patterns. Overall, such research suggests professional engineering practice, whileheterogeneous, involves interplays between the social and technical dimensions of complexproblems. For instance, a longitudinal study that involved over 300 interviews with practicingengineers, survey data from nearly 400 engineers, and multiple years of participant observationsof Australasian engineers found that, “…more experienced engineers…had mostly realized thatthe real intellectual challenges in engineering involve people and technical issuessimultaneously. Most had found working with these challenges far more satisfying thanremaining entirely in the technical domain of objects” [5]. Another study, an overview of mostlyU.S. workplace studies, focused primarily
knowledge areas and knowledge units that provide a foundation for cybersecurity education programs [5]. ThePedagogic Cybersecurity Framework extended the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model to include three additional layersto help explain the non-technical areas that influence security within an organization [6]. The National Security Agency andDepartment of Homeland Security sponsors the National Centers of Academic Excellence (CAE) program to certify colleges anduniversities that meets their requirement by aligning their curriculum to cybersecurity knowledge units that are validated bysubject matter experts [7].A study by IBM to understand cybersecurity academic programs around the world found that less than 60 percent of students
1.36 Engaging in real-world science research 5.21 6.00 1.05 Feeling like a scientist 5.14 6.00 1.10Ratings of specific REU experiences were obtained from participants through six items assessingparticipant ratings of the following areas: working relationship with research mentor, workingrelationship with research group members, amount of time spent doing meaningful research,amount of time spent with research mentor, advice given by research mentor regarding graduateschool and careers, and the research experience overall. The items demonstrated adequatereliability (α = .70) and were measured on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from ‘Poor’ to ‘Verygood
student is “now at the proficient stage of [their]reflective practice.” However, the syntax and content of the reflection is indeed deeper and morein line with what the program seeks to solicit, compared to the student’s first reflection for thesame class. The sentences are longer with a more varied structure and closer syntacticalconnection between them. The student also probes their own emotional state and deepermotivations: “when I can’t clearly draw a connection to real world application in a class, I tendto put in minimal effort to get by; it is easy for me to get in the mindset that the things I perceiveas less important are detracting time from the things I really want to learn. Sometimes, it takesthat extra push or outside perspective for
applied with real consequences, such as preferential treatment for those positivelyinfluenced, and psychological stress for those negatively influenced.25 These biases manifestthemselves in many ways, one of which are microaggressions: small slights, slurs or snubs thataccumulate over time to affect the way individuals experience their environment.26 Inengineering, for example, they can manifest through the questioning looks a black male receiveswhen he walks into an advanced mathematics course – looks that ask, without words, “Are yousure you’re in the right room?”27 Similarly, the surprised tone that accompanies a compliment ona white female student’s computer code implies “I didn’t think a woman could do that.”Given, then, that gender and race
this paper. This may be notably different fromthe typical undergraduate as described by Balakrishnan and Tarlochan 10 who share aboutengineering students’ attitudes towards ethics in the engineering curriculum. They found thatinterest in socio-ethical issues is typically low. However, at the University of Notre Dame, allundergraduate students take multiple philosophy and theology courses 11 . These required coursesengender social consciousness in our students. We find that engineering students frequently askthe question, “How can I engineer for good in the world?” this aligned with the university mottoof being a force for good in the world. Balakrishnan, Tochinai and Kanemitsu 12 compare theintegration of ethics in the engineering curriculum
ofexamples and assignments respectful of a diversity of student learning styles; makingconnections between technical and scientific problems and their social contexts; the use of thecurve (or alternative bases for grading); the weighting of lab work; the role of critical thinking;reduction of student's sense of anonymity; and the style of feedback in the classroom. Facultyalso affect the pedagogical techniques of graduate assistants, in labs, grading, and other activitiesthey may be assigned. It will be faculty, if anyone, who will reconfigure courses to improvelearning5, or reconfigure curriculum to make engineering more real and more engaging duringthe first semesters of coursework (when attrition rates are highest).Method I conducted semi
improved attitudes toward the subject, increased engagement, greater sense of ownershipin learning, and better academic performance [20], [51], [57], [63].Authentic formative assessmentsCentral to the philosophy of student-focused education are authentic and formative assessments[62], [64]–[66]. Authentic assessments are aimed at creating a testing environment which closelymodels real-world professional settings in which students are expected to be able to deliverfollowing graduation or the completion of the course [62], [64]. Formative assessments, on theother hand, are those geared toward supporting the learning process and the development ofstudents’ skills throughout the course [16], [65]. Authentic formative assessments are thereforedesigned
introduce scientific and engineering practice in K–12 science educationto help students “understand how scientific knowledge develops and [to give] them anappreciation of the wide range of approaches that are used to investigate, model, and explain theworld.” Central to this practice-and-process focus is encouraging students to share their ideas,and the reasoning behind them, and work together to build deeper understandings of scientificphenomenon and their applications. By eliciting students’ knowledge of science garnered fromexperiences both inside and outside the classroom, teachers can empower students to make senseof the world around them by refining the ideas they already possess through a dynamic processof argumentation, experimentation, and
and independent experiences in a meaningful environment; Experiences these facilitate autonomy, cultivate engagement-belonging, and foreground leadership importance Scaffolding providing—and gradually withdrawing—needed structures and guidance; provides support for developing more complex frameworks and behaviors Group peer group engagement during learning; clarifies and strengthens ideas Learning while promoting reflective reasoning Diverse engagement with those with differing backgrounds, experiences, or Perspectives perspectives; important to distinguishing one’s own way of being Technical Skills capabilities directly relating to the application of
traditional lecture/homework format. Thus there was arelatively low barrier to develop the online content and in-class materials. Finally, due to recentcampus-wide educational infrastructure investment, several high-quality open classrooms withthe right capacity (70~90 people) became available.If and how engineering courses should be flipped is an active area of research and debate [4].This paper does not comprise a rigorous study of the flipped classroom format. Rather, this paperis a field report by an educational practitioner on our department’s real-world experiences withflipped classroom instruction in chemical engineering. This paper describes what worked andwhat didn’t work in our particular implementation. It also highlights a feature of
colleagues who led successful international travel courses November December January • Scouting trip to visit IES Abroad London and engineering marvel sites February • Prepare and submit course proposal to relevant committees March April May • Correspond with IES Abroad to finalize international travel plans June 2016 July August September • Advertise and recruit students for travel abroad course October • Students complete travel abroad applications November • Notify students
doctoral degrees in Civil En- gineering from North Carolina State University in the USA. Her disciplinary research interests lie in the area of sustainability in asphalt pavements using material considerations, green technologies, and efficient pavement preservation techniques. Her doctoral work focused on improving the performance of recycled asphalt pavements using warm mix asphalt additives. As a postdoctoral scholar at North Carolina State University, she worked on several NCDOT sponsored research projects including developing specifica- tions for crack sealant application and performing field measurements of asphalt emulsion application in tack coats and chip seals. Her undergraduate teaching experience includes
expand the number of students who can benefit from conducting research as the designprojects are embedded directly into the curriculum and are taken by all students in the program.Undergraduate research has been shown to help students take ownership of their own learningand helps them to see the real-world relevance of research as they learn problem-solving skills[1 – 3]. Inquiry-based projects are beneficial because they require a significant investment ofstudent time and effort over an extended period with frequent constructive feedback from facultyand regular opportunities for reflection [4, 5]. This paper addresses the process of developmentof performance indicators and presents the results of assessment and evaluation of both ETACABET and
Paper ID #30807The Pitt STRIVE Program: Adopting Evidence-Based Principles ”TheMeyerhoff and PROMISE Way”Ms. Deanna Christine Easley Sinex, University of Pittsburgh Deanna C.E.Sinex is a Bioengineering Ph.D. candidate at the University of Pittsburgh. She earned her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Her research involves the development and application of engineering concepts and active learning techniques in clinical and institutional learning environments to help improve the literacy of fundamental, yet critical aspects of health.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of
targetresponse rates, in the range of 90% or 95%, and associating them with a bonus to the upcomingmidterm exams or the final student scores. In addition to achieving very high response rates, thisstrategy also instils a sense of responsibility to the students towards their peers and the class,because lack of responsiveness of few students could strip the bonus from the entire class.Examples of common student concerns that can be (or have been) identified by these surveysinclude the general structure of the course (particularly for courses including labs and othercomponents different from traditional instruction), the structure of the lectures (e.g., number ofin-class examples, pace of the material presentation, relation of theory to real world
for their advancement. Their experiences oftenresulted in feelings of resignation, leaving them to question if the promotion process was worth itat all. Additional exploration of the lack of clarity in the promotion to full process has shown thatwomen were more likely to be suggested to “withdraw” their application for promotion before itwent through the evaluation process, making it more likely for them to do so [54]. This wasparticularly salient for women that studied non-traditional research areas, such as those focusedon issues of women in STEM [54]. The evidence that research done in non-traditional areas andresearch performed by women tend to be discredited has kept growing [55]. While efforts havebeen done to close the achievement gap
programs, especially at the elementary and middle school levels, focus onsuch practical applications of STEM concepts to the world outside the classroom [3, 15]. Usinginquiry- and problem-based learning in a camp context allows students to realize the real-worldimplications of what they are learning and motivates students to learn the material more easily,encourages collaboration, and helps students develop higher-order cognitive skills, which are © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencenecessary for success in STEM fields [16]. Bond et al. [16] further found that female studentsand members of URM groups are more enthusiastic about problem-based
, Madison Mitchell J. Nathan is a professor of learning sciences in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Prof. Nathan received his Ph.D. in experimental (cognitive) psychol- ogy. He also holds a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering, mathematics and history. He has worked in research and development in artificial intelligence, computer vision and robotic mobility, including: design and development of autonomous robotic arms and vehicles; sensor fusion; the development of expert systems and knowledge engineering interview techniques; and the representation of perceptual and real-world knowledge to support inference-making in dynamic environments. Nathan also has worked
12.330.3the faculty advisor is to provide general technical advice, suggest analytical techniques,recommend reference materials, and critique technical work. The greatest challenge for thefaculty advisor is often to exercise restraint in providing help to the student team; the studentsmust be given the opportunity to make mistakes in order to have a real-world design experience.IntroductionProblem StatementBecause of the growing energy demands of our society and environmental impacts of energyconversion, efficiency is becoming increasingly important. Many of the systems and devicescurrently employed in the energy field generate extensive amounts of wasted energy. In manycases, much of this waste energy is lost to the surroundings as heat. One method
local areashaving groundwater levels below Elev. 5, and he proposed these were caused by leaky sewerswith relatively localized influence. Further concerns were expressed in a 1914 discussion to apaper by Worcester11.It was the finding of rotted wood piles beneath the Boston Public Library in 1929, and concernsfor the wood piles across the street at Trinity Church that set in motion the major 1930’s studyand the early public awareness of the tenuous relationship between groundwater and wood pilepreservation12. But the issue lost advocates and public awareness with the onset of World WarII, and the urban decline of the 1950s and 1960s. It was not until 1984 when rotted wood pileswere discovered beneath the 19 contiguous rowhouses on the waterside
experiencing the effects of what Cech terms the “culture of disengagementthat defines public welfare concerns as tangential to what it means to practice” [1]. Sheinsightfully proposes that this culture of disengagement is rooted in the “ideology ofdepoliticization, which frames any ‘non-technical’ concerns such as public welfare as irrelevantto ‘real’ engineering work; the technical/social dualism, which devalues ‘social’ competenciessuch as those related to public welfare; and the meritocratic ideology, which frames existingsocial structures as fair and just.” Elements of the culture of disengagement are present in each ofthe universities where we conducted the research. The social/technical dualism animates courseflows at each of the universities
, human factors/ergonomics, en- gineering psychology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, computer vision, biomimetics and biomechan- ics with applications to industrial manipulation and manufacturing, healthcare and rehabilitation, social services, unmanned autonomous vehicle (aerial and ground, indoor and outdoor) systems and STEM education.Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru, New York University Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru is the Assistant Director at the Center for K12 STEM Education, NYU Tandon School of Engineering. As the Center’s STEM Educator and Researcher she works with engineers and faculty to provide professional development to K12 science and math teachers. In addition, she conducts studies that looks at
is a PhD Candidate in History of Technology and Environment, studying how technologi- cal systems influence society’s view on environment. His research relates to how remote sensing satellites were developed in Sweden and Europe in late 20th century, how these were conceptualized and who had the power of defining the satellites’ application. Johan is also part of developing active student participation in Sweden, and have given several reports and keynotes on the topic. Page 26.1586.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Tools for Transformation – How
for the act ofunderstanding or decoding unfamiliar language and concepts as knowledge is passed from expertto novice. This analogy is less useful within this context as students are transferring alreadyfamiliar concepts between sites.Liyange et al build on both theories to propose a procedural model for knowledge transfer. Theirprocess involves four steps: 1. Knowledge awareness: identification of knowledge worth transferring; 2. Knowledge acquisition: acquiring this knowledge; 3. Knowledge transformation (which may involve translation): converting the knowledge to its new context; 4. Knowledge application: using this new knowledge. [13]While students in our classroom can be seen moving between all four steps of
) Teamwork, goal-setting, task management; risk analysis; uncertainty analysis (3d, new items)The abandonment of the outcome around knowledge of contemporary issues, paired with thedeletion of the word “realistic” as a modifier for the constraints under which engineers design, iscurious indeed. It is as if ABET wishes the profession to turn away from the here and now, fromthat which is, well, real. Surely one of those realities is the multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinarynature of engineered systems and engineering work today. To no longer require that engineershave the ability to bridge disciplinary divides does not bode well for our nation’s transportationsystems, energy systems, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals
Thinking has made an impactin the form of STEM Integration. “STEM Thinking can lead teachers to become STEMintegrators who can teach students how to apply STEM subject matter in a variety of “real-world” inquiry-based learning activities” (Reeve, 2015). Wang, Moore, Roehrig & Park (2011)explain it differently, “STEM integration is a curricular approach that combines the concepts ofSTEM in an interdisciplinary teaching approach.” The impact of this STEM Integrationmovement is somewhat controversial because there is no clear definition of the method.However, STEM educators agree that the goal of integration is to increase STEM literacy,develop 21st century competencies, perpetuate STEM workforce readiness, generate studentinterest and engagement
University. His interests include simulation methodology, reliability engineering, application of operations research to manufacturing processes, and production control. Since 1987, Dr. Houshyar has been actively involved with consultation to local, national, and interna- tional manufacturing corporations. A few examples are: Whirlpool Corp., Humphrey Products, Eaton Corp., Checker Motors Inc., Steelcase, Ford Vehicle Operations, Ford Powertrains, Ford Stamping, Ford Electronics, Ford Framing, Ford Assembly, Verson, Automatic Feed, Pratt & Whitney, Prince Corpora- tion, Herman Millers, and ABB Olofstrom. He has assisted corporations in the United States, Germany, Check Republic, Iran, Portugal, Canada, and Mexico
some of the participants. Ana described heramazement of the capabilities of the electrical components that she learned about in herelectronics class: “the transistors and just all the things you can make with these little transistors.Like it is so cool and there's so much possibilities and there's growth every year [in transistorcapabilities].” When an engineering topic sparks the women’s interest, learning about it in class is notenough for them. The participants sought out to gain more knowledge and to improve theirunderstanding of how engineering topics can be applied in real life. Ana stated, “when I'minterested, I go the extra step and I definitely always like to go above where they teach me. So, ifthey're going to teach me