recognition, analyzing and improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 150 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He is the recipient of numerous awards and recognitions; most recently he was awarded the Purdue University, College of Technology, Equity, Inclusion and Advocacy Award. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball
of innovations, NMIMS as the director Shirpur campus and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. Recently, his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of
implementation. The large attendance byteachers indicated the desire for more schools to embrace this new subject, and a signof its nationwide success.The rebirth of technological educational has given teachers a sense of renewed vigourand hope, in-service not only provides subject specific content but assists in thepersonal development of its teachers. Many teachers as the sole technology teacherwithin their schools work in faculty isolation. In-service days help teachers“eliminate the subjective reality of the classroom press”12 they give teachers theopportunity to mix with their professional peers, to discuss, evaluate and express theirviews on their subject area.The consistently high level of attendance at DCG in-service of 87% strengthens
Association of Continuing Engineering Education (IACEE) board and serves as the SIG liaison. She is currently the Executive Director of the Center for Lifelong Engineering Education at the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. Polito has a B.S. from the University of North Texas and an M.S. in science and technology commercialization from the University of Texas, Austin.Ms. Leslie P. Martinich, Competitive Focus Leslie Martinich, Principal Consultant at Competitive Focus, provides education and consulting services in engineering management. With more than 25 years of experience, she has led teams at IBM, Compaq, Novell, Vignette, and several startup companies. She serves as the lead faculty
],illustrated below (Figure 1). Figure 1. Northeastern University's fourteen-point framework for leadership development [17]Similarly, Iowa State University’s Engineering Leadership Program developed a LeadershipModel via a collaboration between engineering faculty, staff, and students [18]. It includes eightlearning outcomes: 1. An ability to function on interdisciplinary teams 2. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3. An ability to communicate effectively 4. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context 5. A recognition of the need for, and the ability to engage in, life-long learning 6. An ability to create a
universitiesto facilitate the technology transfer of ideas originating not so much from its own faculty as fromscientists, engineers and researchers who are unaffiliated with the host university. To maximizethe potential for success of all tenants and to overcome growth gaps typical of start-ups, the EDCmanagement team provides tenants with an array of support services. These include: (1) trainingin state, federal, commercial and private funding sources, (2) referrals to university resources thatinclude academic experts, technology and manufacturing Centers of Excellence, MBA andtechnical student teams and interns to assist with production and strategy development, (3)access to university library databases, (4) introductions to firms providing legal
Paper ID #11722Yes, We Teach Presentations Online and It Works: Methods for TeachingTechnical Presentations to Practicing Engineers in a Online EnvironmentMs. Christine G. Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christine Nicometo is the Program Director for Professional Literacies Courses in the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Department of Engineering Professional Development. She has taught technical communication online for over a decade as a faculty member in the following online programs: Master of Engineering Management; Master of Engineering in Engine Systems; Master of Engineering in Sustain- able Systems. Her
Paper ID #22702Managing Engineering Talent in Organizations: A Qualitative SystematicLiterature Review on Engineering Talent ManagementMs. Swetha Nittala, Purdue University, West Lafayette (School of Engineering Education) Swetha is currently a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue. Her current work includes identifying and developing leadership and technical competencies for early career engineers and managers. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to manage technical talent in organi
the University of California, Los Angeles, as well as an M.A. in Student Development Administration from Seattle University and a B.S. in General Engineering from Gonzaga University. His research interests include teaching and learning in engineering, STEM education policy, and diversity and equity in STEM.Mr. Brett Tallman, Montana State University By Brett Tallman, (Montana State University). I am currently a Masters student in Education, concurrently researching engineering leadership as part of my PhD program. My former adventures include mechanical engineering (I am a P.E. in MT), seminary, teaching (high school math), and biking. You can find more of my engineering education work at educadia.org or on my
Continuing Professional Development Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. Dr. Springer is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic
advisory committees. Springer is internationally recognized, has authored nu- merous books and articles, and lectured on software development methodologies, management practices, and program management. Springer received his bachelor’s of science in computer science from Purdue University, his M.B.A. and doctorate in adult and community education with a cognate in executive de- velopment from Ball State University. He is certified as both a Project Management Professional (PMP) and a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR).Mr. Mark T. Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mark Schuver is the Associate Director for the Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Ap- plied Research (ProSTAR) in the
the How People Learn model that this construct is useful fordeliberating on the power of a classroom instrument for perceiving results in the effort.MethodLearning Training and Development developed the course ENG1069 with the help of a chemicalengineer who focuses on improving educational processes and methods in the field 20. Asprofessor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University, he is the author ofseveral education-related papers for engineering faculty and gives faculty developmentworkshops on active learning 21. He is also participating in Project Catalyst, an NSF fundedinitiative to help faculty re-envision their role in the learning process. Bringing ENG1069 tofruition involved working with engineering educators
Paper ID #32453Adapting an NSF-Funded Professional Skills Curriculum to Train Engineersin Industry: A Case StudyMr. Mark Jason Luchini https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-luchini-28b1b81a/Mr. David J. Cribbs, Jackson www.linkedin.com/in/david-cribbs-miDr. Dirk Joel-Luchini Colbry, Michigan State University Dr. Dirk Colbry is a faculty member in the Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and En- gineering (CMSE) at Michigan State University. Dr. Colbry earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science and his principle areas of research include machine vision and pattern recognition (specializing in scientific imaging). Dr
situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Exploring the Learning Experiences of Recent Engineering Graduates during the School-to-Work TransitionIntroductionThe school-to-work transition is an important period for recent graduates. During the first 12weeks of a new engineers’ job, they encounter
Research Specialist at the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR). Addi-tionally, she is an adjunct faculty member for Webster University and Friends University. Page 25.1284.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Design, Development, and Deployment of an Online, Portable, Blended Course for the Energy Industry using Open-Source Tools: Technological, Logistic, and Instructional Design IssuesAbstractMore and more often we learn of new courses or entire academic programs being brought online.While technologies have advanced
Paper ID #21233But How Do You Feel?Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he was the Associate Director of Leadership Programs at Cornell’s College of Engineering from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Zorman received his M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Technology in Vienna. He worked for 23+ years in the telecom industry in Europe and North America as engineer, leader, mentor, coach and leadership development professional. After a long and fulfilling customer-facing career, Mr
consulting engineer, he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. He is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry.Dr. Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto Serhiy Kovalchuk is a research associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto.Mr. Mike Klassen, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is PhD Candidate in Higher Education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto. He was a long-time
-authorship characterizes moving from externally derived meaning making structures, tointernally controlled ones, as detailed by Baxter Magolda [16]. Her work emerged out ofKegan’s 6-staged theory of development, which focused on one’s locus of control [8].Research has found that several experiences are particularly effective at developing self-authorship [17]: self-authorship grew when students were expected to create their own views andtake responsibility for them (p. 878); self-authorship also grew when critical approaches werescaffolded in class concurrent with guidance and support from supportive faculty and peers (p.879). In summary, self-authorship is a central component of college student development, and itcan be cultivated by giving
. Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto Dr. Reeve was the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a consulting engineer he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students, undergraduate and graduate. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. In 2017, he was co-leader of the team that developed the OPTIONS Program (Opportunities for PhDs: Transitions, Industry Options, Networking and Skills) for engineering PhD students interested in careers outside the academy. He is a
with the NASA Johnson Space Center. He received the IEEE Third Millennium Award, and projects he helped lead re- ceived the NSPE Outstanding Engineering Achievement Award and R&D 100 Award. He is a Registered Professional Engineer and earned the Project Management Professional Certification.Prof. Dennis Arthur Conners c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Systems Thinking Concepts and Applications for Engineering Leadership DevelopmentAbstract Many important and worthwhile initiatives in engineering leadership development focus onthe development of communication, social, and business skills among engineers [1]. Theobjective of this paper
]. Approaches to assessing professional skills such as teamwork,communication, and leadership are likely developed through a culmination of learningexperiences both in and out of the classroom and require behavioral observations, assessments,feedback, and reflection activities [1]. However, research in the application of these strategiessuggests that these methods are costly for both faculty and student as well as time consuming [2].Moreover, promising strategies to address these outcomes include the use of Problem-Basedlearning or cooperative learning approaches [3]. These approaches, developed out ofconstructivist learning theories, places the learner in the context by which the knowledge andskills are needed [4]. These approaches provide
Paper ID #33791Professional Development of Secondary School STEM Educators inSub-Saharan Africa: A Systematized Literature ReviewMr. Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Moses Olayemi is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is passionate about the professional development of STEM educators as change agents in the educational landscape of Sub-Saharan Africa. He aspired to leverage research-based empirical evidence to influence education policies.Mr. Collins N. Vaye, Florida International University Collins N. Vaye is a first-generation graduate student and a
AC 2012-3280: DEVELOPING AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM AT ADEVELOPING UNIVERSITY IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRYDr. Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College Kurt DeGoede is Associate Professor of engineering and physics, Elizabethtown College. DeGoede is currently working on developing a collaborative study abroad program in West Africa built around a design course based in service engineering. Many of these projects include work with renewable energy systems. His research interests are in the areas of biomechanics and the modeling of dynamic systems. Current projects include collaborative work with faculty and students in occupational therapy and an orthopedic hand surgeon, developing clinical instruments for conducting therapy
opportunity and an understanding of the importance of guiding people, but also tointroduce a unique culture being created in the Engineering Leadership program and provideleadership models for incoming students to learn from second year students. These second year students, also called Mavericks, worked closely with EngineeringLeadership faculty, as well as faculty from Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering (Needham,MA), throughout the summer in order to develop curriculum for the incoming cohort of studentsin the fall of 2014. The goal of the course was to create an immersive learning environment thatwas also social, relatable, and inspiring to the instructors and the students. In order to achievethat goal, the Mavericks were given the
AC 2012-3292: DEVELOPING MODEL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL SER-VICE LEARNING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESDr. Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College Kurt DeGoede Associate Professor of engineering and physics, Elizabethtown College. DeGoede is cur- rently working on developing a collaborative study abroad program in West Africa built around a design course based in service engineering. Many of these projects include work with renewable energy systems. His research interests are in the areas of biomechanics and the modeling of dynamic systems. Current projects include collaborative work with faculty and students in occupational therapy and an orthopedic hand surgeon, developing clinical instruments for conducting therapy and
public transportation. In addition to site tours, the students visited museums.Our goal with the students traveling to Europe is that they would gain new insights on how tobetter develop and refine their sustainable product in addition to gaining an internationalexperience. After returning from their one week excursion, students then presented their researchfindings of their overseas travel experience. During the past two years, we have found thatstudents return from overseas with fresh perspectives and new insights on how to better enhancetheir final products.Discussing the Critique Process.Each group’s designs are assessed in the classroom by faculty critiques. Students in the art anddesign program have already been exposed to this manner of
. in the ITC/Morehouse School of Religion and a Ph.D. in Adult Education at the University of Georgia. Page 12.1455.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006PURPOSE INSTITUTE: Promoting Underrepresented Presence on Science and Engineering FacultiesThe primary goal of the PURPOSE Institute is to Empower Current and Aspiring Faculty to Achievement, Promotion andLeadership in the Academy. The Institute focuses on the development of African-American, Hispanic, Native Americanand women engineering faculty members, with an express goal of promoting the recruitment, preparation and retentionof these faculty in the Academy. The
Paper ID #34696The Development of a Virtual Research Preparation and ProfessionalDevelopment ProgramDr. Tiffany A Mathews, Penn State University Dr. Tiffany Mathews is the Co-Program Director for Education and Outreach for Penn State’s MRSEC: Center for Nanoscale Science. She earned her Ph.D. in Chemistry from Penn State and conducted post- doctoral research at Wake Forest’s School of Medicine. In 2007, she joined the faculty at Wayne State University in the Department of Chemistry focusing on using analytical techniques to probe the brain. Since coming back to Penn State in 2013, she has transition on developing programs and
applied in real engineer- ing learning environments to improve student learning and teaching. In this respect her two prominent research contributions are with: 1) artefact-inspired discovery–based pedagogy, i.e., learning activities where students’ exploration of STEM knowledge is self-directed and motivated by interactions or manip- ulations of artefacts; and 2) the development of faculty expertise in outcomes-based course design through the use of the Instructional Module Development (IMOD) system, a self-guided web-based training tool.Dr. Ashraf Gaffar, Arizona State University Ashraf Gaffar received his PhD in computer science with a focus on Human Computer Interaction (HCI), and works at ASU as Assistant
The competition will allow us to interact with external experts and help create a pool ofmentors. Besides that, we need to network with experts in different domains to create a pool ofmentors. We need mentors to refine the entrepreneurial mindset and associated socio-emotionalskills.Developing faculty mentors The college cannot rely too much on external experts and should have some of its facultymentor prospective entrepreneurs. In the beginning, they can be co-mentors along with externalmentors and slowly take up full mentorship. This will also help many prospective entrepreneurs,who are interested in the education domain.Developing a library of resources All prospective entrepreneurs will have to develop knowledge in many areas