conceptual engineering. The goal is that non-engineers should be more informed users of technology and this information can be gained by people who are not necessarily STEM professionals. Division members have developed a considerable amount of research around this approach [1].• Responsible Citizenship: Some work emerging from TELPhE has advocated for technological literacy as a component of responsible citizenship. A key theme in this group is the idea that given the pervasive nature of technology as part of everyday life, technological and engineering literacy should include an ability to understand the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of technological developments [1].• Engineering Literacy for
programming outside of class time.Literature Review: Why mindfulness and sustainability go together like birds of a feather Mental health disorders are often reported amongst college students [1], [2]. Thetransition to college from high school includes a change of schools, a change of class formatsand teaching styles, a change in social groups, increased responsibility, and usually a change inliving arrangements amongst other transition issues specific to an individual. These changes,along with the stress of living in a permanently connected society, with information overload andpossible worry about the finances of paying for college, and increasingly common disasters dueto climate change, may all be factors causing the increase. Demand
Francisco, host student-ledchapters of the Society of Women Engineers [28]. UC Berkeley also has a Gender EquityResource Center that serves the wider campus, and UC Irvine supports Women in Technology atUCI, an organization that also serves the wider campus. Each of the nine campuses have at least one established library that serves as a node forstudents. Certain campuses have dedicated engineering, or more broadly science, libraries.Library workers are already mission driven to support a myriad of student needs, including thediscovery and access of scholarly information, and supporting spaces for learning, collaboration,and research. Each campus operates independently; however, shared library resources andconsortia subscription agreements
visualization by the student to promoteaffective learning in a comprehensive curriculum. Important emerging technologies, such asEEG and muon radiography using cosmic rays for home land security applications are among thetopics discussed. The learning assessment rubric of Highly Competent, Competent, and NeedsImprovement versus Participant Deliverables was used. An improvement was observed in thegrades of discussion sections of lab reports and the written interpretation of numericalcalculations. The sustainability of such triggered learning motivation through the teaching ofperspectives in science, technology and society could be enhanced if an independent collegecourse in Science, Technology and Society has a STEM course as pre-requisite.I
life and the lives of others, and how people collectively make decisions abouttechnology and manage change. This has been mapped in terms of three dimensions –“knowledge, ways of thinking and acting, and capabilities.”1 A person who has developedtechnological literacy is prepared to understand and make informed decisions about technology.Over the past ten years or so, teaching technological literacy has been recognized as an importanttopic.1-3 Faculty members at universities and community colleges have developed courses4 and Page 25.1266.2minors5,6 to help college students develop technological literacy. A review of papers submittedfor
Society for Engineering EducationThese linkages benefit both technology teacher education and engineering and technologyfaculty and students.Preparation for Engineering and Technology When engineering and technology faculty look to K-12 education they generally focus onmath and science classes. High school math and science classes are generally emphasized in thepreparation of students for technological careers. While math and science are essential forcareers in engineering and technology, they do not give K-12 students an understanding of thegoals and culture of engineering and technology. Recently, Technology Education has emerged as a vehicle to deliver effectivetechnological literacy education, and it shows promise for being able
. Earls (Earls,1997), J. Maglitta (Maglitta 1995) and R. Weinstein (Weinstein, 1994). Techno-MBAs wereconcentrated primarily in Information Technology graduate programs.There were some exceptions to the above. MIT’s MS/MoT and NJIT’s MS/Mgt. programs havebeen accredited by the Accrediting Association of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB).They were included because these programs are located within schools of management (e.g.Sloan and NJIT) that are affiliated with engineering schools.In addition, commonly used directories were searched. These included ASEE’s Directory ofEngineering Graduate Studies and Research; Business Week’s Best Executive EducationPrograms; Peterson’s Guide for Graduate Education and the Princeton Review of
Poll Join: PollEv.com/ […]78910111213 Corporate IncentiveEthical workers whounderstand and implementsocial awareness principlescan contribute to moreinnovative, productive, andequitable workplaces andproducts, ultimately drivingbetter business outcomesand societal benefits. (Ely & Thomas, 2020; Lorenzo et al, 2018.; Deloitte, 2023; & McKinsey & Company, 2020). Corporate Ethics Of companies surveyed have11% ethical principles governing emerging technologies. Such a gap in ethics is unacceptable. (Deloitte, 2023)The Academy’s Responsibility Ethics Curriculum Inclusive
trivial matter for higher education institutions because of the needed culture shift.Therefore, envisioning the new academic programs to address the workforce needs ofthese emerging technologies requires a disciplined approach such as road map activity.In addition, the emerging technology predictions covered are intended to address theneeds at a much higher dimension. Now, the challenge is to distill this information to afiner degree to satisfy the needs of the academic program. The approach we areexploring at this time is a road map process, which is commonly adopted by industry.The result will be refined using strategy maps to get to the program level objectives.Electronics Engineering Technology Road Map processThe Electronics Engineering
Advanced Decision Architectures Deep collaboration enabled by staff rotations New collaborations --- Advanced Sensors peer-to-peer, mentorships Flexibility to adapt to emerging research trends Emphasis on rapidRobotics transition through task- order contract International Technology Alliance Network and Information Sciences
the period of the grant. The workshops have now been offered in 15 states. • CREATE faculty have continued to work with other faculty inside and outside of the consortium to broaden their technical background in the manufacturing and information technology areas. • In 2008-2009, a series of technical focus meetings were held and included community college faculty from non-CREATE colleges. New emerging technology areas with high potential for technicians employment are being pursued including alternative energy programs in wind and solar technologies. • A new adaptation of the Facilitator/Teaching Improvement model was piloted in cooperation with an Achieving the Dream community college in Pennsylvania in
undergraduate, or even K-12, education. We aim to better understandstudents’ approaches to engineering problem solving, particularly whether intuition is used as ameans for advancing knowledge on expertise development and problem solving in engineering.Our work explores the role intuition plays as part of problem solving. We have designed aninstrument intended to capture when and how students use intuition during the problem-solvingprocess [14]. This work-in-progress paper describes emergent findings from think-aloud sessionsused to inform the development of the instrument, Predicting and Evaluating EngineeringProblem Solving (PEEPS).MethodsQualitative data was collected during think-aloud sessions completed in spring 2021 with asample of seven
to the career development of women,” J Vocat Behav, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 326–339, 1981, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1.[5] S. A. Kalaian, R. M. Kasim, and J. K. Nims, “Effectiveness of small-group learning pedagogies in engineering and technology education: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Technology Education, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 16, 2018.[6] S. C. Lin, “Evolution of civil engineering students’ friendship and learning networks,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 144, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000390.[7] C. Stadtfeld, A. Vörös, T. Elmer, Z. Boda, and I. J. Raabe, “Integration in emerging social networks explains academic
factors to consider in creating an environment thatfosters and develops the ability to engage in technological innovation. For example, studentsneed to develop cognitive abilities such as technical fluency in a domain, as well as the ability toapproach problems from a multidisciplinary perspective.Our study is investigating the role that computational and analytical abilities play in innovationin the context of a conceptual framework that has recently emerged in the engineering educationliterature: adaptive expertise. The model of adaptive expertise has been presented as a way ofthinking about how to prepare learners to flexibly respond to new learning situations. The currentconception is that developing adaptive expertise requires development
, “Quality assurance of engineering degree programs through public professional accreditation: Practical experience,” in 2017 International Conference “Quality Management,Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies” (IT&QM&IS), Saint Petersburg, Russia: IEEE, Sep. 2017, pp. 443–446. doi: 10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085857.[5] J. M. Williams, “Transformations in Technical Communicat ion Pedagogy: Engineering, Writing, and the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000,” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 149–167, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1207/s15427625tcq1002_3.[6] J. F. Volkwein, L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, L. C. Strauss, and J. Sukhbaatar, “Engineering Change: A Study of the
developedstrategies for solving open-ended, ambiguous problems that closely resemble problems in theengineering workplace, while Ramirez used research from cognitive science and educationalpsychology to develop a framework for teaching engineering so students learned how to makeappropriate judgments for their work.More recently, engineering and engineering education have been reevaluated and charged withproducing engineers who will function in rapidly evolving technical and business environments.In 1997, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (now known as ABET, Inc.)released new criteria for accrediting engineering programs called the Engineering Criteria (EC)2000 4. Unlike prior frameworks, EC 2000 focused on assessments of what students
: Transferability of a Neurodivergent Codebook Developed from TikTok – Implications for Exploring Neurodivergent Engineering StudentsAbstractThe purpose of this work-in-progress research paper is to determine the transferability of aneurodivergent codebook using social media content from TikTok. The neurodiversity paradigmhas started to shift public and scholarly conversations about being neurodivergent from a deficitframing to a celebration of differences in brain functioning. Engineering education researchersshould join these conversations when we consider accessibility for students with hiddendisabilities to integrate the emancipatory language emerging from these conversations in ourresearch. For this WIP study, we
would immediately evoke a distinction according to the use orabsence of numbers, which is not particularly informative in this context.16 To get a clearerunderstanding of the interpretive approach, we need to recognize that some research problems inengineering education are in their nature essentially different from traditional engineeringresearch.3 The core of this difference lies in the complex nature of the social aspects ofengineering education under investigation. More specifically, social reality emerges formmultiple and varied interactions of individuals.13, 17 This emergent13, 18 and inter-subjectivereality19-21 is the very object of research and can in its nature not be represented in simple rules ordeterministic correlations. The
July 2022, under Professor Kurt Becker’s supervision. Before getting his Ph.D. from USU, Mohammad was a student at Oklahoma State University, where he received a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. Mohammad also received another master’s degree in computer engineering from the Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) in Jordan. Besides, Mohammad also has a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering from Al- Yarmouk University in Jordan. Complemented with his educational degrees, Mohammad has more than four years of teaching experience at Najran University, Saudi Arabia. Mohammad was also working as a Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) for 2.5 years at
. Linguisticjustice is defined as equitable access to political or social life through language [11]. Throughtext summary and topic modeling utilizing machine learning tools like Bag-of-Words (BoW) andlatent Dirichlet allocation [12], we identify critical aspects of student narratives of understandingin written responses to statics and dynamics CTs. We seek to use machine learning to identifydifferent ways students talk about a problem. Through this process, we hope to help reducehuman bias in the classroom and through technology by giving instructors and researchersdiverse narratives that include insight into their students’ histories, identities, and understanding.These can then be used to connect technological knowledge to students’ everyday
discussion evaluating each engineering vignette.Students’ Professed Epistemologies: Tentative Support for Scientific ObjectivityWhile existing research suggests engineers tend to elevate the “technical realm” of engineering(e.g., technical knowledge, mathematics, science), participants in this research routinelyexpressed tentative support for the idea that math and science were the best ways tocommunicate and defend ideas, often pointing to social issues, human factors, and personalvalues as caveats to such beliefs. For example, while reflecting on responses to the surveyquestions, one student discussed how the questions were difficult to answer given the number ofcontextual factors that might inform their beliefs about engineering knowledge: I
but not sufficient to the discussion of emerging ontological technologies.5. The use of information technology in the workplace and the need to prepare students forcareers that use information technology has long been tcentral to policies that promote TL inraising productivity. This seems indisputable, but the market is a much stronger driver thanpolicy in achieving this. Where policy can help is in reducing the digital divide that leavestudents from low income backgrounds stranded in low income jobs11 It is also helpful inconditions of continuous technological change to maintain technological fluency through lifelongeducation. Much of this "retooling" is market driven, and the private sector also spends heavilyon education and training
students to memorize, transform, andstore the information they are learning in class, often called cognition [6]. A student’s cognitiveabilities in a particular course could affect their motivational orientation and their uptake of self-regulated learning behaviors [7]. In an educational setting, these two concepts are linked.Svinicki [8] points to this linkage, stating, “[l]earners have to be motivated to develop the mentalmodel [of learning] in the first place and to perform the behavior once they have their models inplace” [p. 64].Within STEM education, both constructs have been a focus for researchers. Many investigatorshave studied engineering students' motivation, but there has been a lack of using motivationtheories established within
Paper ID #39227Work in Progress: Developing Methods from Feminist StandpointPerspectives to Analyze a Panel Discussion and Promote Enduring ImpactDr. Renee M. Desing, Oregon State University Dr. Renee Desing is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University in the School of Civil and Construc- tion Engineering. Her research interests include diversity, equity, inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and
, high quality information and classroom activities is often a daunting proposition. Oneway to alleviate frustration and to avoid reinventing wheels is to use the Manufacturing andEngineering Technologies Education Clearinghouse (METEC). METEC serves as a one stopshop for technology educators in general, and new educators in particular.METEC’s searchable electronic database provides resources pertinent to a broad range ofengineering technologies. Among the vetted materials in the database are course and programoutlines, descriptions of best practices, simulations, texts, activities, videos, PowerPointpresentations, etc. The clearinghouse materials are obtained from numerous sources such asNSF centers and projects, other academic institutions
Sydney E. Junkins 1887 Professor of Engineering, Dartmouth CollegeSeung Ki Moon, Pennsylvania State University Research Associate, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Page 15.156.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Infrastructure to Facilitate the Creation of Courses on Technology and Engineering for Non-EngineersAbstractTechnology is foundational to our current way of life, and informed citizens need anunderstanding of what technology is, how it works, how it is created, how it shapessociety, and how society influences technological
challenges that emerged during remote instruction, and 4) how these adaptationscan influence future in-person instruction.Research ContextThis project is part of a partnership between the University of Colorado Boulder and a largesouthwestern school district that aims to integrate computational thinking (CT) into middleschool science and STEM classes using programmable sensor technologies. These sensors enablestudents to use real-time data streams to support their scientific investigations and allow for datacollection outside of the traditional classroom environment (e.g., throughout their school). Overthe last four years, researchers and teachers worked together to design computationally rich unitsand a new professionally learning model. The
informalenvironments, concepts about problem solving, Makerspaces, the Internet of Things (IoT),STEM and STEAM. The small studio of nine graduate students and one instructor worked onthese aspects, looked to the Iowa Core¹ for educational connections, and incorporated 21stCentury Skills and the Universal Constructs (4 C’s) into the design. Deeper researching andideating recognized major differences between 20th Century approaches to education and newopportunities for learning and solving problems.Today, digital technology is pervasive with mobile devices and the internet providing anabundance of information, knowledge and opportunity. According to Richardson², by 2020 morethan half the US workforce will be “freelancers, consultants and independent workers
Paper ID #40004Collaborating Alone: The Role of Technology Infrastructure in ScientificProblem-Solving PracticesNandini Sharma, The University of Texas at Austin Nandini is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication Studies at UT Austin. Her re- search interests are interdisciplinary and motivated by her formal engineering education in Computer Science (B.E., Punjab Engineering College, India), Information Science (MSIS, School of Information, UT Austin) and a decade of professional experience as a software and usability engineer in the software industry. Her research explores how technology design and
. • Currently working with the NSF ATE Midwest Center to adapt their marketing materials. Page 12.1392.3Objective 3: Implement regional programs in Information Technology, Engineering Technology and Manufacturing Technology that reflect existing and emerging industry needs. • CREATE has developed and implemented over 50 new engineering/manufacturing/ electronics/information technology Associate degree and certificate programs. These new curricula have resulted in 197 new or revised courses being taught at six community colleges in Fall of 2006 that integrate academic and vocational subject matter with industry skill standards