SummerResidency.Feemster11 and Mohamidi et.al12 utilized MATLAB/SIMULINK in an educational setting.MATLAB/SIMULINK is utilized in the four credit hour Engine Systems and Controls course forthe MEES program.MEES Program design-The design of this on-line master’s degree was based on several critical elements: - An identified need - A vision and mission statement - A determination of the students’ skills and knowledge to be developed by the program - A well thought out curriculum - Course design incorporating instructional design methodologies and the strengths of the on-line learning environment - A program and delivery method that meets the needs of the students - Outstanding and competent IT (Information Technology) resources - A financial and
Paper ID #5971Faculty Development Through Industrial InternshipDr. Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University, San Marcos Vedaraman Sriraman is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Texas State University- San Marcos. In the past, he has served as the Manufacturing Engineering program coordinator, Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology and Assistant Dean in the College of Science at Texas State University. He has received several gramts form the NSF and SME-EF to initiate new curriculum and laboratories. Dr. Sriraman has received several teaching awards and has served as the faculty advisor to
AC 2010-1016: THE CONSTRUCTIVIST-BASED WORKSHOP: AN EFFECTIVEMODEL FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING ACTIVITIESSusan Donohue, The College of New Jersey Susan Donohue is an assistant professor of Technological Studies in the School of Engineering at the College of New Jersey.Christine Schnittka, University of Kentucky Christine Schnittka is an assistant professor of Curriculum and Instruction in the School of Education at the University of Kentucky.Larry Richards, University of Virginia Larry Richards is a professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia
U.S. Education Secretary Richard Riley. Those jobs willrequire technology that’s still being developed. The most important thing a student can do todayis learn to learn.”3 Ms. Abel continues “the book also notes that the emerging work force must beflexible, ready to spend a lifetime learning new skills because new kinds of work will continuallybe created and old ones will vanish.”4The effects of technological change on economies and the struggle to keep pace have beendiscussed by many others. In a paper on the economic importance of patents, The EuropeanPatent Office stated “Today’s economy is becoming increasingly knowledge-based andintellectual property in the form of patents plays a vital role in this growth. Between 1992 and2002, the
have already developed the basic understanding of construction methods, materials, and estimating. • Compared with other courses in the construction curriculum, it is less computational. • The department has previously used web-based pedagogy for this course.Tools InvolvedMany tools are available for developing an on-line course. The main tool is the WebCT that isavailable to all faculty at Missouri Western. It has also been the tool for faculty training and hasbeen evaluated to meet the following criteria: Page 11.847.3 • Ability of integration with current registration system and ease of use. • Possibility
CBI and how it has been successfully used in science and engineering. A local two-dayworkshop led by a team with years of experience in developing curriculum using CBI follows.The following semester faculty attend two workdays to implement what they have learned in theCBI workshop by developing content for delivery of a single lecture using CBI which they willuse to access the impact of CBI on student learning. The first group of twenty faculty whocompleted the training in the Spring 2009 semester were employed in the summer to developfive courses in STEM that are to be fully taught using CBI. The final group of 20 completed thetraining in the Fall 2010 semester. This paper describes the details of the faculty developmentplan, the keys to its
. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around affective management of curriculum and instruction in engineer- ing students.Dr. Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Dr. Oenardi Lawanto is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, USA. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, his M.S.E.E. from the University of
Paper ID #18739Work in Progress: The Impact of Faculty Development Workshops on Shift-ing Faculty Teaching Beliefs and Classroom Practice toward Student Cen-terednessMs. Elizabeth Lopez, Arizona State University Elizabeth Lopez is a Master’s student at Arizona State University studying biomedical engineering. She has undergone the undergraduate engineering curriculum and has facilitated the implementation of evidence-based instructional strategies in the biomedical senior design course. In JTFD, she has evaluated and analyzed the shift in instructor fidelity towards student-centered learning.Dr. Yong Seok Park, California
return to the students on a lecture-by-lecturebasis. Three large assembly exams would be administered for the entire course during the term.A New ApproachThe distance learning engineering programs had established a functioning model where students notphysically present at lectures could effectively participate and complete rigorous coursework in theengineering curriculum. Based on the success of these programs, a proposal was formulated to extendthe distance learning model to on-campus students taking Engineering Mechanics: Statics. The rationalewas that a single live section could be taught, recorded, and the video delivered over the campus course
involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is a Professor of Engineering at Olin College of Engineering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic motivation, and gender. She speaks and consults on curricular design, student-centered learning, and gender and STEM.Dr. Kate Roach, UCLMrs. Emanuela Tilley, University College LondonDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Associate Professor at James Madison University (United States) in the Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) and the Director of the Madison Engineering Leadership Program
Paper ID #30116Analyzing Student Achievement to Measure the Effectivenss of ActiveLearning Strategies in the Engineering ClassroomSarah Hoyt, Arizona State University Sarah Hoyt is currently the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program. Her educational background includes two Master’s degrees from Grand Canyon University in Curriculum and Instruction and Education Administration. Her areas of interest are in student inclusion programs and creating faculty development that ultimately boost engagement and per- formance in students from lower SES backgrounds. Prior to her role
diverse setting of India that will be tested and the resultsdisseminated. The overall objectives of this project are: 1. Identify stakeholders and their barriers in teaching engineering at NIT Raipur. 2. Co-design solutions for addressing barriers in conjunction with stakeholders. 3. Develop a curriculum for a faculty workshop that addresses the barriers to teaching engineering effectively at NIT Raipur, including skills in pedagogy, course design and delivery. 4. Conduct seminars and workshops for engineering faculty at NIT Raipur to address barriers in teaching engineering effectively.2.0 MethodologyHuman centered design (HCD) is adopted in this project for understanding needs and valueperspective of stakeholders
engineering projects, and they need to be able to communicate thoseexperiences [13].The work of Larsson, et, al. indicated that certain leadership styles are best suited for certain typesof engineering projects, depending largely upon the project duration. For example, they found that“Integrators,” whose tendency is to ensure that the team works well on an interpersonal level, tendto be best suited for complex projects that require timely completion. Their results suggest thatdiscovery of a leadership style that is effective for the projects that we do in our courses may leadus to develop a leadership curriculum that teaches leadership in that style to achieve better courseoutcomes [14]. In this work we hope to solve this question in the inverse
development and management, change management, leadership development and succession, curriculum development, and competency profiling. At KCPL, she works in the delivery unit to provide leadership and technical Page 25.1284.1 training solutions for all levels of employees and providing organizational consulting for organizational c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012effectiveness, team-building, and change. She has a B.A. in business administration - management fromPark University and earned a master’s in HRD/organization development from Friends University. Sheis a part-time Senior
State University (OSU). She received her Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing and PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from Ohio State. She has seven years of industry experience in the areas of Design and Consulting. Her research focuses on the recruitment, retention, and success of undergraduate students, especially those populations who are under-represented in engineering. She has developed and taught a wide variety of engineering courses in First Year Engineering and Mechanical Engineering at Ohio State. She has received numerous teaching awards in the last five years at both the College and the Departmental level at OSU.Ms. Lucille Sheppard, Ohio State University Lucy Sheppard is a third
by a shared program or curriculum. Thischaracteristic of the model was motivated in part by the fact that STEM instructors often find itchallenging to translate general teaching advice and strategies to discipline-specific contexts. Wehypothesized that grouping instructors by discipline would facilitate “translation.” The model isalso consistent with recommendations for professional learning communities to includeparticipants with common concerns or needs [1], [4].Groups and ParticipantsAs part of the project studied in this paper, SIMPLE teaching development groups were formedin six STEM departments at a single large, research-focused institution. Group members wereinterviewed yearly to learn about the structure and functioning of their
different institutions with interest in applying EM approaches to career development haveteamed for this initiative. The three private institutions vary in size from 1,200 to 10,000. One isreligiously affiliated, and one is PhD granting. All three are members of the KEEN network andall have spent considerable time and resources weaving EM learning into their curriculums. Thenext step is to encourage their faculty to apply an EM approach to their own careers. All threeprovide mentors to new faculty and teaching load reductions for tenure-track faculty. The careerplanning support at these three institutions varies as does the position and rank of the faculty(Table 2). It is understood that titles for nontenure track faculty vary widely across the
wide variety of Life Science professionals in biomedical, biotech,and clinical arenas who need either specific knowledge of the medical product developmentprocess or a broad understanding of the products they use or market. The program can benefitengineers, research scientists, product managers, regulatory professionals, quality managers,non-technical managers, manufacturing professionals, clinical professionals, and other healthcareprofessionals. The curriculum addresses the breadth of the development process, including athorough understanding of FDA regulations and compliance, quality engineering for improvedperformance, how to mitigate commercial and financial risks, and building marketing success.Jobs range from conducting research at
newly emerging academicprogram on electronic systems and training courses delivered by a consortium ofhigh-tech companies. The concepts covered in both programs are very similar.However, the experience of the participants and the desired outcomes in terms ofapplicable skills are very different. By sharing content and using the rapidreconfiguration procedures inherent in web-supported delivery, we have been ableto exploit the synergy between the academic and industry activities. Theexperience has clarified educational priorities and improved the learningeffectiveness for all participants – including the faculty.Origins – parallel programsMany academic courses are reformatted and offered as industry short courses.Less often, courses developed
SIEMENS trainer. To obtain the FANUC certification, thestudents will still have to complete a FANUC Online training session offered by FANUC Inc. Theinstructor who attended this training is Dr. Ma. The training was for four days: Monday 01/07/2019to Thursday 01/10/2019 (two for turning and the other two for milling).Future Work and Conclusion:This is a work in progress paper and continuous process of development. Another author veryrecently went for the FANUC Vision training for an internally funded project both received(another accepted paper in ASEE 2020). The main goal is to prepare the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology (MET) curriculum with mechatronics concentration where these instructors (authorsof this paper) can contribute heavily. A
Paper ID #33722Faculty Development for Research Inclusion: Virtual Research Experiencesfor UndergraduatesDr. Patricia Morreale, Kean University Dr. Patricia Morreale is Professor and Director of the School of Computer Science and Technology at Kean University, Union, NJ, where she serves as lead for the North Region of the Computing Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions (CAHSI). Her research focuses on human computer interaction, equitable software design, and undergraduate retention and success in computer science. She was recognized with Kean University’s Faculty Research Mentor Award and received the Council
Paper ID #29649Faculty Development Mini-Modules on Evidence-Based Inclusive Teachingand Mentoring Practices in EngineeringDr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Sarah I. Rooney is an Assistant Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Delaware. She seeks to bring evidence-based teaching prac- tices to the undergraduate curriculum. She received her B.S.E. and M.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) and her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).Prof. Joshua A Enszer
from the perspective of “personal” leadership development. This focuses onthe importance of developing a personal approach to leadership [10] and the importance ofmetacognition, reflective practice, and peer-evaluation, which are often identified as key facetsof the leadership development process [10][11]. Reflection as an active learning practice isparticularly useful for consolidation of learning concepts and is utilized both inside and outsideengineering education [12] and has been identified as a key mechanism for personal leadershipdevelopment [13] which can aid in the developing a personal leadership philosophy.Given the technical focus of the engineering curriculum, it is useful to provide a structuredmodel for reflective practice. The
, analyzing and improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 150 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He is the recipient of numerous awards and recognitions; most recently he was awarded the Purdue University, College of Technology, Equity, Inclusion and Advocacy Award. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State
improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to the literature more than 110 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) and in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) and mediation.Mr. Mark T
opportunities that online learning provides for creating fundamentallybetter ways to teach and learn. Those opportunities can reach new, strategically targetedstudents, increase teaching skills of all involved faculty, and synergistically improve teaching oncampus.This paper will explore key strategic opportunities that online learning presents for improvingthe quality, reach and impact of engineering education, when focus, effort and resources areexplicitly committed to doing so, rather than simply getting off-campus students to enroll inexisting traditional on-campus offerings.The paper draws largely upon the experiences of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Collegeof Engineering in developing new distance graduate engineering degree programs. The
Paper ID #32369Inform Track: Integrated Teaching and Leadership Development ProgramforGraduate Teaching AssistantsMs. Hyun Hannah Choi, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Hannah Choi is an assistant director of assessment and curriculum design at the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. Her responsibilities include program evaluations, and learning outcomes assess- ments pertinent to innovative curriculum designs. Her areas of interest include, among others, college student development theories, experiential learning, internationalizing curriculum, online learning, and educational technology.Mr. Selim
construction course, capstone design, and aprofessional issues course. Being introduced to leadership ideas early in the undergraduatecurriculum, which are reinforced in later courses, may be a good strategy to motivate studentsand encourage their interest around leadership topics. A number of students also identifiedinternships and other co-curricular activities as contributing to their leadership skills (e.g. ROTC,professional society president, sports activities). Instructors may want to consider the tenets ofEVT when integrating leadership education into the curriculum, explaining the utility value ofthese skills in the workforce and using metacognition to have students reflect on their ownleadership experiences so that they build self-efficacy
adapted over decades tomaximize the time and resources available to create leaders of character.Institution Leadership Development FrameworkIn 2010, West Point’s Superintendent ordered a review of the Academy’s Cadet LeaderDevelopment System (CLDS). Developed and implemented from 1986-1991, CLDS wasdesigned to “guide and integrate all developmental activities over the four-year cadetexperience,” [28]. Academy leadership in 2010 sought a system that could better guide decisionmaking about programs, curriculum, and any other developmental process needed in a universityand military training program. The desired end state was a revised CLDS that included a largerportion of the West Point community. The newly named West Point Leader DevelopmentSystem
role as Vice Provost, he is striving to make UW- Madison a global leader in the service to lifelong learners. He has held these dual responsibilities since 2011. Jeff is currently leading a campus-wide strategic planning process focused on creating more transforma- tive educational experiences for lifelong learners. Jeff first joined UW-Madison’s faculty in 1989 as an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, where he co-founded the Construction Engineering and Management Pro- gram and developed the construction curriculum. In addition, he has authored and co-authored papers on the subject of educating civil engineers. His body of work demonstrates his commitment to using