the last day of class show a trend towards increasedstudent understanding of fuel cell science as well as the political, economic, social andenvironmental impacts of fuel cell technology. Hands-on experience during laboratoryexperiments as well as the fuel cell system design project helped promote T-shaped professionaldevelopment of the students.Introduction Technology innovation moves at an exponential rate making it extremely difficult forengineering curriculum to educate students on all current developments. All over the nationinstructors are given a limited set of time to cover a wide variety of topics while ensuring thenext generation of professional engineers1-3. This constraint forces instructors to teach adiscipline based
enrichment programs[1]. Universities also turned to Discord to help engage their students and enhance the onlinelearning environment they provided [2, 3, 4, 5]. As Discord becomes more prominent in students’ day-to-day lives, we should aim toidentify how Discord communities are impacting student success. We have scraped 4 semestersworth of conversational data from a college computer science Discord server to help identifyDiscord impacts on student success. In this work in progress paper, we propose an exploratorystudy to identify how an unofficial departmental computer science Discord server is impactingstudents’ education, relationships, job prospects, and more. We welcome any comments andfeedback from the community before we begin our
describes the research project students were assigned and evaluates its effectiveness inengaging students in a discussion of ethical dilemmas.The Assignment: Researching Corporate Responses to Crisis Engineering Communication or ME 333T is a required junior-level course in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering. Typically, in semesters past, students have worked onresearch projects involving a topic in engineering. The course has sought to engage students insome reflection on the ethical dimensions and social impact of engineering design, but much ofthe research and writing has been focused more on reporting data rather than evaluating it. Thenew assignment was first used in the summer of 2004 with the goal of integrating a discussion
and physics. All students takethe 3 classes and they are not divided into groups to account for initial knowledge level. Rather,the 3 instructors work together to create a unified science experience revolving around acommon topic, for example: energy, to be studied from their respective points of view. Pre-assessment and post-assessment is carried out to evaluate conceptual understanding.The communication and study skills class has an emphasis on career and academic majoradvising. Pre-assessment and post-assessment are carried out by means of essays intended tomeasure writing and composition skills. During the eight weeks, students engage in independentprojects such as developing their academic plans for declared and alternative majors
previous experiences andimproving future experiences.Activities grounded in reflective practice allow students to actively engage in identifying anddeveloping the goals that they would like to achieve during their first placements. Utilizingreflective practice as part of their early workplace learning experiences can facilitate studentsin developing professionalism and their professional identity [1]. Integrating reflectivepractice and goal development, as it relates to professional practice can help to preparegraduates to effectively enter their community of practice, where engineering is a rapidlychanging form of work [3].To help minimize the gap between university and work, with respect to engineering practice[4], we focus on integrating
of the engineering program anddesign course have a strong impact on mentoring relationships and communities of learning,professional identity for students, how much critical reflection is valued or practiced, and alsowhether affective awareness or professional integrity are addressed adequately (or at all). Inaddition, it is unclear how and to what extent engagement in disciplinary mentoring andcommunities of learning during the capstone year plays a role in professional confidence orintegrity.Based on this review, we have structured our capstone course to incorporate all of theseinfluencers. (The learning interventions we have applied will be discussed in a future article, asthis report’s focus is the review). We have also created a survey
benefits. Additionally, a bioswale was proposed for a parking lot to mitigate runoffdischarge into the creek, safeguarding local water quality. These LID not only offer practicalbenefits for the campus but also provide students with invaluable experiential learning throughresearch and project involvement.Both of these projects demonstrate the potential of the living engineering laboratory to blendeducation, research, and community engagement, creating impactful learning opportunities whileaddressing real-world challenges.Figure 3: Pictures showing urban runoff issues along with proposed solution in the campus area 2) Lab-scale modelsAnother key aspect of the living laboratory is building lab-scale models to demonstrate variousengineering
further their understanding of the lesson content,the knowledge checks were also a mechanism used to prepare the students for summative assessment. Teaching strategies aligned with the ACSE model were employed by the UACI STEM Campinstructors to engage students. Strategies included the use of culturally relevant imagery and media, calland response, African griot teaching style, communal and cooperative learning. The UACI STEM Campparticipants who engaged in the summer of 2023 and summer of 2024 completed pre- and post-programsurveys to assess how the camp’s strategies impacted the participants’ familiarity of contributions toENHANCING LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN STEM LEARNERS 4STEM made by people of African descent, their
inproximity and relationship. The paper will seek to answer one main guiding research questionand two sub-questions: 1. Does the proximity and relationship with the community partner affect the manifestation of empathy in students on service-learning design projects? a. How is empathy manifesting on service-learning projects? b. What factors contribute to the manifestation of empathy in students working on service-learning design projects?ContextThe EPICS program engages students in long-term partnerships with local, regional and globalcommunity partners [6]. Undergraduate students from all engineering disciplines and othermajors across the university earn academic credit within their respective plans of study
. Engineering ethics educationoften focuses on individual and social responsibilities and overlooks the role of engineers indomestic and international humanitarian activities11.Curricular programs and extra-curricular student clubs that engage students in developingappropriate technology solutions for developing communities around the world are on the rise.The HESE Program at Penn State, Humanitarian Engineering Leadership Projects program atDartmouth, the D-Lab at MIT, the Humanitarian Engineering program at the Colorado School ofMines, Global Resolve at Arizona State, and the Mortenson Center in Engineering forDeveloping Communities at the University of Colorado at Boulder are specific examples ofcurricular initiatives. Humanitarian engineering is
its impacts on society, community engagement and experiential learning, and universal design. • Elements of professional formation such as ethical and social critical thinking, mentorship, teamwork and conflict resolution, sustainable design, injustice and inequity in access to energy, professional continual learning and professional identity, community- engaged learning, and social responsibility.This paper provides an overview of the modules, assessment results from the pilotimplementation, and our observations throughout the process. A combination of direct andindirect assessments is used to evaluate both student learning outcomes and students’ sentimentsregarding the holistic educational experience.BackgroundAs
activities (see http://cspogil.org),focusing on data structures and algorithms and software engineering but including other CStopics. In total, there are now over 200 POGIL activities for CS. CS-POGIL has fostered agrowing POGIL community within CS, through conference sessions and workshops (20);support for 3-day workshops (25 faculty, including 4 at community colleges) and facilitatortraining (5 faculty); and a 60-member Google Group. Thus, CS-POGIL leveraged and extendedthe successful POGIL approach to a new area (CS), and explored tools and approaches that mayinterest the broader POGIL community.The CS POGIL Google Group was surveyed on their use of POGIL. Of respondents who hadtried POGIL, 92% believe it increases student engagement, and 84
virtually, mentioning factors such as the language barrier, and lack of engagement in the breakout discussions by some students. 2. Similarities and differences between countries: Students commented on drinking water issues existing in both countries, even if the factors contributing to them and the solutions might be different. They also observed that people in both countries have similar goals and are working towards solutions, e.g., one student commented that “My main takeaway from this experience was that we have a lot in common with our global peers, because we are all students with the goal of learning more and making an impact using our education.” 3. Interaction between different cultures
flipped instruction and active student learning. It isintended to achieve the following specific learning objectives: Develop an understanding of flipped instruction for to enhance student learning outcomes. Understand the TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) Model relating technology, content and pedagogy in the context of use of educational technology to support teaching and learning. Become familiar with the use of freely available web tools and resources to flip instruction and engage students through 'Active Learning'. Understand approaches to investigate impact of flipped instruction on student learning outcomes and self-efficacy through data collection and analysis.5. Target Audience:This
), Material Properties andProcesses (two modules), and Computer-Aided Design (1 module). These modules aim toaddress common pedagogical challenges by providing students with interactive and engaginglearning experiences that complement traditional instruction.This paper evaluates the impact of these VR modules on student learning outcomes, engagement,and satisfaction. The findings contribute to the growing body of research advocating for VR asessential tools for modern education, while also addressing gaps in knowledge about theirapplication.The research presented in this paper is guided by three primary questions: • How does the integration of VR technologies affect student engagement and comprehension in Engineering courses? • What are
-19, 2023.[17] M. D. Johnson, S. T. Margell, K. Goldenberg, R. Palomera, and A. E. Sprowles, “Impact of a First-Year Place-Based Learning Community on STEM Students’ Academic Achievement in their Second, Third and Fourth Years,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 48, pp. 169-195, 2023, doi:10.1007/s10755-022-09616-7.[18] L. Olsen, and P. D. Washabaugh, “Initial Impact of a First-Year Design-Build-Test-Compete Course” Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Vancouver, BC, March 11, 2011, Paper 10.18260/1-2—18175[19] A. Kolmos, J. E. Holgaard, and N. R. Clausen, “Progression of student self-assessed learning outcomes in systemic PBL”, Euro. J. of Eng. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 67-89, 2021, doi:10.1080
andAssessments,” which requires students to graduate with both teamwork and communicationskills.3At our university, implementation of these writing techniques is a multi-layered processinvolving a campus-wide communication initiative, a certification process for communicationintensive courses, and an engineering-specific communication studio. As these new techniquesare integrated into the engineering curriculum, we are concurrently developing an assessmentprogram to critically review the impacts on the curriculum and the increase in writing skillsgained by the students. This assessment utilizes an outside advisory body, digital portfolios, andstudent feedback via questionnaires.The Campus-Wide Communication Program. Writing across the curriculum has
. Which isreally hard at a large decentralized campus.”This brings us to a final yet important contextual factor that concerns how transdisciplinarylearning was defined by faculty and staff involved in the planning and implementation of thisacademic plan. The primary way in which this definition was communicated was through aseries of key curricular objectives, which we summarize below: • The core principles of the academic plan were to prepare students to: o work in collaborative, interdisciplinary teams on complex problems; o develop technological innovations that account for and have a social impact; o earn an integrated degree that combines requirements from whatever degree program they are
advancedplacement junior and senior students in high school. Research projects are alsodesigned, which may be suitable for junior and senior college students and graduatestudents.The curricula will engage students in questions of compelling societal importance – fromengineering and scientific viewpoints – through case studies ranging across manyissues, such as managing pollution caused by nuclear weapons and power production,and increasing efficiency of draft animal energy in rural areas of South Asia to improveproduction and reduce environmental impact. Such case studies will give students apractical basis from which to newly appreciate their studies.Through this unique curriculum project, IEER aims to enable students to use engineeringand scientific
one of finding pedagogical techniques that actuallymake a formational impact on students and concrete engagement with which are clearlyassessable.This paper describes a course recently taught at a liberal arts institution (primarilyundergraduate) in the great lakes region: a senior-level advanced laboratory class, experimentalphysics. I taught the course as structured around a mock scientific journal, which the studentsnamed Physics in Progress [1]. Students created writing artifacts in a journal format (severalrapid communications and an original article), they gave peer-reviews, and had editorial controlover which articles were posted publicly at the end of the course. My initial reasoning forstructuring the course in this way was simply
development, including their ability to engage in critical thinking,understand the dimensions of complex and open-ended technical issues, and recognize otheraspects of higher-level problem solving. This initiative, coordinated by the Leonhard Center forEnhancement of Engineering Education and Engineering Instructional Services, has beenreported at previous ASEE conferences. 2 A new, similarly structured study, will probe students’progressive development of engineering expertise.The results reported here are focused mainly on the influence that exposure to the engineeringworkplace has on students’ and graduates perceptions of their education, and specifically on thewell-known Criterion 2 program outcomes, a-k. Although not reported in this paper, it
capitalism, colonialism, andglobalization, and with the implications of engaging in development work from places ofprivilege.Case studies in appropriate technology highlight the importance of communication, levelingpower relationships, anticipating the social impacts of technology, and meaningful involvementof end users in technology development. Cases address topics including water quantity andquality, food production and preparation, and energy. Through class discussion and shortassignments students analyze the role of technological, economic, cultural, and governmentalfactors in helping or hindering the success of development projects. Two design projects weredeveloped that allow multidisciplinary teams to construct prototypes (of a slow-sand
increased ABET outcomeachievement of programs as well as promotion of qualities associated with becoming asuccessful student and potential entrepreneur. Vaz and Quinn [14] even show that project-basedand experiential, place-based, and community engaged learning is particularly impactful, andNguyes et al. highlight the benefits specifically with minority students [15].In this work, we present a case-study of a project-based application in a core engineering class inthe second (sophomore) year, with heavy ties in EDI and EML. Students research the FederalHighway Act of 1956 and its effects on URM communities. They design and build a prototypesteel truss to reconnect the communities severed by the discriminatory construction of highwaysthrough their
responding to a few questionsassociated with the lesson. If the student gives an incorrect answer, then a review of that aspect isprovided, and a second chance is given. If the student still missed the correct response, then theright answer to the question is given with explanation.Assessment Instruments: The impact of the VR lessons was assessed through a surveyadministered at the end of the fall semester. The survey measured the usability, the engagement,effectiveness of the VR lessons, and perceived impact on outcomes associated with the VRlessons. The items on the survey (Appendix A) were extracted from a validated instrument [13]with reliabilities exceeding 0.7. The instrument consisted of 3-items for the Usability dimension,3-items for the
using a wireless data collection has been expanded to includewireless MICA2 motes (by Crossbow Inc.) with several different sensor boards, which allowinclusion of GPS coordinates to the data on gas concentrations, pressure, and temperaturecollected in different locations.To assess the effectiveness of this instructional approach we developed survey instruments. Theresults of quantitative and qualitative analysis of the impact of students work on the project ontheir understanding of the relevant science concepts will be presented. Our previous researchresults on the effect of using wireless sensor communication project on student’s engagement inthe learning process will be correlated with the results of the analysis of the conceptual
years • Evaluate program impact on college and career choices • Evaluate understanding of STEM concepts and content • Track student participation in other STEM activities 13 NMSINational Math and Science Initiative
Education: Innovations and Research 18.3 (2017).[10] Fowler, Allan, and Ian Schreiber. "Engaging under-represented minorities in STEM through game jams." Proceedings of the second international conference on game jams, hackathons, and game creation events. 2017.[11] Ihrig, Lori M., et al. “STEM Excellence and Leadership Program: Increasing the Level of STEM Challenge and Engagement for High-Achieving Students in Economically Disadvantaged Rural Communities.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 41, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 24–42, doi:10.1177/0162353217745158.[12] Lane, Tonisha. (2016). Beyond Academic and Social Integration: Understanding the Impact of a STEM Enrichment Program on the Retention and Degree Attainment of
assessed and necessary criticisms are given. Moreover, they mustparticipate in communication workshop every semester. Commonly, the program focuses onpresentation skills in fall and writing skills in spring.Outcome H: the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions inglobal, economic, environmental and societal contextOne of the design components is contextualization in which students are asked to investigate thesignificance their design may have on the environment, health and safety concerns, economics,ethics, etc. They must submit contextualization document at the end of semester.Outcome I: recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning
particular focus and emphases on engineers’ impact and value in our society [5].This work’s framework of EM comes from the ongoing work of the Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN). This network is a coalition of 61 universities that is working tobetter grow and develop an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) in engineering students to preparethem to address societal needs and global challenges. Through Entrepreneurial Minded Learning(EML) and the 3C framework (Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value) [5], engineeringprograms within the KEEN network and faculty engaging with the network through their manyfaculty professional development programs [6] are working to equip students withentrepreneurial mindsets to accompany their “standard
limited success primarily because of lack of coordination/interaction between the two teams.The second iteration of the project work with the University of Dayton was initiated with a face-to-face meeting over a weekend in a central location, Seven Springs Resort, near Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania. The students were engaged in various social activities as well as team buildingexercises. This face-to-face interaction proved invaluable in helping the students to bond andresulted in a more successful collaboration between the students on their design project. Thistype of face-to-face meeting has been incorporated in subsequent project work with theUniversity of Dayton and has continued to foster closer collaboration of the students at thedifferent