Paper ID #41436Design Conceptualization over Multiple Design CoursesCaitlyn Berryhill, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoDr. Amanda Clara Emberley, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Emberley is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Design conceptualization over multiple design coursesABSTRACTThis research project's focus is to better understand how students are conceptualizing engineeringdesign over their multiple design projects. We focus
AC 2009-25: AN ANALYSIS OF FIFTEEN YEARS OF THE NATIONALEFFECTIVE TEACHING INSTITUTERichard Felder, North Carolina State University Richard Felder is Hoechst Celanese Professor Emeritus of Chemical Engineering at North Carolina State University. He is a Fellow Member of ASEE, a founding director of the ASEE National Effective Teaching Institute, and the recipient of the ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education and the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Lifetime Achievement Award for Pedagogical Scholarship.Rebecca Brent, Education Designs Inc. Rebecca Brent is an education consultant and licensed program evaluator specializing in faculty development for
development in engineering students. However, perceptions of learning that are sharedamong faculty and students, internally consistent, and (often) validated by individual students’ academic successsuggest a number of questions that are valuable to disentangle and likely require different types of interventions.This study is a pilot to inform broader research design about how engineering students and faculty’s epistemicbeliefs interact and affect their interpretation of learning environments. The present results focus on one aspect -students’ perceptions of what makes teaching ‘good’ and ‘bad’. The pilot uses qualitative interviews and ourintended outcome is the development of a coding scheme to understand and track longitudinal change in
AC 2008-1047: A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FORGRADUATE STUDENTS AT NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYRebecca Brent, Education Designs Inc. REBECCA BRENT, Ed.D., is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm in Cary, North Carolina. Her professional interests include faculty development in the sciences and engineering, support programs for new faculty members, preparation of alternative licensure teachers, and applications of technology in the K-12 classroom. She was formerly a professor of education at East Carolina University. She is co-director of the ASEE National Effective Teaching Institute.Richard Felder, North Carolina State University RICHARD M. FELDER, Ph.D
concept being taught.Additionally, some of the projects or engaging techniques are implemented, but only reach asurface level of understanding for the students and in turn deep learning is not achieved.As discussed above, simply plugging in a project here and there whenever it fits appropriatelycan provide benefits to the students, but, if a course is examined as a whole and redesigned, amore seamless integration of fundamental concepts with projects can be achieved. The questionis, however, how can one perform a complete overhaul of a particular curriculum whilemaintaining the integrity of the content. For engineering educators, it seems only fitting to looktowards the engineering design process. The same principles of engineering design can
emphasized the higher thinking levels ofBloom‟s Taxonomy: analyzing, evaluating, and creating (synthesizing in the earlier model).(Actions related to these levels are highlighted in blue text in the following examples.) Some ofthe higher-level objectives for the math topics included: Analyze and synthesize Fibonacci Sequences by creating original artistic designs incorporating them. Demonstrate understanding of symmetrical properties by designing a small project using symmetrical properties found in Arabesque art. Use complex numbers to develop an advanced fractal, such as the Mandelbrot fractal. Differentiate among various graph trees
‡ College of Engineering The University of Texas at AustinAbstractLearning journals are implemented in undergraduate engineering design courses to encouragestudents to reflect actively on what they can learn from their personal experiences with teamprojects, lectures, and assignments. These journals are intended to catalyze student reflectionand thus enhance student understanding, retention, and capacity for future application of coursecontent. An invaluable side-effect of the journals is continuous feedback that enables real-timeadjustments to course schedule and pedagogy. Implementation details are reported in this paper,including sample reflective prompts, grading rubrics, and sample journal entries with
number of capstonedesign course environments. Additional research is needed to develop and test the measurementof reflective practice.IntroductionSuccessful engineers of the twenty-first century will be markedly different from engineers of thepast. Having sound understanding of engineering sciences, successful engineers will also need tobe problem solvers and innovators who work effectively in times of rapid change. They will needto be global-minded, socially-responsible, systems-thinkers who adeptly address complexproblems having significant human dimensions. [1-4] Engineers will need to perform a varietyof roles in the context of their work: analyst, problem solver, designer, researcher,communicator, collaborator, leader, self-grower, achiever
designing the artifact.2. Directly discuss with the students their misconceptions and how they color their view of the design spacea.3. Develop and use models of designing as mechanisms to help students understand why and what they are doing.b4. Apply their understanding of design processes to forward engineer a problem related to the recovered artifact.The following paragraphs describe an instance of the application of the technique.In the first class, we ask the students to recover the design of an existing artifact. The artifact isthe 3.5” floppy disk. We introduce the floppy disk as a simple yet complex device. It is simplein its actual manufacture but it is technically a complex device with many constraints that oftenconflict with each
todevelop critical design, technical and professional skills. According to research, only deliberatepractice, practice done with the intention of improving a skill, will lead to expertise [1].Therefore, investigations about which courses successfully impact students’ design skills can bevaluable to design educators and all educators who work with engineering students design.Studies have shown that understanding students’ perceptions of their learning and skills isessential for determining how their education has impacted their knowledge and skilldevelopment [8]. However, studies on design skills in capstone senior design courses are limitedin their understanding of the factors that affect a student’s perception of the skills that areimportant for
2021 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35257 Using an Engineering Design Process to Design an Extendable Desk Meredith Magee* Mark Sciutto Damla Silahyurekli University of Indianapolis University of Indianapolis University of Indianapolis mageem@uindy.edu sciuttom@uindy.edu silahyureklid@uindy.edu Nate Comley Alex Ruble Anthony Williamson University of Indianapolis University of Indianapolis University of Indianapolis comleyn@uindy.edu rubleaq@uindy.edu williamsonal@uindy.edu As the Covid-19 pandemic continues to
, design freedom and planning.This paper will focus on the way the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering in Delft is aiming toachieve these changing demands on future engineers within the constraints of the Dutcheducation system and the results achieved so far. It also raises questions on how we caneffectively measure what students are really learning in terms of non-engineering skills atuniversity.Dutch Education SystemBefore explaining the system of project education, it is important that the reader understands theDutch education system as it differs considerably from education system in the US. The first yearat a Dutch university can be characterised as a year of natural selection. Dutch law gives everystudent with an advanced high school diploma
without committingto being one; (2) make students aware of what it means and how it feels to think and act like adesign engineer; and (3) allow faculty, advisors, and potential employers to see individualsmature from having relatively undifferentiated intelligence into professional minds withdocumented skills and experience, some becoming design engineers, but all understanding wheredesign thinking fits into our everyday lives. Thus, the course emphasizes direct experience,practical design thinking, and the building of real product prototypes. No prior design experienceor fabrication skills are required. The ideas developed in the course are grounded in the students’collective background life experiences and observations of "human needs
details. The approach showed useful to help students’ understanding andinsight of deterministic engineering algorithms.IntroductionTeaching students how to solve problems is a growing concern of Engineering and Technologyeducation. Problem solving in the Engineering/Technology practice is usually directed to thedesign of products or processes, and this connection makes the teaching of engineering problemsolving a natural part of design classes. In recent years new undergraduate courses have beenimplemented that expand creative thinking in engineering design by including solving problemand project based-learning [1]. A number of innovative teaching techniques can be employed forsuch purpose, being the “studio” methods particularly successful to
+ 3.23 3.25 understanding of the role of human factors in design* 3.02 n.a. capabilities to deal with supervisor/employee issues in the workplace environment+ 3.02 3.02 skills and insight into strategies for entrepreneurship* 3.00 n.a. understanding of contracts in engineering projects+ 2.98 3.00 capability to deal with ethical issues you listed above+ 2.96 3.42 risk management and safety skills+ 2.96 3.23 skills in organizing safety programs for the workplace 2.89 3.17 strategies
AC 2007-1142: EXPERIENCE AND REFLECTION ON AN INQUIRY ANDBLENDED LEARNING MODULE FOR SENIOR ENGINEERING DESIGNMarjan Eggermont, University of CalgaryBob Brennan, University of CalgaryTheodor Freiheit, University of Calgary Page 12.710.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Experience and reflection on an inquiry and blended learning module for senior engineering designOur full-year capstone design course, “Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering DesignMethodology and Application”, provides students with an opportunity to learn basic knowledgeand concepts through lectures and tutorials on a variety of subjects important to the designprocess
opportunities to integrate these math andscience concepts, and apply their understanding in engineering projects that have implicationsfor their lives and their community. Each ADEPT Project Team consisted of one Math and oneScience Teacher Fellow, two Graduate Engineering Fellows, a university faculty, andundergraduate tutors. Together they helped secondary students succeed in math and sciencethrough comprehensive in-class academic support and engineering project modules.BackgroundThe engineering design process (EDP) is a decision-making process, typically iterative, in whichthe basic science, math, and engineering concepts are applied to develop optimal solutions tomeet an established objective. Among the fundamental elements of the design process
frameworks has been presented, with emerging frameworks identifiedfor future research. Specific examples which point to an applied connection between severalframeworks and research on the technical design or professional skill development ofengineering students were highlighted. It is important for engineering education researchers toengage critically with these theoretical frameworks and to emphasize a deeper understanding ofthe historical and situated context of several of the frameworks detailed above (Secules & Mejia,2021).Recent research has focused on engineering design and problem framing skills (Budinoff &Subbian, 2021; Svihla et al., 2022) and teacher development (Mejia et al., 2019; Galvan et al.,2020). However, more research is
Session 1353 The Rube Goldberg Three-Minute Timer: A Design Based Learning Tool For Engineering Freshman Hazel M. Pierson, Daniel H. Suchora Youngstown State University Youngstown, OH 44555IntroductionRube Goldberg: a man whose name has become synonymous with using convoluted,complicated machines to perform simple tasks. Engineer: among other things, one who designsmachines and systems to make difficult, complicated tasks simple. Although the goal of RubeGoldberg’s machines and the goal of the engineer’s
the mostaccurate form of assessment to determine if team-building had occurred.Current trends in curriculum theory employed at the elementary and secondary school levels can Page 22.1492.3inform the efforts of engineering educators. One of the most widespread models for curriculumplanning in K-12 schools is the “Understanding by Design” or “backwards design” approachdeveloped by Wiggins and McTighe (2005).7 Figure 1 illustrates the three stages of this model. 2. Determine 3. Plan learning 1. Identify acceptable experiences
respect to “Communicate the results of the design process” and “Work in a teamto produce design solutions” (see Figure 11) which are essential for employment. Note, when“Working effectively with others” was defined as a standalone skill rather than as part of thedesign process the gains were slightly lower. The other set of gains that was particularly relevantto persistence and retention, were responses to the following “Interest in taking or planning totake additional classes in this subject”, “Confidence that you understand engineering material”,and “Willingness to seek help from others (teacher, peers, intern) when working on academicproblems.” All three of these items had a combined response rate of good and great thatexceeded 68%. The
. Dr. Nagel joined the James Madison University after completing his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. He has a B.S. from Tri-State University (now Trine University) and a M.S. from the University of Missouri-Rolla (now Missouri University of Science and Technology), both in mechani- cal engineering. Dr. Nagel has performed research with the United States Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the United States Air Force Academy. His research in- terests are in the area of conceptual design and engineering design education. Specifically, Dr. Nagel’s research activities include understanding customer needs, the use functional and process modeling to
and light gauge steel design and construction. Page 13.1130.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Sustainable Research and Design in a Civil Engineering Senior Design CourseAbstractIn an effort to help students understand the broader impacts of land development, a significantsustainability component was added to a capstone senior design project course in a small civilengineering program. This year-long course traditionally involves students completingstraightforward designs in the areas of structural, transportation, geotechnical, and municipalenvironmental engineering. In a
. Jonathan enjoys exploring national parks with his wife and children and traveling to francophone countries.Dr. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four ar- eas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work with the intent to do something new; 3) shifting norms of leaders involved in entrepreneurial-minded action; and 4) developing teaching methods with a storytelling
of a design course might include requiring an Engineering Management orBusiness course directly related to marketing or having a larger portion of a design coursedevoted to these topics.One of the most successful outcomes from this activity was the dynamic and interactive nature ofthe activity. The members of each team had to work together to clarify and understand the ICrequirements. The instructors moved from team to team during the lab to provide Page 24.1228.12encouragement, clarify instructions, and answer questions. While this may have biased thestudent work product, it positively impacted the classroom dynamics. Another
learningenvironments are, by nature, real-world and student-centered (Strobel et al, 2017; Jonasson,1999). Development of these curricular experiences requires an eye towards better understandingstudents’ skills, their perceived value of the educational activities and their motivation to engage.The later has been closely associated with students’ self-efficacy (Mamaril et al, 2016), or theirbelief in their ability to succeed (Bandura, 1997). Studies of undergraduate engineering studentself-efficacy have shown positive correlations to academic achievement (Hseigh et al, 2012) andpersistence (Concannon and Barrow, 2010).This integrated communication with engineering design course development and implementationproject aims to better understand students
student feedback and attribute assessment,will also be discussed. Upper year students who will not experience the engineering design andpractice sequence are being assessed on their understanding of design methods to providebaseline data for comparison with students who progress through the sequence in future years.IntroductionIncreasingly engineering educators see value in establishing a connected sequence of experiencesthat focus on engineering design and practice in undergraduate engineering programs. Notablereports on the future of engineering education conclude that students should be provided anopportunity to integrate knowledge and skills in activities of increasing complexity that emulateengineering practice throughout their program. 3,20
will have:1) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering;2) an ability to design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data;3) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;4) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams;5) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems;6) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility and actions that are congruent with this understanding;7) an ability to communicate effectively by speaking and writing;8) the broad education necessary to
the course and presented to the students in the first class are: Provide an experience that is based upon active student participation. Enhance skills related to engineering design methodology, including modeling, simulation and parametric trade studies. Simulate the mechanical engineering product development process. Illustrate the interaction between competing technical and non-technical issues and the role of compromise, constraints and merit. Provide exposure to various phases of the design process, from definition of requirements to product realization. Help develop an understanding of the planning, coordination and communication required in a team effort.An additional “goal” was added this year and that was to
AC 2009-1125: DESIGNWEBS: TOWARD THE CREATION OF AN INTERACTIVENAVIGATIONAL TOOL TO ASSIST AND SUPPORT ENGINEERING DESIGNLEARNINGSharad Oberoi, Carnegie Mellon UniversitySusan Finger, Carnegie Mellon University Page 14.433.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 DesignWebs: Towards the Creation of an Interactive Navigational Tool to assist and support Engineering Design LearningAbstractFor both student and professional design teams, knowledge generated during the design processfrequently goes uncaptured, and when it is captured, it is usually poorly organized and buried inobscure documents. The design and development process requires that