Paper ID #241422018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Finding the Rainbow Needles in the Engineering Haystack: Connecting witha Hard-to-Reach PopulationDr. Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder Robyn Sandekian is the Managing Director of the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Com- munities (MCEDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder). She joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic
keyexamples of how we have leveraged Meadows’ 14 principles in creating EETI. EETI’s primary mission was to allow faculty to self-organize and form new, positive relationshipsaround the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning. To accomplish this mission, we sought toavoid remedial activities meant to help faculty “fix” their teaching practices, which the facultydevelopment community has come to recognize as counterproductive to building a positive reputationamong faculty (Haras, Ginsberg, Magruder, & Zakrajsek, 2017). Rather, we drew from one of Meadows’principles, listen to the wisdom of the system, to adopt a strengths model of faculty development.Accordingly, our programming allows faculty to engage with EETI on their own
Annual Frontiers in Education, 3, 2002.[25] B. Olds, & R. L. Miller, “The Effect of a First‐Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, 2004.[26] K. G. Ricks, J. A. Richardson, H. P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, & R. A. Taylor, “An Engineering Learning Community to Promote Retention and Graduation of At-Risk Engineering Students,” American Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.73- 90, 2014.[27] C. Zhao, & G. D. Kuh, “Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 115-138, 2004.[28] H. Handley and A. Marnewick, “A
barriers in the recruitment, retention and promotion of women faculty in STEM academics, and 3. Partnerships for Adaptation, Implementation, and Dissemination (PAID) – support the extensibility of materials, tools, research and practices that have been demonstrated as effective in increasing the participation and advancement of women in stem careers.WEPAN, the Women in Engineering ProActive Network, received an ADVANCE award from the NSF,called ENGAGE (Engaging Students in engineering through Instruction and Mentoring). This is thefirst year of this 3 year project, which will fund teams and minigrants from 10 universities each year.The grants will focus is training teams on best practices and disseminating them to their
Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Luke Kachelmeier, University of New Mexico Luke Kachelmeier finished his bachelor’s degree from the University of New Mexico in May 2019. He completed a double major degree in applied math and psychology. His interests are in human factors
major PBLcourse projects. Our prior work [8], [14] showed that the large-enrollment course formatdemonstrated strong student learning outcomes, measured via pre-post course surveys andperformance on summative assignments, with the caveat that the study setting at our institutiondid not allow for controlled comparison between large and small-section course designs.With the emergency constraints or, in some cases, cessation of F2F instruction due to theCOVID-19 pandemic, there is now a fundamental question of whether FYE engineering coursesthat were designed for F2F instruction can be effectively administered in large-enrollmentsections in an entirely online setting. Courses taught in large-enrollment formats weredisproportionately impacted by
Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She joined the faculty at the University of Toledo in 2004. As the Associate Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engagement she leads the development and execution of initiatives and programs to facilitate the recruitment, retention, and success of women, students from underrepresented groups and first generation students. These duties are well aligned with her current research interests and external funding in engineering education.Mr. Bryan Thomas Bosch, The University of Toledo Bryan Bosch holds a B.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering and a M.A. in Educational
sophomore year at The College of New Jersey(TCNJ). The students had not yet completed their student teaching requirement. All pre-service education majors were asked to voluntarily complete the R-MANX and MTEBIsurveys at the beginning and end of their compulsory mathematics content course (MAT105)and their compulsory mathematics methodology course (MTT202). The course MTT202 istaken after MAT105. This yields a total of four measurement points, allowing for three pre-post pairings (one for each compulsory course and one pre-post pairing between Pre105 andPost202). Mathematics majors are not required to take MAT105.In MAT105 (“Math Structures & Algorithms for Educators-I”) students are engaged in athorough development of patterns, numeration
inundergraduate research experiences in engineering disciplines. While there has beenconsiderable study and analysis of the benefits achieved by high-achieving undergraduatestudents engaged in research activities, relatively little consideration has been given tothe impact and benefits of research experiences on engineering students who are betterdescribed as “average”. Yet, these are the students to whom undergraduate researchopportunities need to be provided in order to achieve broader participation. Therefore, itis beneficial to understand how these experiences impact average students so thatprograms are not designed that will not meet the students’ expectations or needs.The primary purpose of this NSF-sponsored work is to provide definitions of
-masters-degree#:~:text=Graduate%20certificates%20and%20master[24] Pearson, 2021 Value of IT Certification Report: A Biennial Look at the Motivations for and Impacts of IT Certification on Individuals and Organizations Around the Globe, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://home.pearsonvue.com/voc/2021-report[25] J. Wright-Kim, "The dynamic financial implications of the community college baccalaureate: An institutional exploration," AERA Open, vol. 8, p. 233285842211264, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221126473[26] X. Huang, J. Cao, G. Zhao, Z. Long, G. Han, and X. Cai, "The employability and career development of finance and trade college graduates," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, p
manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Design and Evaluation of Automated System Modules for Portable Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Kit for Industrial Automation and Control EducationAbstractAutomation impacts our lives on a daily basis. Automated doors, elevators, coffee makers, airconditioners, and copy machines all have controllers and sensors integrated into the machine toform an automated system that provides a service
consists of two distinctphases: collection and disposition. Collection at the high camps, due to remoteness, lack ofroads, and extreme weather conditions, is of necessity manual; Sherpas can go where machinescannot. But the engineering community can actively involve itself in the disposition phase bydesigning facilities to deal with the tons of trash transported from the mountain. Severalinitiatives are already planned or in place, but it is important to note that all depend on unstablefunding, and many are one-time efforts.A useful classroom exercise involves asking students to research and evaluate one of the projectsdetailed below, looking at items such as viability, cost, efficacy, long-term effectiveness, andcultural impact. In addition
-drawn sketches and how they are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, especially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on the impact involvement in academic makerspaces has on student in engineering programs.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. Dr. Nagel joined the James Madison University after completing his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. He has a B.S. from Trine University and a M.S. from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, both in mechanical
Administration, Nanjing agricultural University, China, in 2018. He is currently interested in higher engineering education, engineering education policy, and emerging engineering education.Mr. Zhaowei Chu, ZheJiang University Chu Zhaowei, Ph.D student at ZheJiang University,China,Master of Education, Bachelor of Engineer- ing,Research interest:Engineering Education;Systematic innovation.Mr. Bifeng ZHANG, Zhejiang University Bifeng ZHANG is a PhD student at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. He received his BE degree from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications and MBA degree from Zhejiang University. His research focuses on engineering education and systematic innovation
active student engagement through exploration, questioning, and practicalapplication of knowledge to address real-world challenges. It introduces a new pedagogy that isbeing used to deliver engineering fundamental concepts while providing students with the skillsand experience necessary for success in future careers. Students engage in collaborativeteamwork on an engineering innovation project and apply concepts learned in their classes.Project team members are students from different BME courses comprising of a combination ofundergraduate, graduate, on campus, or remote students.This article highlights the experience and outcomes of students participating in an internationalIBL design engineering project, conducted across multiple continents to
communityinvolvement and academic engagement said that connecting with important communitiesprovided them with a sense of belonging which improved their affective state and allowed themto re-engage in their studies. The authors’ findings point out the personal and academic relevanceof community-based involvement for engineering students.Finally Cynthia Finelli, Brian Burt and their respective research teams examined the impact ofengineering students’ curricular and co-curricular experiences on their ethical development 29, 34.Finelli et al. found that 88% of engineering students reported some kind of co-curricular activitywith an average of three activities per student. When they were asked about ethics, most studentsreported encountering ethical dilemmas
, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for
. Page 15.366.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Designing and Teaching Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Investigating Innovation and Our Engineered WorldIntroductionThrough a curriculum reform initiative, The University of Texas at Austin is developing“signature courses” for freshman undergraduate students. These courses expose studentsto a variety of subjects and engage them in a variety of skill sets. These are “signature”courses because they are developed and taught by the university’s top teaching faculty,where the goals are to foster a scholarly community and to create the most interesting andmeaningful classes possible. Embarking on its third year, Undergraduate Studies 302:The Engineered World
. traditional summative components that occur at the end of a topical unit.Working 4. 9th gradeenvironments withLearning students, Schwartz shouldand Martin30 taught be community one group centered; a graphical they should method to use realisticcalculate standardized problems to scores, andstudents
less likely than men to negotiate on important issues such as start-up packages2,which means that they may be subsequently less likely to have the resources and supportsnecessary as a new faculty member to establish the research agenda required for promotion andtenure. As graduate students and early career faculty members, women are less likely to receivethe kind of mentoring that is essential to provide a firm foundation on which to base a facultycareer12. Finally, lifecourse issues (i.e., marriage and childbearing) pose constraints uponwomen faculty while simultaneously conveying advantages to their male peers4.The NMSU ADVANCE Program, funded by the National Science Foundation in 2002, hasinitiated a number of steps to increase the
quality” and recognizedthe need to engage in lifelong learning (i.e. a disposition or orientation towards the value oflearning), while third-year students were more focused on their learning skills or abilities as theyapplied to the remainder of their formal education [27]. This may be evident of greater personaldevelopment due to maturity and/or experience, an awareness of their formal education yearscoming to an end, or other factors.These findings suggest that programs in Canada are addressing a limited definition of lifelonglearning that might not fully support student competency after graduation and are not consideringhow a program as an integrated whole may impact the lifelong learning competency of students.Accordingly, there is a need for
members engage in their individual projects, the efforts will shift.Seeking Community FeedbackThis Work in Progress seeks feedback from the community on ways to strategically collaboratewith faculty, chairs, administrators, and other offices on improving student retention throughefforts that might include changes in instruction, curricula, and policy. Suggestions from thecommunity on examples of related efforts at other institutions are appreciated as well. Duringthe presentation (poster session), attendees will be invited to engage in the topic by developingan iceberg model (i.e., a systems thinking tool to help elucidate underlying structures and mentalmodels) [13] and comment on the iceberg models created by other attendees and the systemsmap
Education, 2025 Enhancing Coding Skills and Learning Efficiency in Engineering Programming Courses by Using AI ToolsAbstractIntegrating AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini into programming courses, such as the freshman-level Fundamentals of Engineering, provides students with invaluable support for enhancing theircoding skills. One common challenge students face is the correct use of characters and punctuation,which often leads to errors and frustration. This manuscript examines how ChatGPT can helpstudents overcome these obstacles by providing real-time feedback and guidance. In-classexamples were used to evaluate the accuracy of code troubleshooting, and student surveys assessedthe impact on motivation, engagement, and coding
findings effectively, reinforcing both their technical and written communication skills. Bystructuring the lab in two distinct phases, one focused on preparation and team collaboration, andthe other on data collection and analysis, students were given the opportunity to engage with thematerial and experience the full cycle of an engineering project, from planning to execution andreporting. • Lab Assignment #2: Develop and Execute an Experimental Procedure for Identifying the Resistance Coefficient of a Standard 90o ElbowThe second open-ended lab tasked students with calculating the resistance coefficient for astandard 90° elbow, a common component in fluid transport systems. This lab, handout inAppendix 2, provided students with an
and a guide to enhanceteamwork in course projects. Based on TPB, three interventions were developed: (1) a projectdescription document including real-world examples of problems that can be solved with skillsdeveloped through the course project; (2) an accountability plan for the instructional team toprovide social pressure to participate; and (3) a project management plan for the students to havea structure in the groups with well-defined roles. The interventions were adopted in two Fall2023 courses (n = 39). Findings revealed significant improvements in student engagement, taskcompletion, communication, role adoption, goal clarity, and conflict management post-intervention. These results confirm the efficacy of TPB-based interventions in
working in student presentations. Evaluate groups, writing a project report, and comments written by the students an ability to communicate making a short presentation to the discussing their experiences g effectively rest of the class. working in groups. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and h societal context a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in i life long
. For example, a strength of our Site is ourextensive professional development support, with a particular emphasis on communication skills,and regular community-building activities. We leveraged the faculty experience of onlineteaching during the pandemic and engagement of several graduate students with complementaryexperience to transition our programmatic goals of professional development and community-building to the online format. We shipped experimental kits for Scholars to engage in hands-onactivities at home, e.g., to learn about cell culture, microscopy and bioassays, as well asapproaches that focused on computer-based activities, e.g., to learn about molecular modeling.The didactic instruction component intentionally emphasized data
want me to do all that?”)b University of Colorado-Boulder ≠ Most valuable thing learned from the coach ≠ Balance of direction and independence ≠ Availability ≠ Overall rating ≠ Comments for improvementNumerical ratings are provided for the Availability and Overall ratings. The data for Fall 2008and Fall 2009 indicate that most students rate highly their coach’s availability and overalleffectiveness. See Table 1. Note that the pre-guide (Fall 2008) and post-guide (Fall 2009) ratingsare nearly identical for each measure. One could conclude that the coach guide has had nomeasurable impact on the students’ ratings of faculty coach availability and overall effectiveness.This could mean that the guide
performance (GPA), and community connection(one-year retention) as seen in the Results and Discussion section. These programs are acombination of new and old initiatives whose mutual support lays the foundation for the holisticapproach to student support that OSDS is striving to achieve. These programs include: • Engage ME! (Multicultural Engineers) • WE Engage! (Women in Engineering) • Maximizing Academic and Professional Success (MAPS) Coaching and Mentoring • Engineering Freshman Learning Community (EFLC)Regular, consistent assessment and evaluation of academic success and retention metrics throughthese initiatives will allow us to narrow the strategic focus of each program to develop a commonset of complimentary best practices
development (PD) and collaborate on integrating computer scienceinto their instruction of STEM and social science topics. The project is producing units forteachers, who are implementing these units with support from master teachers and educationalscholars. The community serves as a forum for teachers to debrief and learn from each otherabout ways to improve their instruction and design of the curricular units. Libraries in the statesystem act as partners for dissemination to rural areas of the innovative instructional approaches.As a result, in addition to increased knowledge, there was a significant improvement inparticipants’ confidence with integrating CS into their practice as well as their beliefs that theycan affect student learning outcomes