ItIntroductionThe world’s increasingly global economy has created a steadily growing market for engineerswho can work in a globalized environment (Jesiek & Beddoes, 2010). The need for suchengineers has increased even more rapidly in developing nations where population growthoutpaces technological solutions. To be competitive both at home and abroad, Americanengineers must learn how to interact productively with people from a range of cultures andcustoms (Ball, Zaugg, Davies, Tateishi, Parkingson, Gensen, & Magleby, 2012). Americaneducation must produce global engineers.Unfortunately, there is no standard definition of global engineer. A recent literature reviewreveals the extensive debate about this term. (See Jesiek, Zhu, Woo, Hompson, &
Paper ID #25171Engineering Skills and not People through the First-year Design Experienceand Service LearningDr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of South Florida. He is the Director of First Year Experiential Education and Learning. Through this position, he develops and implements the curriculum for USF’s Foundations of Engineering Lab course. He is also the Principle Investigator for Bulls Engineering Youth Experience (Bulls-EYE Mentoring) a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math based outreach program that uses
program, theory vs. application (hands-on), 2) faculty issues such astenure and reward systems and staying current with field and pedagogy, 3) specific curriculumcontent issues of communications, teamwork, technology use, ethics and 4) concern regardingstudent preparation and retention of information. Objective 3 Students will be able to recognize the options for types of instructionalapproaches.. Results from a pair of questions related to types of instructional approaches theypreferred as a student and then how they are or have been teaching demonstrate that a gap doesexist between the two (Figure 2). The largest gap occurs in the areas of active learning exercisesand laboratory
15.1050.4The modeling process is defined as ‘to specify a description of a device and its operatingenvironment that can be used to infer some information about the device’ [16], sometimes giventhe name modeling cycle [17]. The modeling process involves making decisions about relevantphysical domains, abstractions, approximations, and other assumptions [16] .Thus modeling is asearch of a space defined by multiple criteria. The modeling process is a constructive processsince it involves putting together partial solutions under constraints and explicitly representingthe information used to select, assemble, and evaluate the model. Depending on the purpose andfocus of the research, modeling processes might look different [18]. For instance, Lesh and Harel
covered,referencing well-known Statics textbooks, and examined their psychometric characteristics,including validity and reliability evidence, along with their applications in the literature, such ascitations and usage in research. Our findings indicate that due to the wide topic coverage andgeneral use case of the Concept Assessment Tool for Statics, it remains the most cited andutilized concept inventory. The other concept inventories have been developed more recently,with the Test of Representational Competence with Vectors emerging as a reliable interventionassessment tool. This study aims to support engineering educators and researchers in identifyingwhich concept inventories are most suitable under various conditions.I. IntroductionConcept
to Engineering Design, advising undergraduate students in the development of water-related projects. He also works with Rice’s Center for Civic Leadership in the development of activities to promote student community engagement, such as Alternative Spring Breaks and summer experiences with water-related NGOs in Mexico. Jorge’s previous research and teaching experience as a postdoctoral scholar and professor fall within the areas of water quality assessment, water and wastewater treatment, emerging organic pollutants, and ecotoxicology. He holds a B.Sc. in Food Chemistry from the National University of Mexico, and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park.Dr. Armineh
has focused her research in engineering student learning, retention, and student identity development within the context of engineering design. She is currently investigating the impact of cultural norms in an engineering classroom context, performing comparative studies between engineering education and professional design practices, examining holistic approaches to student retention, and exploring informal learning in engineering education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Designing the Project-Based Learning Experience using Motivation TheoryAbstractMany of us incorporate project-based learning (PBL) into the
, revealed that aspects of the challenge-based instruction model (i.e. challengesolving, group work) significantly enhanced student engagement in the class. Studentsdemonstrated concurrent development of content expertise and innovative problem solvingability during the course. Before, during, and after the challenge-based instruction course,students identified that the open-ended challenges characteristic of the instruction model weremotivating, engaging, and interesting. Students also consistently preferred homework andexamination problems derived from real world examples that require creativity and are solvedcollaboratively within teams. Our results, which emerged from a novel student-centered,instruction-sensitive survey instrument, affirm that
corebusiness practice [4] – emerged as one strategy for corporations to respond to the growingcriticisms that citizens, civil society groups and government bodies made of their power andbehavior. At their base, the practices and policies undertaken under the banner of CSRacknowledge that corporations are responsible for more than producing and distributing profit:they must also seek to create social and environmental benefits while minimizing harms.Importantly, while rhetoric surrounding CSR in corporate material invokes broad categories of“the public, “society,” or even “the world,” the field was a key innovator and disseminator ofstakeholder theory. Attention to stakeholders helps to move analysis from idealized abstractionsto the messy complexity
recent graduates’experiences as well as those of other difficult-to-access, perhaps underexplored, populations ofengineers. Introduction and BackgroundSchool-to-work transitionsResearch on engineering practice has emerged as a major focus within the engineering educationcommunity (Korte, Brunhaver, & Sheppard, 2015; Lutz, 2017; Stevens, Johri, & O’Connor, 2014).And while engineering degree programs are designed to prepare graduates for the realities ofmodern practice, research suggests that a significant gap remains between what engineers aretaught in school and what they do at work (Korte, 2011).An important aspect of engineering practice, then, involves the school-to-work transition for
longer a solitary or even dual activity but, rather, is now a collaborativeeffort that brings together academic units such as different departments in a university,researchers from different colleges and universities, with both of these forms of collaborationconducted across continents. As a result of extensive collaborative efforts that are not alwayswell defined at the beginning of the relationship, there is often confusion about responsibility,accountability, and recognition for the research results. Other issues that emerge in thesecollaborative efforts across universities are the complexities of funding, reimbursement, andallocation. Page
, Community College of the Air Force Stephen Harris is an adjunct faculty member at the Pennsylvania State University’s Great Valley School of Graduate Professional Studies. He served in the USAF as an Electronic Warfare Officer and completed both a military and a civil service career with a total of 42 years of Federal service. In his final civil service position he served as the Dean of the Community college of the Air Force. His research and teaching interests include problem solving science and leadership with a focus on the impact of cognitive style based upon Adaption Innovation theory. Dr. Harris received his Ed.D. in Career Technology from Auburn University. c American Society for
, subsequently driving turbines to generate electricity17. The thermodynamicefficiency of this process ranges from approximately 25% to 50%, depending on factors such aspre-combustion treatment, turbine technology, and plant age. A few integrated gasificationcombined cycle power plants have been constructed. These plants have an overall efficiency of upto 94%, particularly when utilized for combined heat and power18. Such facilities emit lower levelsof local pollution compared to traditional pulverized coal-fueled plants. Despite theseadvancements, the application of carbon capture and storage technology after gasification andbefore combustion remains economically impractical for coal-based power plants.The use of coal as a source of energy is strongly
Paper ID #29278Deliberate Development of Creative EngineersLt. Col. Jakob C. Bruhl, United States Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Jakob Bruhl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology, M.S. Degrees from the University of Missouri at Rolla and the University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, and Ph.D. from Purdue University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His research interests include resilient infrastructure, protective structures, and
and Physics), and an MEd (Educational Technology and Design). He is passionate about teaching and has a variety of research interests around the central theme of enhancing teaching and learning. He has worked, presented, and published on research in the fields of STEM education, educational technology, virtual reality, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, and others.Dr. Sean Maw P.Eng., University of Saskatchewan Dr. Maw currently holds the Huff Chair in Innovative Teaching in the College of Engineering at the Uni- versity of Saskatchewan. In this capacity, his work focuses on learning facilitation methods especially as they pertain to engineering design. He earned his BASc and MASc degrees in Systems Design Engi
Paper ID #9851The Distribution of Family Friendly Benefits Policies across Higher Educa-tion Institutions: A Cluster AnalysisMr. Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Schimpf is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education. His research interests include examining how cyberlearning and informal learning environments can be brought into the engineering curriculum, how educational policies affect academic pathways for faculty and students and design research. His dissertation explores how a gaming platform can be used to facilitate early college engineering students skills development.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue
department’s introductory course, and freeing up six credit-hour equivalents, oneand a half courses, in the curriculum. The paper discusses how the ABET process enabled thesediscussions to occur; how other curricular changes needed to enable the design thread to beimplemented were accomplished; and the methods used to enable the two degree programs toalign faculty motivation, distribute the workload, and understand the impact the curricularchanges had on student learning. This case study provides an in-depth analysis of a curricularchange process that could be informative for other programs hoping to make such changes.Introduction and Institutional ContextThis paper describes the ongoing evolution of a small electrical and computer engineering (ECE
further specialization that took place in the mid twentieth centurywith the outgrowth of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) engineering andelectric lighting design. This creates a dilemma for modern practice and education. On one hand, there is a Page 22.1629.2growing need for increased specialization to tackle complex emerging technologies; on the otherhand, there is an even greater need for these specialties to commune in the design process. It isobvious that this division of knowledge is convenient for the academy and practice due toconcerns of professional licensure and academic accredidation, but diminishes the potential
interview data, employing bothinductive and deductive analysis techniques. Four themes emerged: (1) the professoriate appearsdaunting due to the competitive nature of the job market and the academic environment, (2) thework demands of the professoriate are contrary to the work-life balance sought, (3) possessingresearch autonomy in the professoriate is highly attractive, and (4) the professoriate is perceivedas a calling for those who desire to teach and mentor the upcoming generation of engineers. Amore nuanced understanding of the appeal of the professoriate and the career decision-makingprocess of postdoctoral scholars may be an avenue to aid in diversifying the engineeringprofessoriate. The preferred presentation method is a traditional
Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collab- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research
. Her aim is to motivate and increase the num- ber of students interested in pursuing schooling and careers in STEM-related areas. Pamela completed her Bachelor of Science at the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico.Dr. Lily M. Wang P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln Dr. Lily Wang is the Charles W. and Margre H. Durham Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Technology, and Director of the Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction in the College of Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her primary research interests are in room acoustics and noise control, particularly human perception and performance in noise, classroom acoustics, uncertainty in acoustic measurements
(International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on engineering education; design tools
neurodivergent studentsand increase their understanding of how to help these students succeed and thrive. Few studies exist onthe rate of au�sm and neurodivergence in engineering educa�on, but the research indicates thatscience, technology, engineering, and mathema�cs (STEM) fields are atrac�ve to neurodivergentstudents (Grandin, 2022; Wei et al., 2013). Importantly, there has been a steady increase in thequan��es of adult college and university students in the U.S. who are receiving diagnoses of au�sm,ADHD, dyslexia, and other cogni�ve disabili�es that o�en impair their ability to func�on in society,educa�on, and the workforce (Na�onal Science Founda�on, 2023). And more young children arediagnosed earlier and are arriving to post-secondary educa�on ins
Science Education in 2016 from North CaMin Jung Lee, University of North DakotaDanielle Marie Rhemer, Old Dominion UniversityDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE in Electrical Engineering from Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani and his master’s and PhD degrees from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. He pursued postdoctoral studies at the University of Vermont and the University of Maryland, where he was also a research assistant professor. Dr. Kaipa directs the Collaborative Robotics & Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory
provide innovativeeducation and collaborative research programs in the areas of electric power and energyengineering, [2]. Working with our partners, the electric power program in the department ofelectrical and computer engineering (ECE) is contributing to solutions that address the agingworkforce issue in the electric power and energy sector through modernized educationalprograms and laboratories, as well as to advances in technology development, basic and appliedresearch, and outreach.The Electric Power Systems Lab (EPSL) at the University of Pittsburgh, sponsored in-kind byEaton, is a multi-use facility that is currently used for educational activities. The lab is shown inFigure 1. The lab provides opportunities for faculty and students of
began to change in the 1920s as a number of the people whowould later become major names in the field of engineering, such as Stephen Timoshenko andTheodore Von Karman immigrated to America from Europe, bringing with them an emphasis onthe science and theoretical bases that support engineering practice.2 These individuals assumedpositions of power in academia (and trained a new generation of followers of this approach) andsubsequently engineering research began to be practiced and emphasized more in engineeringprograms. The approach spread to programs across the country and gradually the “shop-based”emphasis was phased out and world events such as the Second World War forced the nation tocome up with new technologies to help the United States
College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. His current research interests are engineering edu- cation, software engineering, and developing innovative entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. He was chosen as one of the five outstanding
., Greenfield, B., & Findley, P. A. (2022). ‘You just really have to assert yourself:’ social work, nursing, and rehabilitation counseling student experiences of providing integrated behavioral health services before and after the immediate start of COVID-19. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07465-wAlhasani, M., Alkhawaji, A., & Orji, R. (2022). Mental Health and Time Management Behavior among Students During COVID-19 Pandemic: Towards Persuasive Technology Design. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 7376748 (13 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7376748Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., & Goyal, K. (2020). Gazelle Infotech-optimizing humanitarian supply chain
team member at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead). Mike has an MA in Higher Education and a BASc in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto.Ms. Milan MaljkovicDr. Emily L. Moore, University of Toronto Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional chemical engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leading innovation and technology development efforts in a major engineering firm. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 “Counting Past Two:” Engineers’ Leadership
serve as a springboard for demonstrating to Senior Engineering students the effectiveness and power of a welldefined Design Process Methodology to creatively solve even the most undefined engineeringproblem. It also served as a step by step working example of how the students were toproceed in solving their own design problem; a concurrent design effort to satisfy theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Capstone Design Projectrequirement. The paper proceeds from Problem Statement through a defined Design ProcessMethodology using contributions from a variety of familiar academic resources. The paper isthus intended to offer a single source (albeit: very brief) of information for Instructors andStudents alike, that describes