outreach6. Page 10.1036.3“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education 1. Hands-on learning: Make K-12 science curriculum less theory-based and more context-based, emphasizing the social good of engineering and demonstrating how it is relevant to the real world 2. Interdisciplinary approach: Add a technological component to all subjects and lessons, and implement writing guidelines in math and science courses 3. Standards: Involve engineering in K-12 lessons that map tot state standards for
translate a paperand research into "the real world." The two images in Figure 1 below are screenshots from ahandout I made for class after reading one of CSCW's best papers "Okay, One More Episode":An Ethnography of Parenting in the Digital Age by Mazmanian et al. I took the class prompt intwo directions when I read translating the design implications from the paper to a handout thatwould be appealing to practitioners and the public. Figure 1. Examples from Handouts Brought to Class by StudentsAfter reading the paper this past weekend, I thought about my parents and how they have tomanage screen time for four girls in different ages. I decided to make my handout in bothenglish and spanish to be able to share with my parents. The
thespring and fall semesters. It is a 75-min 8am class offered 2 days a week for 14 weeks. Enrolleesare high school seniors to university seniors, 90% of whom are engineers. It is one of our univer-sity’s Science, Technology and Society Knowledge Area courses because: 1) It provides a broad -based coverage of the biomedical engineering [BmE] field; 2) It focuses on rehabilitation engineering as a subfield of BmE, allowing students to see concrete applications applied to real-life cases; and 3) Ethical dilemmas are posited throughout (covered more in a companion paper).10A fuller course description and its philosophy can be found in ASEE’s and other publications.1-4I.2. A Young Puppy Figured Out by Himself How to TeachThis instructor’s
nature and includeactivities such as prototyping a physical product or application, developing a business plan,interviewing potential customers, delivering pitches, applying to grants, and getting feedbackfrom mentors or other entrepreneurs (Duval-Couetil, Shartrand, & Reed, 2016b).Entrepreneurship classes and programs are therefore generally structured in a project-basedlearning format in which students form team and work on developing solutions for real problems(Duval-Couetil et al., 2016b). In order for students who are participating in entrepreneurshipactivities to be successful, they must communicate effectively and think critically to designsolutions that solve open-ended problems (Byers, Seelig, Sheppard, & Weilerstein, 2013
of able-bodied individuals; consequently, this reinforces the exclusion andmarginalization of people with disabilities – the biggest minority group in the U.S. [13], [14].With ableism in engineering fields still persistent, there has been commendable research aimed atimproving the accessibility of engineering education for students with diverse disabilities. Theseworks addressed multiple fronts, including the proposal of new tools and educator resources,informing policy decisions, and leading new research initiatives [15], [16], [17], [18]. On thetools front, Behm et al. presented an improved real-time tracking text display (RTTD) for deafand hard of hearing students attending engineering lectures [19]. The University of
in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineers’ Imaginaries of “the Public”: Dominant Themes from Interviews with Engineering Students, Faculty, and ProfessionalsAbstractThis paper is the second of a three-part study on engineers’ conceptions of “the public” throughthe theoretical lens of “social imaginaries.” It focuses on dominant themes from semi-structuredinterviews with engineers about their views of “the public,” the role of engineers in society, andcharacterizations of the “ideal” versus “real” relationship between engineers and “the public.”Interviews were conducted with 43 engineers: 13 first-year and 11 senior
/mechatronics PD to science, math, and technology teachers. In addition, she is the projects director of the ARISE program. This full-time, seven-week program includes: college level workshops and seminars, and a high level research experience in NYU faculty labs. Her commitment to diversity and equity is paramount to her work in STEAM and activism. As a former Adjunct Professor at Teachers College, Columbia Univer- sity and biomedical scientist in immunology Dr. Borges balances the world of what scientists do and brings that to STEAM education in order to provide culturally relevant professional development and curricula that aligns to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Her free time is spent hiking, growing
side. And with all the stuff that we’re dealing with (like owning a house and real-world problems)… he kind of made us all feel like... helped us all out. We’re all going to be owning a home someday, [starting a] family. So he would talk to us about life and be understanding of our circumstances. Not everybody’s brought up the same and he just made everybody feels so, so welcomed. And I didn’t want toSTEM SUCCESS AT AN HSI COMMUNITY COLLEGE 16 leave his class ever... but great, great professor. I’ve never felt more, I guess, at home, in a classroom than I did with that professor. (Cyril) For some students, it is the little things
Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) teaching workshop. Dr. Palomo believes that fostering curiosity and life-long learning skills we can make the world a better place. She believes that an inclusive and equitable learning environment is critical for students to be motivated and enjoy their learning journey.Carolyn M Rodak (Associate Professor) Dr. Carolyn Rodak is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the State University of New York Polytechnic Institute in Utica, NY.Cassandra RutherfordCristina Torres-Machi (Assistant Professor) Dr. Cristina Torres-Machi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a
our research activitiesnot only lead to fundamental discoveries, but also product & technology development throughindustrial partnerships. Hence, our main goal has been to reshape our graduate program to giveour students tools to develop and pursue scalable solutions for real-world needs by advancinginnovation and entrepreneurial mindsets.The strong support and expertise of the VentureWell team within the frameworks ofsustainability, and innovation and entrepreneurship, was boosted with the implementation of CoPfor Faculty Development. Our participation in the CoP benefited our project and our ownprofessional development. First, we were given the opportunity to join a community of facultyfellows who were pursuing similar educational goals
the study, though guest lectures followed close behind. Hess and Fore [16] completed an in-depth literature review of engineering ethics education case studies between 2000-2015 and identifiedseveral more techniques that have been practiced and evaluated. Other techniques include heuristicreadings, service learning, peer mentoring, team projects, game-based pedagogy, theoretical grounding,real world exposure, and micro-insertions. After the analysis and the highlighting of four exemplary case studies, Hess & Fore argue thatDavis’ [20] micro-insertions are favorable due to how they bridge the sociotechnical gap and show thatethics, “could be seamlessly integrated while students practice and perfect their technical knowledge
FALL 2017ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONSurvey Tools for Faculty to Quickly Assess Multidisciplinary Team Dynamicsin Capstone Coursesand internal relationships. For brevity purposes, the detailed technical content and managementdetails have not included in this paper but can be found in Solnosky et al. (2013) and Solnosky et al.(2014). The seven team dynamics and performance metrics were based on how teams function ina high performing manner. Research suggests that these dynamics are each related to effectiveteam performance (Anderson and West, 1998; Ilgen et al., 2005). These team dynamics are of equalimportance in real-world industry project teams. The seven dynamic metrics are: 1) Have a high-level creative and commonly agreed upon goal
wellness and behavioral health problems. The SSS meets with studentsindividually each month to set goals, monitors academic progress daily (done through attendingcohorted math classes daily and communicating with instructors), and prepares qualified studentsfor internship applications and full-time employment placement. This academic case managementapproach has been extremely effective in STEM Core cohorts and is supported by research [27],[33], [34], [35].The SSS are also instrumental in helping STEM Core student cohorts—shown to be comprisedlargely of students of color and more female students than found in traditional STEM courses—navigate the often-unwelcoming world of STEM classrooms which are oftentimes majority maleand white. The SSSs
important also in designing aresearch survey that will reach the appropriate populations. As with all research, studies withsensitive or hard-to-reach populations are likely very valuable to the research community, butrecruitment of these populations, especially for large-scale applications, is difficult to achieve (e.g.,sociological research on drug usage or unhoused populations). Furthermore, it is important toconsider whether the population of interest can be contacted by researchers reliably so thatresearchers are able to collect data: If a target study population is not privileged with access tosmartphones, for example, an app-based or SMS-based study is likely not ideal. However, usingthese technology-enabled methods in university contexts
of power comes from the German sociologist Max Weber, whowrote that: “‘[p]ower’ is the probability that one actor within a social relationship will be in aposition to carry out his own will despite resistance...” ([11], p. 37). Many theorists have builtupon or extended this definition to cover different sources, types, and modes in which powermay operate. While Weber discussed some sources of power, Galbraith’s [4] three sources ofpower may be more applicable to the present work: 1) personality or charisma, 2) wealth orstatus, and 3) organizational. In other words, people with strong personalities or who are highlycharismatic may hold or exert power over others as well as those with notable wealth or status insociety (such as a political
learning activities and/or bringing real world experiences into theclassroom, both of which have been shown to increase student understanding of thresholdconcepts [3, 14, 15].One unique study encouraged students in a mechanics course to compute stresses using datafrom strain gauges affixed to a stadium column [3]. This exercise required students to convertstrains to stresses, and then apply Mohr’s circle to determine if the maximum stresses exceededallowable values. This comprehensive approach likely deepened student understanding [3] andallowed students to struggle with the difficult concepts of stress and strain, giving them greaterappreciation for these topics. This assignment also required students to program a solution forMohr’s circle using
calls for students to beengaged in engineering practices such as defining problems, developing and using models, anddesigning solutions. Engineering practices work together with disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) andcrosscutting concepts (CCCs) to engender a practice-based classroom where students engage, notonly in the investigation of the world around them, but also in the application of scientific ideasto develop solutions that address human wants and needs (engineering).Recent research efforts have focused on understanding how precollege teachers support studentsto engage in engineering practices (Watkins et al., 2018). Elementary school contexts can beparticularly important as early exposure and experiences can have a lasting impact on
processing because ofinterpretation of conventions [14]. Finally, graphical constraining, such as the creation of iconrepresentations, requires closeness between abstraction and the real world in order to supportstudents’ cognitive understanding of the material [14].Student experience in educationEquity in education literature highlights the importance of centering the lived experiences ofstudents [15] and tailoring curriculum to ensures student academic success by cultivating theirfunds of knowledge [16]. Here we highlight the importance of attending to students’ existingstudy habits and tailoring visual notetaking practices to students’ funds of knowledge. Further,[17] provide empirical evidence regarding the influence of motivation, interest, and
challenges in K-12 literature. For instance, Dee’s (2005) workON BECOMING A “TRANSFER INSTITUTION” 7intimated that hiring teachers from underrepresented racial backgrounds could help to reduce theachievement gap, but limited his findings to low-income students from the South. For thisreason, the results were not necessarily applicable in other contexts. Scholars should continue totry to determine the set of attributes that make a particular faculty or staff member a good fit tosupport students of color in STEM. While positive interactions with faculty and staff such as these are noted in literature,extant research also reveals the challenges that can define students’ interactions
that semester.Term Project DescriptionStudents had the freedom to undertake any type of study (site-specific study, case study,synthesis, design project, planning-related project, etc.) with a focus on any transportation-related problem of their choice. The main learning goal of the term project was to providestudents with the opportunity to work towards solving real-world problems of interest to them.By encouraging such problem-solving, the project aimed to foster the students’ critical thinking.The project further aimed to provide students with a more comprehensive perspective on thetopics covered during the semester. The project accounted for a total of 20% of the students’final grade, with the final submission accounting for 10% and two
Engineers for over 24 years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy.Dr. Timothy W Mays P.E., The Citadel Timothy Wayne Mays, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Civil Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. Dr. Mays recently served as Executive Director of the Structural Engineers Associations of South Carolina and North Carolina. He currently serves as NCSEA Publications Committee Chairman. He has received three national teaching awards (ASCE, NSPE, and NCSEA) and both national (NSF) and regional (ASEE) awards for outstanding research. He is the recipient of the 2009 NCSEA Service Award. His areas of expertise are code applications, structural design, seismic design, steel connections
survey would have identified the areas where they have hadsubstantial benefits and where improvements could be made. However this has not beendone. This hindsight led to the development of a questionnaire that could be used in thefuture.1.IntroductionWhetton [1] rightly states that most important professing of a professor, involves histhoughtful choice of reading materials, assignments, activities and most of all learningobjectives. This is even more pronounced when the instructor has to choose few experimentsand a project from a wide variety of mechanical engineering applications. The choice has tobe further developed to meet the learning outcomes called the student outcomes defined byABET [2]. Outcomes are descriptions of the end product of
positive learning gains from their “actualwork in the field,” which students further described positively as “authentic” [14]. Theseworkplace experiences helped students connect their coursework with engineering practice [13],[15]. These connections in turn can promote engineering persistence and clarify students’ careerintentions. Students indicated that their primary reason for pursuing co-ops or internships isfuture employment, describing these experiences as providing “real world” experience and alsoincreasing their employability [16]. Like students, early career engineers felt that their co-opexperience prepared them for full-time employment and eased the transition from student toprofessional [6]. These positively described experiences
computing achieve- ments of female high school students in Colorado and encourages them to enroll in computer science at the college level. Prof. Anderson received his Ph.D. in Computer Science in 1997 at the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include hypermedia, the design of reliable large-scale software infrastructure, the design and implementation of data-intensive systems, and the design of web application frameworks. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Intended & Unintended Consequences of Rapidly Expanding an Engineering Mathematics Intervention for Incoming First-Year StudentsKeywords: Wright State Model
Leadership Training at LSI Corporation and received an award LSI Corporation Worldwide Operations Review 1999 for his significant contributions to the Quality Improve- ment Systems. At LSI Wajid was the PE in charge of the world famous APPLE IPOD 2000-2001 proces- sor WW qualification/production. Over the years Wajid has managed several projects related to stream- lining operations with utilization of state of the art technology and digital systems. This has given him significant experience working with ISO standard quality systems. He is a specialist on ABET accreditation procedures and was appointed by the Dean of Engineering, KFUPM, Hafr Al Batin campus to lead the intensive effort of preparing the EEET program for the
and specific feedback to students about theirlearning. The results also agree with the recommendations (use of active learningtechniques, providing feedback) made by Chickering and Gasmson [4] for effectiveundergraduate education.More than 90 percent of seniors agreed that professor’s lectures, coordinating lab withlecture, and organization and preparation for class and lab activities, are important fortheir learning and success. These results support the findings reported by Guskeyregarding the importance of planning and organization. The majority of EET seniorsperceive that coordinating lab with lecture is important for their learning. When a facultymember tries to coordinate lab with class, students see the application of technical
, and parsimonious measure of the contextualcompetence of undergraduate engineering students.Introduction The practice of engineering requires more than solving for x. Engineers must be able tosolve real-world engineering problems while also understanding the range of their relevantcontexts. Projects such as the One Laptop per Child program, China’s Three Gorges Dam, andnew ultra skyscrapers illustrate the social, economic, environmental, political, and culturalchallenges of today’s engineering problems. The ABET program accreditation Criteria 3.c, 3.f,3.h, and 3.j promote contextualization of engineering practice [1]. The ABET criteria mandateoutcomes to ensure that engineering graduates cultivate the non-technical skills
, viscosity22). Combined with report writing and subsequent oral presentation, these activitiescontribute both “hands-on” experience and team communication opportunities, routinely cited aspreparation for the “real world”. Of the recent hot topics in federal research, namely biotechnology, nanotechnology, andinformation technology, only biochemical engineering appears to have made inroads in chemicalengineering lab instruction, as illustrated by papers CEE papers on fermentation 23-25 andbioseparations 9,26,27. Gradual reform of undergraduate laboratories have occurred through alteration ofemphasis to include product design28, device troubleshooting29, safety30, EC2000 criteria 31-32,process design 33,34, environmental awareness35
a real-world manner. FE learning modules provide specific instructions onhow to build the FE model of the engineering problem to increase student performance in theanalysis for “Concrete Experience” on Kolb’s Cycle. Page 24.212.7 4 Figure 1. Kolb Learning CycleLearning StylesEach FE ALM developed in this work is designed to span a spectrum of different characteristicsin which students learn. The Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles25 is composed of fourdimensions: active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global
Paper ID #9670Big Picture Thinkers in Industry—Who Are They?Hadi Ali, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue Univer- sity (majoring in aerospace systems design, with a minor in astrodynamics and space applications), and a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue (majoring in artificial intelligence