readings, discussions, and self-designed projects, students explore materials science concepts alongside the social, cultural, andenvironmental factors that shaped technological and scientific history. Although some formal in-class activities are planned, many class sessions are flexible, allowing students to engage inindividualized learning approaches. The projects are loosely framed, enabling students todevelop key competencies while investigating topics of personal interest and controlling projectfocus and direction. In this paper, we discuss the processes and motivating factors that led to theinitial design and continued development of the Paul Revere: Tough as Nails course block. Wedescribe the philosophical and practical benefits of the
path. 6. I believe an engineering related internship is a valuable opportunity. TWC Course Relevance to Internship 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Can relate Internship - more Internship - Used studies at Used intern exp. Eng internship is academics to motivated for decision on internship in class valuable intern work academics career Series1 4.40
designed to engage students indiscussions and projects around the ethical and societal considerations surrounding engineeringsolutions and technology, such as CRISPR gene editing technology, where issues withinequitable access to the technology and the potential for discrimination against people areconcerns [22]. Loyola University Chicago incorporates social justice content through their coreengineering curriculum. [23] In a first-year course, undergraduate students participate in anintroduction to social justice that includes terminology and introductions to microaggressionsand biases. This is followed by social justice case studies on the impact of technology on societyin upper-level classes. The case studies connect justice to technical content
capstone course.Due to a unique partnership between departments at our university, the product design andbiomedical engineering students have multiple courses in common. These courses currentlyinclude courses taught by product design faculty: computer-aided design (SolidWorks, 2 credits),ergonomics (2 credits), user experience design (2 credits), and user interface design (1 credit),and courses co-taught by faculty from both product design and biomedical engineering: humananatomy (3 credits), and entrepreneurship (2 credits, taught by only biomedical engineeringfaculty in iteration 1). Due to differences in curriculum sequencing, in the first iteration of thecollaborative capstone design course, product design students had not yet
end of the first-semester coursein Autumn 2021. This assignment was given before the students were exposed to completing auser-centered design process in the first-year engineering course. The assignment was introducedin class as part of an introduction to design and students could complete the map in-class or forhomework. The Engineering Mindset 3 C’s (curiosity, creating value and making connections)were not explicitly discussed with these students prior to making the concept maps. D. Multidisciplinary Capstone Context The capstone course that was used in this study was a multidisciplinary capstoneprogram. The program is a two-semester sequence that is offered every academic year to seniorengineering students meeting the
classroom. A literature review of experientiallearning found that most experiential learning research centers on in-class programs and coursesand has assessed a range of skills including technical, professional, and personal outcomes(Jamison et al., 2022). However, curriculum change takes time. Engineering curricula are alreadyextensive and time-consuming, so adjusting or adding more courses is not always possible.Therefore, out-of-classroom experiences have emerged as another way to develop the skillsnecessary to create engineering professionals.Many out-of-class activities have been shown to give students the opportunity to learnprofessional skills including service-learning, internships, co-operative education, engineeringsocieties, and design
-reflectionassignment. In the peer evaluation assignment, students will be learning to provide constructivecriticism. In the self-reflection assignments, students will be evaluating themselves and lookingfor ways to improve given provided feedback. Students will sign and submit a consent formregarding each peer evaluation that they submit. This consent form will allow students to (1)agree to allow the instructor to share their feedback anonymously with the video creator, (2)agree to allow the instructor to include their feedback with all the other feedback (i.e., overallcombined score), and/or (3) agree to allow peer feedback on their feedback. The students can optout of sharing their feedback with another student. (Given the small class size, the instructor
students. From student-led design and construction teamsthrough surveys of recent alumni, the methods and results of this single case study can serve as atemplate for development and evaluation of new maker spaces to review as they plan andimplement their own spaces to foster design, innovation, and entrepreneurship skills inundergraduate engineering students.2 Overview of the Design StudioThe Design Studio is a 5,500 square foot student-run space consisting of several interconnectedrooms on the ground floor of a building primarily used to house the mechanical engineeringdepartment offices and labs (Figure 1). It began in 2012 with just one room that was previouslybeing used as a large storage space, and grew strategically as departmental needs
engineering content, as this is covered in regularclass sessions, but it does include instruction in “+ X” content (in this project, entrepreneurship)which would not be covered in class sessions. Scenario/* Hands0On* Team* Homework* Story* Lab* Discussion* Decision:Making* Page 24.996.5 Figure'2'*'Scenario"Based!Learning!pedagogical!elementsThe second and third steps of this process are what distinguish this curriculum from previouscase study curricula because it involves a “social world” hands-on experiences (in the form of alab) that
universities'engineering programs have different challenges. These include large class sizes, low studentattendance, and a higher education system structured to limit student-academic and peer-to-peerinteractions, limiting student engagement development [10]. Similarly, students are mainlycommuters living at home. Thus, attendance to class is conditioned by external variables such astransport, schedules, etc. Large class sizes present a barrier for students to develop relationshipswith their peers. In addition, in Australia, digital recording and streaming of lectures havebecome a standard component of the resources provided to students through learningmanagement sites [11], impacting the decrease in student attendance in class, and interactionwith their peers
Jordan is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in metallurgical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, an M.A. degree in theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materials-related courses and does work in the area of mechanical behavior of composite materials. He is also interested in entrepreneurship and appropriate technology in developing countries.Mr. John Edward Miller, Baylor University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Helping Engineering and Computer Science Students Find Joy in Their WorkAbstractAs
not specifically and/or entrepreneurship. invention, innovation, to invention, innovation, and/or entrepreneurship and/or entrepreneurship. and/or ties to STS concepts.Figure 2: Rubric for scoring student responses to survey questions 1-3.Giving one point for weak, two for medium and three for strong allowed us to calculate weightedaverages for the three questions. In Figure 3, these are broken into averages for first-year andadvanced students as well as an overall score for the class. There was not a great deal ofdifferentiation between the two groups. Question 1 Question 2
transferable toanother context. Nevertheless, the 29 records that passed the screening and appraisal processprovide insights into each of the guiding research questions and present assessment options for avariety of curricular and co-curricular contexts.What tools are available for assessing students’ (a) conceptual knowledge, (b) design skills orapplication of knowledge, and/or (c) beliefs/attitudes/interests related to sustainability?Across all assessment targets, self-report survey items were the most common. Perhaps surveyitems are commonly used because the domain of sustainability and sustainable design is broad,ill-defined and somewhat normative25. In addition, surveys are easy to administer inside oroutside of class. However, survey items are
an affiliate Associate Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is active in engineering within K-12, serving on the Technology Student Association and Solid Rock International Boards of Directors, and has recently co-authored a high school text, ”Introduction to Engi- neering”.Dr. Stephen J. Spicklemire, University of Indianapolis Has been teaching physics at UIndy for more than 35 years. From the implementation of ”flipped” physics class to the modernization of scientific computing and laboratory instrumentation courses, Steve has brought the strengths of his background in physics, engineering and computer science into the classroom. Steve also does IT and engineering consulting.Dr. Joseph B
and hands-on teaching is more effective that theoretical teaching,particularly at the undergraduate level. Consequently, the main teaching method adopted isstudio-based3,4 to combine hands-on experimenting with lecturing rather than the traditionalseparate lectures and lab sessions. The studio format increases interactivity between instructorand students in the classroom and engages students in active learning. Page 14.772.3The use of projects wherever possible in the curriculum provides motivation and focus forlearning and facilitates student understanding of class material5. Class projects must be well-related to class material in both topic
1993, he has taught courses and laboratories in engineering mechanics, design, and entrepreneurship. His other responsibilities include undergraduate academic advising, senior design project supervision, undergraduate research supervision, and graduate research supervision. Dr. Bucinell has advised the SAE Baja, SAE Formula, and projects related to the ASME Human Powered Vehicle project. Dr. Bucinell has directed the International Virtual Design Studio project that ran in collaboration with the Middle East Technical University in Ankara, Turkey; Altim University in Ankara, Turkey; and ESIGELEC in Rouen, France. He also founded a chapter of Engineers Without Boarders at Union College and has traveled to Boru Village
AC 2008-656: DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR INTERNATIONALEXPERIENCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONIvan Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State Brandywine. His current research interests are in the areas of Global Engineering Education, Engineering Design Education, Innovative Design, and Global Design. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is Vice-President for Region I and assistant of the
ProgramEach year, the RIT Honors Program admits approximately 100 new students from the university's2,300 entering freshmen. These outstanding students represent the top 5% of RIT's acceptedapplicants in each participating college, or just over 1% of all students applying for freshmanadmission to RIT. In selecting students for the RIT Honors Program the Admissions Committeelooks for a combination of characteristics that will support the student in meeting the demandsassociated with being a member of the Honors Program. For entering students, this potential isdemonstrated largely by high-school grades, test scores, class standing, recommendations and arecord of extracurricular activities and personal interests.Students currently at RIT are able to
entrepreneurship and thatMechanical Engineering (ME) programs should include an increased emphasis on practicalapplications of how devices are made and work. 5 The ASME Vision 2030 report states that: “To address these weaknesses, an increase in and enrichment of applied engineering design-build experience throughout degree programs is urged.”Product design and development tasks, sometimes referred to as product realization steps, areoutlined in many college texts (for example in “Engineering Design” by Dieter and Schmidt 6)distinguishing conceptual design, embodiment design and detail design. Testing usually takesplace during the embodiment design phase, requiring models, simulations, and in certaincircumstances physical prototypes to
recommended prerequisites for the course. Full details about the originalcourse structure and content are provided in Jablokow, Matson, and Velegol’s 2014 article8;additional details about the course relevant to the current investigation are provided next.2.3 Intelligent Fast Failure (IFF) and its Role in the CIC MOOCIntelligent Fast Failure was one of three main themes that formed the core of the CIC MOOC,along with Creative Diversity8 and CENTER (Character-Entrepreneurship-owNership-Tenacity-Excellence-Relationship)8, as illustrated by one MOOC student in Figure 1. By integrating thesethree themes, we aimed at developing change-focused mindsets for creativity and innovation in ourMOOC students: Creative Diversity to recognize that everyone is
(2015-2016) I have the privilege of being a Course Assistant for three classes at Stanford: (1) E14: Introduction to Solid Mechanics; (2) BIOE51: Anatomy for Bioengineers; (3) BIOE80: Introduction to Bioengineering and Engineering Living Matter. I also have pleasure of serving as the Safety and Operations Manager at the Volkswagen Automotive Innovation Laboratory, which includes managing the machine shop and teaching students how to use the machinery. In this role I am able to advise and educate students on design choices for their personal and research projects from ideation phases to functional products, with an emphasis on design and manufacturing techniques. c American Society for
constructivism. Engagement with roboticsalso improves student motivation and competencies such as communication, teamwork,leadership, problem solving, resilience, and entrepreneurship [7,8].The question of why diversity and inclusion in MRE education is important has been asked formany years, and two of the leading women in social robotics, Maja Mataric and CynthiaBreazeal, answered this question in an interview with the Wall Street Journal in 2016 [9].Mataric and Breazal stated that the key to drawing in women innovators is to show them how thework they do will impact the world. They stated that it is important to engage developers of allgenders and ethnicities because innovation is a personal, experience-driven pursuit. Breazealstated that people work
implementations and future possibilities, and better understand the theoretical ra-tionale behind gamification [10]. Specifically, successful descriptions of such methods in the class-room involve three factors: game mechanics, game dynamics, and aesthetics [5], [11], [12]. Game mechanics are the means by which one converts specific inputs by the player into specificoutputs. These are the are the base components such as rules, basic actions, and rewards. Gamedynamics dictate how the players interact during the game, traditionally the means by which theplayers are involved in playing. Typically these involve player feedback in some loop; causingskill to come from repeated interactions. Game aesthetics are how the mechanics and dynamicsinteract with
public. As Associate Professor her mantra has been to connect education to profes- sional practice inside and outside the classroom as demonstrated by the local and state awards she has won: 2014 UTEP’s CETaL Giraffe Award (for sticking her neck out); 2014 College of Engineering In- struction Award; 2014 The University of Texas System Regents’ Outstanding Teaching Award; the 2012 NCEES Award for students’ design of a Fire Station. In her work, Dr. Santiago helps to find innova- tive engineering solutions through an understanding of the balance between sustainability, social equity, entrepreneurship, community engagement, innovation, and leadership to improve the well-being of peo- ple. A few examples include
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20768The formation of innovative behavior values in new type high schools - na-tional research universitiesProf. Zulfiya Kadeeva, Kazan national research technological university Associate professor Innovation entrepreneurship and management Department Kazan national research technological UniversityProf. Raushaniia Zinurova, Kazan national research technological University Professor Innovation entrepreneurship and management department Kazan national research technologi- cal University c
management in the aerospace industry - Entrepreneurship, team-taught by the Executive Associate Dean of the CoE and a member of the Industrial Engineering faculty, both of who have successfully started and managed businesses.All of these classes feature additional lectures by experienced industry people, classprojects, and the participation of non-engineering students. The CoE plans to extendavailability to these courses, add a specific communications element (based on a graduatelevel course currently taught in Civil Engineering and Environmental Science), andpropose at least one of the courses for the University General Education curriculum
broaden their field of knowledge.Assessment: The academic foundation is currently assessed through our rigorousaccreditation process. The Certificate for Leadership and Professional Development programwill be assessed through its program objectives given below. • Pursue opportunities for innovation and entrepreneurship • Lead the way to address problems related to local and global healthcare • Continue education in BME or another field in one of their top three academic choices • Advance in professional positions that align with their career goals1st Dimension -- Academic foundation: The academic foundation is illustrated in Figure 1,but may be replaced by the established BME curriculum at any institution. Students completefundamental
benefits of blendingentrepreneurial skills and tendencies with engineering are great. It has even been postulated thatengineers with an entrepreneurial inclination are the core drivers of economic growth in nations[1]. Many programs, both publicly and privately funded, have focused on entrepreneurship or theentrepreneurial mindset (EM) in engineering education. The National Science Foundation’s I-Corps program is one example on the public side, and the Kern Family Foundation’s KEENprogram (Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network) is an example on the private side.KEEN is a growing network of over 35 U.S.-based academic institutions with the shared missionof integrating the EM in their undergraduate engineering programs [2]. The focus of KEEN is
interdisciplinary research at the intersection of social psy- chology, higher education and engineering education, with specific emphasis on the influence of gender stereotypes in student teams, motivation and the development of self-authorship in STEM undergraduates.Ms. Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University Mary Raber currently serves as Assistant Dean for the Pavlis Honors College Institute, co-Director of the Innovation Center for Entrepreneurship and Director of the Global Leadership Program at Michigan Tech- nological University. She oversaw the implementation and growth of the Enterprise Program at Michigan Tech since its inception in 2000. Her current responsibilities include academic program and curriculum
andcomputer science majors their first year. Projects are structured for students to experienceengineering design and problem solving process in a multi-disciplinary, team-based setting.Students learn core engineering concepts while developing professional skills through a series ofprojects that showcase the primary engineering disciplines.Each project in the Intro to Engineering course emphasizes different engineering fields whilefostering the development of students’ professional skills in technical communication, teamworkand problem solving, along with sustainability, entrepreneurship and creativity. These topics arecovered through class lectures, two e-learning modules that students complete outside of classhours, and three team-based projects