of their discipline, with transitions occurring after typicalformal training opportunities (e.g. grad school, postdocs) are over. There are limitedopportunities for professional development when starting education research, and options arehighly dependent on home institution type, department priorities, and faculty career stage.The PEER program helps faculty at any institution jumpstart their transition intodiscipline-based education research. Our goal is to help foster the next generation of STEMeducation researchers. PEER participants develop quality research projects, engage intargeted experiential work to develop their projects and skills, and collaborate and form along-term support community of peers, mentors and collaborators. Over the
methods, or impactful results.Some STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Math) events take the format of atraditional science fair, where students develop experiments and present, but integrate arts andcreativity. These tend to still be focused on students ages 10 and up [5] [6]. Alternatively,STEAM Nights tend to be family events where attendees visit various booths to conduct hands-on activities appropriate for all ages. These nights are an opportunity for students and theirfamilies to engage in a plethora of hands-on, mind-on activities. They ignite an interest inacademic areas that perhaps students would not typically be interested in or deepen an alreadyfound passion. STEAM Nights are generally set-up as an open house style event
projects sponsored by industry, developing the teaching the Engineering Projects in Community Service course, and developing curricular and co-curricular programs at the Engineering Innovation Center which promote innovation and entrepreneurship among engineering students and in collaborations with other colleges on campus and partnering with other institutions across the country. Page 26.1107.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Designing an Intensive Innovation Experience – Aggies InventBackgroundIn 2013, the National Academy of Engineering publication, The
environment that enables users to perform online signal processing calculationsand simulations1. It is based on an object-oriented programming environment that allowsstudents and practitioners to run simulations over the Internet. Simulations can be performed inthe intuitive graphical interface of J-DSP by placing and connecting “blocks” to establish signaland data flow. Students can also visualize the results interactively in the simulation environment.Original J-DSP functionality included algorithms for signal processing2, imaging3, controls4,time-frequency analysis5 and communications applications6.This paper presents our plans in the NSF CCLI Phase 3 project which are aimed at developing,disseminating and assessing several new J-DSP capabilities
programs in the US include a capstonesenior design experience, the level of training that the students receive in the product design anddevelopment process can vary considerably between programs. In some cases, students learn theproduct design process in parallel with their capstone senior design project. In others, there areone or more previous courses that focus on teaching different phases of the product design anddevelopment process. Also, there are other factors that impact student learning such as variationsin the design process favored by each faculty member supervising a capstone senior designproject, the specific design process presented and the terminology used in different productdesign textbooks, and the product design textbook
was shortened to a subset of the original; results are reported forboth surveys on the questions in the shortened version.The second survey read as follows: What are you doing to help your engineering students become leaders? The University of St. Thomas (UST) School of Engineering has been offering leadership courses for engineering graduate students for 10 years. These graduates say their experience in these courses have been eye-opening for them. Their learning has caused them to step up to a whole new role resulting in powerful impact in their organizations. Last year, we surveyed engineering deans on this subject. Thirty-seven schools responded, and the results of that survey are attached. We are asking your help to
needs very efficient automation, management andcontrol systems with real-time communication connections over long distances. In the same time,the unprecedented economy globalization has amplified the impacts of technology and sciencediscoveries on the modern societies in ways that have not been predicted. The connectivityprovided by the internet and communication technologies has generated new products, services,business market opportunities, making in the same time available workforce that is often well-educated and cheap. This is likely to have profound impacts on the wealth distribution indeveloped and developing countries, and changes into the socio-economic structure of countrieswhere the population general wellbeing has been taken for
characteristic is the variety of learning strategies employed, including • weekly quizzes on assigned reading, • interactive lectures provided to all students as a group, • weekly recitation sessions of no more than 20 students designed to engage students in interactive discussions of current energy news and how it impacts energy sustainability, • weekly essay assignments requiring students to summarize, analyze, and synthesize material they are initially provided, and later encouraged to find for themselves, and • student-centered semester-long projects with open-ended guidelines.The diverse instructional team includes two full professors in charge of the lectures, a third
cooperation at higher educationlevel between European, US and Canadian Higher Education Institutions, by fosteringinterinstitutional relations and sustainable international cooperation. It has contributed to thedevelopment of doctoral education first by promoting bilateral research work and doctoraltraining through candidates, post-docs and staff exchanges. Specifically the Consortium hasdeveloped specific areas for cooperation with incipient researchers networks on the next focaltopics selected from key priorities for EU, US and Canada (see below) through joint researchactivities and academic cooperation.First results: mobilitiesSimilar experiences in other parts of the world require only dissemination at students level forobtaining high impact
engaging students in the contentmore deeply (i.e., anything that was not a lecture or typical homework). Deliverablesfrom this phase of the project include both a collection of two-page memos describingclassroom innovations in the context of signals and systems, as well as characteristics offaculty development groups and the topics instructors found most important to discuss inmeetings with the group. Based on data collected in this phase, we providerecommendations about how to structure faculty groups to facilitate discussions aboutteaching.BackgroundThe project draws on what we know and understand about accomplishing teacherdevelopment at the K-12 level. School-based models that are grounded in teachers’needs, questions, and daily work have
studentssucceed both personally and academically. Students expressed strong satisfaction for the core activitiesorganized by Flit-Path. Core activities and regular interaction with mentors built a strong sense ofcommunity that positively impacted retention and graduation of students as the previously mentionedimpressive Flit-Path results have demonstrated. As a result, Flit-GAP relies and builds on the infrastructureand support services that benefitted Flit-Path students (e.g., orientation, socials, distinguished speakerseries, strong academic advising). However, Flit-GAP emphasizes research, internship andentrepreneurship experiences to a much greater extent than was experienced during Flit-Path. Flit-GAPcohort students engage in professional pathway
, ananalysis of time requirements and project deliverables was presented.Research shows that DEIJ are important aspects of engineering education that impact theexperiences and outcomes of students, faculty, and the engineering profession as a whole. Inaddition, project-based learning can provide numerous benefits for marginalized students inengineering education, including increased engagement, contextualized learning, collaborativeopportunities, authentic assessment, enhanced self-efficacy, and exposure to role models andmentors. Among our respondents, only 16% of the projects stated having DEIJ emphasis.Unfortunately, our survey did not collect any details on how those connections between DEIJand FY projects were made by the survey respondents. By
educate engineering and engineering technology faculty and graduate students that are effective, flexible, inclusive, and sustainable after funding ends. 2. Foster a virtual community of engineering and engineering technology education researchers through the use of Purdue HUBzero technology 3. Conduct evaluation on impact of these programs on individuals who participate and on the respondents’ students and institutions.This paper addresses the second goal of the RREE2: fostering a virtual community of engineeringand engineering technology education researchers. In particular, we will discuss the design anddevelopment of the Collaboratory for Engineering Education Research (CLEERhub.org) and mapthe design of this
"relational and ethical process of peopleworking together to accomplish positive change" (p.13). In a survey of CS faculty, Quinn [4]found most respondents teach ethics in various courses to comply with accreditationrequirements and suggested that most of the courses are likely discussion oriented. In contrast,the relational model of leadership highlights the relevance of engaging students in ethicalprocesses that support inclusive, justice-centered, and equity-oriented understanding of complexethical dilemmas. Thus, the course at this Hispanic-Serving Institution focused on thedevelopment of interpersonal skills and used an integrated active, cooperative learning as thepedagogical approach to support interpretation and inquiry. This allowed students
institute operates and seeks to achieve the vision and itsmission. 9The task of designing an institute’s vision, mission, and values is an all-important exercise forthese articulate the beliefs and aspirations of the institution. These statements should be short,crisp, and unambiguous. It is important that all the stakeholders—including the students, facultymembers and the employers, and not just the administrators—have a say in this. This promotesclearer communication and transparency and ownership. This however becomes a challenge inlarger universities with many colleges and departments. One way to keep the
that are previouslyunconnected, or by creating new ways for combining previously connected elements [10].Hence, intellectual capital is cultivated in the firm by combining knowledge in new waysfrom different stakeholders of varying expertise and experiences [11]. Seekers and sharers ofa knowledge platform exchange and recombine elements of knowledge with one another [5].The use of the functionalities of the corporate smartphone platform serves as the intermediaryfor enabling the creation, combination, and sharing of knowledge for the intellectual capitalof the firm. In this paper we view that the same can be applied for the intellectual capital ofengineering students in the classroom.Knowledge sharing can have a direct impact on knowledge
ABET Program Evaluators to the ASCE Regional Governors and the ASCE Committee on Education. Each constituent was assigned one of four possible priority ratings based on their level of involvement: o 1 = high priority and to engage as soon as possible and continuously in December, February, March, and April; o 1.5 = high priority for engagement but requires less frequent communication but targeted attention from January to June 2014; o 2 = medium priority for engagement in February and April; and o 3 = lower priority providing access to CEPC information through web page articles and, maybe, social media, but not directly.The plan targets communication
identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a
larger numbers of participants, collaboration amongmore diverse teams, computational topics, and utilization of previously collected data. Ashcroft et al. (2020)also discussed the larger community college impact of remote REUs before the full impact of COVID.Another virtual REU example (Cadena et al., 2020) included diverse applications and poster presentations.2.0 The Interdisciplinary Research Experience for UndergraduatesFor the past two summers (2018 and 2019), groups of students from a Historically Black College in theSoutheast participated in a problem-based learning journey in the context of studying about autonomousvehicles. One of the long-term goals of this project was to prepare students, who are underrepresentedminorities, for
success in this that students and faculty should discipline. perceive and engage with all aspects of the world around them. The skills that I 100% also plan on continuing to have learned from Value Creation develop their and their students’ workshops have made me a more entrepreneurial mindset after this engaging teacher, a better researcher workshop. and a more effective contributor to my local community.” STEM
of Black Engineers, theSociety for the Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science, theAmerican Chemical Society, the American Physical Society, and the National Conference onUndergraduate Research. E-blast communications were developed and distributed throughout theyear to give program information to student contacts made at conferences – these were lively,colorful, professional, and provided timely information.Program faculty engaged heavily with regard to recruitment, as they attended conferences andgave invited talks at other universities. Materials were developed including a Graduate ProgramsAdmissions Guide, a Graduate Student Handbook, Graduate and Career Fair exhibit materialssuch as banners, table throws, and
wherein students engaged in a group of three to four members in anill-structured design project. We address one research question in this study: (1) “In what waysdoes empathy manifest with/for team members in a junior-level biomedical engineering designcourse based on post-course interview reflections?” We hope that this investigation will facilitatefuture work that can help instructors promote empathy in teams, help researchers identify how to“see” empathy’s manifestation in teaming contexts through qualitative data, and to help theengineering education community better understand the design outcomes that empathic teamstend to produce.Literature ReviewIn this literature review section, we address the question, “What is empathy?” We approach
professor who truly loves what he does. Part of what makes Dr. Olsen such a successful teacher is his joy at working in tandem with the students. He has been involved in developing the curriculum for several classes in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department as well as continuing to modify the curriculum and teaching methods for currently established courses. Dr. Olsen is passionate about interdisciplinary education and actively collaborates with students and faculty in civil engineering, mechanical engineering, architecture, and landscape architecture. He has a breadth of understanding across multiple disciplines that allows his to engage with students on a large variety of topics.Todd Beyreuther
]. Additionally, KEEN states that curiosity is an important skillset forengineers to develop to be engaged in their course work and adapt to the changing world aroundthem [1]. In their study on integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning (EML) into first-yearengineering courses, KEEN colleagues found that integrating concepts of the entrepreneurialmindset, including curiosity, led to improvements in their students’ abilities to meet technicallearning objectives [8].Strategies to Support CuriosityThe following strategies are woven into the students’ coursework to support the growth anddevelopment of curiosity: • Active learning in the classroom stimulates curiosity by encouraging students to ask questions and explore ideas through mini design
Paper ID #24865Board 8: Aligning A.S. Manufacturing/Engineering Curriculum to IndustryNeedsDr. Marilyn Barger, National Science Foundation ATE Centers (FLATE) Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Founda- tion and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathways; has produced award winning curriculum design and
your class, and they'll, and they'll review it. And then they'll meet with the students in like these little focus groups, and get feedback, and then they'll meet with you. And they'll give you all this discussion, ideas and books to read or whatever.”Whether directly or indirectly, the university provided many options for the faculty involved inthe curriculum initiative to engage in both formal and informal learning experiences to preparethem for their upcoming courses. One issue that wasn’t highlighted here but needs to be exploredfurther is how accessible this information was, and if faculty knew of the opportunities that theyhad available to them. Lastly, all faculty had social capital of their colleagues and friends
member (second semester of design project); and 10) effectively communicate your design in both oral and written formats.* (a) ability to apply mathematics, science and engineering principles; (b) ability to design and conduct experiments,analyze and interpret data; (c) ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs; (d) ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams; (e) ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems; (f)understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) ability to communicate effectively; (h) the broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context; (i) recognitionof the need for and an ability to engage in life-long
of both open and closed loop experiments. Various approachesto experimental set-up may be pursued, and the student can see the impact of algorithmic andmanual tuning strategies for both SISO and MIMO modes of operation. The impact ofdecoupling is also readily visible, in addition to assessing the overall quality of the regulationprovided by the control scheme implemented. Within the context of this institution’s curriculum,the added experience of group-driven project work and both oral and written communication arealso important educational experiences.To assess the impact of the use of this and the other hands-on process control relatedexperiments, pre- and post-experience surveys were employed with two different groups ofstudents in
are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, especially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on the impact involvement in academic makerspaces has on students in engineering programs.Dr. Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University Dr. Kimberly G. Talley is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, Maker Space Co-Director and Senior Research Fellow for the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research at Texas State University, and a licensed Professional Engineer. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. from the University of Texas at Austin in Structural Engineering. Her undergraduate
learning has some obvious drawbacks. One advantage withdeductive learning is that there is no danger of confusing the student. However, it is not easy toengage students in discussion since you (as the instructor) are expected to provide the examplesafter you have discussed the principle, and this can make a mathematical subject appear dry.Also, unless the instructor goes back and provides some historical perspective, the student doesnot see how and why a given concept was invented or derived. Thus, it appears that in contrast,PBL makes for a more engaging style for communicating information, since students are likelyto be more attentive (Hmelo-Silver et al.5