learn,develop, and reflect through active participation and thoughtfully organized communityinvolvement. It enhances the academic experience of students by relating academic content andcourse objectives to issues in the community.Community engagement through service learning has become a well-established educationapproach in liberal arts and science education. While engineering education seems like a naturalfit, community engagement through service learning with very few exceptions is not integratedwithin the engineering curriculum. To provide hands-on educational experience, traditionally,engineering schools have developed partnership with industry through various programs such asinternships, co-operative education and sponsored research
experiences of theDivision of Technology, Culture, and Communication at the University of Virginia. I The new criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States, announcedas "Engineering Criteria 2000" by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,demand that graduates have a wide range of abilities and understandings, about half of which arebased on knowledge transmitted by the humanities and social sciences; among these are "anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility," "an ability to communicateeffectively," "the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions ina global and societal context," and "a knowledge of
experiences of theDivision of Technology, Culture, and Communication at the University of Virginia. I The new criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States, announcedas "Engineering Criteria 2000" by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,demand that graduates have a wide range of abilities and understandings, about half of which arebased on knowledge transmitted by the humanities and social sciences; among these are "anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility," "an ability to communicateeffectively," "the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions ina global and societal context," and "a knowledge of
collaborative mechanisms to be used for establishing anykind of initial connection for establishing collaborations.Once the collaboration is established then the next step is maintaining this collaboration. One ofthe important factor that can help in maintaining strong relationships among collaborating Page 19.21.2institutions is to always stay in touch and keep regular communication channels open. Authors1 report importance of feedback and sharing of ideas. Any such feedback will have no impact ifcollaborating institutions are not listening to each other. International collaborations may includeaccepting various and at times opposing ideas that
forstudents from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds to STEM curriculums in K-12 schools, out-of-school STEM programs are an important pathway for increased studentengagement [4]. By engaging students in out-of-school engineering experiences, the engineeringeducation community hopes to increase students’ interests in pursuing careers in engineering byarousing excitement through their engagement with engineering activities [5-9]. Researchsuggest that two primary factors for diverse students limited engagement with engineering as afuture profession is their narrow conception of engineering careers and their decreasing interestsin core subjects like math and science as they progress through middle school [5-6]. Forexample, students
engineering education, students might face uncertainty when theydesign due to lack of relevant scientific and mathematical knowledge, or unfamiliarity withtechnological tools such as CAD [8]. Due to the degree of uncertainty associated withengineering design, the ability to handle uncertainty is one of the main characteristics ofengineering design thinking [4]. Therefore, it is important for students to learn how to manageuncertainty as part of engineering and scientific practices. In fact, scholars in the field have urgedfor uncertainty to be included as a central part of engineering education [11]. “Managing uncertainty refers to behaviors an individual engages in to enable action inthe face of uncertainty” [8, pp. 494]. Typically, students
leadersfrom DukeEngage (https://dukeengage.duke.edu/), a program that gives undergraduate students atDuke University an opportunity to engage in service learning with communities in the U.S. and abroadthrough an immersive, 8-week experience. We sought to identify DukeEngage experiences that:1) focused on education, literacy, community development, or outreach, 2) worked with schools andcommunities that experienced challenges related to the SDGs, and 3) were interested in incorporat-ing hands-on STEM curricula into school programs. Through DukeEngage, we identified communitypartners in both Kenya and India. The subsequent expansion of the program into Guatemala wasdriven by a student-led group called Desarrolla, a club that aims to connect the Duke
projects that allowed them to sharedetails from their major disciplines. For example, electrical engineering students included detailson power conversion and civil engineering students on water management issues. Other studentschose projects based on their personal interests, such as musical instruments, sports and hunting. Page 23.887.6Table 3. Materials and the Environment (MATL 2220) Course ObjectivesProvide information on the environmental impact of materials throughout their life cycle. By theend of the course, the students should be able to: ● Compare the environmental impact of products
: Provide students with hands-on experience in renewable energy engineering concepts, including energy generation, storage, and distribution. ● Enhance Problem-Solving and Teamwork Skills: Engage students in a collaborative project of building sustainable connected communities simulating real-world challenges. ● Foster Industry Connections: Introduce students to career pathways and opportunities through direct interactions with industry professionals and leaderships. ● Promote Renewable Energy Education among Underrepresented Minority (URM) groups: The camp hosted a diverse group of high school students from six school districts in the Greater Washington region.Program StructureThe camp structure revolved around
that were made to content delivery and lab activities within theGD&T course, discuss changes in how assignments were evaluated, compare studentperformance on course outcomes with previous semesters, describe student engagement duringthe semester, and discuss instructional strategies that had positive impacts on student learning.IntroductionThe Department of Technology at Illinois State University, a public R2 research university in theMidwest, began offering a stand-alone course on geometric dimensioning and tolerancing in thefall of 2016. TEC333 has been offered each fall semester since that time. The course provides anoverview of basic GD&T terminology, opportunities for students to apply GD&T in a designsetting for modestly
research questions for the entire intervention: • In what ways does the intervention impact the cognitive (e.g., knowledge and skills) and noncognitive factors (e.g., social and emotional behaviors) of JROTC cadets and how equi- table is the distribution among various subgroups of students? • In what ways does the intervention impact the school curriculum program in CS/Cyber (e.g., offering more CS/Cyber courses, increased awareness of inequities in these courses, addi- tional professional development experiences for teachers, additional students at the schools engaged in CS/Cyber)?Although the first question focuses on the impacts on students and can be informative about whatneeds to happen within the capacity
, academic engineering curricula tends to focus on developing thetechnical skills of the students, overlooking the soft skills or 21st century skills that are just asimportant. The 21st century skills include critical thinking, communication, teamworkcollaboration, metacognitive awareness, and creativity. Developing such skills will enable futureengineers to effectively engage in interdisciplinary endeavors and adapt to changes in nationalpolicies and emergent technologies. This paper presents a project that integrates 21st century skilldevelopment (i.e., metacognitive awareness, constructive thinking, and communication) into amanufacturing systems course. In this course, students learn about manufacturing systemsthrough a series of teamwork-based
setting equitable learning opportunities forcan rely on various forms of communication, students of all kinds.such as facial expressions and tone of voice,which helps guide facilitation of student Why OBS Studio?learning. However, establishing a strongteaching presence for blended and remote Teaching remotely since spring of 2020, I,learning environments differs markedly and several other faculty members in thefrom doing so in a face-to-face classroom. ECE department were concerned about lack of student engagement and participationduring an online class. Students were not difference sources, which builds a live videopaying attention and/or
State University (MSU) is a land grant institution with an enrollment of ~17k.MSU is unique in that it has an R1 Carnegie ranking (“very high research activity”) and also isclassified as having “significant commitment to community engagement” and “very highundergraduate enrollment”. The Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering (NACOE) at MSUhas ~4k enrolled students, which is ~24% of the total enrollment at MSU. In terms of technicalcommunication, engineering students, with the exception of Civil Engineering and ComputerScience majors, are not required to take a writing or technical writing course if they score abovea 28 on the ACT or have above a 3.9 high school GPA. The primary places where technicalwriting and presentation assignments occur
context of academic material that distinguishes service-learning from community service or volunteerism and that facilitates the integration of servicewith learning. Service-learning students do not receive credit for service itself but rather fordemonstrating learning attained through the process of reflection on service. The learningobjectives of service-learning include not only a deeper understanding of academic content butalso personal growth and civic engagement. Reflection—individual and/or collaborative, writtenand/or oral—is carefully designed to help the students analyze their experiences in thecommunity from academic, personal, and civic perspectives. Reflection supports students inconsidering the similarities and differences between
) introduce young students to a range ofengineering careers. Co-designed with science education faculty, the E2 curriculum aims toprovide fun and engaging content with easy integration into formal and informal science learning(Colston, Thomas, Ley, Ivey, & Utley, 2017). An activity guide for facilitators assists in theintegration of the video lessons (exploration and explanation with the engineer) with hands-onclassroom activities and follow-up challenge activities (engagement and elaboration with ateacher or facilitator). The instructional videos, materials list, and activity guide can be found at:http://www.engineeringiseverywhere.com/. E2 video lessons and hands-on activities aim to increase interest and excitement aboutengineering
, semiconductor technology has improved at anexponential rate following the self-fulfilling prophecy of Moore’s Law. Improvements insemiconductor technology have in turn enabled remarkable improvements in communication andinformation technology, leading to major changes in the way people communicate, compute,acquire and use information, and seek entertainment.This paper describes a First-Year Seminar taught in 2017 and 2019 in which students from arange of different majors explore the history and societal impact of semiconductor and relatedtechnologies throughout the semiconductor era. The goals of the seminar are to provide studentswith a qualitative understanding of how semiconductors are designed and manufactured, anappreciation for how the technology
reactive measure Assistant Dean of Graduate Affairs – new position Key actions taken: » Created the graduate student advisory group » Developed a new annual advising assessment tool » Assistant dean has become a key contact point for graduate students » Ensured a Grievance Advisor has been identified and a grievance policy is made clear in all graduate student handbooks » Increased and improved communications with the graduate students Health Services Housed a mental health professional from University Health Services on the engineering campus part-time and distributed a list of available mental health
improving it. The general approach of this project is to develop research-‐based curricular materials for use in mechanics of materials courses. A cohort of approximately 20 university and community college instructors will then implement, assess and improve the developed materials. Ongoing research on student understanding of fundamental concepts in mechanics of materials will help support the development of those materials. The graduate students and PI’s conducting this research at Washington State University will also provide support and resources to assist the project team as they implement and assess the newly developed materials. This small
development of disciplinary communities of practice and associated student achievement. He was a coauthor for the best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and this year has received the Michael Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award from the Materials Division of ASEE.Prof. James A. Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology at Arizona State Univer- sity. For the last three years he also held the Elmhurst Energy Chair in STEM education at the University of Birmingham in the UK. Previously, Dr. Middleton was Associate Dean for
"demonstrates the hands-on learning and understanding of real-world challenges that the projectprovided. The word cloud visually reinforces the impact of the project in preparing students forindustry-relevant problem-solving and decision-making skills. Figure 5. Word cloud representation of student responses to question 4 5. DiscussionThe results of this study highlight the effectiveness of integrating experiential learning intoconstruction management education, particularly through a hands-on Design-Build project.Similar studies have demonstrated that project-based learning enhances student engagement andhigher-order thinking skills by bridging theory with real-world applications (Bosman et al., 2018;Shekhar et al., 2018). While past
-person meetings over the course of the semester focusing on diversityand inclusion, student motivation and engagement, and mentoring strategies [4]. Phillips et al[7] created one of the most comprehensive TA training modes for their first-year engineeringUGTAs consisting of five parts; orientation, informal peer mentoring, grading training, labtraining, and content training. In this program, heavy emphasis is made on content training byattending weekly lab training, as well as assignment training. This preparation enforces themastery of the content delivery, but is focused on only one course in the first-year engineeringcurriculum so is not scalable to offering UGTAs in multiple course programs. Portions of all ofthese models have been
Master’s in Education from Trevecca Nazarene Uni- versity focusing on Mathematics and Physics (2015) and a Bachelor’s in Global Security and Intelligence from Embry Riddle Aeronautical University (2009) ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Iterative Research Kit Exchange Program for Remote High School Science (Evaluation) Managing a Montessori-inspired Collaborative Off-campus Secondary ProgramAbstractStudent engagement in science curriculumis dependent on hands-on live labs,rigorous collaboration and studentownership of learning goals. However,remote labs are often over-scripted,restrict student choice, and do not
knowledge, initiative, customer focus, andprofessional impact. This paper discusses the collaboration that took place to create the course,the infrastructure developed to deliver the course, student participation and learning, and anassessment of the student experience.IntroductionStudents in the 21st century come to the university expecting to receive a learning experience inwhich they are challenged to grow as individuals. A common criticism, however, is that once atthe university, their teachers rely too heavily on lectures and workbook exercises, spoon-feedingthem information in a pipeline model of communication which places the teacher in the role of“expert” and student in the role of “passive receiver” of knowledge. In such a situation
the product as it might appear in a newspaper publication. b. Prepare a preliminary written, oral, and visual display. 5. Media release and the product pitch – This assignment requires students to: a. Finalize a media release for the product as it might appear in a newspaper publication. This communication should be crafted in a way that connects stakeholders to the usefulness of the product and its financial, cultural, social, and environmental impact on the world. b. Finalize written, oral, and visual display (poster and video) of the product for a broad audience.To gain a better understanding of themselves, their team, and their project, students will engage
CourseABSTRACT In this paper, the research team will discuss the lessons learned from the design of a newIntroduction to Engineering course at two California institutions: a community college, and auniversity. The design of the course focused on engaging students with innovative technologyand empowering students to develop technology-based engineering solutions for their semesterproject. The goal of this paper is for the authors to share their experiences in 1) designingVR-infused activities and design challenges for their courses, 2) developing two VR-readyclassrooms, and 3) implementing virtual reality (VR) in their classroom environments. Thedesign of the class was focused on the adoption of group-based problem-solving, educationalgames, and
of practicetheirs [26].” Thus, engaging in the practices of a community causes one to identify as a memberof the community. Solving a real-world engineering problem over several semesters mayincrease a student’s self-identification as an engineer [25].The ProjectIn developing the curriculum for a new BS Engineering Science program at LUC, the first authorembedded multi-semester projects called curricular contextual threads. For the patientmonitoring contextual thread, each student builds a functional cardiograph over four semesters.The projects parts are embedded in ENGR 101 Introduction to Engineering Design (4 cr hr),ENGR 201 Experimental Engineering (3 cr hr), ENGR 324L Engineering Core Lab (1 cr hr), andENGR 3x1L Specialty Lab (1 cr hr
. Sometimes though, the project-basedlearning (PBL) driven by my student questioning leant itself to students creatingsolutions to problems they saw within our community. An example of this is creating abutterfly garden based on their studies of Chicago’s ecosystem. Or creating a mentoringphysics Olympics to support the middle school, science students. In general, these project-based assessments transformed lab experiences intoelevating tools that can impact their communities, in which every student can findmultiple unique avenues to success and can elevate practice to be culturally sustaining[5]. As students encounter safety within their standing homogeneous lab groups andlearn how to get creative and embrace failure as a learning tool
, conducted in classes at multiple participating universities, shows an intermediate analysisabout learner engagement, different level of scaffolding, competency, and the depth ofconceptual understandings. The eventual goal is to use assessment items developed from thisstudy to test the appropriateness of the CooL:SLiCE framework (e.g., for the effectiveness ofconstructed knowledge in deep learning, the impacts of different autonomy levels on studentlearning, and learners’ engagement).Introduction Engineering initially was taught as a hands-on discipline. Through the years, however,with advances in science a pedagogical shift to a curriculum delivered via lectures occurred.Such an emphasis limits student learning through experience. Current
deliverables, team communication, and conflictmanagement, respectively. Even with the short time span, the workshops are designed to be activeand engaging so that students can build awareness, gain experience, and have open discussions withtheir peers. All of this together can instill trust among team members. This paper will introduce theoverall plan in more detail relating to the design and implementation of these modules. Preliminaryresults and challenges will be introduced in addition to future plans. We have already seen positiveimpacts on our students resulting from this work. IntroductionEngineering projects typically require the collaboration of team members from different disciplinesand expertise1