interested in improving the culture and environment of undergraduate education experience for all students, particularly those from underrepresented groups.Dr. Patricia Clayton, University of Texas at AustinDr. Maura Borrego, University of Texas at Austin Maura Borrego is Director of the Center for Engineering Education and Professor of Mechanical Engi- neering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego previously served as Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foun- dation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards
tocommission the development of a seminar to help prepare these new faculty for a heavy teachingload. The seminar was intended to meet the following criteria: 1) be of short duration, 2) bebased on methods supported by research, focusing on 'best practices in engineering education',and 3) be suitable for new faculty, graduate assistants and part-time faculty.The authors (holding both engineering and education degrees) received an internal grant andcollaborated with instructional designers from the university's E-learning center to develop andfacilitate the training. The purpose of this seminar is to promote the best practices, to guidefaculty and teaching assistants new to teaching in the engineering fields, to advance theirconfidence and satisfaction
Paper ID #15277Work in Progress: Measuring Dispositions Toward Teaching Strategies andTheir Reported UseDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand
engineering, is also Director of Michigan Tech’s D80 Center. D80 has the mission to develop contribution-based learning, research, and service opportunities for all students and staff to partner with the poorest 80% of humanity, together creating solutions that matter. As Director of several international programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels, Paterson, his colleagues, and his students have conducted numerous community-inspired research and design projects. Paterson is an educational innovator, recently adding courses for first-year students, Great Ideas, and graduate students, Discover Design Delight. At the intersection of these two fields, Pa- terson leads several national initiatives for learning
AC 2009-971: A PROJECT-ORIENTED, TEAM-BASED LEARNING APPROACHEdgar An, Florida Atlantic UniversityManhar Dhanak, Florida Atlantic University Page 14.93.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009A Project-Oriented, Team-Based Learning Approach Edgar An, Manhar Dhanak Ocean Engineering, Florida Atlantic University Abstract – This paper presents our outreach efforts in the Department of Ocean Engineering at Florida Atlantic University. The main theme of the outreach effort is “project-oriented, team-based” learning philosophy, which goes beyond the typical “cookie-cutter hands-on” ideas in that there is an overall
, pp. 9-21, 1991.[14] Barba, R. H. and K. E. Reynolds, “Towards an Equitable Learning Environment in Science for Hispanic Students”, in International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1998.[15] Micron, Incorporated, at http://www.Micron.com/education Page 10.434.14 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationWILLIAM LOENDORF obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside
our overall top-down systemic approach,we conducted a focus group with departmental graduate program faculty and administrators (i.e.,graduate program director, graduate program coordinator, director of graduate education, andanother faculty coordinating faculty development efforts), to understand their perspectives on thedepartment’s advising practices. These perspectives were enriched by an additional focus groupwith doctoral students recruited from within the same department. In particular, we sought tobridge a gap in the literature by advancing our understanding of departmental practices andprocesses that support engineering doctoral student advising. We pose several key researchquestions (RQs) that focus on specific departmental advising
Paper ID #14722Identifying as an Engineering Technology GraduateDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring engineering technology education research and the performance of engineering technology students in the classroom and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
and will graduate in May 2006. He took the initiate to lead the effort in helping the village of Abheyur, India and setting up an official EWB student chapter. Page 11.1053.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Providing Engineering Students a Global Perspective through a Project for Developing Communities – Lessons Learned at the University of HartfordAbstractThe University of Hartford strives to offer its students a complete education, one that willprepare them for the challenges of the global community of the 21st century. To help meet thismission, the engineering
mathematics courses. She received her PhD in Applied Mathematics from Clarkson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 CoOrdinated Math-Physics Assessment for Student Success(COMPASS) assessments on continuing math courses and attitude toward mathAbstractThe COMPASS: CoOrdinated Math-Physics Assessment for Student Success program aims to im-prove students’ understanding of mathematical concepts using physical applications. COMPASSis a first-year calculus course that combines mathematics concepts with physical applicationsin an effort to improve student understanding of mathematics using their outstanding physicsintuitions. The implementation of the COMPASS program is
conference entitled “Research and Engineering Education in a Global Society.”Participants identified best practices, discussed strategies, and formulated a declaration forachieving goals in engineering education and global research cooperation, with a view tobuilding a global society in the next century.5 Joining in this call for change was the NationalScience Foundation, which encouraged mutual and beneficial cooperation with other countries inits publication NSF Engineering: The Long View.6Universities in general have long supported the view that an international experience is avaluable part of education. However, such an experience is more difficult in a program of studyfor engineers than some other disciplines. Consider, for example, that 43% of
engagement and performance: The social network analysis perspective," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 15, p. 020150, 2019.[26] A. a. H.-S. Johri, C and Ruiz, D and Malik, A and Karbasian, H and Handa, R and Purohit, H. , ""More Than an Engineer: Intersectional Self-Expressions in a Hashtag Activism Campaign for Engineering Diversity.," " ACM COMPASS, 2018.[27] H. a. J. Le, A. and Malik, A., ""Curating Tweets: A Framework for Using Twitter for Workplace Learning," " ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, 2019, 2019.[28] C. O'Toole, " “Virtual Learning Environment Faculty Continuing Professional Development-Networked Learning Communities” A Critical Literature Review.," Irish Journal of
biomechanics of degradable medical devices. He is passionate about educating undergraduate, and graduate students, as well as the general community in biomechanics, biomedical engineering and the S.T.E.M. fields.Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley is an associate professor with a joint appointment in Civil Engineering and Chemical Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. She specializes in Environmental Engineering and her research interests include water and wastewater treatment, water reuse, sustainability, and engineering education.Dr. Clay Gloster Jr, North Carolina A&T University (Tech) Clay Gloster, Jr. is currently serving as the
Paper ID #30036Student Perceptions of First-Year Engineering Justice CurriculumDr. Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin-Stout Devin Berg is an Associate Professor and Program Director of the B.S. Mechanical Engineering program in the Engineering and Technology Department at the University of Wisconsin - Stout.Dr. Tina Lee, University of Wisconsin-Stout Dr. Tina Lee is an Associate Professor of Anthropology, the Program Director for the Applied Social Science Program, and the General Education Director at the University of Wisconsin-Stout.Dr. Elizabeth Anne Buchanan, University of Wisconsin-Stout Elizabeth Buchanan is Endowed
support for persons with disabilities as well asthe engineering and design involved in creating that support.In the second project of the unit, “Artificial Joints & Limbs,” Students examines anatomy andphysiology in preparation for designing an internal prosthesis (Figure 3). A variety of materialscan be used for this project in which students will both create conceptual graphics and build aphysical model of the knee joint.Figure 3. A diagram and photo of an elbow joint. Adopted from Tortora 21 Page 9.1406.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
companies such as Ecopetrol, Texas Instruments, and Ericsson. His research interests focus on inclusive STEM learning and teaching methodologies for students with physical disabilities.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Experiences of Students
Paper ID #5976Teaching System Modeling and Feedback Control Systems: A Multidisci-plinary Course in Mechanical Engineering and Electrical EngineeringProf. Li Tan, Purdue University, North Central DR. LI TAN is currently with the College of Engineering and Technology at Purdue University North Central, Westville, Indiana. He received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of New Mexico in1992. Dr. Tan is an IEEE senior member. His principal technical areas include digital signal processing, adaptive signal processing, active noise and vibration control, data compression and digital communications. He
factors overscientific or theoretical knowledge, implementing targeted interventions, thus adjusting theinstructional approach and refining the use of the tool. These efforts aim to strengthen theanalysis of the lesson design’s impact on learning outcomes and explore the potential integrationof emerging technologies for enhanced effectiveness in specific educational contexts.References [1] C. Vieira, R. Aguas, M. H. Goldstein, S. Purzer, and A. J. Magana, “Assessing the impact of an engineering design workshop on colombian engineering undergraduate students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1972–1983, 2016. [2] M. A. Feij´oo-Garc´ıa., H. H. Ram´ırez-Ar´evalo., and P. G. Feij´oo-Garc´ıa., “Collaborative
and learning (pp. 53-66). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3146-4.ch004.[9] Stephanie Bell (2010) Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83:2, 39-43, DOI: 10.1080/00098650903505415[10] Thomas, J., Utley, J., Hong, S. Y., Korkmaz, H., & Nugent, G. (2020). A Review of the Research. Handbook of Research on STEM Education.[11] Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192113732.[12] María-José Terrón
Engineering Education, 2011 Views of Diverse Groups of International and American Students Concerning Business, Cultural, and Ethical IssuesAbstractUniversity programs have a growing number of students from all around the world, making itimportant to consider the perspectives of these students to maximize their learning experiences.As manufacturing and business activities and operations become increasingly global, theopportunity for interaction with these students gives all of our students, including traditionalNorth American students, the opportunity to learn about other cultures and their impact onbusiness and business ethics. It is far too easy to assume mistakenly that all students view class topics from the traditionalCanadian
Paper ID #42511Identifying Educational Communication Patterns through Social Media Interactions:The Case of Engineering Education in OklahomaAsif Mohaisin Sadri, International Islamic University, Malaysia Asif Mohaisin Sadri is an experienced Senior Executive specializes in Supply Chain Management. His interdisciplinary journey blends academic achievement with professional leadership. He began with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, laying a strong foundation for his problem-solving skills. Recognizing the importance of understanding diverse aspects of business, he pursued a Master of Development Studies
Paper ID #37745Exploring the Alignment of Instructor’s Intent and Students’ Perceptionof Using Self-Assessment in an Engineering Undergraduate CourseMr. Viyon Dansu, Florida International University Viyon had his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Systems Engineering. Thereafter he co-founded STEM- Ed Africa, a social enterprise involved in developing products and services geared at teachers’ devel- opment and improving high school student’s problem-solving abilities in STEM subject areas. He is currently a doctoral student of engineering and computing education at Florida International University, Miami.Mr. Yashin Brijmohan
examsetting.Bibliography1. Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET Inc, 2010.2. M. Griffin System Engineering and the “Two Cultures” of Engineering. Boeing Lecture, Purdue University.March 28,, 2007.3. L. M. Nicolai, Viewpoint: An Industry View of Engineering Design Education,International Journal of Engineering Education, 14, 7-13 (1998)4. Wulf, William A. The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform. Proceedings Realizing the New Paradigm forEngineering Education, 1998.5. Sheppard, S.D.; Jenison, R.; , "Thoughts on freshman engineering design experiences," Frontiers in EducationConference, 1996. FIE '96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of , vol.2, no., pp.909-913 vol.2, 6-9 Nov 19966. Tonkay, G.L.; Sause, R
on Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams and Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity), paper sessions, and trainings at the Annual Conference (summarized in Figure 4). These attracted diverse panelists and moderators for multiple diversity-focused sessions (e.g., Best Diversity Papers; Diversity in Chemical Engineering Education: Status and Perspectives). Figure 2. 2014-2015 Annual Conference Schedule for Diversity Committee Programming3.5. 2015-2016 (Chair: Adrienne Minerick)Because of the challenges of working within an organizational structure, including how membersare nominated, work from 2015-2017 included planning and
Paper ID #12122Using an intention-uncertainty matrix to categorize entrepreneurship educa-tion offeringsMr. Jacob Dean Wheadon, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jacob Wheadon is a PhD candidate in engineering education at Purdue University. His current research focuses on understanding the benefits of entrepreneurship education for engineering students. He has a BS degree in manufacturing engineering technology and an MS degree in technology and engineering education from Brigham Young University. Before pursuing graduate studies, he worked as an industrial engineer and earned the Six Sigma Black Belt from the American
learning. He is the coordinator of the industry sponsored capstone from at his school and is the advisor of OU’s FSAE team.Prof. Maysam Pournik, University of OklahomaMr. Bryan William Bodie c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Industry-University Partnership to Foster Interdisciplinary EducationThe increase in technological change and global competition has led to the natural pairing of colleges andbusinesses in the United States and around the world. A collaboration of business and education cantarget and emphasize specific labor markets, skills, and the student to help prepare a highly skilledworkforce that increases economic opportunity and competitiveness. This system of
. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. 2009. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. L. Katehi, G. Pearson & M. Feder (Eds.). Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.25. Tran, N.A., and Nathan, M.J. 2010. An investigation of the relationship between pre-college engineering studies and student achievement in science and mathematics. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 143-157.26. Tran, N. and Nathan, M.J. 2010. Effects of pre-college engineering studies on mathematics and science achievements for high school students. International Journal of Engineering Education. (Special issue on
inclusion,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 371–392, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20391. 9. A. Minichiello, O. Lawanto, W. Goodridge, A. Iqbal, and M. Asghar, “Flipping the digital switch: Affective responses of STEM undergraduates to emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Project Leadership and Society, p. 100043, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100043. 10. O. Lawanto, A. Iqbal, W. Googridge, A. Minichiello, and M. Asghar, “Emergency remote learning: Developing an understanding about online learning features and Students’ feelings,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 38, no. 5-B, pp. 1629–1642, 2022. 11. J. Mirabelli, A
Paper ID #25682An Integrative Education in Engineering and the Liberal Arts: An Institu-tional Case StudyDr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infras- tructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including engineering economics, sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infras- tructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory
’ perspectives and helps themdevelop as individuals and members of an inclusive society in which their technical products and services areused.These research findings have brought in significant fortunes to liberal learning. It is increasingly becoming anintegral part of engineering curricula all over the world. Leading institutes like Princeton, Yale, and CMU runprograms for engineers to help them gain a clear appreciation of technology and the socio-political forces thatshape it. While the Indian engineering education system has been slow in adopting the paradigm, anautonomous college has taken the first step by introducing an one credit course on liberal learning to itssophomore students of non circuit branches i.e. mechanical, production, metallurgy