, all of whom wereunfamiliar with the technical course content, resulted in both a clearer understanding of theinstructor’s expectations and a greater commitment to positive outcomes for the students.IntroductionEffective writing is a lifelong skill. Although students in certain disciplines, such as engineering,focus more of their energies on problem solving and comprehension of technical material, theability to persuasively convey one’s ideas and theories is necessary in all fields of advancedstudy. As restated by Jason Swarts and Lee Odell, “effective communication generally, andeffective technical writing specifically is essential to success…because it conventionalizes
and design experiences at thefreshman level has been deemed a critical pathway to increase the impact of this project. Theideation and design activities engage and encourage students to act with increased autonomy toaccomplish the credit-bearing tasks. The majority of the hands-on projects introduced with theCNC lab encourage students to take control and command of the project and also design theirown experiments to assess engineering content. In regards to relatedness, hands-on machiningand design activities are expected to directly relate to engineering students’ identification withengineers as a group or discipline. Furthermore, students work primarily in teams increasing in-terpersonal interactions and relatedness to the department
passing rates for some student work, thus fostering greater leaps inimprovement of learning in those outcomes. Team review of student work also facilitates greaterlevels of cooperation and more frequent deliberate communication between faculty members andindustry colleagues, ultimately enhancing student learning through the sharing of ideas betweenthese two groups.Findings are reported as: (1) a comparison of passing rate statistics before and after inclusion of industry raters, (2) reflections on the process by both industry and faculty raters, and (3) reflections on the process by the administrators of the rating.We recommend that other institutes consider use of industry raters for student outcomes becauseof the enhanced continuous improvement
/20009666.2021.1877891.[18] S. Scholarworks and A. Ertwine, “The Perceived Impact of Curricular Maps on Student Retention at The Perceived Impact of Curricular Maps on Student Retention at a Community College a Community College.” Available: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgiarticle=9978&context=dissertatio ns[19] G. Trujillo and K. D. Tanner, “Considering the Role of Affect in Learning: Monitoring Students’ Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, and Science Identity,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6–15, Mar. 2014, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241 .[21] S. B. Hulley, S. R. Cummings, W. S. Browner, D. G. Grady, and T. B. Newman, Designing clinical research, 4th
inproviding transformational educational experiences for students, and that it is an excellent way toattract and retain diverse students to STEM disciplines. It is also one of the best places to embedinformation literacy education; PBL is an established method of bringing both disciplinary skillsand lifelong learning skills together in ways that are engaging for students, and in the case ofservice learning, impactful to communities or individual stakeholders.4,5 WPI, as well as otherinstitutions aiming to graduate future engineers across specializations, use student projectoutcomes to support professional as well as technical skills development for a wide variety ofaccreditation standards, including but not limited to those of ABET in the U.S.A
inventing something, making adifference in the world (especially for female students), and financial security12. Engineeringstudent team effectiveness is strongest when team members are motivated by a need forachievement, and only marginally by a need for affiliation with teammates13. Engineers in theworkplace are motivated by money (its value and suggested rating), recognition for achievement,responsibility, challenge of the work, and opportunity for growth14. On the other hand,demotivation can result from supervision, work organization, bureaucratic controls and authoritysystems, and unfairness.Motivation is crucial in engineering education due to its influence on student productivity,importance in the workplace, and impacts on teams in capstone
Paper ID #40933Work-in-Progress Study on the Impact of Study Sheet Quality on AcademicPerformance: A Case Study in an ”Engineered Systems in Society” CourseExamination.Mr. ISAAC DAMILARE DUNMOYE, University of Georgia Dunmoye Isaac is an Engineering Education Ph.D. student, in the College of Engineering, University of Georgia. His area of research focuses on students’ learning, cognition and engagement in virtual and online learning environments. He is interested in qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodology research that are needed for proper design of instructional material, necessary for harnessing and experimenting
instructors can enhance the module for future offerings.Findings from the module's implementation demonstrate increased knowledge and understandingof the impacts of COVID-19 on different transportation systems from various stakeholderperspectives. SMU students' mean scores showed high post-evaluation scores, and NMTstudents’ scores increased from pre to post evaluation. Additionally, the reflective writingassignment revealed students' awareness of various issues, including operational and economicimpacts on operators and users. This paper offers contributions to our engineering community byfocusing on lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience while providing recommendationsfor improving this co-create module.Keywords: COVID-19, Infrastructure
sense of community [3], [6], [7]. Clearly, the experiences of Blackstudents at PWIs and HBCUs are drastically different. Many studies have juxtaposed HBCUsand PWIs in efforts to highlight these inequities. In contrast, we have chosen to include keyelements of the experiences of Black students at HBCUs to better understand how Black studentsat PWIs can be supported in their efforts to maintain success. We acknowledge that theexperiences of all Black students at PWIs are not the same and come with their own nuances thatare dependent on the backgrounds of each individual student; however, we assert that thenegative experiences of some Black students should be of concern to all stakeholders at PWIsand thus we position our research within the PWI
for curriculum, pedagogy, and projects. Middle and high schools have historically facedchallenges introducing engineering into the curriculum in an inclusive and authentic manner.Because these students are still flexible about their career decisions3,4, programs that peakinterest can still influence students’ college and career plans. An inclusive approach could havesignificant impact on the diversity of the engineering workforce.A large public university implemented EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service) forundergraduates in 19955,6. The approach has been successful in preparing students professionallyas well as addressing compelling needs locally and globally. The program has also shown that itis an inclusive approach to
. Characterizing engineering design engagement of thesechildren can help us inform educational practice to provide more supportive engineering learningopportunities for autistic students. The goal of this paper is to capture and present ways childrenengaged in solution optimization as they worked on an engineering design activity with theirparents. The following research question guided this work:What does solution optimization look like when enacted by children with autism engaged in ascenario-based engineering design activity?Engineering Design ModelsEngineering design is an iterative process, which has been introduced through several differentempirical models and theoretical frameworks. These models are either descriptive (describing thedesign
preparegraduate students for their future careers?Theoretical frameworkThis study was guided by the literature on situated learning. Situated learning is a theory that“emphasizes and promotes real and authentic learning” (p.3)10. This type of learning occurs incontext – learners are engaged in authentic activities, as part of a community of practice.Authentic activities refer to the “coherent, meaningful, and purposeful activities” (p.34)11 that areshared by members of a community of practice and in fact characterize that community.Participating in authentic activities enables learners to understand experts’ points of view,“shapes or hones [learners’] tools,” and provides them with experience (p.36)11.As a social theory of learning, situated learning
Methodist University-Dallas, TX. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. His research interests include Digital Signal Processing and Digital Image Processing applications, Communication Systems, and Robotics. He is an author of numerous research papers and presentations in these areas. He has worked on undergraduate education projects focused on increasing student learning, academic success, and retention in critical freshman and sophomore level gateway STEM courses. Dr. Aliyazicioglu is a member of the IEEE, Eta Kappa Nu, Tau Beta Pi, and ASEE. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
simplest to serve a subset of students already inclined toward innovation andentrepreneurship, but maintaining a sense of balance and driving a diverse set of users into thesespaces is a critical goal [3]. Considering the resource-intensive nature of such spaces, theircontinued value depends on engagement with a critical mass of students participating inmeaningful and value-adding experiential learning activities.Toward that end, analysis of usage continues over three years at a makerspace situated in a largepublic research university in the upper midwest. Students access the makerspace via courses heldin the space, through open visits, and by registering for and attending short courses--dubbedMicrocourses--taught there. Over three years, the
College Men from Rural Maine,” College Student Affairs Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 83– 96, 2019.[28] A. W. Astin and Anthony Lising Antonio, Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2012.[29] T. V. Dinh, “Community College Transfer Students’ Success in STEM Fields of Study: The Impact of Engagement on Baccalaureate Degree Attainment,” Ph.D., The University of Texas at Arlington, United States -- Texas, 2017. Accessed: Nov. 22, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/1920065957/abstract/EF49CBC75BE441 1BPQ/31[30] R. K. Conyne and R. J. Clack, Environmental
hearingstudents in class through technology, such as using eye-tracking or face-tracking to locate the classroomfocus (R. S. Kushalnagar & Kushalnagar, 2012) This is particularly important for deaf students, because,unlike hearing students, deaf students are frequently seen as “not able,” which creates a cycle of lowexpectations and gaps in students’ meta-knowledge (Marschark & Hauser, 2008). These strategies toengage students may create a more inclusive learning environment for students. More research on deaf-hearing collaboration is needed to be done to determine the impact inclusion and engagement by bothdeaf and hearing students in engineering classrooms and labs.Finally, engineering programs should consider maintaining full visual access
for novice designers in many areas. Petroski discovered a similardifficulty occurring with engineering design where “design has been a notoriously problematicaspect of the engineering curriculum” [9]. Design is a subject which requires the ability to solveproblems or issues by the communication of their ideas. The main obstacle expressed, by botheducators and students of design education, is the influences on design ability and creativity[10].For this study the main influences being applied include: Activities prior to task engagement. Opportunity to engage in wild thought. Stimuli present in immediate environment.The application for the purpose of input to obtain a creative output is through the medium
on enhancing undergradu- ate and graduate student learning, engagement, and workforce development by transforming biomedical engineering education through scholarship and research of innovative teaching and learning practices and technologies. He has worked in higher education for more than 35 years at state and private universities and an NCI comprehensive cancer hospital. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Professional Development Through High- Impact ExperiencesIntroductionThe Department of Biomedical Engineering at Texas A&M University (TAMU)comprehensively redesigned its undergraduate curriculum in response to a host
aspiration (β=0.11, SE=0.04, p<0.05), asillustrated in Figure 3. Specifically, when not participating in the career guidance orservices provided by the university, engineering students’ satisfaction with majorcourses significantly predicted their employment aspirations in a positive direction(β=0.46, SE=0.04, t(3160)=11.64, p<0.001). However, when participating in theschool-provided career guidance and services, the impact of satisfaction with majorcourses on employment aspirations strengthened. In other words, satisfaction withmajor courses had a more pronounced effect on engineering students’ employmentaspirations when they engaged in the school-provided career guidance and services(β=0.57, SE=0.02, t(3160)=29.40, p<0.001). Figure
Aerospace (WIA) which provide support resource and foster a sense of community for women in field of aerospace engineering.Ms. Tove Elisabeth Kopperstad, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Tove is a 3rd year PhD student in the Aerospace Department at the University of Illinois - Urbana Cham- paign. Her work in applied aerodynamics as an experimentalist focuses on rotors design and optimization, rotor-wing integration, and distributive propulsion. During her time at UIUC she has engaged herself in graduate student community building and welfare through the Aerospace Graduate Student Advising Committee and the Women in Aerospace student organization.Ani Pirosmanishvili, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
course. This study is inspired by such a course, where students work inmultidisciplinary teams for two semesters in designing, building, and testing projects. Theobjective is to evaluate the process of students’ self-placement in team roles and the impact ofthese roles on their engagement and perception of success during the project developmentexperience, to investigate how student role placement, rotation and execution contribute to theirdevelopment of leadership and teamwork skills. Results are presented from a mixed methodssurvey and data from three cohorts of students between 2021 and 2023, including questions onthe students’ course goals, role assignments, role rotations, and if their roles affected theirengagement, success, or team’s
responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student Engagement and Industry Readiness in a Systems Exploration, Engineering, and Design Laboratory (SEED Lab)IntroductionLaboratory courses have been a key component of engineering education in the United Statessince the founding of the earliest American engineering schools [1]. Today, well-designedlaboratories in the undergraduate curriculum play a critical role in the development of students'hands-on skills, problem-solving abilities, teamwork skills and analytical thinking while alsodeepening the content learned in lecture-based classes. The primary focus of
quicklybecame apparent that the pandemic, with its forced closures of campuses, schools, and daycarecenters, and sudden transition to distance learning, was having a disproportionate impact onwomen with family responsibilities and women faculty of color. In addition, faculty of colorfaced the trauma and stress of the George Floyd murder and the resulting demonstrations anddifficult conversations on campuses across the country, as well as the ensuing traumaexperienced by students of color who often turned to women faculty of color for support [39].The pandemic impacted the original timeline and modality of the implementation of thePartnership programs, such as delaying it by one year, but also offered several opportunities.First, it offered the
question if they belong. This belonging uncertainty, coupledwith stereotype threat, can result in a negative disparate impact on marginalized groups inengineering. As such, this work focuses on typical adversity faced by college students, not theimpacts of sexism, racism, homophobia, or other forms of bias in engineering education.The impacts of this intervention on both students and faculty are being studied throughquantitative instruments, classroom observations, and longitudinal interviews with 71 studentsstratified by intervention group, gender identity, and racial/ethnic identities. Results from ourquantitative analyses indicate promising trends in the intervention for addressing academicequity gaps (i.e., differences in student academic
Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of a Modeling Intervention in an Introductory Programming CourseAbstractThis complete research paper describes the impact of a modeling intervention on first-yearengineering students’ modeling skills in an introductory computer programming course. Fivesections of the first-year engineering introductory programming course at a private,STEM+Business institution were revised to center around modeling concepts. These fivesections made up the experimental group for this study. The comparison group consisted of foursections of the course that were not revised. Students in all these sections were given twodifferent versions of a modeling problem two times in the semester to
found to outweigh socio-demographics such as genderand race in affecting students’ engineering pathway [37]. These factors are exhibited incurricular experiences, co-curricular experiences, institutional environment, and contextualsupports and barriers, to be elaborated below.Curricular experiences are found to impact students’ intentions of studying engineering. Studentperceptions of teaching barriers, satisfaction with course activities, and interactions withlecturers and classmates have an immense impact on students’ intentions of pursuing engineeringcareers [38]–[40]. For example, engineering students, particularly male software and hardwarestudents, perceived more teaching barriers than their peers in other engineering disciplines [39
integrate information from multiple units. The OEMPcombatted this by allowing students to engage with multiple concepts for one project. Conceptsthat were initially taught in independent units were woven together as the student-authors wereforced to recall various units throughout the duration of the project. This helped to create a moreholistic understanding of the statics course material and had a lasting impact on the studentsability to recall course content. The real world applications of the project also had a significantimpact on the students’ comprehension of course material: Katelyn: The realistic aspect of the OEMP was beneficial towards my understanding of statics material. It was much easier to understand why we were learning
is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. in Food Process Engineering from the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First-Year Engineering Program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of
and fewer students engaging in STEM studies collide.The camp leadership committee determined that, to be successful, the following goals needed tobe met in designing the camp: 1) to develop approaches to relate systems engineering to middleschool students, and 2) to focus on hands-on activities for the campers. To that end, theleadership committee focused on the following questions: • What impact could the camp have on middle school students’ knowledge and attitudes towards engineering? • What characteristics of hands-on activities are most exciting to middle school students?The resulting camp design uses the theme of using natural systems as inspiration fortechnological systems, an idea connected to research areas of several
studies report that student engagement is the primary challenge of usingeffective teaching methods in online courses and students appeared to be far more impacted by distractionsin comparison to face-to-face sections (Boettner & Bailey 2014). Through a meta-synthetic review of theliterature on distant learning and online course development, researchers have shown several emergentthemes in the literature (Cherney et al. 2018). First, collaborative online learning environments were moreeffective in improving the achievement of learning outcomes in comparison to non-collaborative onlineenvironments. Second, there are a number of conflicting conclusions in the literature which need to beresolved with further research and data collection