,abilities, and understanding of engineering, career opportunities, high school preparation, successstrategies, incorporating projects to introduce high school students to engineering and advisingstudents for an engineering career. Results2 of these surveys and more details of the summerworkshop were presented at the ASEE 2003 Annual Conference.Another measure of the success of this workshop was the interest it generated in follow-upcollaborations between UMBC and local high schools. A few examples include: • Invitations for UMBC to make several high school career day presentations. • Numerous high school class visits and tours of UMBC’s College of Engineering. • UMBC’s participation in the establishment of a High School Engineering Academy
capabilities, asdefined by they advertisements on their website was provided. Teams then have to workidentifying what information they would need to be able to create this tooling design system. Asthe facilitator of this process, I observed the teams working and asked them questions of whatwas the information behind a suggested system design point. While the team was brainstormingtheir ideas and solutions, these “outsider” questions required them to step back into their ownthought processes and assess what was the technical information that 1) created the idea and 2)what additional information would be required to ensure the team completely understands theidea or implementation. By questioning their knowledge and helping the teams identify
that will allowlearning. Simply asking about it, “So, this is pretty frustrating?”, can be enough of anacknowledgment. You can also ask the student how they are dealing with the feelings, whetherthey were able to focus on something else, and move on to how they approached the problem,preferably in a general sense so that it can become a discussion of strategies rather than solving aparticular problem. After addressing the aspect of the student that is most in crisis, a discussionof the particular issue will be feasible and more likely to have a lasting impact.Students are often so involved in the experience of their emotion, the difficulty and the pain, thatthey cannot productively focus on their work. In office hours or tutoring sessions
Session 2313 Building an Active Environmental-Chemical Engineering Research Program with Undergraduate Students Jeffrey G. Sczechowski Civil and Environmental Engineering Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 ABSTRACTWith a University-wide theme of “learn by doing”, all Cal Poly undergraduates are required tocomplete a Senior Project. Environmental Engineering students are encouraged to conduct anexperimental or an applied design project
allowing the synthetic transaction to follow the same path that is taken by thestudent's and teacher's sessions when accessing the cloud-based resource.After the solution for the authentication of the web filtering application is verified, the agentdeployment will be expanded to the additional schools, with the final goal of having multipleagents deployed at each school in the school district, the school district’s central office and theirInternet Service Provider.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE National ConferenceReferences[1] S. Stein, J. Ware, J. Laboy, H. E. Schaffer, “Improving K-12 pedagogy via a Cloud designed for education,” International Journal of Information Management
to design and construct “sustainable homes” for an NGO partner in Honduras.The process used was part of a more general three-phase academic construct developed forstudent teams to produce replicable solutions to basic needs in developing countries [3].The intent of the Honduras Sustainable Housing initiative was to combine two elements: 1. Thefinancial means for a Honduran family to obtain a home via an affordable mortgage loancombined with a subsidy provided by the in-country, faith-based community and 2. Asustainable home. Each two semester (Sept. - May) program incorporated two team trips toHonduras. The purpose of the first trip, shortened because it occurred during the semester, was togive the team of undergraduate engineering and
of leadership styles and collaborativeteaming activities, three panel discussions by active women engineering leaders,breakout group strategy sessions that identified and developed blueprints foraction, and a planning session for future activities. There were two ultimateproducts of the Summit: a report documenting specific advice for groups toadvance women leaders; and ten specific action blueprints. The full report can bedownloaded from www.weli.eng.iastate.edu. The objective of this paper is todocument the specific steps for how the following groups can contribute toincreasing the number of women engineering leaders: 1) individual womenengineers, 2) engineering organizations including universities, and 3) professionalengineering
bone.SettingIn general, the proposed experiments and design projects introduce the students to a practicalexperimental technique of reflected photoelasticity for the evaluation of stresses in a member.The objectives of the experiments that used a specimen in uniaxial tension show the student thefollowing: 1. The development of stress in a member 2. The region where the theoretical axial stress equation is valid 3. The effects and determination of assembly stress 4. The interaction of normal, bearing, and contact stressesEquipment and specimenThe experiment setup is shown in figure 1; equipment, specimen, and parts needed are: 1. Tensile machine 2. Reflection polariscope 3. Manual null-balance compensator or
the second semester (ENGR 492), class attendances are minimal while student teameffort is focused on the actual work required to complete the design project under the guidance of Page 9.568.2their technical faculty advisor. Frequent meetings and progress review sessions are conducted to “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”facilitate the design effort and to assist the teams in staying on track. While the final deliverableproduct varies from
Session 3449 Numerical Methods for Engineering Technology Students Gregory K. Watkins William States Lee College of Engineering The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223AbstractNumerical methods is defined as techniques by which mathematical problems are formulated sothey may be solved with arithmetic operations. Many of these techniques have great importancein the development of finite element theory and other advanced topics, but are of questionableimportance for Engineering Technology
meaningful and effective in light of limited spatial resources and growing classsizes. Typical class size is 15. The course structure involved 3-hr class discussions thatcompliment 3 hr weekly lectures. During each session, the 15 students’ discussion group isdivided into subgroups of 5 students; each sub-group is given 1 or 2 topics (under which specificproblems are highlighted) to discuss. After about 15 minutes of preparation, the sub-groups areencouraged to debate/discuss the issues with each other; the professor acts as a discussionfacilitator and summarizes key issues raised during the 3-hr discussion. Another more importantconsequence is that the teaching method should shift in emphasis from passive lecturing tomentoring and small group
Session 1455 Growing the National Innovation System: Reshaping Professional Graduate Education to Ensure a Strong U.S. Engineering Workforce D. A. Keating, 1 T. G. Stanford, 1 D. D. Dunlap, 2 D. R. Depew, 3 S. J. Tricamo, 4 D. H. Sebastian, 4 S. K. Fenster,4 G. S. Jakubowski, 5 M. I. Mendelson, 5 R. J. Bennett, 6 J. M. Snellenberger 7 University of South Carolina 1 / Western Carolina University 2 / Purdue University 3 New Jersey Institute of Technology 4 / Loyola Marymount University 5 St Thomas University 6 /Rolls-Royce
Session 1793 A Course Investigating Technology in World Civilization William R. Loendorf Eastern Washington University School of Computing and Engineering Sciences Department of Engineering Technology and Multimedia DesignAbstractAn interdisciplinary course has been created that explores a historical perspective of thedevelopment of technology in a global context. This junior level course traces the interconnectedevents and cultures in which technology developed. It investigates how technologies are inter-related and how cultural factors
Sciences.Prior papers and presentations provided the general outlines of the international student exchangeprogram or primarily focused on details related to the ABET accreditation process.1-4 The latteris a crucial issue since every degree path must meet all EC2000 accreditation criteria. Over 100students have participated in the program since its inception in 1994. All but one studentsuccessfully completed all requirements of the exchange program and received degrees from bothMSOE and the FHL.IntroductionMany universities offer opportunities to study in a foreign country. The organization of thestudent exchange programs range from a university serving as a gathering point and providing anumbrella program for students from many institutions to
aspect of a research problem that will meet the capstone course requirements is possible.The difficulty may be in deciding the scope of the project and whether it is advisable for a teamto undertake a given project. Some general questions faculty members should ask to helpdetermine the answer include: 1. Is the the level of the project appropriate for seniors in your program? Some projects just are too complex, require too much of a time commitment, or too long of a time period for a senior design project. Sometimes a project might be broken into pieces such that it would work for senior design. If managing the senior design team or training them to be really helpful to the
. Page 15.211.12APPENDIX D: Bar Chart Generated based on Collected Data .Likert Scale Analysis. 5: Best Possible Scenario 1: Needs Improvement Page 15.211.13APPENDIX E: Analysis of Bar Chart GeneratedThe bar chart is based on Likert Scale.One can observe from the bar chart that the two “traits”Characteristic # 1 (Environment: Fundamental Knowledge and Concepts) andCharacteristic # 4 (Depth of Understanding of the Importance of Environment)both show a respectable mode values of 4, indicating that the students have had an adequateunderstanding of the concepts and importance.However, the other four other characteristics show mode values of
opportunity(often a short-lived window of opportunity) arises. Remember that in the university fundingarena, “first come” is often “first served.”12. Never settle for sloppy or half-done work or documents. “Engineering is in the details.”Aim for high quality. A little with quality is worth a multitude of slop. Of course, there is apoint of diminishing returns (say, in the number of content revisions) but, in general, aim for highquality in all work.13. Do not underestimate the importance of written communications. In academia, these areusually as or more important than technical ability in building a reputation and creditability.Although often time consuming, when clearly indicated, write articulate, grammatically perfectmemoranda, proposals, and
goals specified in the MBTI TFS and6 are general questions relating to team effectiveness. Note that 2 questions specifically relate togoals of BOTH the 6-Hats and MBTI TFS. Question 1, 3, 6, 9 and 15 measure goals of the 6-Hats TFS. Questions 1, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 15 measure goals of the MBTI TFS and 2, 4, 5, 12, 13and 14 measure general team effectiveness issues. This is summarized in Table 5 below. Page 5.9.9 Table 5 – Correlation Between TFS, Goals & Questions on the Team Effectiveness SurveyStatement Statement TFS Goal Number 1 Our team is very creative
, software, and tools. Even in the large lecture halls, students are teamed into smallergroups to build hands-on, in-class projects. The [University] offers a state-of-the-art activelearning classroom to facilitate such projects in smaller groups of students in the big lecture halls(Figure 1). These activities promote problem-solving skills, teamwork, technical communication,and ethics. Students are introduced to concepts such as creative thinking, prototype design,estimations, essential software such as Excel, CAD designs, Solidworks, Microelectronics,CircuitPython, Jupyter Notebooks, and ethics-related activities. Each topic is presented at thetime in the semester when students begin applying the topics to their design projects. In thesecond
AC 2009-2480: THE UNDERSTATED VALUE OF FREEHAND SKETCHING INTECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONDiarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Diarmaid Lane is a teaching assistant and PhD student in the Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering at University of Limerick. He is currently responsible for teaching Design and Communication Graphics to trainee teachers of Engineering Education. His special interests include freehand technical sketching and pedagogical approaches in Engineering Graphics Education.Niall Seery, University of Limerick Dr. Niall Seery is a lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering at University of Limerick. He currently directs the graduate
that the same might be done for allareas of research. What follows would be the responsibility of the research community to owntheir role as the ‘Guardians’ of the knowledge they discover. At present there is no sense ofawareness of this guardianship. The community decides what constitutes acceptable knowledgethrough peer review of grant applications (for the initial production of knowledge) and ofjournals and conference papers (for the dissemination of such knowledge) as well as through thetext books and courses created for the next generation of scientists. However what constitutes thisknowledge’ base and the acceptance of the notion of a negotiated knowledge is not explicitlydiscussed.The second step involves considering the processes by
these two areas into oneseamless package of three twenty hour courses. A certificate is awarded at the successfulcompletion of the program. A letter grade and CEU’s are posted to a permanent NU transcript.Because of the uniqueness of this program, technical management from the company has beeninvolved since inception. An Engineering Manager works closely on curriculum development andthe evaluation of the course and serves as mentor to the participants. Communication betweenfaculty and mentor is ongoing. The company training personnel handle general administrationand scheduling. Continuing Education has a major role in reproducing course notes and classtransparencies as well as its regular support functions. The program has completed its
Team building skills 1 9.1 1Stage-3: Determining the technical portion of QFD matrix (HOWS)Online survey was conducted for alumni and in-class survey was conducted for currentstudents to gather the necessary critical elements in meeting the customer requirements.The data obtained from the surveys provided the research group with some suggestionsfor their effects in meeting the requirements. Considering the result of the surveys, theresearch group generated best suggestions by brainstorming and HOWS were includedinto the top portion of the HOQ for internal customers. A group of 3 senior undergraduatemanufacturing students participated in the brainstorming sessions and provided theirvaluable suggestions
which data were gatheredrepresenting 44% of the co-op students. The data were analyzed and reported for each ofthe instruments and aggregated with all majors and classes. Students from fourdepartments (mechanical engineering—25, chemical engineering—9, electricalengineering—1, and civil engineering—1) were part of the analysis. Of the 36 co-opstudents, 11 students were in one of the Foundation Coalition programs resulting in arepresentation of 31%.• Co-Op Student Evaluation: The purpose of the Co-op Student Evaluation was to obtain general information on the student and the company. Additionally, there was a rated questionnaire designed to obtain student responses on several items regarding the co-op experience as well as the
following are example transcripts of portions of teaching sessions using the SocraticMethod in undergraduate engineering courses at the University of the Pacific.Example 1. Example transcript of a portion of a teaching session, using the Socratic Page 13.486.4Method, in an Analog and Digital Communications Systems senior elective course. Theclass is taught in Spring 2008 and a total of 4 students are enrolled: Bryan, Justin, Jesseand Patrick.Professor (MG): Is it important to discuss the idea of the size of a communication signal?If yes, why? What is this idea useful for? If not, why? Bryan, please go first.Bryan: Yes, it is useful, because you need to
for research into functionally similar systems that can be used toanalyze the ability of engineers to represent engineered systems.BackgroundFunction and Functional ModelingFunctional models are tools that allow a designer to abstract a system to its flows of energy,material, and information to allow exploration of problems in a “solution-neutral” manner. Flow-based models generally stem from the work of Pahl and Beitz [1] who helped to formalize andpopularize the methodology in mechanical engineering design, but more broadly, functionalmodels may be used across controls engineering, systems engineering, software engineering, andengineering design [2].These models typically use two levels of abstraction: a black box model and a sub
, please see the subsequent section.Course ContextAAE 20401, Aeromechanics II Laboratory, is a one-credit laboratory (lab) course in aerospacestructural mechanics at Purdue University. The lab course offers six lab preparatory lectures andsix physical (hands-on) labs. The durations of the lectures and labs are 50 minutes and 110minutes, respectively. During the lab preparatory lecture session, a faculty member delivers alecture. Then, at the beginning of the physical lab sessions, graduate teaching assistants (TAs)leads the guided physical lab sessions. All individuals in the teaching team are Purdue AAEmembers. Table 1 shows the summary of AAE 20401 using abstract terms in StructuralMechanics. The course provides the students with the
to Associate Professor in 2013 and Full Professor in 2019 . Dr. Chrysochoou’s general research area is environmental geochemistry, with a focus on site remediation, characterization and reuse of industrial waste and construction materials. Dr. Chrysochoou’s serves as the Principal Investigator of the project ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Department program, this 5-year project aims at transforming educational practices and cultivate the potential of neurodivergent individuals to contribute to engineering breakthroughs American c
AC 2009-582: WEB-BASED CONTROL FOR MECHATRONICS LABORATORYEXPERIMENTSImmanuel Edinbarough, University of Texas, Brownsville Dr. Immanuel Edinbarough is a Professor in the department of Applied Engineering Technology at the University of Texas at Brownsville. He has successful track record spanning over 25 years in the service oriented and challenging fields of academia, industry and military. He is a hands-on manufacturing expert who has worked in several areas of engineering, manufacturing, and technical management including research, design, and production of mechanical, electronic, and electromechanical systems. Recognized trainer and resource person in the fields of CAD/CAM/CIM, Robotics and
Electrical Engineering at Colorado School of Mines in Golden, Colorado. He has over 32 years of combined teaching, research, and industrial experience. Dr. Ammerman has coauthored and published a number of award winning technical articles, published in archival journals. His research interests include renewable energy integration, engineering education, computer applications in power system analysis, arc flash hazard analysis and electrical safety.Dr. William Hoff, Colorado School of Mines William Hoff received a BS and MS degree in Physics, and a PhD in Computer Science from the Univer- sity of Illinois-Urbana. After working as a staff engineering at Lockheed Martin, he joined the faculty at the Colorado School of Mines