fundamental engineering and life sciences and 3) to train a workforce to sustain agrowing bioengineering industry in the United States and participate in the economicdevelopment of the State of South Carolina. To assist in accomplishing these goals, theDepartment of Bioengineering participates in a university-wide program known as CreativeInquiry3. This program, unique to Clemson University, was developed to allow small teams ofstudents to study problems stemming from curiosity, a professor’s challenge, or simply the needsof the world around them. With more than 250 projects currently active, programs are availableto every undergraduate student at all levels, and new projects are welcomed and encouraged. Afaculty advisor, who leads the group and
. degree in Robotics and Automation (2000), from the University of Pisa, Italy. He has also worked at the Industrial Control Centre, Strathclyde University, UK, (1995) and at the Department of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA (1999). From 2000 to 2008 he served as faculty in the Flight Control Group at the Department of Aerospace Engineering , West Virginia University. His research at WVU involved system identification, sensor fusion, fault tolerant systems, machine vision, and adaptive and nonlinear control, especially applied to UAVs. He joined the Mathworks in 2009, where he currently works as a Technical Evangelist for the west coast area.Srikanth
include work-family balance, mental health, self and identity, social psychology, and life course. Jordana hopes her research will illuminate the positive ways women balance motherhood and career. Email: jhoegh@purdue.edu.Alice Pawley, Purdue University Alice Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. Dr. Pawley has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is co-PI on Purdue University’s ADVANCE initiative, through which she is
Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Aidsa I. Santiago Román is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Science and Materials and the Director of the Strategic Engineering Education Development (SEED) Office at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM). Dr. Santiago earned a BA (1996) and MS (2000) in Industrial Engineering from UPRM, and Ph.D. (2009) in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her primary research interest is investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering science with underrepresented populations. She also teaches introductory engineering courses such as Problem Solving and Computer Programming, Statics, and
task durations. A modified WBS with partially populated planned start dates andautomatically calculated end dates is illustrated in Figure 3.b. PMW: The Gantt Chart/MilestoneThe Gantt Chart is the most widely used method in industry for project scheduling andprogress monitoring. Its advantages include: 1. Direct correlation of tasks with duration of time. 2. Straightforward integration of sub-tasks having separate scheduling charts. 3. Flexible time units ranging from daily to annual. 4. Visual representation for quick assessment of project progress.The milestone chart is similar to the Gantt chart in structure, except only symbolssignifying the completion of a major task are included. There is no indication of taskinitiation
the “traditional” paradigm wherein courses frequently stand as independent entities with no apparent connection. Also, the project allows students to develop a professional design portfolio that can be presented to perspective employers, be used as a valuable reference for future design tasks, or be used as part of CEES’s outcomes-based assessment. Furthermore, Sooner City provides a natural forum for incorporating other pedagogical reform initiatives, such as just-in-time learning, collaborative learning, and laptop computing. The primary goal of the project is to produce graduates who can consistently think at a higher level, and who are thus capable of handling open-ended design
Paper ID #10494Analysis of Design Process Knowledge Task Responses: Statistical Approachesto Uncover Patterns (Research)Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and the Director of Informal Learning Environments Research for INSPIRE (the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning). She has a BSc in Mathematics from the University of Puget Sound and an MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Washington. Her research focuses on: par- ents’ roles in engineering education; engineering learning
education. Instead, engineering education must empower students to use technology“responsibly, reflectively, and effectively” 1. More moderate solutions include the use ofdeliberate computing 70, which guides students’ use of technology by telling them when to uselaptops, when to shut them down, and provides specific directions for engaging with lecturematerial 71-73.The problem of distractions caused by multitasking, task-switching and interruptions has been animportant issue in human-computer interaction in the past decade 74. Several researchers, bothfrom academia and industry, have tried to create interface solutions for personal computers thatminimize the costs of interruptions and distractions e.g. 75,76-79. These interface innovations helpto
, 2006. 95(1): p. 25-37.13. Wolfe, J. and K. Alexander, The computer expert in a mixed-gendered collaborative writing group. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2005. 19(2): p. 135-170.14. Litzer, E., et al., Gender and Race/Ethnicity in Engineering: Preliminary Findings from the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering, in ASEE2010.15. Hartman, H. and M. Hartman, Do Gender Differences in Undergraduate Engineering Orientations Persist when Major is Controlled? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2009. 1(1): p. 61-82.16. Commonwealth Club. Women In Business: Lessons Learned. 2003 [cited 2010 30 June]; Available from: http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/03/03-08women-speech.html.17
Paper ID #8847Introducing Sustainability into Engineering Design: a First Year CourseDr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger received her Bachelor’s degree from Northeastern University in 2004. She then went to work in the Biotechnology Industry, where she worked on process development of recombinant proteins from mammalian cell cultures. In 2006, Dr. Pfluger enrolled into the Chemical Engineering PhD program at Northeastern University. In the spring of 2011, she successfully defended her PhD dissertation entitled ”Biomimetic Replication of Intestinal Basement Membrane Topography”. In the fall
shifted to studying active learning techniques in engineering education, specifically service learning and social justice.Dr. Clifton R Johnston, Dalhousie University Dr. Johnston is the NSERC chair in Design Engineering in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Dalhousie University. He has taught and practiced design engineering for the past 20 years. He has been awarded the STLHE Alan Blizzard Award for Collaborative Education, the ASME Curriculum Innovation Award and a PIC V Best Paper award at ASEE.Dr. Andrew Trivett, University of Prince Edward Island Page 23.26.1 c American
paradigm has been developed tocommunicate with, and to appeal to, today's students, including collaborative learning,web-based learning, and smorgasbord curricula. While modern technology may be usedto benefit the instructional process, there are some disadvantages to using itinappropriately or prematurely. In our enthusiasm to be on the cutting edge oftechnology, we must not overlook some basic, time-tested principles of instruction.Certain critical factors (maximum rate of information input, processing rate, decay rate,and compression ratio from textbook to lecture) will put an upper bound on learning rate.Consideration must also be given to the observation that some entering students are notwell-prepared for engineering study, and many have
ProjectsThe capstone design experience at the University of Idaho is a two-semester sequence thatinvolves a variety of projects sponsored by regional industry. This culminates in the largestacademic design show in the Pacific Northwest where design teams from departments ofMechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering,Biological Systems Engineering, Metallurgical Engineering, and Computer Science display theirwork to the public. Information about this annual event can be found at www.uidaho.edu/expo.During the current academic year, the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering have joined forcesin an interdisciplinary class that meets concurrently and has uniform project expectations. Morethan 80 seniors and a
century. Educating and training a newgeneration of skilled scientific workers with the multidisciplinary perspective necessary for rapidadvances in nanotechnology is one of the key transforming strategies of the U.S. NationalNanotechnology Initiative (NNI). To ensure that tomorrow’s workforce and leadership is in thepipeline to pursue further education in the area of nanotechnology, a focus on first-year studentsis critical2.The interdisciplinary nature of nanoscale science and engineering – its blending of chemistry,physics, biology, mathematics, computer science, materials science, geology, engineering, etc. –provides new opportunities for interdisciplinary course and curriculum development, as well asfaculty collaboration, both in teaching and
groups:participants in the student teams and non-participants. In this paper, the authors present asummary and discussion of the survey results, and discuss the workings of the steel bridge andconcrete canoe teams as well as recommendations for enhancing student participation in theproject teams.Steel bridge project teamThe steel bridge team is an avenue for students to apply the skills that they learn in the classroomto a real-life project. It is a collaboration of students that work together to fabricate a 1/64th scalesteel bridge to compete in the American Institute of Steel Construction Student Steel BridgeCompetition. Students must follow strict rules on bridge dimensions, maximum deflections,bridge loading, safety, and construction limitations. The
professionalengineers? Are there evaluation studies to show the success or failure of this philosophy toproduce professional engineers?Whether there are specific answers to the above questions or not, it looks like that the philosophyof education has changed from the past to the present and will change in the future. The future ofhigher education, for engineers in the 21st century, can be envisaged as different from its past andpresent. Whether this will be better or worse depends on what is perceived as the best way ofmanaging change in education. There is already a marked transition in the approach, objectivesand subject matter of engineering courses to cater for new technologies and industrial needs. Thefollowing points will help to pave the road to reform
allpositions in universities.4 Adjunct faculty are often important members of the engineeringfaculty because they are familiar with current trends and practices in industry and pass them onto their engineering students. Their role in the education of future engineers is especiallyimportant in computational class and labs.However, adjunct faculty members have some barriers to overcome as they enter the academiccommunity. First, they do not have office hours throughout the day so that it is easy for studentsto schedule appointments. Often they come from their own workplaces and have little time Page 8.1036.1between work and teaching to
. His research involves the study of outcomes assessment of student competencies in relation to continuous improvement in higher education.Mark’s undergraduate work concentrated on the study of integrated manufacturing systems and holds a B.S. in Industrial Technologies, and a M.S. in Technology with a focus in Training and Development, and in Project Management.Steven K. Mickelson, Iowa State University Associate Chair, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Director, Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching Co-Director, Iowa State University Learning CommunitiesThomas J Brumm, Iowa State University Dr. Tom Brumm is associate professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State
(3 female, 17 male) were enrolled in the fall. Almost all ofthe students were in their fourth semester in the spring and fifth semester in the fall. Theengineering students required to take this course include mechanical, civil, nuclear, industrial,aerospace, biological, bioengineering, and engineering science.The students were allowed to self-select teams with most having four team members and a fewhaving three. Four roles were given to be assigned within the group. A project leader was neededto call and run meetings, assign tasks, and deal with other management issues. A lead researcherwas assigned to collect and organize all the research from the team members. The over-allorganization and documentation role was assigned to a project
, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Math. CSULA faculty train fellows through apreparation course and workshops in order to improve communication, collaboration, andteaching skills. Furthermore, a strong partnership between CSULA, LAUSD, local industry, andminority serving organizations such as Great Minds in STEM and MESA has been established inorder to achieve program goals. Broader impacts include increasing the number ofunderrepresented minority students who pursue college degrees and careers in STEM and tostrengthen the research and teaching skills of the graduate fellows. At the time these demonstrations and activities were performed, the program consisted ofeight fellows
along with computational algorithms that are robust and efficient, the application ofcomputer aided model-based approaches to predict designs for structures, machines, electronicsand even molecules becomes possible and practical. The authors engage in research thatincorporates various computer aided model-based activities including developing models forphysical phenomena such as chemical reactions 2, the behavior of complex processes 3 anddesigning molecules for various applications 4. As part of their ongoing National ScienceFoundation (NSF) grant entitled, “Controlling the Properties and Performance of Concrete UsingComputer Aided Molecular Design 5,“ and in collaboration with a NSF Research Experience forTeachers (RET) site, they have
Mapping and Indirect Assessment of Universidad de las Américas Puebla’s Engineering School OutcomesAbstractAs part of assessment efforts at Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) EngineeringSchool (ES), in 2009-2011 curricular mapping analyses were performed for ES outcomes in eachof the undergraduate engineering programs as well as a series of surveys were designed andimplemented to assess ES outcomes with various stakeholders (faculty, students throughout thecurricula, graduating seniors, alumni, and employers), regarding their perception about theimportance of the thirteen ES outcomes and the progress made by our students in achieving theseoutcomes. Engineering programs’ curricular mapping was carried out with collaboration
to otherdisciplines like law, arts, music, management, teacher education, or any other fields that havemade extensive use of cases for professional training.Teaching with cases often involves several challenges for the instructor. These includediagnosing technical problems and formulating solution strategies, making engineering andmanagement decisions taking into account technical, economic, and social and psychologicalconsiderations, and confronting ethical dilemmas [6]. The instructor needs to either have lots ofexperience or they can invite aerospace engineers from the industry to give seminars and presentcases. The instructor can then have students analyze the cases. The cases need to be authentic,and may also be drawn from stories in
setting and a single person took responsibility 11for their training and participation. “While I was doing my work I had a grad student that justworked directly with me. So if I had questions she could answer my questions. If not, we couldsit there and look it up and I think it was very collaborative.” In each case, the studentparticipant had a positive experience working relatively closely with them. The remaining threeparticipants described a more isolated experience in which they were trained and directed by anumber of alternating individuals. “There were three to four grad students in there filtering inand out. Some went on vacation for a couple
, and CE professional practice. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Distinguished Member of ASCE. Page 25.1329.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Raise the Bar Initiative: Charting the Future by Understanding the Path to the Present – Accreditation CriteriaBackgroundAt the 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Civil Engineering EducationConference (CEEC ’95), key leaders from industry and academia identified four primary issueareas requiring the focused attention of the U.S
. FultonSchools of Engineering is located on ASU’s Tempe Campus, the largest single US campus with59,794 students. There are over 4,400 undergraduates and 2,100 graduate students inengineering and computer science. In this paper, “engineering” includes computer science, butnot construction.In Fall 2010, ASU had three NSF grants which supported transfer upper division and graduatestudents. The primary scholarship funding for transfer students was an NSF S-STEM grant(#0728695) called CIRC/METS (Collaborative Interdisciplinary ResearchCommunity/Motivated Engineering Transfer Students) for 2008-2012. If transfer students in thisCIRC/METS Program graduated and continued on to graduate school full-time right aftergraduating, they could receive a scholarship
Paper ID #7812Measuring the effectiveness of pedagogical innovations using multiple base-line testingMr. Alex Albert, University of Colorado Alex Albert is a PhD Candidate in the Construction Engineering and Management Program at the Uni- versity of Colorado at Boulder. He has conducted research for the Construction Industry Institute and ELECTRI International, studying hazard recognition and response. Alex specializes in implementing experimental research methods in engineering education to perform hypothesis testing and draw causal inferences.Dr. Matthew R. Hallowell, University of Colorado Dr. Matthew Hallowell is
Professor and Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at the Oregon Insti- tute of Technology, where he teaches structural engineering courses and conducts research in engineering education. He is also a registered Professional Engineer. Page 25.1125.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Responses to an Unfamiliar Thing: How Learning About a Structural Sculpture Can Make It More AppealingAbstractA collaboratively conceived and designed engineering teaching sculpture was recently installedat a small teaching-oriented engineering college. What began as an
and student learning for about ten years.Dr. Daniel W. Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning (ITLL) program and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University and a M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of reten- tion, program evaluation, and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include assessment
principles are introduced into lower level courses through demonstrations and how thebasic principles of process engineering can be taught to a multidisciplinary student group. Thesepresentations and experiments are drawn from past experience and those of this present year withour new multidisciplinary Freshman Engineering Clinic course at Rowan University.INTRODUCTIONThe Rowan engineering faculty are taking a leadership role by using innovative methods ofteaching and learning, as recommended by ASEE[1], to better prepare students for entry into arapidly changing and highly competitive marketplace. Key program features include: (i) inter-and multi-disciplinary education created through collaborative laboratory and coursework; (ii)stressing teamwork