AC 2007-1015: PROMOTING LEARNER AUTONOMY IN ENGINEERINGMichael Bramhall, Sheffield Hallam University Mike is Head of Learning, Teaching and Assessment at Sheffield Hallam University's Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineering and Sciences. He is the Associate Director of the Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy at Sheffield Hallam. He is also the Associate Director of the UK Centre for Materials Education at Liverpool University, which is part of the UK Higher Education Academy.Keith Radley, Sheffield Hallam University Keith is a Lecturer in Curriculum Innovation at Sheffield Hallam University,(specialising in media and resources)in the Learning and Teaching Institute. Keith has 25
devices, particularly those utilized in the areas of prosthetics and artificialorgans, are a combination of mechanical systems and materials with sophisticated electroniccomponents. To continue to enhance these devices there is a need for engineers who have acombination of strong interdisciplinary traditional and specialized biomedical engineering skills.Towards this end, in the Spring of 2001 LeTourneau University began to develop the courses andlaboratories necessary to establish a new concentration in biomedical engineering built upon ourbroad core curriculum. This concentration is designed to prepare future engineers forprofessional biomedical positions in industry and for graduate study in BME, the biomedicalsciences, and/or medical school
, Inclusion & Ethics,” a 3-4hour session focusing on increasing awareness of diversity and inclusion issues in engineering,and fostering ethical and responsible behaviors among engineers. These modules were pilotedduring the 2017-18 academic year, and were added to the regular EF catalog in the fall of 2018.The DEF also pursued longer term (3-5 year) plans to develop new curriculum. The goal is tocreate a flexible suite of materials that can be adapted to different audiences, including students,academics, and engineering professionals. To this end, Tau Beta Pi partnered with MichiganState University and other regional and national training organizations to submit a proposal tothe National Science Foundation to develop professional skills training
2006-489: AN UNDERGRADUATE POWER ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: AUNIQUE AND PRACTICAL APPROACH TO BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEENACADEMIA AND INDUSTRYRavel Ammerman, Colorado School of Mines Ravel F. Ammerman (Member IEEE) received his BS in Engineering in 1981 at Colorado School of Mines (CSM), Golden, Colorado. He also received his MS in Electrical Engineering (Power Systems and Control) at the University of Colorado in 1987. He has over 24 years combined teaching and industrial experience. Mr. Ammerman has coauthored and published several technical articles on Engineering Education, Curriculum Development, and Computer Applications related to Power Systems Engineering. Mr. Ammerman is an accomplished teacher
A New Engineering Program’s Needs, Development, Implementation and Assessment Results Mohammad Amin National University, San Diego, California mamin@nu.eduAbstractBrowsing on the web, shopping online, sending messages, checking email, playing games,sending multimedia data, and paging are routine activities. Some of these activities are nowpossible through a mobile phone which has embedded itself in society faster than anycommunication system in history. Almost everyone agrees that the applications of wirelesscommunications in different areas, e.g. laptops, home automation, public safety, e-business
and economic approaches. The initial offering of the business-based GSSEprogram did not include a formal means of interfacing GSSE students with capable andinterested engineering and agricultural science students at CSU. Rather, any such interfacesbetween GSEE teams and engineering/science students were achieved on an ad hoc basis andresulted in varying degrees of success. Accordingly, in 2009 a Course and Program Grant wasobtained from the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) to formalize alinkage between GSSE Masters students and graduate students within the College of Engineering(COE) and College of Agricultural Science (CAS), respectively. The NCIIA grant hasfacilitated the development of a new program in
Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.5. Edward Gehringer, Luke Ehresman, Susan G Conger, and Prasad Wagle. 2007. Reusable learning objects through peer review: The Expertiza approach. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 3, 5 (2007), 4.6. Akbar, Shoaib, Edward Gehringer, and Zhewei Hu. "Poster: Improving Formation of Student Teams: A Clustering Approach." 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion (ICSE-Companion). IEEE, 2018.7. Sayles, Andre H., and James H. Wise. "Organizing effective laboratory work in teams." Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century. Vol. 2. IEEE, 1995.8. Schultz, Thomas W., and J. Michael Jacob. "Guiding
isgood for everyone. In education field the Mercosul was conceived predicting similar educationalsystem and so not so sudden there are new laws dictating new adjustments and Schools have toadapt to new situations. It takes time and operating staff qualified to reach this target. In SuperiorEducation the adjustments happen slower once the goals and results have deeper consequencesnot only for education but also for economy [07].Engineering education institutions in Brazil following these new trends are, kind of running fastto form a new engineer. New programs have been conceived, new approaches, new laboratoriesand so on. Changes have been happening and many of them are successful [08]. And despite allthe efforts it is not possible to say that
AC 2012-4328: NO SKILL LEFT BEHIND: INTELLIGENT TUTORINGSYSTEMS ENABLE A NEW PARADIGM IN LEARNINGMr. Hatem M. Wasfy, Advanced Science and Automation Corp. Hatem Wasfy is the President of Advanced Science and Automation Corp. (ASA), a company that special- izes in the development of online virtual learning environments, and advanced engineering simulations. He has helped design several interactive learning environments that include a CNC machining course, a centrifugal pump maintenance course, an undergraduate physics course, and a welding course. He re- ceived a B.S. (1994) and an M.S. (1996) in mechanical engineering from the American University in Cairo. Wasfy’s research interests include advanced learning systems
all undergraduate students go directly to post-baccalaureate academic labs,many undergraduate students do. It is easy to assume that academia and industryhave different safety training requirements, but this study stated that reported trainingwas similar leading to a difference in safety culture and intrinsic motivation.MethodsThis paper presents the results of an assessment study done to determine the impact ofintegrating Safety Modules throughout the core chemical engineering curriculum. Weanalyzed student responses to a pre and post survey taken before and after anacademic year where they engaged with various Safety Modules throughout their corechemical engineering classes, in order to determine how their approach to, perceptionof, and
experience, which in turn can help create a more effective teaching environment.This paper focuses on ways to build partnerships in both of these areas, meeting the informationneeds of faculty and students. Each partnership is different, but effective partnerships worktoward helping both the faculty member and librarian achieve their goals. Identifying commonground is the starting point for building a synergistic relationship. Examples of effectivepartnerships will be presented from literature as well as the author’s personal experiences. Thepurpose of this paper is to encourage new engineering faculty and librarians to creatively seekout partnerships in order for each to become more effective.IntroductionNew faculty members face several challenges
, process, react loop.Using sensors and sensor data in engineering classrooms has become increasingly beneficial forengineering education. As pointed out in a paper by Arsenault, et. al., hands on, sensors andsensor data motivates students to pursue science and engineering disciplines as well as associatedcareer paths [1]. Lessons in the classroom quickly become more interesting [2] and engaging[3].Current students are generally not tinkerers like many engineering students of the past and lack adeeper appreciation for these devices. In addition, the industry approach of replacing instead ofrepairing has only exacerbated the problem. While there is tremendous attention from bothacademia and industry in these devices and machines, there is a general
. Foroudastan, S.D. “Retention and Recruitment Plan for Engineering Technology and Industrial Studies at Middle Tennessee State University,” Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, June 24-27, 2001, Albuquerque, NM.9. Canistraro, H.A., Katz, P., Girouard, J., Lankford, A., Dannenhoffer, J. “A New Approach to the Introduction to Technology Course at a Four Year College of Engineering Technology,” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, June, 2000, St. Louis, MO.10. Johnson, K.V., and Rajai, M. “Student in the University: A Format for Retaining Students in Engineering Technology,” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference, June, 2000, St. Louis, MO.11. Smith, M.R. “Student Prediction and Tracking of Learning Progress during an Assembly
in the 21st century thanin the preceding timeframes. Engineering technology and the requirements from the globalworkforce are in constant evolution. This behooves engineering programs at universities acrossthe world to adapt their curricula to prepare the graduates for the challenges in the engineeringindustry. The engineering curriculum which adopts integrated projects on a centralizedengineering project platform [1] enables the student to become an active, intentional, and goal-oriented learner through problem-solving [2]-[3] in a project-based [4]-[6] and project-enhancedlearning [7] environment. Traditionally, core lecture and laboratory courses have been taught inrelative isolation of each other. This approach does not effectively
P-TECH: A New Model for an Integrated Engineering Technology EducationAuthors: Rebecca K. LaForest1, Iulian Gherasoiu2, Daniel White1, Harry Efstathaidis11 Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, SUNY Polytechnic Institute2 College of Engineering, SUNY Polytechnic InstituteAbstractWithin the past decade, the United States has seen an upswing in job opportunities in theindustries supported by science, technology, engineering and mathematical (STEM) academicprograms. Nanotechnology, or the study of material properties at the nanoscale, has led thisrevolution which has created the steady wave of new jobs and investments, especially in NewYork State. This relatively new field of study has concentrated and benefited from
Session 2213 Introduction to Chemical Engineering - A New Course for Freshman Students Dana E. Knox and Basil C. Baltzis Department of Chemical Engineering New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ 07102AbstractOftentimes entering freshman students know little about the major they have selected.Furthermore, the transition from high school to university is not straightforward and may createserious problems impacting retention. In order to address the foregoing issues we
future.1 Thus, within STEM curricula, a need exists to provide practical,hands-on training in gas turbine systems. In parallel, however, a pragmatic need remains tobalance energy-focused training with classical engineering and science fundamentals whilekeeping institutional costs manageable. New energy course content and the laboratoryapparatuses used to deliver it must be carefully evaluated and integrated so as not to overburdenSTEM programs or curricula.Three approaches predominate the instruction of gas turbine systems in current engineeringcurricula. First, gas turbine system theory can simply be taught in a lecture course without anaccompanying laboratory, 2 which deprives students of hands-on experience. Second, the “virtuallaboratory
learned over the past two years through an extensive evaluationprocess are shared to help other institutions implement EESP and similarly equip new faculty tobecome the necessary “change agents” in undergraduate engineering education.Background and Scope of EESPThe Engineering Education Scholars Program (EESP) is a small but crucial endeavor in theNational Science Foundation’s (NSF) approach to stimulate a comprehensive reform ofundergraduate engineering education1, 2. In 1996, organizers initiated EESP at the University ofWisconsin at Madison to encourage a cultural change in engineering education from traditional Page 3.559.1faculty-centered
. Page 5.430.1Guiding AssumptionsThe faculty development model we present is based upon a set of assumptions that apply to ourinstitution. In section “Getting Started : A Framework for Developing Your FacultyDevelopment Model” of this paper we discuss a general approach to creating a facultydevelopment model at your own institution.1. We define new faculty as any faculty member, tenure-track or otherwise, in our college who has joined the college at any of our university’s locations in the year prior to the workshop date. We also include “new faculty” from the prior two years who did not attend the new faculty workshop in their initial years. The vast majority of these faculty are at the assistant professor level, however we invite all
role in supplying the necessary talents that serve thelocal private, state and federal businesses2,3. Other universities utilize an introductory course in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright © 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 2their curriculum, similar to ME150, in order to improve retention and preparation for their bachelordegree4,5,6,7,8,9. The University of New Mexico (UNM) is located in the central region of the State of NewMexico which is host to several national laboratories such as Sandia National Laboratories, LosAlamos
AC 2007-126: ADVICE FOR NEW ENGINEERING FACULTY: INSIGHTSGAINED FROM FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMSKam Jugdev, Athabasca University Dr. Kam Jugdev is an Associate Professor of Project Management and Strategy in the MBA program at Athabasca University in Alberta and an Adjunct Professor at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Alberta. Her specific areas of interest and research include project management as a source of competitive advantage, project lessons learned, project management maturity models, project success/failure, project management education, and distance education. Dr. Jugdev actively contributes to the advancement of academic and professional communities of
. The new degree program was launched in the Autumn of 2020 at the OhioState University. Offered by the regional campuses which have traditionally been feeder campusesto the central campus, this employer-driven program will prepare graduates for high-demandmanufacturing occupations that require strong technical and management skills.The curriculum for the four-year degree program was based on industry needs that will allowgraduates of the program to help the state build the manufacturing workforce needed to competeand thrive. The curriculum is driven by a rigorous assessment process and foundational skills formathematics, physics, engineering, and management skills including the following: problem-solving, innovation, leadership, and change
Session 1280K-12 Education and Systems Engineering: A New Perspective Ben Erwin Tufts University Center for Engineering Educational Outreach Page 3.385.1 In a classroom in the suburbs of Boston, a class of first-graders are designing snow removal equipment out of LEGO Dacta materials. Before breaking up into groups, they are having a class discussion about different types of equipment - shovels, plows, front-end loaders, etc. One boy raises his hand and says "Can we make up
, casting, and tablework milestone.The identification of similarities between theatre and engineering could be further leveraged bypotentially using theatre productions as a surrogate for systems engineering. Since the validatingprocess of new engineering approaches can take years, using a system that has similarcomplexities, such as theatre, might be beneficial for investigating different systems engineeringapproaches.Conclusions and Future WorkThe cross-disciplinary education of an engineering student in theatre yielded interesting results inregards to similarities between the disciplines and on useful theatre techniques that could beapplied to engineering practices (see Table 4). The knowledge learned will lead to research thatwill investigate
students per team. In the senior year the CATME peer feedback systemin the curriculum needed for success in capstone design. These two approaches provide a unique is used to calculate 20% of the class grade, with another 20% coming from individualopportunity for engineering students participating in capstone design to take an active role in assignments and a a team time card/instructor evaluation system that helps to differentiatefuture learning at their university. The third approach was to introduce an open-ended group individual student contributions to team success [1]. The remaining 60% of the grade comesproject called “Teams Teaching Engineering” to a first-year introductory engineering class to from team
University of Tennessee was initiated in fall 2001with a focus to provide students in Engineering with skills and knowledge of businessfocused towards new product development. National Science Foundation (NSF) providedfunding for the program from 2005 to 2008 which helped enhance the program and led todevelopment of several prototype products and commercialization of one the productsSafelightTM. The program has graduated more than 25 joint MS/MBA students so far withthe number growing every year. The graduates have a double set of skills:enterpreneurship and business skills along with the advanced engineering skills needed tobecome leaders in innovative science and technology. The faculty associated with theprogram, who had limited previous
to offer greater breadth in science and in professional practice. Theundergraduate curriculum is a “zero sum game” at best; new requirements in any area must bebalanced with reduced requirements in another.In a larger sense, however, the change from proficiency to understanding of four civilengineering areas does not represent a lowered standard. Rather, it is a reallocation of civilengineering technical depth from the undergraduate level to the graduate level—as reflected inthe new Advanced Level General Criteria discussed below.Finally, it should be noted that the phrase “technical areas appropriate to civil engineering” is Page
Session 2132Beyond ABET: A new school-wide process for continuous improvement in engineering education Professor Dick K.P. Yue and Barbara Masi, Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractHaving brought 13 programs successfully through ABET’s challenging new EC2000accreditation requirements, the most interesting outcome of that process was the identification ofhow much more could be done to create a streamlined, effective continuous improvementprocess for all. In the year following MIT’s 2001 ABET review, the School of Engineeringbegan implementation of a new school-wide continuous
laboratory.To assess the effectiveness of the laboratory experiment a student survey was administered andresults indicate the new laboratory experiment has been successful in improving studentengagement.IntroductionThis paper describes a set of laboratory modules based on a low-cost toaster oven that studentsencounter throughout the mechanical engineering curriculum. The toaster oven project is part ofa larger effort by several mechanical engineering faculty to enhance the entire laboratorycurriculum. The laboratory curriculum enhancement includes two facets: 1. Modernize and improve the technical skills acquired by students in the laboratory courses. 2. Thoughtfully incorporate developmental skills (soft skills like teamwork
University, offers a “dedicated approach” toentrepreneurial engineering education. The residential, full-time, twelve-month program isgrounded in a dedicated curriculum, a dedicated space and a dedicated faculty. The dedicatedcurriculum is delivered through 12 courses in which only TE graduate students are able to enroll;11 of the 12 courses were designed specifically for the new master’s program. These coursestake place in a dedicated studio/classroom facility that is open 24 hours a day, seven days aweek, to which only program students and faculty have access. The TE program is also fortunateto have a dedicated faculty, who were hired specifically to create the collaborative space anddevelop and deliver the curriculum. The result of this dedicated