University Patrick Heaney is pursuing an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Old Dominion University (ODU). He received an M.S. in Education from the University of Pennsylvania (2014) and a B.A. in Economics and Mathematics from Yale University (2009). After graduating from Yale, Patrick served in the Marine Corps Reserve and taught 6th Grade Mathematics at LEAP Academy University Charter School in Camden, New Jersey.Prof. Yuzhong Shen, Old Dominion University Yuzhong Shen received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Fudan University, Shanghai, China, M.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, and Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University
-month program) and control(students who did not participate) groups.Research Question The research question of this project is: How does participation in a 5-month ROVexperience influence 6-8th grade students’ interest in, and perception of, technology andengineering?Background There is limited literature that discusses the significance an ROV program has on studentinterest and perception of technology and engineering in an educational setting. Most of theliterature involving the use of ROVs consists of a study or report of the curriculum andexperiential design for that particular program. For example, several of the reports include theresults of participants’ accomplishments, and in some cases participants’ perceptions or
Pursuing a Personalized Program to Prepare for an Academic Career at an Engineering Department without a Formal Teaching Curriculum Amaka Waturuocha1, Laura Ford1, Christi Patton Luks1 1 University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USAAbstractTypically, when applying to graduate school for doctoral programs, students are not 100%certain of the route their careers will take: industry, academia or both. Most times though, theylean more towards one of these options. In such a case the potential graduate student tailors theirapplications /interests to schools with the kind of curriculum that fits their particular needs. Oncein graduate school
2016. The student evaluations and feedback has overall been positive but thelogistics have posed challenges related to the volume of students. Most all challenges have beensolved, with continuous improvement now the focus of the teaching team. Training teachingassistants and faculty is ongoing to improve uniformity in grading and quality of feedback to thestudents.IntroductionAs discussed by Miller et al.1, the curriculum revision has been planned since 2010 becauseengineering work, engineering students, and educational methods are changing. The newcurriculum content was put together by taking into account recommendations from ASME, theNational Academy of Engineering, and the Carnegie Foundation. It also looked at innovativecurricula at other
academic disciplines. This understanding is critical to ensuring that students from allbackgrounds are appropriately supported in pursuing their degrees and faculty are equipped todiscuss these topics with their students. In this pilot project, researchers from RowanUniversity’s College of Engineering and College of Education who were interested in exploringDEIJ implementation in the classroom in a cross-collaborative manner explored the followingresearch questions: (1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part oftheir degree program curriculum? and (2) How do faculty members’ conceptions of DEIJcompare across disciplines?There is scant literature on faculty members' conceptions of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, andJustice
across the Undergraduate Curriculum: Preliminary Results from the Collaboration Across Boundaries (CAB) Pedagogical StudyS. Monisha Pulimood1, Diane C. Bates2, and Kim Pearson31Department of Computer Science, The College of New Jersey2Department of Sociology, The College of New Jersey3Department of Journalism and Professional Writing, The College of New Jersey1. INTRODUCTIONDespite the growing need for scientific literacy, colleges and universities offer most scientificcontent in courses offered in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Thispaper reports on the evaluation of the Collaboration Across Boundaries (CAB) pedagogy, whichincorporates project-based, community-engaged learning in
Poll Join: PollEv.com/ […]78910111213 Corporate IncentiveEthical workers whounderstand and implementsocial awareness principlescan contribute to moreinnovative, productive, andequitable workplaces andproducts, ultimately drivingbetter business outcomesand societal benefits. (Ely & Thomas, 2020; Lorenzo et al, 2018.; Deloitte, 2023; & McKinsey & Company, 2020). Corporate Ethics Of companies surveyed have11% ethical principles governing emerging technologies. Such a gap in ethics is unacceptable. (Deloitte, 2023)The Academy’s Responsibility Ethics Curriculum Inclusive
meta-analysis, but one of the methods he discusses, servicelearning, is viewed by others10, 29 as a component of a curriculum incorporation approach.There appears to be a significant amount of debate related to methods of incorporation, but verylittle rigorous investigation to determine which methods of curriculum incorporation are mostcommon or most effective. Drake et al.35 performed a comparison of two methods of integratingethics in the engineering curriculum, a stand-alone course and several modules within generalengineering courses (quasi-across-the-curriculum). This rare comparison of two curriculumincorporation methods was unsuccessful in generating conclusive statistics in support of eithermethod. Discussion and debate over curriculum
Framework for Curriculum AssessmentExpanding upon our previous discussions on curricular analytics, we examine the nuanced chal-lenge of analyzing the impact of curricula on student progression. This analysis is particularlycomplex due to the multifaceted nature of curriculum-related components influencing studentprogress. Our methodology focuses on decomposing the overall complexity of a curriculum into (a) (b)Figure 1: Undergraduate Electrical Engineering program structures at two major public univer-sities with the same ABET accreditation standards.two primary elements: instructional complexity, which refers to the pedagogical methods andsupport mechanisms
participants did research in the lab at their host university and engaged incurriculum development, industry tours or other professional development activities. Amongthese professional development opportunities included a “Changing the Conversation” activity toprovide the RET participants with ideas on how to attract a more diverse group of students to thefield of engineering.24, 25 Since one of the main objectives of this program was to facilitate thetransfer of the engineering research activities into the teacher participants’ classrooms, asignificant component of the experience was curriculum development. Similar to that describedby Billiar, et al, the Engineering Design Process (EDP) was used to develop the curriculum. Thisallowed the teachers to
key design principles,including: i) Student agency: highlighting students’ ability to contribute meaningfully toknowledge creation and engage in real-world projects; ii) Open-endedness: acknowledgingthe inherent flexibility of interdisciplinary learning and the need for ongoing coursedevelopment; iii) Dialogue and transparency: emphasizing continuous communicationbetween students and faculty throughout the design process. These principles challengetraditional, pre-designed approaches and advocate for flexible, co-developed curricula.Inspired by the work of Markauskaite et al. [19], the experimented course at PlakshaUniversity was co-designed not by students and professors but by two professors belongingto different streams.A recent study in
ideas to solve those problems.In the rest of the paper, we present the proposed approach, a case study, and a conclusion. Keyfeatures of the proposed approach include hands-on experience, team-based project, and learner-centered education. A computer engineering course, offered mainly for senior and graduatestudents is used for the case study.Proposed ApproachA typical curriculum design consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, andevaluation activities, which are operationalized in specific tactics (Asaduzzaman et al., 2013;Dick et al., 1985; Gustafson et al., 2002; Hardre, 2003; Lunenberg, 2002; Richey et al., 2001,Seels et al., 1991; and Whitman et al., 2014). Six types of knowledge and skills, based onactivities in the
. Thus, providing the students inthe modified curriculum with a hands-on, project based, self-motivated process for learningtheoretical concepts based on the design and analysis goals of the academic competition project. Any junior level student could participate in the modified curriculum if they had fulfilledall the prerequisites for the replaced courses and they had not already taken one of the replacedcourses. This way the participants were prepared to learn the material but had not already beenexposed to it. Perrenet et al. [12] lists the three main objectives of education as “(1) acquisition ofknowledge that can be retrieved and used in a professional setting; (2) acquisition of skills toextend and improve one’s own
Electronics”,2010 IEEE EDUCON Education Engineering Conf., Madrid, Spain, 2010 (CD).17. A. Yadav, D. Subedi, and M. A. Lundeberg, “Problem-based learning: influence on students’ learning in anelectrical engineering course”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 100(2), pp.253-280, 2011.18. F. Martinez, L. C. Herrero, and S. de Pablo, “Project-based learning and rubrics in the teaching of powersupplies and photovoltaic electricity,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 87 - 96, Feb. 2011.19. R. Belu, “Renewable Energy Based Capstone Senior Design Projects for an ET Curriculum”, 2011 ASEEEConference & Exposition, June 26 - 29, 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada (CD).20. D. G. Lamar, F.F. Miaja, M: Arias et al., “Experiences in the application of
grid computing. Currently, he is working as an instructional associate professor at the Department of Engineering Technology. He has been teaching courses including Electrical Circuits, Telecommunications, Data Communications, Com- puter Networks and Advanced Wireless Networks. He is actively involved in curriculum development and revision. He has worked on a successful project funded by FDIP to enhance instructional excellence of part time faculty and teaching assistants using hybrid orientation programs. He has also been involved in two recently funded instructional research grants from NSF-CCLI (Co-PI) and NSF-REU (senior person- nel). Prior to his current position, he was involved in the design of electrical
of Mechanical Engineering, Florida A&M – Florida State University b Lockheed Martin CorporationIntroductionLike most other programs, the curriculum of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at theFAMU-FSU College of Engineering is capped with a one-year senior design project in which thestudents work in teams to design and implement products or systems under the sponsorship of anindustrial partner. It has been recognized that capstone design courses represent an excellentvehicle to round out a good engineering education and they provide the appropriate platform forstudents to apply design thinking and transition into a professional career1. Many universitieshave adopted this
. This course project, based on current avionic technology, allowsstudents to have better understanding of their theoretical knowledge, as well as a good practice ofhands-on skills.IntroductionThe Aeronautical Engineering Technology (AET) program at Purdue University preparesstudents who are interested in aviation and aeronautics with necessary aeronautical knowledgeand aircraft maintenance skills. In addition, it helps students prepare for the FAA Airframe andPowerplant Certification exams. An appropriate course design is crucial to facilitate thedevelopment of anticipated abilities for students. The electrical and electronic systems is one ofthe primary components of AET curriculum. The series of electrical and electronic systemscourses in AET
Paper ID #33118The SUMMIT-P Project: Transforming Undergraduate Mathematics Educa-tionto Support Partner DisciplinesDr. Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves holds a joint appointment in the College of Engineering and School of Ed- ucation as Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Associate Professor of Teaching and Learn- ing at Virginia Commonwealth University. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests are in STEM education, biomedical signal and image processing, and machine
Paper ID #36482”Emotions can hinder Professional Experiences:” Emotional states offirst-generation engineering students when introduced to hiddencurriculumDr. R. Jamaal Downey, University of Florida Dr. Downey has been a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida since 2021. His current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum as well as how Latinx contingent faculty experience workplace inequities in engineering. He received his Ph.D. in Language, Literacy, and Culture in Education from the University of
Paper ID #37258Identifying curriculum factors that facilitate lifelong learningin alumni career trajectories: Stage 1 of a sequential mixed-methods studyNikita Dawe PhD Candidate, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education, University of TorontoAmy BiltonKimia Moozeh Kimia Moozeh is a Research Associate in Engineering Education at Queen's University, Canada and a Chemistry instructor at Durham College, Canada. She earned a B.S. and M.Sc. in Chemistry from University of Toronto, and a PhD in Engineering Education also from University of Toronto
AC 2007-686: TOWER OF STRAWS: REACHING NEW HEIGHTS WITH ACTIVELEARNING IN ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR THE FIRST-YEAR CURRICULUMJohn K. Estell, Ohio Northern University JOHN K. ESTELL is Chair of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department, and Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science, at Ohio Northern University. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, user interface design, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi
Engineering Education at the University of Toronto, Canada (March 2021). Before that, she completed her MASc. (2015) and BASc. (2012) in Electrical Engineering at the University of Toronto.Andrew Olewnik (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor | Engineering Education | University at Buffalo © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Critical Review and Refinement of a Professional Development Survey for Engineering Undergraduates, Toward an Integrated Tool for Reflection Across the CurriculumAbstractIn this evidence-based practice paper, we aim to explore considerations for supporting theprofessional
on Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering Technologies, this courseaddresses the challenges students face in understanding the engineering curriculum andprofession. It aims to guide students to make informed decisions when selecting their academicmajor. The course, developed collaboratively by faculty across three engineering technologydepartments and the First-Year Programs, centers on a hands-on project involving an automatedrobotic system for testing and sorting light bulbs, simulating real-world engineering applications.This paper discusses the course's design, objectives, and pedagogical strategies. It includes aliterature review on factors influencing engineering major choices and highlights the importanceof addressing
transformation startedwith the development of a curriculum for healthcare Lean Six Sigma training, and the useof this curriculum through a $1.2M training grant with a local health care system. Facultywere able to begin bringing the real life project experience into the class room expandingtheir IET and IT student experiences beyond the world of manufacturing. The trainingopportunities have continued into transactional service organizations as well with theanticipation of continuing so as to round out faculty experience with Lean Six Sigmaapplication in manufacturing, service and healthcare organizations. To date, theprograms in which faculty teach have made significant changes to continue to attract the‘non-industrial’ sector. The changes noted here
, manyinteresting and non-trivial electrical and computer engineering problems require a strongprogramming background or knowledge of advanced mathematics.Digital logic, however, is an area of computer engineering that requires more transferableskills—such as critical thinking and problem-solving—than advanced theoretical knowledge.Digital logic uses discrete mathematics instead of the calculus that many students struggle withearly in the engineering curriculum. Although new knowledge has to be acquired in the area ofBoolean algebra, this new content is a very natural extension of the regular algebra that mostengineering students are already very comfortable with. Because of this non-reliance on calculus,digital logic projects make prime candidates for
technology programs although mechanical orelectrical graduates do the engineering and manage the industry.II. Development ProcessCurrent needs of the packaging industry, especially the machinery manufacturers, call for acombination of electrical and mechanical skills. Some schools such as Penn State and RIT haveinstituted BS degree programs in Electro-Mechanical or Electrical-Mechanical ET and a numberof two year programs in Integrated Systems Technology have sprung up with help fromworkforce development funding. These programs are generally aimed at manufacturing.Analogous interdisciplinary engineering programs tend to concentrate on designing mobilemechanical systems with embedded micro controllers. The packaging industry is in a uniqueposition to
development and revision at the course, program, and institutional levels, including how faculty attitudes, beliefs, and cultures influence curricular and instructional practices and how these in affect student learning. In recent years, she has been studying these topics in undergraduate engineering programs with funding from the National Science Foundation.Mr. Prateek Shekhar, University of Texas - Austin Prateek Shekhar is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. His research is focused on the adoption of research based curriculum and instruc- tional strategies in engineering classrooms. He holds a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of
Foist, Xuping Xu, Timothy Gage, Seth Truitt, and Matthias Schmidt California Baptist University, rfoist@calbaptist.edu, xxu@ calbaptist.edu, MatthiasHans.Schmidt@calbaptist.edu, TimothyDean.Gage@calbaptist.edu, Seth.Truitt@calbaptist.eduAbstract - Recent National Science Foundation (NSF) curricula: subjects are taught in isolation, without properresearch, aimed at improving the Electrical and context, and do not adequately prepare students to integrateComputer Engineering (ECE) curriculum across all four that knowledge. In addition, labs were not used effectively.years, makes strategic use of laboratory projects. The That study recommended a “spiral model” and
www.slayte.comUnderstanding Impacts of Soft Robotics Project on Female Students’ Perceptions ofEngineering (Work in Progress)AbstractGender disparities persist across traditional engineering disciplines such as mechanicalengineering and electrical engineering in colleges. Participation in K12 educational robotics is acommon precursor to enrollment in traditional engineering majors, however the gender gap inK12 competitive robotics perpetuates this gender disparity. We hypothesize that soft robotics,consisting of robots made from complaint materials that safely interface with the body, is a fieldthat may appeal to female students’ enthusiasm for bioengineering and healthcare applications ofengineering. While much of soft robotics work exists in research laboratories
) observed that when EML isincorporated into a Problem Based Learning activity done in a Fluid Mechanics course, thestudent’s enthusiasm for the assignment and the subject matter increased and the learning isenhanced. Problem- and project-based learning activities that integrated EML in either a courseor a sequence of courses fostered entrepreneurial skills in students (Liu et al., 2017; Mallory,2015; Gibbons, 2021; Seyed, 2020). Moreover, several higher education institutions have alreadystarted to redesign their entire engineering curriculum to incorporate EML at multiple levels(Mynderse et al., 2015, 2019; Gerhard et al., 2014; Seyed, 2021).Engineering assessment is essential to evidence-based decisions and practice in key areas of EEresearch