analysis and design the students must understand are at timesoverwhelming, but when students are given a chance to design devises that have an immediatereal-world application, they are motivated to progress in unimaginable ways.Despite the high resistance from both students and educators, the ideas behind discovery learningare getting more and more accepted, as industry begins seeking employees who are betterproblem-solvers and independent workers. Producing graduates capable of designing high-qualityproducts is the ultimate goal of engineering education. However, the resources necessary tosupport good design education are underestimated by schools and universities. This leads to weakdesign curriculum and ill-prepared engineering graduates. The
Paper ID #5944Building Student Capacity for High Performance TeamworkDr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Dr. Davis is Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State Uni- versity. For two decades he taught capstone design courses with multidisciplinary teams and developed instructional materials and assessments that enhance student team success. He is a Fellow of ASEE and an active consultant on engineering design education.Mr. Ronald R Ulseth P. E., Iron Range Engineering Ron Ulseth directs and instructs in the Iron Range Engineering program in Virginia, Minnesota and
Paper ID #7374Integration of Augmented Reality into the CAD ProcessDr. Tumkor Serdar, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Serdar Tumkor is affiliated as a research scientist and professor in Mechanical Engineering Department at Stevens Institute of Technology. He had been a member of the faculty at the Istanbul Technical University from 1996 to 2007. Dr. Tumkor received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical Uni- versity in 1994. His teaching interests are Machine Design, Engineering Design, and Engineering Graph- ics. His current research interests include Design of MEMS devices with polymeric nano
Motion Control Laboratory Focusing on Control Design and Fluid Power EducationAbstractThis paper presents the development of a Motion Control Laboratory in the department ofMechanical Engineering at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). The main objectives ofthe lab are to 1) Prepare students to work in real-world motion control applications by providingstudents with hands-on experiences to better understand control system design ideas andconcepts, 2) Expose students to electromechanical and fluid power hardware, and 3) Educatestudents about the benefits and capabilities of fluid power and electromechanical actuation.Students analyze systems in both open-loop and closed-loop operation, implement simulationsvalidated by
responsibility, develop and implement complex systems,communicate and function within multidisciplinary groups, and understand impacts of theirdesigns in different societal and environmental contexts.Achieving these outcomes requires a pedagogy that not only holistically broadens non-technicalaspects of engineering design, but provides a conducive learning environment that is responsiveto the changing professional industry landscape. At our University, we have endeavored tofacilitate innovation and professional efficacy by closely tying our capstone course with currentindustry practice. The course begins with as a traditional lecture course in parallel with theproblem-based learning format during the first five weeks to rapidly prepare learners for
, theengineering faculty expects to offer multiple sections of the course in the future. The multiplecourse offerings will permit direct comparison of traditional course formats with the modeldescribed here.ConclusionThe course structure is designed to guide the ECU engineering students through a journey ofexperiential understanding of the project management process via a learning centered coursestructure. Students are expected to begin their learning “journey” by implementing their projects“by the book” in order to understand project management theory and in support projectcompletion. This course is being offered (Spring 2007) at the time of the development of thisarticle and is the first time the course has been offered for the ECU engineering program
engineering curriculum. They Page 25.1372.2argue for the “reflect-in-action” plan where students build their designs and understand the flawsin them, themselves7, 8. However, there are no clear guidelines available regarding the use ofphysical models and their cognitive implications in engineering education.This study addresses the cognitive effects of the use of various kinds of examples and physicalmodels on engineering students who design a stunt vehicle as a part of their class project. Thestudents are divided into three groups and given three different kinds of examples: a good one, apoor one and a poor one with warnings about its negative
designproject. One of the requirements for each technical competency is a deep learning activity(DLA), which is an in-depth experiment to understand a concept or process more fully. Toconclude a competency, a student completes an oral exam with the instructor for an average timeof one hour. In order to graduate in two years, a student needs to complete eight technicalcompetencies per semester in addition to seven credits of professionalism, design and seminar.IRE students must take 3 credits of design each semester and work closely with their teammatesto complete their projects. With the design groups set up in a team setting allows the students tointeract similar to how engineers do in industry. A distinctive feature of these design groups atIRE is
videos bygraduate engineering students who served as project facilitators and who had prior experiences inconducting K-12 STEM education projects. It was emphasized to the evaluators that for researchpurposes their assessment of the participants needed to be genuine and unbiased. The evaluatorsconsidered the following five factors in assessing each team: understanding of problem statement,information and knowledge gathering, idea generation, design tradeoff, and idea and designiterations (see Appendix 2). The evaluators individually rated each of these factors for each teamon a scale of 100 (see Appendix 3 for the evaluation rubric adapted from [36]). Their rating ofeach team was guided by interviews of team members to assess their progress in
: A goal-directed problem-solving activity (Archer, 1965) that initiates change in human-made things (Jones, 1992), and involves optimizing parameters (Matchett, 1968) and balancing trade-offs (AAAS, 2001) to meet targeted user needs (Gregory, 1966).This definition of design also connects to many of the elements of engineering design that Dymet al. (2005) specified, emphasizing the complex nature of engineering design that requiresbalancing many things at once. With something so complex, experience-based andprofessional-knowledge oriented design courses can be challenging to assess. In general,engineering design education researchers suggest assessing the students’ understanding of thedesign process as well as their skills in
Simulation Results Figure 10 – MathScript Simulation Results for Phase and Gain MarginSummary and ConclusionsThe sample modules presented above are user friendly and performed satisfactorily undervarious input conditions. These and other modules helped the students to understand the conceptsin more detail. These modules can be used in conjunction with other teaching aids to enhancestudent learning in various courses and will provide a truly modern environment in which Page 25.917.11students and faculty members can study engineering, technology, and sciences at a level ofdetail.The LabVIEW modules are designed using built in Mathematics and
programs will be covered.IntroductionMost degree programs that teach building engineering have design opportunities are often less thanideally constructed to reflect practical careers due to relatively few faculty members being trained, or theyhave no similar industry experience necessary to guide students [1]. Consequently in these settings, only asurface level understanding of their value is realized [2]. Many engineering students do not know how toapproach large complex systems due to their exposure to idealistic examples [3]. Additionally, they notcapable of providing critical multi-disciplinary integration of their designs due to the isolated nature oftopics in the classroom [4] [5]. Capstone courses provide a comprehensive evaluation of
. Thecourse was designed to transfer as the required engineering graphics course from a pre-engineering program to any bachelor-level engineering program. Consideration was made in thedesign of the course to ensure smooth transfer to both mechanical engineering programs as wellas civil engineering programs, which often have different requirements for engineering graphics.The course is broken into three components: technical sketching, 2D CAD, and 3D CAD. In thetechnical sketching portion of the course, the general concepts of engineering graphics arecovered including projections, visualization, dimensioning, and working drawings. This portionis not only designed to give students the foundation of engineering graphics before transitioningto computer
, Page 22.194.2programmable logic controllers, and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). The second is toprovide the student with an understanding of the relative suitability of these components inindustrial and technical applications with respect to key selection criteria including cost,performance, power requirements, and ease of implementation. The final objective is tofamiliarize the student with a set of industry-standard tools used to program these devices and tomake estimates of their performance and power requirements.Course ContentThe course is designed for a ten-week (plus final exam) quarter system. The topic schedule isshown in Table 1. Week Topic 1 Introduction to
Paper ID #34516Switching Gears in Machine Design; A Focus Toward Technical WritingSkills in Lieu of a Hands-On Semester Design and Fabrication ProjectDr. Dennis O’Connor, California State University, Chico Dr. Dennis O’Connor received his B.S. (2004) and M.S. (2007) in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Illinois University Edwardsville and Ph.D. (2014) in Engineering Science from Southern Illinois Univer- sity Carbondale. His major research interests are dynamics and vibration including nonlinear systems and numerical methods. He joined the Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering and Sus- tainable
EGEN 310 Project Management Leadership Team Building Communication Skills Figure 1: Topics of instruction in our multi-disciplinary design course.BackgroundThe course was established in 2009 to support ABET [1] requirements of providing a multi-ddesign experience for Montana State University students. The overarching objectives of thecourse were to provide an understanding of the engineering design process and require studentsto build a design within some given parameters, while working
is greatly enhanced when incubator clients submit a jointproposal with a university or federal laboratory (6) Additional services and resources includingpatent knowledge, alumni who may act as advisors, business contacts and strategic alliance Page 12.717.4facilitators or investors, access to a far-flung network of laboratories and technical expertise, andaccess to investment by university foundations.All the above mentioned research findings and other issues and environmental factors wereconsidered when designing the engineering entrepreneurship programs at Florida Tech.Additionally, leading entrepreneurship programs in the country were
engineering. At the university, the students areprovided with the background information to understand the basics, to recognize qualitymachining, and to succeed in their careers introduces them to career expectations. Therejuvenation of the time tested “Tap Wrench” project has been updated to include machiningtechniques, metallurgy, machining vocabulary, and the jargon as well as helping studentsbecome familiar with and use actual machines in production. The experience provides a base forother engineering design courses, senior design projects, and careers in manufacturing ormechanical engineering.The “Tap Wrench” project provides a sound participatory approach of tradition engineeringeducation. Well know theorists in principles of learning recognize
college of engineering thatbenefits humanity by educating socially responsible engineers inspired for life-long learningusing an innovative learn by doing philosophy in partnership with industry and otherstakeholders.” PBLI is consistent with this mission because it promotes the use of a multi-disciplinary, participatory, learn by doing, “hands-on” laboratory, project and design centeredapproach. The PBLI enhances educational outcomes for students in accordance with the strategic Page 13.1010.2plan, it enhances the professional development of the faculty in conformance with the strategicplan, by encouraging and supporting expansion of faculty
moment equations, and energy methods. Withthe development of note-taking handouts supplied to the students, the structured analysis is ledby the instructor using Castigliano's theory of internal energy. The problem formulation is keptgeneral until the last step. The numerical integration can be performed by using the software ofthe students' choice.” The researchers [4] “found that using this approach accomplishes a richer,deeper understanding of design among our students and increases their confidence as indicatedby our pre- and post-activity assessment.”In general most millennium students entering engineering programs with a background incomputing, video games, computer graphics and other ‘virtual’ experiences and skills are readyto interact
engineers regularly do during a post-academic ‘real world’ project, includingenvironmental scientists, policy makers, technicians, interns, and managers.To address these issues, faculty at Merrimack College in North Andover, Massachusetts, adaptedProject Based Learning to include collaboration between different courses. “EnvironmentalDesign,” a Civil Engineering course with 25 seniors enrolled, “hired” other courses of students toconduct specific tasks of interest to our projects. An Ecology course was hired to conductmacroinvertebrate sampling. An Electrical Engineering course was hired to design and developa water quality monitoring device. A STEM Education course was hired to complete some waterquality measurements. Finally, the students of
graduates will be prepared to work in a wide variety of industries, local industryneeds for the major industry sectors demonstrate that it is an excellent location for the new BSSEprogram. Based on our analysis, the following areas capture the main SE skills required inindustry in the Charlotte area, in North Carolina, in the U.S., and globally: • Decision and Risk Analysis • Systems Modeling and Optimization • Systems Design, Planning and Analysis • Supply Chain and Logistics Engineering • Quality Engineering • Engineering Management • Communication and Presentation • Understanding of Global Business DynamicsA list of required skills in industry was developed based on the information of skill needs wehave gathered
. Understanding of Page 12.451.3mechanical engineering basics, insight in practical engineering, communication skills,creative and critical thinking, ability to work independently or cooperatively, endlesscuriosity and unfaltering academic passion are only a few of the most important requirements.The education of such good engineers for the industries needs innovation of lecture-orientedclasses and curriculums to cover new technologies. Policies to give more opportunities forstudents to have practical design experience and accumulate work capability throughindustry-academy cooperative education and motivate professors to participate in theprogram. Especially
renders a “planning tool” that effectivelystructures classroom learning tasks in a well-organized format and sequence to enhance studentmotivation, retention of information, and understanding of difficult concepts [18]. Although the5E model was originally envisioned for and has historically promoted inquiry learning, itsstructured framework can be flexibly adapted to authentically address the three dimensions of theNGSS. For example, [19] suggests incorporation of classroom instructional and learning tasks suchas engaging in scientific practices, formulating research questions, conducting engineering design,and refining scientific models through the phases of explanation, engagement, exploration, andelaboration, respectively. Moreover, [20] has
undergraduateengineering students through the practice of SRL. The practice of SRL develops students’awareness of their thinking through metacognition. This project connects research andeducational activities with the dual aim of better understanding and improving engineeringstudent design processes. a) Research Activities The central goal of this research is twofold: (1) to develop and validate a suite ofmethodological tools to study metacognition in engineering design activities; and (2) to describethe metacognition of students engaged in a design activity. This study is conducted in twophases. The main research components (Phases 1 and 2, described below) utilize a descriptivestudy to investigate student self-regulation and the types of self
model allows. VR can enlargesmall scale items or slow down fast mechanisms to allow the user to interact better and understand thedevice. At the same time, these technologies can vary significantly in terms of realism, time to create,learner experience, and impact on learning. It is especially important in working with these technologiesthat learning experience is prioritized and studied.In this paper, we delineate the pedagogical requisites and learning objectives of a Machine Design course.We focus on the potentialities and constraints of current educational methodologies that employ images,CAD programs, and 2D video and look at the use of VR within engineering education. We then presentthe evaluation of the integration of a Virtual Reality
. Blended classes allow students to getfeedback and directions on the Web and in face-to-face classes.Question 4: What suggestion do you have for improving the face-to-face classes?One great benefit of a blended class is the opportunity for student and instructor interaction.Students responded that they wanted more demonstrations in class. This is not surprising, withmany engineering education classes using class time for labs. Another common response wasthat students would like to understand the structure of the Website in conjunction with the classmeetings. They wanted the classes to build on or reinforce the lessons from the Web. Studentsalso commented on wanting more team activities in classes. They wanted to discuss case studies
of Wisconsin and is an ASQ-certified Quality Engineer and Reliability Engineer. His research interests are in engineering system design, analysis and management, supply chain management, Lean systems, and quality and reliability management.Thomas Johnson, Besam Entrance Solutions Thomas E. Johnson III, President of Johnson Lean Consultancy, 28 years of manufacturing experience in all facets of production and operations. Consultant to operations for many Fortune 100 companies in aerospace, automotive, precision materials, and supply chain operations. Professional instructor and mentor for Lean transformations and new operation start-ups.Tom Benson, Pass and Seymour-Legrand Tom Benson is a
offered to middle school mathematics andscience teachers over a two week period. Each day of the workshop was seven hourslong, with a four hour morning and a three hour afternoon session. Both the morning andthe afternoon sessions focused on hands-on activities designed to improve the Page 13.1324.3participating teachers’ knowledge and understanding of how science, mathematics,engineering and technology can be used to enhance science and mathematics instruction.A detailed schedule of the workshop activities is displayed in Table 1.Teachers were self-selected and drawn from 9 school districts in the Denver Metro area.Thirteen mathematics teachers and 14
Engineering major, Texas A&M University.Bahram Asiabanpour, Texas State University Dr. Asiabanpour is an assistant professor of manufacturing engineering at Texas State University since 2003. He has published several journal and conference papers in Rapid Prototyping and CAD/CAM. He designed and has taught four new senior-level courses in manufacturing engineering program including capstone senior design. He has been very successful in involving undergraduate students in his research in rapid prototyping and in his publications. He has also enlisted the support of local industries in his teaching and research activities.Jesus Jimenez, Texas State University JESUS A. JIMENEZ received the B.S. and