. so that theycan teach engineering concepts to K-12 students to encourage and stimulate them to pursueengineering careers.” RET awards are made through two mechanisms: RET site grants, whichprovide a research experience to a cohort of in-service or pre-service teachers, and RET
. Single, P. B., C. B. Muller, C. Cunningham, and R. M. Single. "Electronic Communities: A Forum forSupporting Women Professionals and Students in Technical and Scientific Fields." Journal of Women andMinorities in Science and Engineering 6 (2000): 115-29. 20. Glaser, B. G. , and A. L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine, 1967. 21. Boyle, P., and R. Boice. "Systematic Mentoring for New Faculty Teachers and Graduate TeachingAssistants." Innovative Higher Education 22, no. 3 (1998b): 153-79.Biographical InformationPEG BOYLE SINGLEPeg Boyle Single is the Mentoring Specialist and Senior Research Associate for MentorNet and a ResearchAssociate Professor of Education at the University of
. discussion of our observations so far.I. ECE curriculumFor freshman-level students, the ECE 101, 102, and 103 sequence during the first year is theirprimer to engineering design and project management [2]. ECE 101 Exploring ElectricalEngineering is a course that gives new students insight on what electrical and computerengineering is about and what opportunities are available for them if they choose to study in thisfield. The class is lecture-based, but faculty and practicing engineers from industry are ofteninvited to give presentations on their work. In addition, students test simple electrical circuitsduring weekly labs. Finally, there is a major class project that involves teams of four-to-sixstudents working on the design and construction of a
professional engineers personally showed the need for practical and applied skills[1]. Institutions with engineering technology programs expanded associate programs to includebaccalaureate curricula, which included mathematical theory, alongside technical skills,mimicking traditional engineering programs before the 1950s [1].One issue in the formation and growth of four-year engineering technology programs was anaming convention. With the reluctance of engineering faculty to adopt the bifurcated curricula,engineering programs were, and still are unwilling to adopt engineering technology programs asengineering [1]. Ideas for naming this new baccalaureate degree program included "AppliedEngineering" and "Engineering Science" [4]. Academic institutions
purpose of the instrument Gather preliminary feedback Research existing instruments Determine suitability of an existing instrument Ascertain needs & thoughts of potential survey usersContent Validity Extensive Literature Review Concrete purpose of survey Item Generation Determine theoretical framework Develop new items
. These types of academic activities alsohave the added benefit of giving the feeling of students being a ‘class’, rather than a name in alist of a video conference.The majority of research, however, shows that there are many concerns, with online education,many of which were the same concerns that held back the implementation of online education inthe past. A key concern that professors and lecturers have is how to properly assess their studentson the knowledge they seek to impart on them [12-14]. In a traditional format, the majority ofcourses will have a mixture of assignments, and a midterm and a final exam. In an online format,teaching teams and faculty have to determine new and effective ways to assess their students.Another issue is how to
courses, a series of general education courses were chosenthat address major global social issues. Herein, the new engineering program isdescribed, along with the program plan. This new degree program has the advantage ofdeveloping an international-focused curriculum within engineering for students with astrong interest in eliminating world poverty in a sustainable manner.IntroductionA major role for faculty is curriculum updating and design. As the world of engineeringchanges, it is a faculty responsibility to keep the curriculum up to date and relevant forcurrent and future students. Faculties normally respond by making incremental changesand adjustments to the curricula. Over time, incremental changes can lead to curriculathat are no longer
difficult to adaptand present the LWTL curriculum without training under and interacting with faculty familiarwith the existing courses, given the complex integration of content and material.Intellectual property was also a concern during this process, and resolving issues relating tointellectual property was important for the successful transfer of LWTL content and knowledge.Having developed extensive course materials over many years, faculty at Louisiana TechUniversity reasonably wished to ensure that their work would receive recognition whenemployed at another university. It was also hoped that some adapted or modified work producedby Campbell University faculty would be useful at Louisiana Tech and adopted back into theiroriginal LWTL
application problemstudents struggled with asked them to use the magnetic properties of a current-carrying wire toexplain how a maglev train works and then taking it a step further to determine which parameters(the magnitude of the electrical current, mass and size of the train) would impact theperformance of the train.To address these issues, EENG 386 was redesigned in the summer of 2015, and the new versionis currently being taught for the first time as this paper is being written. To begin, center facultymet with the instructor to better understand the instructors perspectives on the course and to co-analyze course data. We approached the opportunity to work wit this faculty member using thelenses to focus our efforts: [cognitive lens] to
teachingtechniques to promote deeper student engagement with the ethical issues surroundingengineering and managerial decision making. Qualitative and quantitative measures are utilizedto understand changes in student behavior between the start and end of the course. Quantitativeresults and analysis using data collected through the Engineering and Sciences Issues Test(ESIT) found a significant (p = 0.014) improvement in student reasoning while supporting dataindicated high levels of student engagement and enjoyment. Areas for future study andimprovements are discussed.IntroductionIn light of the near constant onslaught of front page news regarding the transgressions of ourcorporate citizens and leaders, it seems that the ethical norms of organizations are
fullyacademic. The Engineering Faculty, as a whole, is currently investigating the legal issues ofintellectual rights and student/faculty responsibility.With 19 – 24 projects to be handled, the project course effectively involves many more peoplethan just the course instructor and project co-ordinator. This leads to misunderstandings andcontradictions. Assigning a single project to all students under one faculty advisor would avoidthis. However, this is an approach the department does not want to take even if it were to becomepossible to find a faculty member willing to give up an already developed course to concentrateon the project course. As this paper goes to press, our provincial government has just fundedtwo new degree programs within our
settings [2].Naturally, prior to the pandemic many courses in STEM were designed and taught with theexpectation of face-to-face interactions. The many physics and STEM laboratory-based coursesare but one obvious example. These courses tend to rely heavily on the classroom presence ofboth faculty and students. However, during the pandemic, as all classes and laboratories quicklyshifted to remote environments, the courses offered by physics and other STEM departmentsquickly became vulnerable to a host of new issues. Within the higher education communitymany faculty and students were naturally unprepared to deal with these new issues and thechallenges they created. Of course, there were a few faculty and students that had a limitedamount of
department chair (typically male) as they seek to improve the climate.However, in listening to dozens of chairs and creating conversations about climate withdepartment leaders, it can be noted that, virtually without exception, they are genuinely well-intentioned, caring about their department, and wanting to move their unit forward during theirstint as chair. They are keenly concerned for the professional success of each member of thedepartment. They wish for all members of the department community to be empowered and toexcel and wish to navigate well personnel issues, trying to find the fair, just and healing solution.They feel burdened and saddened by troubling conflicts, sexual harassment, faculty fights overspace, inappropriate behavior in
AC 2009-766: LEADERSHIP MODELS AND PRACTICES COURSE: STUDENTPERCEPTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERSHIP SKILLS ANDINCORPORATION OF A NEW LEADERSHIP COURSEAndrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, and serves as chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee.Melissa Grunow, Lawrence Technological University Melissa Grunow is the Coordinator for the Leadership
a subject liaison to learn thediscipline and build a targeted collection in collaboration with instructional faculty whilebuilding strong relationships with the department. In addition, this article will discuss how thishas prompted a re-evaluation of the process in the library and in the institution for looking atlibrary resources for new program proposals.BackgroundDeveloping collaboration between instructional faculty and librarians with regard to buildingcollections, especially related to new academic programs, has been an ongoing issue discussedextensively in the literature, but solutions often remain elusive. Cultural and organizationalbarriers are discussed by Shen [3] including financial, psychological, and communication styles.Wu
disabled wrt walkingPlus-size, Tall, or Short Discriminated User Product is inaccessible to people whoIndividuals are plus-size, tall, or shortRace and Ethnicity Discriminated User Product is inaccessible to people based on their race and/or ethnicitySafety Product Issue, Effect Product causes safety concerns for some peopleSocioeconomic Status Discriminated User Product does not consider the socioeconomic status of certain users in their design
Economic Development” and presented to numerous organiza- tions including the ”Nanoelectronics, Photonics, and NANO-SAFETY” topic for the U.S. Congressional Nano Caucus. He is an IEEE CPMT Distinguished Lecturer and an invited speaker on nanotechnology issues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #10610Dr. Robert JC McLean, Texas State University BSc (Microbiology), University of Guelph, Guelph ON Canada 1978 PhD (Microbiology), University of Calgary, Calgary AB Canada 1986 Postdoc (with TJ Beveridge, University of Guelph) 1986-88 Assistant Professor (Research faculty) Dept
Committee also developed a shortpulse check that is being administered every 3 months to check in with the faculty and staff about howthey are feeling about the department’s climate and culture.While we didn’t necessarily solve all climate and culture related issues in the department, we startedconversations and are piloting several new approaches. During the lightning talk we’ll share our processincluding what worked well and what was less effective at generating discussion and stimulating change.Preferred presentation format: Lightning TalkKeywords: climate and culture, equity, inclusion, diversity, climate survey, pulse check.BackgroundA high-profile sexual harassment lawsuit prompted a campus-wide climate/culture initiative with the goalof
implementation at the start of the semester. Some of these timerelated issues included running an RF communication Page 26.95.13system and overhead vision system with many technical glitches, offering student access to a new 3D printing lab without knowing how best to manage such a powerful resource, and making changes to the mission details as the instructional team learned the limitations of the lab’s capabilities. Many of these concerns could have been mitigated with sufficient testing of all systems prior to the start of the semester. Beyond these types of comments, the instructional team also supplied valuable feedback that likely could not