support from home, feelingsof inadequacy with regards to mathematics performance, feelings of isolation, homesickness, andlack of connection within a large university. Incoming first year female engineering students areinvited to attend the ESCape camp based on math SAT scores. The desired attendance isapproximately fifty students, so students with lower scores are invited to apply. The week longcamp includes elements of how to succeed in college math, three dimensional visualizationskills, trips to local manufacturing plants and visits with their entire female engineering staff,parent programs, social programs, introduction to the campus computing environment and more.Reunions are held throughout the year, and the students are tracked in terms
this program had on both a student’sidentity as a research scientist, and their overall perception of the climate in the engineering schoolat a large southern research institution.Introduction This mentorship program aims to combat some of the troubling trends demonstrated amongLGBTQ+ respondents on the recent Cockrell School of Engineering climate survey, administeredin 2021[1]. The survey found that LGBTQ+ graduate students felt the engineering school was lessaccepting (p < 0.05), that they were rewarded less for their work (p < 0.05), and were less trustingof the engineering school administration (p < 0.005) than their straight counterpart. Theseresponses suggest action is needed to both build trust in the administration and
the non-profit CollegeStudentAdvocates.org. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comAuto-Awarding Points for Incremental Development in Programming CoursesAbstractProgramming textbooks and teachers commonly advise students to develop code incrementally,avoiding writing large amounts of code between test runs, and instead compiling/runningfrequently. However, without an easy way to give students points for following an incrementaldevelopment process, students often write large blocks of code and then "hope it works". Theymay also rush through the development process. Today, many environments capture everystudent program run, which opens
? The community may be as large as a city or it may be as small as the residents of a particular road. It will be different for each bridge. Explain how much the community (or communities) relies on the bridge. Explain briefly how populations were estimated. 2. Societal Impact Assessment – Based on the societal impact data from the inspection form, assess the overall value of the bridge to the communities that use it and explain the consequences in the event of a loss of the bridge. List any other societal impacts that are relevant. 3. Structural Assessment – Describe your assessments of the deck, superstructure, and substructure (citing specific problem issues) and then provide an overall assessment
STEM educational community.To achieve these goals, we have recently focused on: • Creating and implementing new standardized assessment tools that measure student learning, especially through the development of new experimentally focused concept inventories, as well as measure ease of adoption by instructors. • Identifying implementation barriers for wide-spread adoption and how these might be overcome by applying the business start-up methodology of the NSF I-Corps program, working with faculty who have recently received funding to implement the mobile pedagogy, and holding focus groups among different constituencies.Both of these general areas of activity represent works-in-progress. In the former we
challengesassociated with integrating such technologies in courses and programs. Underlying thesechallenges is the realization that student development in these areas is likely to encompass allthree commonly accepted domains of development; the cognitive, affective, and psychomotordomains. Furthermore, such technologies are advancing at a rate faster than the faculty candevelop the skills required to teach to the students. As such, by the time faculty developsufficient knowledge, appreciation and physical skills to use the technologies, the technologieshave advanced to the next level. This paper will discuss how the Civil Engineering program atthe United States Military Academy has met these challenges, assessed them, and appliedsolutions.IntroductionThe
promote experiential and interactive learning in the entrepreneurialsurrounding. Students took two courses for credits: (i) Introduction to Customer-Driven TechnicalInnovation and (ii) Introduction to Product prototyping at Silicon Valley. During the program,students experienced the technology-driven world of Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley is theinnovators’ and entrepreneurs’ dream world and is ground zero for customer-driven technologyevaluation, innovation, invention, and prototyping. It is also an ideal location for inspiringinteractive and non-traditional college learning experiences. Students spent time visiting start-upsand large corporations and worked on a project where they advanced, through multiple iterationsof the design cycle, an
Paper ID #12607The Impact of Supplemental Instruction on the Performance of Male and Fe-male Engineers in a Freshmen Chemistry CourseMs. Emily Olina Wisniewski, Northeastern University Emily is a senior chemical engineering student at Northeastern University with a minor in biochemical engineering. She has been a chemistry tutor for freshman engineering students for the past three years.Miss Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University Rachel Shapiro is a third year undergraduate student studying chemical engineering at Northeastern Uni- versity. She has been involved in the Connections Chemistry Review program for the past 2
the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Jorge Dorribo Camba (Associate Professor)C. Robert Kenley C. Robert Kenley is a Professor of Engineering Practice in Purdue’s School of Industrial Engineering, where has been
inCommunity Service (EPICS), Armstrong Atlantic State University’s Talented Researcher inEngineering (TRIE) (Goeser et al., 2009), NASA youth programs, and the US For Inspirationand Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST), to name a few. While these programs arenot specifically created for high school curriculum, they provide positive evidence of studentslearning through design. These university programs also largely rely on engineering and servicelearning, a means of involving engineers in community service by engaging them in real worldengineering problems that serve a nearby community.Project-based courses are designed to helps students view engineering problems systematicallyand maturely (Crismond, unpublished). Each step of the EDP can be
cognitive loadfound that software generated measures of lexical syntax, complexity, and diversity were verystrong predictors of English as Second Language learners’ conceptual grasp of conversationalEnglish 12 and related task performance. Our study is largely informed by the work of 12 andseeks to investigate the application of a similar procedure. Our approach is to automaticallygenerate lexical indicators using various software, make an inference about the cognitive load ofthe participant, and determine if there is any correlation to a traditional qualitative assessment ofconceptual understanding.Natural Language Processing ToolsThe methods described in this section involve complex linguistics procedures and computationalgrammars, which are
teaching-focusedinstitutions with Civil Engineering programs, all of which are predominantly undergraduateinstitutions. Three of these universities are private, and the other is public: The Citadel: small public university in the Southern U.S. Merrimack College: small private university in the Northeast U.S. University of Evansville: small private university in the Central U.S. Bucknell University: small private university in the Northeast U.S.Pre- and post-course surveys were developed based on key concepts in geotechnical engineeringto assess students’ prior exposure and knowledge gained in the foundation engineering course.The pre-tests (background knowledge probes) were administered to measure students
Academic Professional in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. As the Coordinator of Assessment and Student Retention in the School, she is responsible for accreditation and program review requirements and assessment of several special academic programs. In addition, Jill directs programs that promote student retention and success, especially among underrepresented, female and transfer student cohort groups. Her educational background is in the fields of Policy Analysis and Public Administration, with emphasis on research methodology.Joel Jackson, Georgia Tech Dr. Jackson received a dual major B.S. degree in Electrical and Computer
lack of an ESE instrument for engineering studentsin an entrepreneurship education program specifically is critical and needs to be addressed.Therefore, in the present study, we adapted an existing ESE instrument for engineering studentsin an entrepreneurship education program at a large southeastern university in the United Statesand examined the psychometric properties of the instrument. In the field of engineering education, there has been an increasing number ofentrepreneurship education programs. Engineering educators have identified the link betweenentrepreneurship and engineering and realized the importance of entrepreneurial-related skills,such as creativity and leadership skills (Da Silva et al., 2015; Wang & Kleppe, 2001
craft. The goals are to foster interdisciplinary student collaboration and to providestudents with the opportunity to learn and apply the hands-on skills promoted by the Makerculture. Each semester, a different Maker is selected through an application process. The Makerleads a small group of students through a series of hands-on fabrication workshops during thesemester. When the project is complete, the program culminates in a capstone event that sharesthe project with the larger University community.The MIR executive committee, which consists of 6-8 undergraduate students, leads andadministers the program with faculty support. The committee issues the Call for Proposals forboth Makers and student participants; conducts interviews and reference
; Program: Curriculum is the most commonly researched component of CI mainlythrough two types of quality criteria: those required for Engineering accreditation, such asmastering mathematics and physics [9], and those intrinsically desired qualities in a curriculum,such as flexibility, and non-redundancy [9]. Many papers discuss cases of how their institutesimplemented CI for their own curricula and the type of tools and artifacts used [6], [23]–[25],and there is a line of research focused on the type and evaluation of metrics required forcurricular CI [26].Most curriculum CI models are an extension or variation of Deming’s PDCA with an adapted setof acronyms such as Data Collection-Analysis-Review-Action [21], 5-Step-Assessment [27],Gather-Read
understand and can applyfundamental ST and SE concepts, not to have graduates who are system engineers per se.When faculty in traditional engineering programs incorporate ST/SE concepts and skills intotheir courses, a critical goal involves creating valid and reliable methods for assessing students’development in these new areas. Developing effective assessments is not easy in general (e.g.,Garfield & Gal, 2007), and doing so outside of one’s disciplinary specialty (e.g., mechanicalengineering faculty designing a systems engineering assessment) is even more challenging.Thus, a high-level goal of the current effort is to create, test, and refine a standardizedassessment for ST/SE that can be disseminated for faculty to use as part of their
, and outcomes are notdeveloped consistently in students [4]. In engineering programs, self-drive and motivation israrely mentioned as a desired outcome nor assessed and therefore is not developed consistentlyin all students.Students benefit from both formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment,providing feedback to guide improvement, enables students to adjust their learning based onunderstanding of their strengths and weaknesses. Summative assessment, measuringachievement, enables students to know how they have advanced in learning and how theirachievements compare to expectations [5]. High quality assessment must have clear purpose,clear targets, methods that match the targets and purpose, sound sampling, and absence of bias[6
criterion? RQ2.Which Broader Impacts statements are being addressed in a sample of proposals submitted to and awarded by EEC?To answer these questions, I conducted a small-scale exploratory study using a convergent parallelmixed method approach because it allowed me to quantitatively assess if the Broader Impactcategories were being addressed, qualitatively understand overall trends in the proposals, and useboth methods to outline potential avenues for measuring Broader Impacts. In research questionone, the intention was to gather information about Broader Impact trends that Program Officershave seen in the programs they manage. While research question two was limited to ProjectSummaries. Therefore, in the analysis of research question
Assessing teaming skills and major identity through collaborative sophomore design projects across disciplinesAbstractCollaboration and student projects than span multiple departments are often seen as too difficultto pursue due to administrative, topical, or other logistics related barriers. This projectdemonstrates an approach at introducing true interdisciplinary design projects within asophomore level materials and energy balances courses in both Bioengineering and ChemicalEngineering programs at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Engineering curriculahave been focused on integrating design in the freshman and senior years but often fail tointegrate projects into the sophomore and junior year courses. The study
programs to develop undergraduateresearch programs with small classes for the top 15-20% of the student population. This strategyhas the potential for creating a large number of academic orphans. While none of these strategiesare de facto problematic, regional university academic programs with a heterogeneous studentprofile are much more sensitive to the trade-offs of leveraging. Acknowledging these institutionaldifferences is essential for developing strategies to ensure degree program accountability.Academic Profile of Engineering StudentsThe primary discernable difference is the academic profile of students. The studentprofile in a regional university is much more heterogeneous. Elizandro, et. al. demonstratedthat an aggregate analysis of a
Paper ID #36900What’s in a Name? General, Interdisciplinary, and Integrated EngineeringProgramsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, En- vironmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering program (formerly Engineering Plus). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic
indicators that had been designed to measure whether the students exceeded, met, or did not meet, departmental expectations. These assignments continued with the change to the industry sponsored project format. Page 15.159.8 7Table 3: Outcomes assessment schedule in CE 493Course Semester Primary Program Outcomes Assessed (a) math, science, and eng (j) contemporary issues (b) design/conduct experiments (k) techniques, skills, eng tools
theprojects will be critical in future adaptations of similar projects in a classroom environment.Furthermore, since the projects are not tied to a course grade, students are less likely to beinhibited by failure or reward.An anonymous survey was conducted after completion of all the projects to assess the students’perceptions of learning and to obtain student feedback. Since the number of students involved inthese projects is relatively small, statistical analysis is not expected to be useful at this stage.Therefore, data collection has been limited to self-reporting and attitudinal measures. Although itis acknowledged that self-reporting has several limitations, it is useful for this study since itserves the role of a pilot. Once fully implemented
manufacturing. The challenge for MFS online lies in successfullyreproducing the learning experiences that arise during face-to-face teamwork activities andinteractive projects. This means moving the MFS online involves creating online equivalents forsignificant interactive team work and activities ranging from laboratory experiments on differentmanufacturing processes, team-based product design with physical products/in softwareplatforms and their assessment to simulating manufacturing system and supply chain operations.To help students master the complex technical concepts and skills and to give them a foundationin creativity and teamwork, these interactive aspects of the coursework are critical. The goal of the MFS degree program at the
used.Despite the numerous publications in this area, there appear to be no studies derived from alarge, statistically significant data set on which to base an evaluation of the effectiveness of thepresently available tools. The reports cited above refer to assessment strategies which are almostentirely qualitative or have very small sample sizes, lacking different control groups to isolatethe effect on learning derived from the introduction of multimedia.Over the last few years, new visualization material in the area of solid mechanics [Cooper,Jensen1-3,5,Gramoll, Behr,URL/CD12,13,15,16,17, White,Mason], as well as many other areas(notably dynamics and statics), has become available [URL/CD13]. However, particularly in theareas of solid mechanics
students for entry into STEM professional schools. These findingsare summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Programs for Underrepresented Students at Study Institutions Big State Large State Medium State Southern StateMentoring Mentoring team for all Peer mentoring for 1st Centrally coordinated Mentoring for 1stprogram students; includes years and transfers. mentoring programs year minority recruiting and for all students. engineering students ambassador Tiered mentoring in responsibilities small mentoring Mentoring for Black Mentoring a
Development be Accomplished with the Same Instrument?ABSTRACTThis paper is a Work in Progress Paper that will summarize the work being done at theUniversity of Dayton, School of Engineering to re-envision the promotion and tenure processand criteria as a powerful professional development tool for faculty. As part of the re-envisioning process a literature review on promotion and tenure was conducted. Additionally,promotion and tenure by-laws from approximately 25 engineering programs at small, mediumand large universities were examined. This paper will summarize the re-envisioning process andresultant policies with an emphasis on how these policies can be used to promote facultydevelopment.INTRODUCTIONThe landscape of higher education is undergoing
. In addition, faculty collaborated in several educationalcommunities that improved teaching pedagogies, resulted in real enriching experiences tofaculty and students alike, and significantly contributed to the betterment of education ofthe students.At College of Applied Science, faculty and students collaborations in the Honorsprogram took on various forms. Collaborative applied research with industry, like theformation of knowledge base that captured the experience of company professionals,provided new opportunities for enhancing students’ education. Faculty community“Problem Based Learning” enriched the cultural and educational experience of thestudents. Pilot programs like “Assessment with Portfolios” helped in developingformative and
teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Leveraging machine learning techniques to analyze persistence in undergraduate computing programsAbstractAlthough student retention remains a significant concern for all Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics