. Okudan is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design at The Pennsylvania State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla. Her research interests include intelligent shop floor control, manufacturing strategy modeling and measurement, solid modeling, product design, and product design teams. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of Engineering Education and Technovation. She is a member of ASEE and ASME. She is also a National Research Council-US AFRL Summer Faculty Fellow of the Human Effectiveness Directorate for 2002, 2003 and 2004
contributions at the college, university, regional, and national levels. In addition to producing various journal and conference publications, he has been involved in the development of numerous software packages for research, education, and professional applications. Several of these programs have evolved into commercial products and are used widely in education and practice. Page 11.196.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 An Integrated Modeling, Analysis, and Authoring Environment for Structural/Mechanical Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper presents an approach for technology
be expected since Grandy’s5study focused on high-ability minority students who may not have come from the diversesocioeconomic background of the students in this study.Surveys and interviews will be used over the next two years to continue to gather data on thestudy participants. Ultimately, however the richest data will be obtained when it is known whichstudents persist to earn engineering degrees and the hurdles they overcame.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.ESI-0227558, which funds the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE).We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of the other researchers collaborating in theCAEE APS study
Issues of Diversity in Engineering Education and a Path Forward for Action Isadore T. Davis Raytheon Missile Systems, and ASEE Corporate Member Council Eugene Deloatch Dean, College of Engineering Morgan State University Sherra Kerns VP, Olin College of Engineering, and President, ASEE Lueny Morell
Session 2620 Integration of a Fire-Fighting Robot Contest in Multi-Level Engineering Education David J. Ahlgren, Igor M. Verner Trinity College/Technion—Israel Institute of TechnologyAbstractThis paper examines the educational benefits of the Trinity College Fire-Fighting Home RobotContest and it describes contest-related curricular developments, both at university and high-school levels, that have been sponsored by Trinity College and the Technion—Israel Institute ofTechnology. The paper evaluates the value of the contest as a medium for team-basedinterdisciplinary design
suggests the needto develop faculty interaction with students. While these environments are known to be morenurturing than predominantly white institutions, maybe they have become too relaxed inaggressively guiding students towards degree completion. Until there is a shift in the HBCUenvironment (faculty interaction) on the undergraduate level, there will continue to be a lack ofgraduate level degrees offered and earned at these institutions compared to PWIs.Bibliography1. Splitt, F.G. The Challenge to Change: on realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education. April 2003.2. Anderson, M.S. (1996). “Collaboration, the Doctoral Experience, and the Departmental Environment.” Review of Higher
Session 3280 Curriculum Integration Using Case Study Approach for the Enhancement of Technology and Engineering Education William L. Call, Saleh M. Sbenaty Murray State University (Kentucky)/Middle Tennessee State UniversityAbstractIntegrating physics, mathematics, and communication skills in engineering and technologyeducation is one objective of the three-year NSF-funded grant titled “The South-East AdvancedTechnological Education Consortium, SEATEC.” The consortium is a collaborative effort of fivedifferent teams across Tennessee. Each team includes multi-disciplinary faculties, industrypartners
Page 3.584.1The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) recently publishedEngineering Criteria 2000, which sets new standards for evaluating, assessing and accreditingengineering programs in North America [1]. The criteria are purposefully vague in nature toencourage innovation in engineering education [2]. Proceedings from the National Conferenceon Outcomes Assessment for Engineering Education [3] reflect educators’ frustration with thisissue. The process for implementing new means of assessment will be iterative in nature, andwill involve collaboration among educators, industry leaders, accreditors, and stakeholders [2].Engineering Criteria 2000 cited the student portfolio as a means for meeting criterion three:program
Paper ID #42003Ethical Reasoning, Moral Intuitions, and Foreign Language in Global EngineeringEducation [Global Engineering Ethics Education]Dr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Rockwell Clancy conducts research at the intersection of technology ethics, moral psychology, and Chinese philosophy. He explores how culture and education affect moral judgments, the causes of unethical behaviors, and what can be done to ensure more ethical behaviors regarding technology. Rockwell is a Research Scientist in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Before moving
Paper ID #41690Board #442: Data-driven Approach to Problem Solving in Renewable Energyand Engineering EducationDr. Mohammad Abu Rafe Biswas, The University of Texas at Tyler Dr. Mohammad (Rafe) Biswas is an Associate Professor at the University of Texas at Tyler Houston Engineering Center in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. His expertise and interests include process dynamics and control, fuel cell systems and thermal fluid engineering education. He has taught courses in system dynamics and control, process control, energy conversion, and thermal fluids laboratory.Dr. Aaditya Khanal, The University of Texas at Tyler
Paper ID #43781Culturally Relevant Practices at Hispanic Serving Institutions: A SystematicReview of Engineering Education LiteratureDr. Hyun Kyoung Ro, University of North Texas Dr. Hyun Kyoung (Hyunny) Ro, Associate Professor of Counseling and Higher Education at the University of North Texas, holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education from The Pennsylvania State University with a minor in Educational Psychology—Applied Measurement. Her research focuses on Gender and Racial Equity in STEM Education, Learning Experiences and Outcomes for Marginalized Students, and Critical Quantitative Research and Assessment.Shirley Anderson
childhood science methods courses. She has taught engineering to children in informal settings, and is a partner with Harford County Public Schools (Maryland) on a district-wide project to implement elementary engineering instruction using EiE units of instruction. Her research includes examining the ways in which children and adults critically analyze technologies, and investigations of factors that support and those that hinder elementary teachers as they learn to teach engineering. Page 22.329.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Classroom Teacher - Enrichment
AC 2010-2416: BRINGING RESEARCH INTO THE CLASSROOM:CONCEPTUALLY NEW HEAT-EXCHANGE CARTRIDGE FOR CHEMICALENGINEERING EDUCATION.Baba Abdul, Washington State University Baba Abdul obtained an MSc in Chemical Engineering from the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria Nigeria in 2005. He has had some work experience in the chemical process industries, mainly petroleum refining and solids processing. He is part of the faculty at ABU. He is currently working on a PhD that includes elements of Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer in Helico-symmetric channels, and Engineering Education at the Washington State University, Pullman WA. 509-335-9625;davab@wsu.edu.David Thiessen, Washington State University
group outperformed the comparison group on a Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationnumber of measures. The pedagogy examined in the study should be adaptable to anyengineering curriculum at any institution since large classes were used and special classroomswere not required. In a study of design courses across the ECSEL coalition, Terenzini et. al. 17reported that students in design courses that used “active and collaborative approaches toteaching design reported statistically significant advantages” in three areas: design,communication and group skills “when compared with … students
Engineering Education, 2024provides a strong foundation for further education and future employment opportunities asstudied by Marques et al. [5].Data Analytics in STEM EducationBrown et al. [6] integrated data analytics in engineering education to address technical require-ments from a multicomplex environment perspective concept using data analytics tools such asIBM Watson Analytics. The results obtained from a multi-complex environment have aided stu-dents and improved their decision approach to quantify data accuracy and project requirements.The integration of analytics tools fostered the engineering students the ability to forecast require-ments and create new methods critical to their engineering design.Data analytics was also added to a core
in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received his PhD from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh, where he is currently working as an Assistant Professor. His research interests are engineering education, and in the area of optics; he specializes in developing optical fiber-based sensors for monitoring harsh environments.Dr. Irene Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She has experience teaching programming, design, entrepreneurship, and sustainability topics, and is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University
education and Latinx engineering entrepreneurship.Ms. Magdalini Z Lagoudas, Texas A&M University Magda Lagoudas, Executive Director for Industry & Nonprofit Partnerships, has been at Texas A&M University since 1992 and served on several capacities across the College of Engineering, including Director for the Space Engineering Institute and Associate Director for the Space Engineering Research Center. Current responsibilities include pursuing strategic partnerships with industry to provide engineering students with opportunities to collaborate on multidisciplinary teams addressing real world challenges and with industry engagement. College signature programs include the Texas A&M I-Corps Site, AggiE Challenge
369 Flexible and Enduring Engineering Education Built on the Basics and Reinforced through Practical Problem Solution Jeffrey Ashworth, William Crisler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Prescott, AZAbstractStudents in any discipline learn and retain more when exposed to material that stimulates theirinterest. In engineering, all students must understand certain basics in mathematics, physics, orthe concepts of their chosen discipline. A student may be able to memorize or otherwise masteran advanced concept without the basic knowledge to verify the technique
Community Member First, Researcher Second: Tensions in Authentic Engineering Education Outreach (WIP) Yuliana Flores, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of WashingtonAbstract Community engagement and outreach in engineering education can create tensions forresearchers who are also community members, particularly when navigating dual identities andresponsibilities. This paper examines the complexities of community engagement through anautoethnographic study of a high school engineering outreach project on usability testing. Theproject, which began from personal curiosity and later connected to doctoral research, illustrateshow community
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Academic and Industry Collaboration – A Literature ReviewAbstractAs part of a larger project determining best practices for establishing and maintaining effective,sustainable, collaborative relationships between academic and industry professionals, thisreview will outline the available materials and, conversely, the multiple gaps that exist regardingcourse content, methods of teaching, and practical experience relating to preparation for careersin engineering and engineering technology. Currently, there is no clear agreement on whichprinciples and practices best enable industrial partners and academic institutions to establishand maintain mutually-beneficial partnerships. In fact
- Madison and was a Research Associate at the National Research Council of Canada before joining Nippon Koei. His expertise includes numerical modeling, rockfall analysis and mitigation, and general geomechanical analyses. Page 13.789.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 International Collaboration for Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory ExercisesAbstractThe project described in this paper is a collaborative effort between California Polytechnic StateUniversity and Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. based in Tokyo, Japan. The collaboration was establishedfor the Geotechnical
)/Year Title Publication Venue Pinto et al. (2019) [47] Work-in-progress: A systematic IEEE Global Engineering mapping study of experiences with Education Conference, active learning strategies and methods EDUCON in Brazilian engineering education Sang et al. (2017) [48] A systematic mapping review on Proceedings of the LACCEI cooperative and collaborative learning International Multi- in engineering and computing conference for Engineering
, 2010.[16] K. Chavez, Queer Migration Politics: Activist Rhetoric and Coalitional Possibilities. UI Press, 2011.[17] B. Williams, P. C. Wankat, and P. Neto, “Not so global: a bibliometric look at engineering education research,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 190–200, 2018.[18] H. Xian and K. Madhavan, “Anatomy of Scholarly Collaboration in Engineering Education: A Big-Data Bibliometric Analysis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 486–514, Jul. 2014.[19] K. Breznik and V. Skrbinjek, “Citation network analysis of documents on engineering and technology education,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 213–218, 2017.[20] C. Lee and D. Sohn, “Mapping the Social Capital Research in Communication
traditional college content materials. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #34670Dr. Danny D. Reible P.E., Texas Tech University Dr. Danny D. Reible is the Donovan Maddox Distinguished Engineering Chair at Texas Tech University. He was previously the Bettie Margaret Smith Chair of Environmental Health Engineering in the Depart- ment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering and the Director of the Center for Research in Water Resources at the University of Texas in Austin. Dr. Reible holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engi- neering from the
Paper ID #34810Contextual Social Awareness in Design: Engineering Education as aCatalyst for ChangeMrs. Greses P´erez, Stanford University Greses P´erez is an Afro-Latina engineer, learning scientist and educator. She is a Ph.D. candidate at Stan- ford University in Science Education and Learning Sciences. Her research focuses on the role of language and cognition in engineering and science learning, particularly for Black and Brown students. In addition to her ongoing work on culturally relevant VR education, Greses combines interdisciplinary perspectives and mixed methodologies to investigate issues of diversity and
Paper ID #25993Mind the Mindstorms: Technocultures of Engineering Education in ThreeU.S. Elementary SchoolsDr. Michael Lachney, Michigan State University Michael Lachney is an assistant professor of educational technology at Michigan State University. With expertise in qualitative social science methods, he is interested in the role that technologies can play in strengthening school-community relationships. He is currently working on educational technology design strategies and implementation tactics to help teachers enroll community-based expertise in culturally re- sponsive science, technology, engineering and
Paper ID #11727Innovative Confidence: what engineering educators can do and say to gradu-ate more effective innovators and intrapreneursDr. Leo E. Hanifin, University of Detroit Mercy After engineering positions in the computer, aerospace and automotive industries, Dr. Hanifin led a re- search center focused on manufacturing technology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute for eleven years. He then served as Dean of the College of Engineering and Science at the University of Detroit Mercy for twenty-one years. He is now retired from full-time academic responsibilities, but continues to consult in higher education, study
Virginia. He received the PhD degree in Physics from the State University of New York at Binghamton in 1980 and joined Bell Laboratories that same year. At Bell Laboratories he was Director of Advanced Lithography Research in the Physical Sciences Research Division. He joined the ECE department at University of Virginia in 2001 and was appointed Department Chair in 2003 and served until 2012 in that capacity. His research interests include nanofabrication, nanoelectronic devices and Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Incorporating Studio Techniques with a Breadth-First Approach in Electrical and Computer Engineering EducationBackgroundThe
: contemporary issues of engineering education in general, and those of the Middle East and the Arab Gulf States, in particular Page 12.1119.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 On Professional Development of Engineering Educators in the Arab Gulf States: Rethinking the Mental ModelAbstractEngineering education in the Arab Gulf States ((Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, United ArabEmirates, Qatar, and Oman) faces significant challenges as it seeks to meet the demands on theengineering profession in the years to come. Engineering faculty and the young in particular,need to expand their technical knowledge
drawbacks of portfolios as documented in these papers indicatedthat portfolios can provide a good record of student achievement, support select assessment, andcreate opportunities to impact student learning, team collaboration, and career development. Thereview also indicated that educators should provide support for students when they are creatingtheir portfolios in order to cultivate the possible benefits of portfolio use and avoid possiblenegative effects.AcknowledgementsThe preparation of this work was supported by the National Science Foundation (REC-0238392,“Using portfolios to promote knowledge integration in engineering education”). The authorswish to thank Yi-min Huang, Matt Eliot, Roxane Neal as well as the anonymous ASEEreviewers for