ObispoDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical
Paper ID #32909Implementation of Sustainable Integrated Aquaculture, Aquaponic, andHydroponic Systems for Egypt’s Western Desert Through Global Commu-nityEngaged ResearchLamyaa El-Gabry, Princeton UniversityDr. Martina Sherin Jaskolski American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Implementation of sustainable integrated aquaculture, aquaponic and hydroponic systems for Egypt’s Western Desert through global community engaged researchAbstractThis paper presents an international student internship collaboration between Princeton Universityand the
Professor in 2013 and Full Professor in 2019 . Dr. Chrysochoou’s general research area is environmental geochemistry, with a focus on site remediation, characterization and reuse of industrial waste and construction materials. Dr. Chrysochoou’s serves as the Principal Investigator of the project ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Department program, this 5-year project aims at transforming educational practices and cultivate the potential of neurodivergent individuals to contribute to engineering breakthroughsDr. Arash E. Zaghi, University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is an Associate Professor in the
Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at
engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor in The Polytechnic School within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research interests include topics related to engineering stu- dent persistence, STEM graduate students (particularly women), online learning, educational data mining, and the modeling and analysis of manufacturing systems. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering and graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering, all from Arizona State University.Dr. Eunsil Lee, Florida International University Eunsil
and professional development along with academic development, theseparticular HIP became a focus of our study. Collaborative Assignments & Projects Writing- Common Intensive Intellectual Courses experiences Senior First Year Culminating
Annual Conference and Exposition, June 23, 2018 - December 27, 2018, 2018, vol. 2018-June.[32] D. W. Parent, “Novel gateway stay/add policy used to increase student success rates in an introductory circuits class,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2017, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190600.[33] R. M. Nelms, M. L. Langford, and R. F. Halpin, “Problem-solving videos as an instructional aid for engineering education,” in 31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005., 2005, p. 7 pp., doi: 10.1109/IECON.2005.1569234.[34] J. Delvicario, D. G. Lauria, P. Mellodge, and Y. Yu, “Promoting Critical Thinking Through Troubleshooting Exercises in Fundamental Electric
Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Nickolas A. DeCecco Professor in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Founding Director for the Engineer- ing Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering.Dr. Wendy Carter-Veale, University
District. She completed two master’s degrees, one in Education and the other in Business Administration, and she is currently pur- suing a doctorate degree in Organizational Leadership with a concentration in Education Administration. Naylor developed a passion for urban education as a teen student mentor over twenty years ago and enjoys integrating technology in the learning process. Currently, she serves on the BoD of Learn VR, a virtual reality organization that provides urban students learning experiences through the lens of virtual reality. Before becoming an Educator in the disciplines of business and technology, Naylor spent over ten years as a business leader in the telecommunications industry
in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior Research Scientists program funded by After School Matters of the city of Chicago, to promote STEM for high school students and 3) a collaboration with the Center for College Access and Success – Northeastern University to promote STEM learning in their Upward Bound Math & Science program, also oriented for high school students. More information regarding the mentioned programs can be find at www.scientistsfortomorrow.org American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building Capacity to Promote STEAM in Communities The impact of Professional Development for teachers, instructors, and
communicate messages from Changing the Conversation. [28] Manhattan Engineering Variation on EAN; Outreach can encourage None articulated. Survey of 89 Undergraduates could describe the Shabhazi, College Ambassadors collaboration between enrollment in undergraduates. lesson they had developed and could Lehnes, Jacobs & School of
PracticesInformal STEM EducationPromoting engineering and STEM through summer camps is a well-developed practice. Theliterature outlines several best approaches to effectively implement learning into camps. Workingwith hands-on activities increases interest in engineering while allowing students to practiceproblem solving and designing their own solutions to a problem [9 -11]. Such activities reinforceteamwork and communication skills as students collaborate in groups to develop solutions andexplain their ideas [11]. While using hands-on projects are common practice, they often lack amathematical component, which gives a less than accurate representation of college engineeringprograms [10]. The UACOE camps implements mathematical concepts within the
Paper ID #241792018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Black Engineering and Computing Doctoral Students’ Peer Interaction thatFoster Racial IsolationDr. Monica L. Ridgeway, Vanderbilt University Monica L. Ridgeway is a first year Post-Doctoral Research Fellow apart of the Academic Pathways Pro- gram at Vanderbilt University. She has joined the Explorations in Diversifying Engineering Faculty Ini- tiative (EDEFI) research team lead by Drs. Ebony McGee and William H. Robinson. Monica has recently received her Ph.D. in Science Education from the
raise university, industry or externalfunds to support them. We propose to develop a learning community among the regional campusEngineering bridge leaders and conduct a series of workshops on fund-raising and sustainabilitystrategies for the 3 regional campuses with new summer bridge programs for incomingunderrepresented Engineering students. The Broader Impact of increasing the retention of students in baccalaureate Engineeringmajors is derived from the urgent need to expand the pool of STEM graduates, especially raciallyunderrepresented students (African American, Hispanic, Native American). That need isdocumented in a series of monographs by major government and scientific councils. Penn Stateis comprised of the flagship University
the University of Alberta in engineering and is a registered professional engineer with APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta). Prior to her career at MacEwan, Shelley worked in industry as a research engineer and a consulting engineer for several years.Dr. Jeffrey A. Davis, Grant MacEwan University Dr Davis obtained his PhD at ETH Zurich specializing in multiphase flows and thermal hydraulics in nuclear reactors. With a passion for teaching, Dr. Davis’ research focuses on pedagogical topics such as student engagement, active learning, and cognitive development. Projects he is currently working on include ”Development of a risk assessment model for the retention of
users of libraryspaces and services. Additionally, many of these studies have focused on engineeringpractitioners working in industry, who may have little access to libraries. One would expect thatengineers in academia, i.e., faculty and graduate students, would be more conscious of the libraryand thus more likely to utilize it. Engel’s 2011 survey of the information-seeking behaviors offaculty at 20 public research universities included two questions on space use. The results weresimilar to studies of engineering practitioners, showing a preference for electronic resources andpersonal communication and little interest in visiting the library building. “Close to three-fourthsof respondents (73%) indicated that they had visited the physical
Epsilon.Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University RICHARD WHALEN, SUSAN FREEMAN, and BEVERLY JAEGER are members of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is to provide a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience in engineering that endorses the student-centered and professionally-oriented mission of Northeastern University. While they concentrate on developing first-year engineering courses and teach across all engineering disciplines, they also teach specialty courses in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at
AC 2009-1398: A TABLET-PC-BASED ELECTRONIC GRADING SYSTEM IN ALARGE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSERicky Castles, Virginia Tech RICKY T. CASTLES is a computer engineering PhD student in the Bradley Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech. He received a masters of science degree in computer engineering in 2006 and a masters of science degree in industrial and systems engineering (human factors option) in 2008. He is currently a co-coordinator for hands-on workshops in a first-year engineering course. His research interests include knowledge representation, physiological data monitoring, artificial intelligence, and expert systems.Eric Scott, Virginia Tech Eric Scott
are much smaller in terms of attendance, so you should havemany opportunities to interact with the attendees.It is never too early to start working on your teaching philosophy statement. A teachingphilosophy statement is a document describing the way you approach teaching and learning andhow you put your philosophy into practice. Some teaching philosophy statements also includeteaching interests (courses and topics you enjoy teaching) and examples of courses that you havetaught.Think about forming relationships with faculty members other than your advisor(s). Forinstance, these could be professors for which you were a teaching assistant, faculty whocollaborate with your advisor(s), or mentors working in industry. Ask if your school
Paper ID #19667Engaging Engineers in Inclusive Cultural Change Through a New Method,Articulating a Succinct DescriptionEmily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. She is involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of Engineering ranging from student support programs, faculty bias awareness trainings, and inclusive cultural change. She is a recent Industrial and Systems Engineering graduate from Ohio State University, where she was also very involved with
Educational Effectiveness. Dr. Pulford’s professional background in engineering includes a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering as well as industry experience as an aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering communication education, engineering student learning motivation, narrative structure in technical communication, and the improvisatory skills of educators. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Implementation of Peer Review to Enhance Written and Visual Communication Learning in
specific postgraduate education requirements for a given specialty area should be determined individually by the responsible academy, in close collaboration with the associated ASCE technical institute.Q: In the BCCEP process, how will a candidate’s mentored experience (ME) be assessed? How much additional experience (beyond the four years of progressive engineering experience required for the PE) will be needed for board certification?A: First, it is quite possible that the amount of focused specialty-area experience might vary from specialty to specialty (as is the case in the medical profession). Thus, we suggest that the experience requirements for a given specialty area should be determined individually by the responsible
: Barbara helps teams generate creative environments. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to expanding paths from creativity to innovation. She also helps individuals answer challenging questions when she teaches some of her methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Barbara sometimes uses her storytelling methods as a form, and storytelling as rapid prototyping to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to delivery. Barbara also uses story as a projective prompt in her experiments. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Challenge Me, Disagree with Me: Why
alack of understanding during classroom activities [11]. Other studies have suggested that there isno significant differences in the learning outcomes of students in traditional lecture coursesversus flipped courses and that those in less affluent areas may have difficulty with accessing thetechnology needed to complete the course [10].The studies identified above are relevant to engineering education and to specific engineeringdisciplines. As engineering education requires soft-skill development to meet industry needs, thequestion arises as to the effectiveness of the flipped classroom technique in engineeringleadership courses. However, the exploration of a flipped classroom strategy implemented in anengineering leadership course is not found
communities in which the projects take place. Research has shown that the integration ofservice learning can have unintended consequences for partnering communities [12–14]. Throughinterviews with community representatives, Blouin and Perry [15] identified that the combinationof poor student conduct, mismatched objectives, and inconsistent communication can lead toundesirable outcomes for community participants. Some researchers in this field have offeredsuggestions for improving both institutional and community outcomes that include closerpartnerships with community organizations even to the point of collaborative construction of thecurriculum which includes service learning and a strong institutional commitment to communityengagement and trust
was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Classroom Belonging and Student Performance in the Introductory Engineering ClassroomAbstractThis Complete Paper – Research describes a pilot study among post-secondary
country are implementing hands-on activities in the classroom becausethere is evidence that they improve long-term material retention and critical thinking skills[1][2]. A study at Oregon State University found that working in teams gives studentsopportunities to communicate with others, set group expectations, and practice conflict-resolution, all of which are skills that are highly desired in industry [3]. A major goal ofimplementing groupwork into the classroom is to prepare students for teamwork in theengineering workforce, yet students are not learning technical and non-technical skills equally inthese types of classroom settings. Many studies have shown that women frequently take onstereotypically feminine roles, such as being in charge of
is the architect of a unique 4-course mod- ule focused on creativity and problem solving leadership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. She is one of three instructors for Penn State’s Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Creativity, Innovation, and Change, and she is the founding director of the Problem Solving Research Group, whose 50+ collaborating members include faculty and students from several universities, as well as industrial representatives, military leaders, and corporate consultants.Mr. Xiaorui Zhu, Pennsylvania State University Xiaorui Zhu was born in China in, 1989. He has master degree of Applied Statistics in College of Ap- plied Science of Beijing University
, In-Class Learning Environment as a Teaching AssistantIntroductionActive learning techniques, when properly implemented, have been shown to improve learningcompared to traditional lecture. A review of active learning by Prince found broad support foractive, collaborative, cooperative, and problem-based learning.1 Specifically, a meta-analysisrevealed that small-group work, one form of active learning, promotes enhanced academicachievement, more favorable attitudes toward learning, and increased persistence in STEMfields.2 Despite the strong evidence, many college engineering courses uphold the status-quo,lecture-only format because changing the structure of a course takes considerable time, planning,and foresight
Paper ID #12769Making Value for Faculty: Learning Communities in Engineering FacultyDevelopmentDr. Stephanie Pulford, University of Washington Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) Dr. Stephanie Pulford is an instructional consultant within University of Washington’s Center for Engi- neering Teaching & Learning, where she coordinates the Engineering Writing & Communication Devel- opment Program. Dr. Pulford’s professional background in engineering includes a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering as well as industry experience as an