Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md.8. Eris, o., (2004), Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass.9. Hazelrigg, G.A., (1994), “Rethinking the Curriculum: Is Today’s Engineering Education Irrelevant, Incomplete, and Incorrect?” Prism, ASEE, Wash. D.C.10. Kahnemann, D., Slovic, D.P., and Tversky, A.,(1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.11. Ramos, J., and Yokomoto, C., (1999) “Making Probabilistic Methods Real, Relevant, and Interesting Using MATLAB,” Proceedings, 1999 Frontiers in Education Conf., Institute of Electrical and
interactive blend of evolution, EvoParsons opens the door of unprecedentedopportunities to go beyond just adapting to independent learning experiences.We believe this qualitative innovation brings our algorithms closer to the level of generalizationthat also differentiates educational research from teaching practice. As such, evolutionarytechniques may not only benefit individual students, but also unveil insights motivating furthereducational research. We investigate EvoParsons to answer the following two researchquestions; • Research Question 1 (RQ1 ): Does EvoParsons evolve relevant misconceptions 18 that classify student’s errors? By relevant we mean if the interesting and harder misconceptions are getting priority over trivial
the classroom in discussing their subject. AAUP has assessedthat the overwhelming preponderance of targeted harassment threats come from politically right-wing sources [2]. Journalists investigating the targeted harassment of faculty have identified keyportals like Campus Reform as sources for internet trolls to identify academics to harass [3].When articles targeting faculty gather steam through sharing and republication in multiple mediaoutlets, harassment can intensify in both frequency and severity of threat to the individual andthe campus.This targeted harassment is of concern to the ASEE scholarly community not only because itthreatens members of our community but also because it may have a “chilling” effect on researchand innovation in
fields to work on a suite of projects that investigate, evaluate and report on the mosteffective and efficient use of innovative access and inclusive technologies. Numerous prototypesdirectly resulted from the creative work of deaf students which was thoroughly vetted by subjectmatter experts, many of whom are deaf.The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act requireemployers to make reasonable accommodations for deaf employees. This paper describes how anR&D center focusing on accessibility for deaf part-time and full-time co-op employees, providesstudents the inclusive opportunity to experience the same equal benefits and privileges of beingin a “hearing” employment.Per focus group interviews of
Roberts University is continuing the development of a fully functional flight simulator toassist in the design of original aircraft. Through faculty and staff guidance and a plethora of datafrom the previous team's endeavors, much progress is expected by April 2020. The ultimate goalof this project is to develop an innovative approach to deepen the understanding of aircraftdesign through the use of the flight simulator. With this technology, students can producerealistic motions of flight through virtual reality and six degrees of freedom of a Stewartplatform with revolute joints. The flight simulator provides a state-of-the-art learning tool for students. Linking theHTC vive virtual reality headset to the mechanical part of the system
currentlearning and future application. Introducing children to valuable STEM experiences, startingat a young age, has been shown to improve science literacy, promote critical thinking,develop problem solvers, and empower the next generation of innovators, creating newoutcomes that strengthen the economy [1]. Not all countries, however, acknowledge the need for STEM education. For example,although Kuwait, a small country in western Asia, ranks 57th (of 189 countries) on theHuman Development Index (HDI), with a score of 0.808 (or very high human development),the country ranks among the lowest in human development for Arabic/Persian Gulf countries[2]. CS curriculum in Kuwaiti K–12 public schools fails to prepare students for the 21stcentury
] Battle, A., and A. Wigfield. 2003. College women’s value orientations toward family,career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior 62 (1): 56–75.[37] Tennell T. (2019). "An Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration to Understand First-YearEngineering Retention,” 126th Annual American Society for Engineering EducationConference, Tampa, FL, June 15-19, 2019.[38] N. B. Honken and P. Ralston, “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look,” J. STEMEduc. Innov. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, 2013.[39] N. B. Honken, P. A. Ralston, and T. Tretter, “Step-outs to stars: Engineering RetentionFramework,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, pp.1–18.[40] Eccles, J.S. 1984. Sex differences in achievement patterns. In
engineering learning environments.Ms. Emily A Madden, University of MichiganDr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Lecturer in Technical Communication and an Assistant Research Scientist in Engineer- ing Education at the University of Michigan. She loves serving as a ”coach” to engineering students as they engage in communicating their ideas to a range of stakeholders. She studies teamwork and team- based pedagogy, with a focus on inter-team communication and equity. She is one of the Faculty Innova- tors behind Tandem, a Center of Academic Innovation tool for supporting students working in teams. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020AbstractEngineering student project
growing algae. Despite this narrower decision,they considered many factors, including which provided more room for innovation and whichmight make lipid extraction simpler or more difficult. The teams in cohorts 2 and 3 were asked tofirst make their choices regarding which kinds of algae to grow, and they were encouraged toindividually explore many options and factors prior to choosing. In the case of cohort 2, theyconsidered few strains and few factors, and quickly affirmed their agreement with one another,and this is reflected in Table 3. In contrast, the team in cohort 3 discussed a wide range of algae(including some less common strains, referred to in shorthand by students as broni and groni) andfactors. Thus, these results provide insight
Glenn Department of Civil Engineering at Clemson University, and a 2005 graduate of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech. Her research portfolio focuses on transportation infrastructure design, safety, accessibility, and management. She is currently the facilitator for the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Depart- ments (RED) grant at Clemson, and is leading three transformation efforts related to culture, curriculum, and community to achieve adaptability, innovation, and shared vision. Alongside her research, Dr. Ogle has been active in the development of engaged learning and has led two interdisciplinary undergraduate translational research and education courses
Paper ID #30024Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure: Lessons Learned from Eight YearsInstruction on the CEBOKWilliam D Lawson P.E., Ph.D., Texas Tech University William D. Lawson, P.E., Ph.D. serves as an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Texas Tech Uni- versity. His career in higher education is characterized by excellence and innovation in teaching, award- winning scholarship and sponsored research, and professional service at the national, regional and local levels. Creative activities encompass both technical research on geotechnical applications in transporta- tion, and interdisciplinary study of
Continually Challenged with Integrated Design ProjectsAbstractIntroduction: The undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) curriculum should preparestudents to confidently approach complex problems, as graduates will enter the workforce in anenvironment of rising healthcare costs, decreasing average life expectancy, and significantsocioeconomic disparities in health outcomes. With this landscape, solutions to contemporaryproblems will require innovative thinking and groundbreaking medical technologies, suggestingthat the future of BME will be increasingly design-oriented. BME curricula generally includelaboratory and project components aimed at preparing students for senior capstone; however,students may begin capstone
10% Activity Session Assignments 15% Exam #1 20% Exam #2 20% Final Exam 30%Prior the start of the semester, more than 80 mini-lecture videos were recorded, covering everyindividual topic in the course. The mini-lecture videos were recorded using the “Lightboard”(Fig. 1) at the University of Maine Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning (CITL). Theinstructor writes on a transparent glass board (located between the camera and the instructor) andthe video images are inversed in post-processing. Figure 1. Screenshot of a mini-lecture video recorded using “Lightboard
alphabetical order by division and indicate whether a division had papers inboth years included in the study.Divisions sponsoring papers on communication in 2015 1. Chemical Engineering (also in 2019) 2. Civil Engineering (also in 2019) 3. Computer & Information Technology 4. Continuing Professional Development 5. Educational Research and Methods (also in 2019) 6. Engineering Entrepreneurship & Innovation 7. Engineering Management 8. Engineering Technology 9. First Year Programs (also in 2019) 10. Liberal Education/Engineering & Society (also in 2019) 11. Materials 12. Manufacturing Materials and Processes 13. Mechanical Engineering (also in 2019) 14. Multidisciplinary Engineering (also in 2019) 15
. While industry partnerships havelong been a central part of engineering and technological education through programssuch as co-op and capstone design, community partnerships – and partnerships aimed atsocial transformation – have not been central. In fact, they challenge some of thedominant approaches to engineering education, namely, strong emphases ontechnological innovation and institutional expertise as well as client- and problem-basedapproaches to partnerships [6]. As a result, in many research university-communitypartnerships, the university functions as the source of expert knowledge that seekscommunity partnerships for the purpose of “technology transfer.” However, GeorgiaTech and a growing number of leading universities are changing
More Women inComputer Science and Math”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, pp.1-11, 2016.[2] L.S. Tenenbaum, M.K. Anderson, M. Jett and D.L. Yourick, “An Innovative Near-PeerMentoring Model for Undergraduate and Secondary students: STEM Focus”, Innovations inHigher Education, 2014.[3] A.M. Zaniewski and D. Reinholz, “Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoring programin the physical sciences”, International Journal of STEM Education, 3(14), 2016.[4] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency”, American Psychologist, 37(2), pp.122–147, 1982.[5] H.B. Carlone and A. Johnson, (2007), “Understanding the science experiences of successfulwomen of color: Science identity as an analytic lens”, Journal of Research in
undergraduate research students.Dr. Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina Dr. Pierce is the Director for Diversity and Inclusion and Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. He is a Bell South Teaching Fellow in the College of Engineering and Computing and ASEE Campus Representative.Dr. Zulfikar Berk, University of South Carolina Dr. Zulfikar Berk’s research interests include constructivist learning approaches, global education, ex- periential learning, and problem-based learning. He is enthusiastic about the contribution of innovative pedagogical approaches by working on various teaching and learning models in advancing engineering education
engineering problems, including fluids, geotechnical, and structural problems. She is a CEE faculty mem- ber since January 2010 and she was also member of the faculty of Universidad Simon Bolivar, Venezuela, for fifteen years.Dr. Lili Steiner, Florida International University I design and implement education solutions that are efficient, effective, and scalable. Specifically, I focus on the development of meaningful learning innovation from discovery and design through production and deployment. My research and experience have shown that a full-cycle approach is the most effective way to deliver value. Because of this, I work on full-cycle, full-scale projects. Conceptually, this means that I’m involved in every
2020].[4] E. Tipton, "NSF Award #1937633 Abstract: Modern Meta-Analysis Research Institute," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1937633&HistoricalAwards=f alse. [Accessed 11 3 2020].[5] L. S. Istaplet and G. Hancock, "NSF Award #1937745 Abstract: Quantitative Research Methods for STEM Education Scholars Program," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1937745&HistoricalAwards=f alse. [Accessed 11 3 202].[6] R. S. Caffarella and L. F. Zinn, "Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 241, 1999.[7] L. M
inestablishing connectivity and communication among members and creating an environment inwhich the doctoral students felt nurtured in their personal and professional development. Thiswork details a novel approach to onboarding new members of a research group and aims todemonstrate the value of translating organizational change and workforce sustainability toacademic environments.IntroductionOn an individual level, graduate education is a transformative time for engineering students’personal and professional development and on a broader scale, it contributes to the training offuture innovators who contribute to the economic and intellectual prosperity of society [1]. Thisperiod fosters the skills and principles that support disciplinary stewardship [2
of a patient are often more effective. Local solutions involvehorizontal innovation networks to create assistive technology that is modifiable by healthcareprofessionals and patients, not just the engineers that created the device. However, the ability tocommunicate between engineers, healthcare professionals, and patients requires empathy.A number of other researchers have investigated the importance of developing empathy in theirengineering courses. Mitchell and Light (2018) have incorporated initial challenger interviews,subject matter expert speakers or videos, stakeholder engagement plans, and reflection exercisesto help students develop empathy in “EPICS,” a first-year design course at Colorado School ofMines [2]. In another first-year
Paper ID #29909Does Playing the Violin Help Science Students Become Better Scientists?Prof. Wei YAO, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University Yao Wei, Ph.D, Professor at Institute of China’s Science Technology and Education Policy, School of Pub- lic Affairs, Zhejiang University. He holds BE and BCom degree in from Zhejiang University, and Doctor’s degree in management science and engineering from Zhejiang University. He is currently interested in engineering education, and innovation management.Mr. Bifeng ZHANG, Zhejiang University Bifeng ZHANG is a PhD student at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. He
US engineering schools.This period of growth correlates with double-digit increases in the School’s sponsored researchfunding, which increased by 75% between fiscal years 2016 and 2019, placing the School wellabove the average research growth rate for top engineering graduate schools. This boom in theresearch enterprise is of course due to a variety of innovative and forward-thinking endeavorsimplemented by School leadership toward building a more robust research infrastructure. Andquality PhD students working alongside world-class faculty is a key component of thatinfrastructure. It should be noted the number of School faculty with research and/or teachingroles increased 30% from 2014 to 2019.Of course, the School recognizes the
Learning in Capstone Design Courses [Senior Design]." IEEEpulse 3.3 (2012): 54-57.[8] Dunlap, Joanna C. "Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone courseprepares students for a profession." Educational Technology Research and Development 53.1(2005): 65-83.[9] Lee, Wonsuk, and S. Searcy. "Multispectral sensor for detecting nitrogen in cornplants." ASAE Annual International Meeting, Midwest Express Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.2000.16GMO seeds are probably the single biggest contributor to farm yield for crops: https://modernag.org/innovation/the-science-inside-gmo-seeds/ 12[10] Osborne, Shannon L., James S. Schepers, and Mike R. Schlemmer
18 sections of the course and each section has 40 students. The objective of the course is toexpose students to design thinking concepts and enable them to solve various design challenges.The pedagogical framework of the course is focused on collaborative learning in a project-based,active learning environment. Student teams participate in various activities in class designed topromote creative and innovative thinking. The major learning outcomes focus on 1) writing anarrowly focused problem statement addressing open-ended or ill-defined global challenges; 2)applying ethnographic methods to understand technological problems; 3) developing a searchstrategy, access technical data bases and evaluate results and source quality; 4) creating
commonly stated for choosing tomajor in engineering also differed between male and female students [19]; within EnvE, 41% ofboth genders cited helping the environment, but more female students cited having a positiveimpact on society and helping people. A more general study found 14 categories of students’motivations for choosing to study engineering; additional reasons commonly included problemsolving, creativity/innovation, practicality, and a desire to build things [20]. This study alsofound gender and discipline differences among students’ motivations; however, EnvE was notamong the majors examined. Neither study explored if or how a students’ motivations towardelements in engineering changed over time.Students commonly change majors in
needs that drive technological innovation as well as the social contexts in which theyoccur. To counter this, some interventions focus on the communal and social qualities of STEMwork, drawing in students previously left cold by stereotypes of asocial loners [25], [26].Stereotypes of Scientists (and Engineers)To help improve and clarify assessment of these interventions, as well as create a method ofmeasuring students’ scientist identities, the Stereotypes of Scientists Scale (4S) was developed[27]. The 4S uses the idea of ‘fit’ to assess science identity – it assesses students’ beliefs aboutscientists, as well as their beliefs about themselves, to measure the overlap or potential fit theyexperience with STEM roles as defined by the participant
-on material that can beapplied to students’ future careers [4]. One way that undergraduate students receive hands-oninstruction is through participation in undergraduate research programs. Undergraduate researchprovides students with many benefits, including improved critical thinking and communicationskills, practice working with real-life problems and solutions, engagement with mentors andfaculty, and an increased knowledge of disciplinary focus [5], [6]. Undergraduate researchallows students to practice creativity, innovation, and problem solving, and is more likely tobetter prepare students for the workforce than passive pedagogy, like traditional lectures [5].Increased self-confidence has been identified as an additional benefit of
interests in learning to use the 3D printers and design something using CAD software. They could have pursued more artistic interests in the design and creation of the pieces they put in their modules. Or they could have really focused on the social, human dimensions of the problem to think about how people would interact in their module. In choosing this broad theme, we were intentional in making sure there were clear groups of people that would serve as clients, that there was opportunity for technical innovation, and that there were many sub-problems within the theme students could choose to pursue.Chanel: I let the experiences and expertise of my student guide research questions and efforts. I make
interests are in renewable energy applications, fluid-thermal sciences, and international education.Dr. Shannon N. Conley, James Madison University Shannon N. Conley is an assistant professor in the Bachelors Program in Integrated Science and Tech- nology (ISAT) at James Madison University. She holds a PhD in Political Science from Arizona State University, and her research and teaching focus on social, policy, and ethical issues related to emerging science and technology. Additionally, her previous and current work focuses on the development and implementation of tools and approaches for socio-technical integration across disciplines. Conley also conducts research in pedagogy and responsible innovation, participates in the