composition and the value that first-year composition courses offer to engineering students – even (or perhaps especially) without animmediate focus on the kinds of documents traditionally considered part of technical writing.Developing a Metacognitive Framework Through Engineering – First-Year CompositionPartnershipsA Framework for Rhetorical LearningIn arguing for a rhetorical framework for communication instruction, we recognize that fewengineering faculty have either the curriculum time or the disciplinary background to developand implement this approach. Also, we agree that efforts to improve students’ grammaticalcompetence or design assignments that mirror current workplace practices are valuable. But,following Boiarsky, Hodges et al., Dias et
].To address this tension at our university, we are engaging undergraduate engineering studentsacross multiple phases of soft robotics curriculum development. Students are developing softrobotics learning modules as co-designers, which is what is presented in this paper. In the future,they will get to pilot their activities with other students. Once modules are fully developed andpiloted, they will be implemented in courses across our mechanical engineering (ME) curriculumand shared publicly. Overall, our full project will explore the potential for student-generated softrobotics modules to impact the learning and interest in soft robotics of both (a) the studentsdesigning the modules and (b) the students participating in the modules once they
,” Eye on PSI CHI, PSI CHI, The International Honor Society inPsychology, Spring 2010[5] Haynes, L., Pfeffer, S., Boss, J. et al. “Lab management: insights for the new investigator.”Nat Immunol 7, 895–897 (2006) doi:10.1038/ni0906-895[6] Younis, N., “Establishing and Assessing Educational Objectives for EngineeringPrograms,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition[7] Arati Phadke, Sangeeta Kulkarni, "Enriching Curriculum Through Laboratory Courses forTechnology-Enhanced Learning", Technology for Education (T4E) 2018 IEEE Tenth InternationalConference on, pp. 118-121, 2018, DOI 10.1109/T4E.2018.00032[8] Sasha Nikolic, Peter James Vial, Montserrat Ros, David Stirling
ofthe development, usually lasting between 2 months and 6 months, but which has taken more thana year for complex projects (see [12] for one example). Once a prototype solution has beencompleted, instructors and Ideas Clinic staff will design the learning materials for the course, andit will transition into an implementation phase. For projects with significant hardwarecomponents, the implementation phase often includes significant work to scale the hardware foruse by an entire class of students.McRae et al. [13] specify that quality work-integrated learning (WIL) programs have fourcommon characteristics: 1. Pedagogy – WIL needs to be integrated into the overall curriculum 2. Experience – The learning environment must be supportive of the
Engineering ABET accreditation in 2001 and 2007. In 2004-2005, McKnight served as Interim Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, and in 2008-2009 served as Acting Vice Provost for Research.Prof. Michael E. Pelletier, Northern Essex Community CollegeDr. Paula G. Leventman, Northeastern University Paula Goldman Leventman has been Diversity Coordinator and Internal Evaluator for the NSF-funded Center for Subsurface Sensing and Imaging Systems (CenSSIS) from 2000 to 2011. She was Assistant Dean of engineering for women’s projects at Northeastern University from 1982-2004. Leventman was Principal Investigator of the NSF-funded Multiple Pathways toward Gender Equity in the U.S. IT Work- force, 2001-2005
AC 2007-72: FOSTERING CREATIVITY IN THE CAPSTONE ENGINEERINGDESIGN EXPERIENCEElvin Shields, Youngstown State University Dr. Elvin Shields is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering. His research has been generously sponsored by a University Research Professorship during the 2005-2006 academic year at Youngstown State University. Since 1995, Dr. Shields has coached approximately 250 mechanical engineering students through nearly 90 capstone design projects ranging from collegiate competitions to industrial problems. Page 12.757.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
AC 2007-2879: USING THE SAE COLLEGIATE DESIGN SERIES TO PROVIDERESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES FOR UNDERGRADUATESGregory Davis, Kettering University DR. GREGORY W. DAVIS is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, formerly known as GMI Engineering & Management Institute. Acting in this capacity, he teaches courses in the Automotive and Thermal Science disciplines. He also serves a Director of the Advanced Engine Research Laboratory, where he conducts research in alternative fuels and engines. Currently, Greg serves as co-faculty advisor for the world's largest Student Chapter of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and the Clean Snowmobile Challenge Project. Greg is
, but most projects aredominated by design and build activities. The customer needs, business, and societal aspects takea back seat while the projects focus on technical knowledge and ability6.Instead of taking the traditional approach, we are trying to incorporate the entrepreneurialmindset into all of our engineering students, starting with freshman engineering courses andending with their senior design capstone courses. We decided to entice students by exposingthem to engineering entrepreneurship from very early in their program of study, i.e., the firstsemester of the freshmen year. This strategy is inline with the observations of Bilen et al.9 andGeorgi et al.7 who note that younger students are more interested in entrepreneurship. They
workshops. Since then, mbed inparticular has become a choice platform on campus for fast prototyping of a wide range ofprojects, largely due to the ARM Developer Day, but also because of its simplicity andabstracted programming model simple enough for non-Electrical and Computer Science studentsto develop applications with. Senior design projects also started migrating from a single designplatform to a search to find the most suitable platform for a wider range of applications. Page 23.207.7 Figure 4. Ticket sales by ticket type. Figure 5. Tickets sold.The 2nd ARM Developer Day (http://armdeveloperday2nd.wordpress.com/)The
feedback due to changes in the electrical engineeringprogram. Koll¨offel and Jong [4] observed improved conceptual understanding and proceduralskills on virtual lab inquiry learning, but its ecological validity was questioned.Marasc and Bejkat aimed to boost interest in electrical engineering by integrating it with othersubjects [5]. Sababha et al. [8] implemented project-based learning in an Embedded Systemscourse, enhancing students’ understanding of real-world applications, though lacking specificdetails on the approach’s limitations. Zhang et al. [9] used design-oriented PBL in a powerelectronics course, outlining the course plan and student feedback, but not mentioning thelimitations or challenges.Collaborative Learning emphasizes group
engineering,humanities, and entrepreneurship and innovation at Worcester Polytechnic Institute(WPI), a technology-focused university in Worcester, Massachusetts. The university isbest known for its 47 year-old project-based curriculum. WPI’s 14-week semesters aredivided into two seven-week “terms.” Our sequence involves a three-credit course in thefirst term (for which students receive Humanities and Arts credit) followed by another 3-credit course in the second term (for which they receive Engineering credit). The twocourses are an integrated six-credit hour sequence.“Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present” provides a deep, integrative learningexperience of benefit to both STEM and non-STEM students, and it is our hope that itwill be taught in
faculty in 1981. Dr. Toossi has worked both as a research scientist and a consultant on various projects related to aqueous aerosols and droplets in the atmosphere, nuclear safety, sensor design, air pollution modeling, flame propagation, fluid mechanics, and fiber optics. Dr. Toossi has successfully managed over $6 M in research contracts from various private and Govern- ment agencies, holds two patents and has published a book on energy and in various peered and refereed journals. His current research interests are in hydrogen storage systems, combustion-generated soot emis- sion, sorption refrigeration, hybrid-electric vehicle design, and renewable energy systems. Dr. Toossi is a member of ASME, ASEE, SAE, SPIE
Paper ID #29720WIP Adopting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Upper Level EngineeringElectromagnetics CourseDr. Matthew Garett Young, Arkansas Tech University Matthew G. Young received his B. Sc. in Electrical Engineering from Arkansas Tech University in 2009. He obtained his M. Sc. in Microelectronics-Photonics at the University of Arkansas in 2012. For his M. Sc. studies, he focused on the growth of silicon nanowires via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In August of 2016, he joined the faculty at Arkansas Tech University as an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering. His Ph.D. was completed at the
paper describes this methodology and its implementation.1 IntroductionGraduate programs in Engineering Management enroll students who had undergraduateeducation in a variety of disciplines such as civil, mechanical, electrical, and architecturalengineering and other science disciplines. Knowledge on how to define specific work systems,which are combinations of workers, machines and information, to perform useful work willgreatly enhance engineering managers. In particular, competence in method study and workmeasurement will greatly assist them to carry out or supervise method planning and workestimation and because of this, work system is often included in the curriculum. The Master ofEngineering Management program, at United Arab Emirates
undergraduate management class and the results provedthat “the multimedia case did indeed enhance the learning experience of the students.” Toevaluate the effectiveness of using a LITEE multimedia case study and access how theimplementation aids student learning, Elrod et al. (2010) studied and found that the LITEEcase study did aid student learning and broadened their vision by taking municipaldevelopment and teaching the professional side of project management as an example. Fini’s(2010) study also found that working with real cases could motivate students and maximizetheir learning and relate the theories to the practice, and learn to tackle real world problems.Similarly, Mbarika et al.’s study (2010) that aimed to examine if multi-media case
have focused on the in-person classroom context [9, 10, 11, 12], and the onlinemodality could benefit from further study. This research addresses this gap by examining theintegration of EM principles in an online, first-year engineering course and evaluating theirimpact on students’ skills and mindsets. This work provides valuable insights for engineeringeducators and curriculum designers. By demonstrating how small-scale interventions in onlinecourses can foster an entrepreneurial mindset and enhance value creation, this research highlightsstrategies for improving the student experience. Additionally, it highlights how intentionalchanges in course design enable students to connect their coursework to complex, real-worldengineering challenges
Paper ID #26367Short Story Writing Requirement for Enhanced Biomedical Engineering Ed-ucation and for Engineering Ethics Competitions — Ethical Twists and CostAssessment RequiredDr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University Director, Center for Rehabilitation Engineering, Science and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Pro- fessor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Short Story Writing Requirement for
toengineering [3]. Authors such as Lengsfeld, et al. [4] and Leydens and Schneider [5] havepresented models for “disciplinary writing” in the engineering curriculum: that is, writinginstruction that is contextualized in a way that is integrated with engineering instruction and thatelucidates the importance of writing in engineering practice.Since the inception of the College of Engineering at Rowan University, the engineeringcurriculum has incorporated a “disciplinary” approach to communication through the two-courseSophomore Engineering Clinic (SEC) sequence. The primary learning outcomes for SEC I areengineering design and technical writing. The second course, SEC II, presents a similarintegration between engineering design and public speaking. Both
Hampshireand California State University, Sacramento (CSUS). The research objectives of the NEESproject include validating hybrid testing techniques to the point of structural collapse bycomparing global and local responses with results from shake table testing previously performedby Lignos et al (2008). This validation experiments consider 1) hybrid simulations where thewhole structure is physically tested and only dynamic effects are simulated in the computer and2) substructure hybrid simulations in which portions of the structure are physically tested andothers are simulated in the computer. Thus, considering the larger goals of the research project,the 3-day engineering workshop curriculum described herein incorporates the theme of studyingthe
research projects and increased their confidence intransferring skills acquired in the courses to their research work. Additionally, the majority of students reported that hands-on learning significantly heightenedtheir interest in pursuing further research or a career in embedded systems design. However,several challenges were identified, along with my insights from student research advising, thatcan be used to improve teaching practices in embedded systems courses. Student feedback andperformance data suggest the following areas for improvement: 1) PCB Schematic and Layout Design: A notable gap in PCB design instruction exists across most Engineering Technology (ET) programs in the U.S. Incorporating PCB design into the curriculum
are prepared, as much as possible, forthe “dynamic and active” writing of the workplace they are about to enter.Bibliography1 Milanovic, I. M., and Eppes, T. A., 2009, ‘Capstone Projects for ET: Issues, Benefits and Trade-offs’ 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, Paper ASEE-2009-30.2 Bahktin, M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. 1986. Austin: University of Texas Press.3 Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., and Miller, R., 1986, “Writing at Exxon ITD.” Writing in Nonacademic Settings, ed. L. Odell and D. Goswami. Guilford Press.4 Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., and Pare, A, 1999, ‘Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts,’Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.5 Paretti, M.C., 2008, “Teaching Communication in
students. By using a mixed-methods approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative analyses, it gave proper investigationof how hands-on preparation enhances students’ academic performance, engagement, and careerreadiness. The research aims to provide perceptions into curriculum development and pedagogicalstrategies that address fundamental gaps and provide support for the HBCU's wider mission tocultivate a diverse and skilled engineering workforce.2.0 Literature ReviewRecent research has highlighted the critical role that hands-on learning plays in enhancing STEMeducation at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Hands-on approaches,including laboratory experiments, project-based learning, and simulation activities, have
greater sense of belonging to discipline, self-efficacy, and career readiness; particularly for under-represented minority (URM) students [3].However, such active-learning experiences are usually offered late in their engineering degree(e.g., senior-capstone projects) rather than early and often throughout the curriculum. Mostredesign efforts to address this issue typically focus on single, or multiple but disjointed gatewaycourses [4]. An example of a critical path in the Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE)department at Sacramento State is shown in Figure 1.Figure-1: Example curriculum path in the EEE major, showing long engineering pre-requisite chains called critical-paths. Courses shown in Bold, shaded, are redesigned as a part of the
, including being able to effectivelyself-regulate their own learning and take responsibility to understand and apply engineering.In 2015, the Electrical Engineering Department at a University of South Florida (USF)university in the U.S. initiated the Taking Responsibility to Understand Engineering (TRUE)initiative as part of a department cultural transformation program.The TRUE initiative was one of multiple elements in the transformation, and within theinitiative, the implementation of TRUE projects was a key programmatic activity. TRUEprojects bring together students, faculty, industry, and community to engage in doing real-world problem-solving during the 4-year undergraduate program. Students take responsibilityto self-regulate, learn, and apply
% 53.2% 100% LL (29.9) (29.6) (29.8) (32.1) (31.8) (31.9) (31.8) (31.3) (33.4) (32.2) (33.2) (0.0)Note. 1. Standard deviations in brackets. 2. KB=Knowledge Base for Engineering; PA=ProblemAnalysis; IN=Investigation; DE=Design; ET=Use of Engineering Tools; IT=Individual and Teamwork;CS=Communication Skills; PR=Professionalism; IE=Impact of Engineering; EE=Ethics and Equity;EP=Economics and Project Management; LL=Lifelong Learning. 3. This table depicts one-waydependencies. The values in each cell represent the dependency the graduate attribute in the column onthe left has on the graduate attribute in the row across the top. For example, the dependency of KB onPA is 67.4%, whereas the dependency of PA on KB is 82.9
inclusive pedagogies.Dr. Johnson Carroll, University of Johannesburg Johnson Carroll is an Associate Professor and Engineering Education Specialist in the Faculty of Engi- neering and the Built Environment at the University of Johannesburg. He holds a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering and other degrees in engineering, mathematics, and liberal arts from the University of Texas at Austin. He joined the University of Johannesburg in 2010, where he has served as a senior lecturer, department head, and since 2013 as an engineering education specialist. His research interests include curriculum design and innovative assessment.Dr. Jennifer ”Jenni” M Case, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
AeromechanicsII. AAE 20401 is an aerospace structural mechanics lab course for second-year students wherethey had the opportunity to use the Virtual Lab software. When implementing the Virtual Labs,we characterized the content, assessment, and pedagogy of the course under the BackwardCourse Design Model to identify how the Virtual Lab software could be integrated into thecoursework. After a year of getting feedback on the software from the students and investigatingthe pedagogical approaches on how to use it, we introduced a new format on the use of thevirtual lab in Fall 2019. This paper describes the latest version of the lab course with theintegration of the Virtual Lab software. The curriculum design, presented in this paper, is auseful reference for
, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- principal investigator for the following National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects: Professional Formation of Engineers: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (PFE: RIEF) - Using Digital Badging and Design Challenge Modules to Develop Professional Identity; Professional Formation of Engineers: REvolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments (IUSE PFE\RED) - Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transform- ing Society. She is a member of the CBE department’s ABET and Undergraduate Curriculum Committee, as well as faculty advisor for
cover thefundamental concepts of digital logic through a hands-on approach, utilizing remotely accessibleFPGA hardware. The labs are structured to build upon each other gradually, enabling students todevelop their knowledge and skills step-by-step, for comprehensive understanding of material.BEADLE Curriculum & FeaturesThe BEADLE curriculum consists of six labs that progressively cover digital logic conceptsusing hands-on approaches (figure 1). The curriculum requires no prior knowledge or experiencein electrical engineering concepts. Figure 1: Organization of BEADLE labsLab 0 familiarizes students with the tools and technology used in the course, including softwareinstallations and remote lab platform accounts
improved understanding of the science they use in the service of designcompletion.6 In this paper, we describe a curriculum research and development project devotedto exploring this hypothesis. We consider the theoretical background that supports this endeavor,the initial set of four engineering design-based science curriculum units that have been created,and the preliminary findings on the science content learning that occurs during unit enactment.The purpose of our project is to explore an overarching research question: what are theconsequences of using engineering-design-based activities as contexts for specific sciencecontent instruction in the upper elementary grades? To investigate this question, we havecollaborated with local teachers to