Page 24.158.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014An Experiment to enhance Signals and Systems learning by using technology based teaching strategiesThe University of Texas at El Paso teamed with the “Signal Processing Education Network,”(SPEN), which consists of academic, industry and professional community. SPEN, an NSF-sponsored effort, is based on four technologies: Connexions, interactive simulation tools,Quadbase question/answer system and OpenStax Tutor. It seeks to develop materials that alloweducators to break away from traditional textbook-lecture-homework education, and create a newframework based on an engaged community of educators, students, and industry
, and reflect on the impacts their choices had on rocket performance using distincttools from the discipline of each course.Among the novel aspects of our approach is to expand beyond a two-course project sequencespanning just one academic year, a technique already used in many engineering curricula.Instead, our project is integrated into a multi-year five-required-course sequence with at least onecourse appearing in each year of the four-year mechanical engineering curriculum. We expectthis approach to engender significant benefits to student learning. First, it promotes “spacedrepetition”, wherein learners encounter the same material in briefer sessions spread over longertime periods rather than the study of information in single blocks, as
. engineers for innovation. The education of an engineer must no longer beconsidered a one time event constrained to four years or that all of the knowledge and skillsrequired of engineers for advanced practice can be developed in four years without experience.Universities must engage in another important role, that is within their mission of professionaleducation, by creating a new type of advanced professional education that nurtures the growth oftheir graduates beyond entry-level. Professional engineering education must become a process oflifelong learning and development that enables growth of engineer’s as innovators and leadersthroughout their professional careers. This requires professional engineering education to bespecifically designed as
resources associatedwith these programs. The presented work addresses this gap by examining why women STEMfaculty choose to engage or not engage in EEPs.Conceptual FramingThis work aims to understand why women STEM faculty may or may not choose to participatein EEPs amidst their broader work as academics. This requires both attention to why adultsmight choose to participate in non-compulsory educational programs (like EEPs) broadly, andalso particular attention to EEPs as a specific type of educational program. Thus, to frame ourwork, we drew on both adult learning and entrepreneurship education literature to examine ourresearch question. Specifically, the Participation in Entrepreneurship Education Programming(PEEP) model conceptualized by a
extra-curricularelements. As a result of these efforts, recent reviews of entrepreneurship education in collegesand universities in Canada (Parsley and Weerasingue 2010) and in Ontario (Sá et al. 2014) haveconfirmed that engineering schools rank second only to business schools in the number anddiversity of entrepreneurial programs and courses available to students. Other countries areactively engaged in similar evolution and growth of entrepreneurship education (Valerio et al.2014). One recent example is the Chile New Engineering 2030 initiative that aims to overhaulengineering education in that emerging country by introducing a strong focus onentrepreneurship (Grose 2015).The past President of the American Society for Engineering Education
boundstudents and an accessible, cost-effective authentic intercultural experience, which complementsand supports related aspects of students’ development during their undergraduate degreeprogram through employing teamwork, collaboration, communication skills (de Escalona, 2019).Students bear no additional financial cost for participation in a COIL course, and, with no travel,students can maintain engagements on campus with RSOs, stay on track for graduation andmaintain employment opportunities. While COIL is not a substitute for traditional study abroad programs, COIL projectcourses allow the University of Illinois to preserve and to grow its portfolio of internationalofferings allowing for a long-term commitment to internationalization of the
minority lecturers, part-time, and other non-tenure track faculty in STEM higher education. Related to student learning and the practice of pedagogy, contingent faculty also facewhat might seem to be overwhelming challenges. Contingent faculty are less likely to interactwith students in innovative pedagogical ways [20], [21]. The ways in which these lesserinnovative teaching methods and practices manifest for the students includes but not limited toless interaction with students, less opportunities to engage in collaborative strategies, and lesstime for classes which could leave contingent faculty unprepared. These factors coupled with asense of not belonging for contingent faculty places said individuals on the periphery of any kindof
Visual (-) to Verbal (+) Sequential (-) to Global (+)Figure 1. Learning style preferences for graduate and undergraduate BME students at TheUniversity of Texas at Austin.3) Do students’ learning styles impact their use of instructional technologies?Studies have looked at achievement and hypermedia-assisted instruction without finding anyconclusive results. One extensive review on hypermedia as an educational technology postulatesthe current array of learning styles inventories may not be able to ascertain the nuances in arelationship between learning styles and achievement13.Within BlackBoard®, one can obtain counts of the number of times that different aspects of thesystem were
broadening participation of underrepresented students in engineering; ● Provide redshirt academic and mentoring support to approximately 800 students in the Consortium across the grant duration; focus on first-year support at the new university partners and second-year support at the existing ones; ● Retain at least 70% of the scholarship students into the second year in an engineering major at the new partners and their third year at the existing ones; ● Engage and train at least 30 engineering faculty to mentor the scholarship recipients; ● Research how the different program elements of the redshirt model impact student retention and
Tuskegee University. Dr. FloydSmith has an accomplished scholarly career, both in traditional technical research and inengineering education research, where she focuses on belonging and student engagement. Shehas also served as a rotating program officer in the Division of Undergraduate Education at theNational Science Foundation.Shruti Misra is a Ph.D. student in electrical and computer engineering at the University ofWashington and is the lead teaching assistant for the department's industry-sponsored capstonedesign program (ENGINE). She conducts research on identifying measures that are relevant tocharacterizing regional innovation ecosystems. Shruti holds an undergraduate and master’sdegree in electrical and computer engineering. Prior to her
engages his students in undergraduate research experiences and focuses on infusing creative design and structured problem solving in undergraduate engineering courses. He is also an active member of the American Society for Engineering Educators, American Concrete Institute, and American Society of Civil Engineers.Dr. Patricia Brackin P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia Brackin is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where she teaches design throughout the curriculum. She is particularly interested in sustainable design. Her B.S. and M.S. are from the University of Tennessee in Nuclear Engineering and her Ph.D. is from Georgia Institute of Technology in Mechanical
otherBIPOC students at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). Recognizing the pivotal role of HSIs inattracting and retaining racially minoritized students in engineering programs, the study seeks tocomprehensively understand how faculty engage in teaching, mentoring, and supporting thesestudents and how administrators' leadership and support services influence the overalleducational landscape in engineering programs at HSIs.Drawing on existing scholarship emphasizing the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusionin higher education, particularly within engineering, the study will select and analyzeapproximately 37 peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings published from 2010 to2022. Employing predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria
Sustainable Innovation at the University of Pittsburgh. He serves as the Program Director for the Master’s in Sustain- able Engineering, the Undergraduate Certificate in Sustainability, the John C. Mascaro Faculty Fellows, and the Sustainability Global Engagement grant. He is the faculty lead for the University Honors College Food Ecosystem Scholar Community. His research lab, Sustainable Design Labs, focuses on fusing analytical chemistry, sustainability design principles and data analytics to address Water and Sustainability grand challenges. Current thrusts focus on Smarter Riversheds, Microbial Fuel cells and advanced oxidation and separation processes. Focused on co-creating long term partnerships that synergize
implemented hands-on activities in the classroom. Half of theteachers chose to participate in this follow-up. These visits served multiple purposes. Forthe teachers, they provided encouragement to utilize the physical science, mathematics,and engineering content covered during the workshop and an additional set of hands toimplement these activities in the classroom. They also provided “resident experts” in theclassroom who may be used to answer questions both from the teachers and students. Forthe students, the graduate students acted as near-peer role models and provided aninteractive and engaging learning environment that connects engineering to real worldapplications.Assessment MethodsBoth formative and summative evaluations were used throughout
intend to improve theoutcomes in mathematics points to active learning, hands-on projects, comic book-likeinterventions, mentoring programs, use of technology, one-to-one help, and peer study groups, aspotential remediation tools [8]. The literature also reveals that the most successful methodsdirectly address real math skill deficits [9]. The work reported here focuses on a NationalScience Foundation (NSF)-funded project aimed at improving fundamental math skills of pre-engineering students, at the large R1 institution UNLV and at the community college in theSouthwest CSN. For UNLV and CSN STEM majors, addressing math proficiency gaps for highschool graduates is critical. Therefore, there is a need to devise innovative math remediationmethods
below.Sophomore Cohort – Students who have declared either Industrial Engineering or MechanicalEngineering as their major will be invited to participate in PUMP. There will be twenty slots forthis pilot program every year. The students will be divided into cohorts of 5 students based ontheir major and other similarities in their background (age, work, family obligations, etc.). Therewill be a special emphasis on creating at least one all-female cohort. These cohorts will form anstructured collaborative learning and support system that will meet throughout the academic yearto further develop their math skills, communication skills, and team skills, which ABET wantsinstilled into students. Placing students in groups where others have similar academic and
. Grisel Lopez-Alvarez, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignAndrea J. Kunze, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Andrea Kunze is a PhD student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the Department of Educational Psychology. Prior to coming to UIUC, she completed a MS in Educational Psychology at NC State University, and a BS in Human Learning & Development at Georgia State University. Her research currently focuses on utilizing qualitative and mixed methodologies to explore people’s perceptions and experiences of the social environment in which they learn or work, and how it impacts their engagement and success. American c
within their existing courseworkParticipants were satisfied with the training and team1. Participants thought it was good use of their time, M=3.8 on a 4 point scale2. Participants were able to develop a sense of community through the virtual format3. Participants rated faculty members and graduate assistants relatively high on a 4 point scale, 3.2 and 3.1 respectively.ImpactThe two projects, WySLICE and WySTACK, have already had a direct impact on over 190 educators(K16 + collegiate) as well as several dozen graduate and undergraduate students. The project participantshave developed over 300 activities that intersect computing and other domains. Lessons and ac-tivities conducted in the same academic year as the educators participated in the
imparted to the next generation ofprofessionals. Instead, using creativity can mean generating excitement in students as theyapproach engineering problems in original ways that have a tremendous impact on society(Raskin 2003). Methods for Incorporating Human Behavior Skills in Engineering EducationThere have been various methods that have been incorporated to enhance the human behaviorskills of students in engineering programs. Some of the initiatives are describe below for each ofthe human behavior skills.Communication skillsEngineering students need to improve their communication skills in order to meet job demands(Beer, 2002). The communication of information is an essential element of successfulengineering practice, and the ability to
success.In the proposed approach, students engage in projects that not only address real-world problemsor challenges but also contribute to serving the needs of a community or organization - when adeliverable is created and shared with the community. These projects typically involveidentifying community needs (Step 2), designing and implementing solutions (Step 1), collectingand processing data (Steps 3 and 4), and reflecting on the impact of their work on both learningoutcomes and community well-being (Step 5).The set of sensors used in the proposed approach can be seen in Figure 2, where the cameras areshown in detail (Figure 2.a), and also the system assembled on top of a vehicle is presented(Figure 2.b). It used five GoPro cameras (three
. Beatty, “Hybrid Courses with Flexible Participation: The HyFlex Course Design,” in Practical Applications and Experiences in K-20 Blended Learning Environments, IGI Global, 2014, pp. 153–177. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch011.[18] J. Sonney, E. E. Cho, Q. Zheng, and J. A. Kientz, “Refinement of a Parent–Child Shared Asthma Management Mobile Health App: Human-Centered Design Study,” JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, vol. 5, no. 1, p. e34117, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.2196/34117.[19] E. Cabi, “The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students’ Academic Achievement,” IRRODL, vol. 19, no. 3, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3482.[20] Zoom Communications, “Video Conferencing, Cloud Phone, Webinars, Chat, Virtual Events: Zoom
mechanisms for such a goal. The first was by creatingawareness in students about what engineering is in a broad sense. This was the purpose of theIntroduction to Engineering course (INGE3001). The second mechanism was establishinglearning communities through project-oriented engineering teams. In this latter approach,advanced students helped first- and second-year students deepen their engagement with theirspecific engineering fields by exposing them to the design process used in the completion ofcapstone and special projects problems. This second interaction was enabled through a secondcourse named Introduction to Learning Communities (INGE3002) [16].The decision of creating an Introduction to Engineering course was based on observationsmade on the
changed over timeand how it varies based on gender, race, ethnicity, family status, and rank. For example, Milemet al. (2000) compared faculty time allocation in the areas of student advising, teaching, andresearch across two- and four-year institution types collected using data from national surveys offaculty conducted in 1972, 1989 and 1992. They found a general increase in time engaged inresearch across four-year institution types, with the largest percentage change in doctoral andcomprehensive universities. Also, their findings indicated that all four-year institution types,except for research universities, and two-year colleges had statistically significant increases inteaching and preparation time over time.Toutkoushian and Bellas (1999
organizational culture or actions. This is important because as the field ofengineering diversifies, cohorts will be looking for community partners to engage with thatreflect that same diversity. Research suggests that engineering students of color and femaleengineering students experience high levels of stress around their perceptions of inclusion intheir engineering programs and in the field itself [3], [4]. While there are limitations to thisapproach, certain concrete facts like whether staff pronouns are included in online bios or thenumber of PoC on the organization’s board of directors may help local engineering students andfaculty discern levels of inclusion in potential community partners.Signaling Theory as a FrameworkSignaling shapes the
. Advocating for increased awareness of how the uses of IT in the modern practice of STEM professions impacts the educational requirements for these careers.2. Exploring the possibility that the new IT STEM literacies – with their emphasis on visualization, rich context, staged-problem solving, and electronically enabled collaboration – may more strongly appeal to female and minority students than traditional teaching methods.In what follows, we first give an overview of the assessment results that have led us to re-purpose our portal. This discussion is followed by highlights of our projected program toimprove teacher professional development (TPD) so as to influence standards-driven reform in
cultural tools, language, and other symbols. With thisperspective, an instructor’s central role is to provide instructional support, scaffolding, andfacilitate student active classroom engagement that will help them maximize their learning, in away that is more effective and goes beyond than merely lecturing or giving students answers. In short, story-driven learning environments are influenced by the classroom context,which varies from classroom to classroom, requiring instructors to appropriately scaffold andfacilitate students in crafting and reframing the meaning of their personal stories (Vygotsky &Cole, 1978; Yager, 1991). This approach allows students to not only share their life stories withothers, but also to reflect on and
proper listening techniques in a non-threatening environment that can lead to understanding, and in most cases, ultimately result in sharing and communication [9]. For this in-class activity, students were paired and given 3 cards, taking turns to answer, listen, and learn about each other. After, new pairs were formed and the process was repeated until everyone had completed a round with all other participants. Week 1/2: The cultural/social experiences in weeks 1/2 in the Czech Republic focused on learning about Brno and Prague and were the same for Years 1 and 2 (with specific details in Table 1). To increase impact of these activities in Year 2, participants were asked to write and submit
coupled with the need for specialized technicalfeedback for each project has made this course difficult to scale. This paper has two distinctgoals; 1) To detail the strategy implemented over the past two years to scale this capstone designcourse to fit a senior class of over 200 students while maintaining course learning objectives and2) to better understand the student perception of the capstone course and subsequent restructure.A student’s perception of a course can impact their engagement, learning, and performance [8].The instructional team’s explanation of the course structure, learning objectives, and resourceconstraints to the students can change their perception of the course and encourage studentengagement. To do this well, we must first
. Thus, we wonder: To what extent does engaging studentsin integrated engineering design and physics labs impact their development of computationalthinking? We have incorporated engineering design within a traditional introductory calculus-based physics lab to promote students’ conceptual understanding of physics while fosteringscientific inquiry, mathematical modeling, engineering design, and computational thinking.Using a generic qualitative research approach, we explored the development of computationalthinking for six teams when completing an engineering design challenge to propose an algorithmto remotely control an autonomous guided vehicle throughout a warehouse. Across fiveconsecutive lab sessions, teams represented their algorithms using
explicitmethod of facilitating students to learn about and engage in improving their individual team-effectiveness through team-based projects in design courses.The effectiveness of a student in a team, as approached in this work, is the ability of the studentto contribute to team performance in a manner that: i) focuses on putting the performance needsof the team before their own, ii) takes an open and cooperative approach to the work, and iii)values and leverages the abilities and contributions of all team members. To facilitate developingthese ideal behaviours in students, this approach aims to develop individual team-effectivenesscompetencies that are necessary to create a high-performance team. Developing thesecompetencies in the individual instead