developed by the following students:Ben Llana (figure 1), Bernado Quiroga (figure 2), Sonia Solt, Rusty Prentice and CaseyWendelburg (figure 3), and Steven Bell (figure 4).ReferencesEscrig, F. (1996), “General Survey of Deployability in Architecture,” Mobile and RapidlyAssembled Structures (MARAS ‘96), Proceedings, pp 3-22.Hanaor, A. (2000), “Some Structural-Morphological Aspects of Deployable Structures forSpace Enclosures,” Structural Morphology Colloquium, International Association forShell and Spatial Structures (IASS 2000), Proceedings, August 12-15, Delft, Holland.Ishii, K. (2000),Structural Design of Retractable Roof Structures, Southampton, Boston:WIT Press.Liapi, K. A. (2001), “Transformable Structures: Design Features and
Session 1309 Development of a Novel Foundation Course for Biomedical Engineering Curriculum Ann Saterbak, Ka-Yiu San, Larry V. McIntire Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston TX 77005AbstractThe Bioengineering undergraduate program at Rice University is developing novel courses tomeet its primary program objectives. Students are required to take seven core Bioengineeringcourses and five elective courses in one of the three tracks of Cellular and MolecularEngineering, Systems Engineering and Biomedical Instrumentation, or Biomaterials andBiomechanics. The
, power supply and oscilloscope in the lab (see Figure 1). • Communications – this two-week experiment required them to build an AM radio from a commercially-available kit that was sold at the campus bookstore. Each student took home the completed radio. • Motor and Generator5 – Again, a commercially-available kit served as the basis for this experiment where they wound and tested their own motor, assembled the generator, and tested the two. Each student took home these systems. • Programmable Logic Controller – A competition, involving programming an Allen- Bradley SLC 5/02 PLC to perform a specific task, set the foundation for this topic. (Prizes consisted of 0.83 ohm, 20 watt
Session 2559 Formal Laboratory Reports Pros and Cons: An Interim Report Peter J. Shull Penn State University, AltoonaI. IntroductionEngineering programs have historically faced the major challenge of providing engineeringstudents with a solid foundation in written communication skills. In response, most engineeringcurricula include fundamental writing courses focused on developing and improving writtenperformance. With this emphasis in mind, the use of writing exercises in the classroom providesan opportunity for engineering
Session 2793 GradeWatch – the Software Package Displaying on Web Pages Students Grades Bogdan M. Wilamowski, Aleksander Malinowski University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY / Bradley University, Peoria, ILAbstractThis paper describes a web-based database allowing students to check their progress in coursesthey are taking using a web browser front end. The database interface is written in PERL and isinterfaced to the Internet by a web server. It can be tested and downloaded for non-profit usefrom http://sant.bradley.edu/~olekmali/grades/.IntroductionProviding up to date and accurate
interests of engineering students. Generally they are lessprepared, mathematically, than previously, and not as experienced in structural visualization.2 - few engineers actually use EM professionally. Modern engineering is directed more tosystems and software analysis rather than to hardware and components.3 - those who use EM employ only a small part of the subject’s complexity. Despite teachinga host of fields: D, E, B, H, P, M, ϕ, A, modern computer solution methods generally employonly the last two of these quantities, with the others being found only for post-processingconvenience.4 - there is real curricular pressure to make room for new courses and proposals to reduce theengineering credit requirements. These, combined with reasons 1 and 2
PennDOT Internship program. More importantly, of the PennDOTinterns, about 40% of the students indicated that their primary duties were related to maintenanceor road inspection.Meeting with members of the ET division Industry Advisory Committee (IAC) regarding thisissue resulted in recommendation to offer the technical elective in pavement design andmanagement to replace Photogrammetry (the previously offered elective). The idea of offering thecourse was then presented and discussed at both the CET department and college levels. Theproposed efforts to develop and offer the new elective were found to support at least twoobjectives under the division Strategic Goal 1(Engineering Technology (ET) will offer students ahigh-quality undergraduate
Session Number: 1793 Towards An Engineering Education Capability Maturity Model María M. Larrondo Petrie, PhD College of Engineering, Florida Atlantic UniversityAbstractThere are many skills and capabilities considered crucial to an engineer. Colleges of engineeringand engineering accreditation boards have developed curricula and criteria that assess mastery ofthe requisite mathematical, scientific and engineering foundation. However, other critical skillsand capabilities, such as technical writing and oral communication skills, problem solving skills,interdisciplinary team collaboration skills, leadership skills, ethics and creativity are
EM120 - FALL 1999 Lesson #: _____ MBTI Type: _______ Please rate the following statements on a scale from 1 to 10 (1 - very untrue; 10 - very true): ___ 1. Today’s class kept me interested. ___ 2. Today’s class was a good learning experience. ___ 3. This class prepared me well to apply today’s concepts to problems. ___ 4. This class motivated me to further explore today’s concepts. FIGURE 3. 30-SECOND SURVEY FORM3.2.2. 30-Second Survey Results for Module EffectivenessIn order to measure the effect of the module-based content in a generic manner, the data wasreduced in the following manner
Pedagogy Infused with Self-Regulation OpportunitiesAs is previously introduced, the ultimate big project is divided into a series of small sub-projectsto create rhythm and allow space for self-regulation to happen. The sub-projects, brieflydescribed in Table 1 below, have synergistic inter-connections. The session of Sub-Project 1 isalso an orientation session informing students that each sub-project is a stepping stone for thenext in the whole series that culminate in the final big project. The instructor makes special effortmaking students know their responsibilities but at the same time reducing their anxiety level. If astudent is at risk failing a sub-project, the instructor or the teaching assistant will provide timelyfeedback and
cooperative venture of all the major wood associations in NorthAmerica, as well as research organizations and government agencies.NEES Operations is managed through a cooperative agreement between the National ScienceFoundation and Purdue University for the period of FY 2010-2014 under NSF Award (0927178)from the Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) Division. The findings,statements and opinions presented in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarilyrepresent those of the National Science Foundation or Wood Products Council.References[1] 2009 Legislative Session: 1st Session, 39th Parliament. (2009). Bill 9 - 2009, Wood First Act. BC Legislature.[2] U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1994
cohort was C+ for Chemistry-1 with laboratory.Underutilization of Tutoring ServicesThe tutoring system provided by cohort program was not as effective as had been anticipated;most of the students declared that they would only attend mandatory tutoring sessions. Whilenearly all students attended mathematics (Pre-calculus and Calculus-1) tutoring, relatively fewattended other sessions. When looking only at math tutoring sessions, it became apparent thatthose for Calculus-1 were more frequently attended (and professors were more often visitedduring office hours) than were those for Pre-calculus.Assessment and EvaluationIn the Fall 2012 semester, the pilot CSMT cohort program was initiated by grouping first-timefreshmen according to major, with the
cases also included in the “solution space”? Byanswering yes to all the above questions, a good abstraction has been performed. The ultimategoal of abstraction is to increase the insight into the problem and also increase the solutiondomain for innovative solutions.Another example is provided to better illustrate the process of abstraction. The problem is todesign the brakes of the car. Figure 1 shows the evolution of the need statement from acolloquially expressed form to a technically precise abstract form. The solution specific detailsare eliminated and the terms are made qualitative. By abstraction, the final need statement istechnically precise, solution independent, general but not vague, and includes all possiblesolutions. Problem
ResearchMethodologyThe focus group component of the study employed a qualitative comparative case studyframework,67 where “insider” perspectives on empathy and care in engineering were taken fromengineering faculty and “outsider” perspectives were taken from non-engineering faculty. Notingthat “careful attention to case selection is crucial to [a qualitative study’s] success”,(p.11)68taking engineering responses as one case and non-engineering responses as another allows for acomparison of (1) general understanding of empathy and care, (2) mechanisms for teachingempathy and care, and (3) differing viewpoints on how these fit into an engineering context.Three engineering and three non-engineering focus group sessions were conducted with a total ofseven
asked to reflect on: 1) What things they wouldrecommend changing in future years 2) What things they would keep the same 3) How thecourse was different from a traditional high school class and to 4) Reflect on the 1-3 mostimportant technical things they learned and to 5) Reflect on the 1-3 most important non-technicalthings they learned. All of these questions were free response. A majority of students in bothcohorts noted aspects of the applications section of the course (i.e. “Learning where electricitycomes from”) as the most important technical skills they learned. A majority of both cohorts saidthat the course was different from their high school classes because they had more independence(several students reported “having more freedom
Session 2542 Utilizing Distance Learning Technology to Deliver a Graduate Program in Engineering Management to Working Professionals Betsy Ennis Dulin, Eldon Larsen, William Crockett Marshall University College of Information Technology and EngineeringAbstract Delivering an innovative graduate program in engineering management to a student bodyconsisting almost entirely of working professionals can be challenging, especially when studentsare geographically remote from each other and from the main campus. Distance learning methodsand technologies
A dam C oker Don C hangeau Financial A nalysis Long R ange P lanning R esearch and D evelopm ent P roduc t D evelopm ent Flight Test E ngineering Yuan Tan A dam C oker Don C hangeau R ic hard Am es A dam C ok er O livier Deigni R ichard Am es Tinoush Moulaei Sam W anis Yuan Tan P eter P osiask Justin H ausam an O livier DeigniFigure 1: The team structure of ASI, for its first phase, as a university-based technical team
thecharacteristics that they are available as open source and they can run on multiple computingplatforms (at least Windows, Unix, Linux, and Macintosh), although the first release isconfigured only for Windows clients and Windows, Unix or Linux servers. Beyond this, eachcomponent is specialized to fill a particular function. Each communicates with another via theInternet Protocol (IP), with the result that they do not need to be run on the same computer,although they generally are grouped on one server computer and many user computers as shownin Figure 1. Instructors and students use identical software, configured as required by theireducational role. The typical student computer is a Windows PC with sound card. We use a“Tablet PC” laptop computer for the
Page 25.1333.5product, but did not help the students to trace design rationale. The original expectation thatdocumented versions of the iterations and reflective decisions made will be lower in number thanwhat the photographs and video show are evidenced in transcripts from the in situ video.Transcripts from the video scenes show that generation of the storyboards caused additionalbrainstorming and decision-making, but without in situ video most of the artifacts would showlittle evidence of all of the decisions and iterations. Most project groups submitted pre-construction storyboards and post-construction storyboards, but none of the groups submittedmultiple storyboards as their projects evolved. Figures 1-5 show transcripts of group
Session 1353 Enriching Freshman Design Through Collaboration With Professional Designers P. Hirsch, J. Anderson, J.E. Colgate, J. Lake, B. Shwom, and C. Yarnoff Northwestern UniversityEngineering educators over the last fifteen years have increasingly emphasized the teaching ofdesign.1 As a result, design courses are not only being offered as a capstone experience inengineering majors; they are increasingly found at the freshman and sophomore level. This latterdevelopment has sparked a controversy about whether it is desirable, or even possible, to teachdesign to
teaching machinery andhelping ensure student safety. While this does mean that a given group of students only learnselectronics for one two-hour session every other week, we have found that directed instruction inthese periods is sufficient to allow students to achieve the end of semester goals. In the case ofYork College, this rotating schedule provided at most a 16:1 student to faculty ratio during thetime in which students were supervised.Each of the groups of 16 students is divided up into three to four project teams, giving team sizesof four to six students. In our experience, while groups of four students are quite capable of Page
provides a meta-level view ofproject management using BaseCamp, thus the expectations for the wiki project to meetspecific project management outcomes are low. Interview and focus group questionssuggest that students and raters believe wiki knowledge management and BaseCampproject management are complementary but serve different purposes. Those findings aresummarized in rater and student perceptions.Rater perceptionsRaters responded positively to the Wiki project overall, indicating that graduates withKM experience would be highly valued in industry. Rater responses are summarized inAppendix D. Raters identified strengths in three general categories: (1) archivedknowledge; (2) peer communication; and (3) flexible systems. Raters agreed that
critical to the team’s success in achievingits objective. In the DMS course the students organize themselves into functional groups, e.g.shaft, bearing, structure, shielding, controls, etc. The group structure is needed to simplifyindividual tasking and assessment as well as to heighten the sense of accountability among groupmembers.The courses also complement each other in both project type and length. The DTFS course usesmultiple in-house generated projects of two week duration, while the DMS course uses 1 termlength industrial project. They are also complementary in their introduction of other non-engineering topics. The DTFS course addresses both engineering economics and contemporaryenvironmental issues while the DMS course addresses design
. Dr.Claudio da Rocha Brito has received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering, B.S. degree in Mathematics, B.S.degree in Physics, M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering all from the University of São Paulo. He was theGeneral Secretary of ICECE`99, the Technical Program Chairman of ICECE`2000 and he is the General Chairmanof INTERTECH`2002.MELANY MARIA CIAMPIMelany Maria Ciampi Tenente da Rocha Brito is a Researcher of University Center of Lusiada. She is Secretary ofBrazilian Chapter of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc – IEEE – ESShe belongs to the State Council of SBPC – Brazilian Association for the Advancement of Science and she isCouncilor of Brazilian Environmental Research Center - NPAB. She
technical needsof the current practices in the field and global industry. Modeling and simulation built uponcomputational science and engineering has now become the third key solution methodology innot only engineering and physical sciences but also in other areas such as biology, economics,and health sciences that are generally considered to be non-computational fields. Theinterdisciplinary master's degree program in Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) atour University is now more than 4 years old, and provides graduate education in several Page 15.301.2computational areas and the associated primary field disciplines. The CSE program since
4Appendix for activity prompt, room set-up and additional Cavalier Daily information provided tostudents.3.1.2 Focus Group SessionEach team of students participated in a forty-five minute focus group session immediately following theEngineering Design Activity. During this session, teams were asked a series of questions about thoughtsbehind their actions taken during the activity and thoughts on the overall team interaction. The questionssought to develop an understanding of the general thought process displayed during the activity withspecific questions focusing on the team’s overall approach toward developing a solution. Other questionsasked during this session were centered on the two curriculums involved in this study and how much
well as in the context of assembly, 3) differentiate between the various stages in thedesign process and describe the total process in general terms, and 4) individually design ormake significant contributions to the group performance of the following tasks: • Problem identification and definition, • Product research, analysis and decision-making, • Design and drawing refinement, and implementation, • Model and prototype construction, and Page 8.834.2 • Develop a technical report and visual presentation of a product and /or system design. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education
of the collection for exhibitions both nationally and internationally, and our 1500 volume research library, which is available through our Walter Schroeder Library at MSOE. • The Museum has also become the host venue for a number of professional conferences and symposia, including those organized by: The Society for Industrial Archeology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluid Power Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, American Foundry Society, Association for Corporate Growth, Society for Technical Communications, Thunderbird School of Global Management, Institute for Urban Agriculture, Association of General Contractors, and many others. The Museum
productsThe results of the pre-course survey question on familiarity with communication products arepresented in Figures 1-3. At the beginning of the semester, students consistently rated themselvesas most experienced with presentations in PowerPoint or Google Slides. This is not surprising, astoday, students are introduced to creating Google Slides as early as elementary school. Studentsalso reported having at least some experience with technical posters, fact sheets (and similarwritten documents), reports/research papers, and professional emails. The least familiarcommunication products were professional social media posts, web pages, message maps,communication plans, and evaluation plans.Figure 1. Responses to spring 2021 pre-course survey
articulation agreements with Nanjing University andShanghai Normal University for Law, Engineering, and Engineering Technology.1 One of thesearticulation agreements involves accepting mainland Chinese students as transfer students intoManufacturing and Electronic Engineering Technology programs and integrating them intoJunior/Senior level classes. University of Dayton faculties have been teaching classes both in the USand in China. The University of Dayton currently has Chinese undergraduate students in theirprogram currently experiencing their senior year in technical classes. The students also participated Page 12.916.3in an English