should prove useful in anyengineering course on RF circuits, electromagnetic, SI and EMC. As high speed, low power,wireless, and hand-held embedded engineering designs become more common, computerengineering students have a growing need for knowledge and experience in design andmanufacturing issues related to SI and EMC. We have found these experiments to be valuableand effective in enhancing student interest in RF, SI and EMC.1 IntroductionElectromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and signal integrity (SI) have become pervasive designissues in high-speed designs of digital systems, wireless devices, mixed signal systems, andhand-held devices. Two ready examples of industries with acute and long-standing need forengineers with an understanding of EMC
. For example, an instructor mayrequire one line of comment for every ten lines of codes. These numbers are determinedwithout sufficient scientific support; hence, students may resist the requirements and treatthem as burdens. Open-source programs are widely used today and they can be considered as samples forteaching programming. We analyze 6 open-source software projects with 6233 files and 3.27million lines of code to discover their commonalities. The projects are python, gdb, emacs,httpd, kde, and doxygen. These open-source programs are used and contributed by manyprogrammers. These particular programs are selected as examples of high quality code byvirtue of their extensive and successful use in industry and academia. These programs
Paper ID #17737Teaching/Learning Soil Mechanics with Mnemonics, Intuition, Insight andInspirationProf. Jiliang Li P.E., Purdue University Northwest, Westville Campus, INDIANA, USA Dr. Jiliang Li, D.Eng (Mining Engineering, USTB), Ph.D. (Civil Engineering, UA), P.E., M.ASCE, M.ASEE, is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Purdue University Northwest at Westville campus, Indiana. Before returning to teach at University, he had industrial experience in several States with consulting projects ranging from small residential, commercial and subdivision projects to large scale State DOT and federal projects after
facilitate the connection between military experiencesand STEM degrees. For example, the Florida Senate Committee on Military Affairs initiated anawareness campaign to encourage veterans to enter STEM fields and to encourage government 2and higher education to collaborate on STEM programs for student veterans.10 Some universitieshave established programs to encourage veterans to pursue STEM degrees, including the Stern toSTEM program at Old Dominion University11 and an effort at Virginia CommonwealthUniversity to create a system to match military courses or experiences to college-levelengineering course credits.12A recent study on student veterans found that that 2/3 of respondents felt that their MOS
great experience! If possible, even if it's not exactly what you want you don’t know where you want to go to do, it will still help you build your resume yet, look at the different programs that and give you industry experience. There will are offered (I know there is a lot!) in be more networking events and Spring countries that you speak the language or semester career fairs, so look out of them too. want to travel to. Studying abroad requires that you plan ahead and it’s Internships are great! Companies are almost easier to get an idea of how it can work always looking for students who can program, with your schedule when you know what so you'll be in a great position to find an
mentioned incorporating value creation into their courses. Othercomments included helping students to connect with a past course, making industry contacts forguest speakers considering value creation, reaching out to others who also use these techniques,and using Course Mapping. The third open-ended question, “How might the Teaching Institutehave been improved?” resulted in two primary themes. The most frequent suggestion forimprovement was to include more example modules. The second most frequent suggestion forimprovement was to provide more time for discussion of modules that participants design alongwith more one-on-one sessions for faculty to explore new teaching strategies. Other commentsincluded less time doing hands-on activities and more
Paper ID #25275Middle School Teacher Professional Development in Creating a NGSS-plus-5E Robotics Curriculum (Fundamental)Dr. Shramana Ghosh, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Shramana Ghosh received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University of California, Irvine in 2017, her Masters in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2013, and her Bachelors in Manufacturing Processes and Automation Engineering from University of Delhi in 2011. She is currently working as a postdoctoral associate at the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, NY, USA. In this
qualitative scholars who urge integration of data generation and analysis so thateach informs the other [39-42], I embedded “narrative analysis” directly within data generationprocesses (Figure 1). Narrative analysis is the process by which researchers organize dataelements (i.e., discrete stories) into a coherent developmental account [34]. In effect, narrativeanalysis is a synthesis of data rather than its separation into constituent parts (i.e., coding). I usednarrative analysis to create representative, experiential narratives in collaboration with eachparticipant. Later, I analyzed the data across the narratives, looking for outcomes related to theresearch questions, to provide transferable conclusions and recommendations for practice. Tofurther
technologies and infrastructure, therefore, Activity 3 wasdeveloped in collaboration with a trained social scientist (Tomblin).Activity 3Research Question 1: Socio-political and stakeholder influences on engineering Overall, students demonstrated greater recognition of social, political, and socio-technicalsystem complexity because of the activity (Table 3). Student pre-activity responses (Question 1,Day 0) about the benefits and challenges of EVs mainly focused on technological (19.0%),environmental (21.4%), and economic (26.2%) issues. The activity shifted student focus awayfrom economic (Day 1 = 4.9%, Day 2 = 14.9%) and technical issues (Day 1 = 5.6%, Day 2 =13.4%) toward social (Day 1 = 12.3%, Day 2 = 24.5%) and socio-technical complexity
, novelty, and heavy collaboration [2]. Hackathons have beenused to: Spur interest in computer science fields [3] [4] Create innovations within companies [2] [5], for governments [6], and for research projects [7] Provide applications of learning for undergraduate students both within the STEM fields [3] [8] [9] and in non-technical fields, such as marketing [10]Within an educational context, hackathons are very useful for stirring engagement and forcorrecting student perceptions of their program [3] [4] [10]. There is, however, limited literatureon hackathons being used in-class, with the “Markathon” [10] being one notable exception.Hackathons are usually, but not always, competitions [8]. Most
, human factors/ergonomics, en- gineering psychology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, computer vision, biomimetics and biomechan- ics with applications to industrial manipulation and manufacturing, healthcare and rehabilitation, social services, unmanned autonomous vehicle (aerial and ground, indoor and outdoor) systems and STEM education.Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru, New York University Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru is the Assistant Director at the Center for K12 STEM Education, NYU Tandon School of Engineering. As the Center’s STEM Educator and Researcher she works with engineers and faculty to provide professional development to K12 science and math teachers. In addition, she conducts studies that looks at
Paper ID #21516Reactions from First-year Engineering Students to an In-depth Growth Mind-set InterventionDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a MS in Industrial Engi- neering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her research is focused on decision-making within the context of engineering design. She is working to leverage engineering edu- cation research to shift the culture of engineering to be more inclusive of
Paper ID #23265Satisfaction: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Engineering Writing Course-workDr. Stephanie Pulford, University of California, Davis Dr. Stephanie Pulford is the Associate Director for Instructional Research & Development of UC Davis’ Center for Educational Effectiveness. Dr. Pulford’s professional background in engineering includes a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineer- ing as well as industry experience as an aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering
University in West Lafayette, Indiana. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Changes in Student Perceptions of Course-Based Service-Learning at Large Scale: EPICS at 23 Years OldAbstractThe EPICS Program, founded at Purdue University in 1995, has grown where it is engagingmore than 1100 students per year collaborating with more than 50 local and global communityorganizations. The EPICS program has experienced a more rapid phase of growth in recentyears, doubling the enrollment from 292 in the spring of 2010 to 603 in the fall of 2017 and over700 in 2018. This phase of growth included shifts in the composition of teams, as more first andsecond year students enrolled in the design
Paper ID #26956Designing a Laboratory Ecosystem Framework, and Scaffolding an Interac-tive Internal Combustion EngineDr. David MacNair, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. MacNair serves as Director of Laboratory Development in the Woodruff School, and manages Junior and Senior level laboratories in Mechanical Engineering. He develops innovative laboratory experiences based on lessons-learned from the maker movement and real-world industrial challenges, and is building an ”ecosystem” of academic laboratory equipment and curriculum resources which allows universities to collaborate on the development and execution of
engineeringcommunity after their experience. Finally, over 75% plan to continue their research beyond thesummer and pursue graduate school.IntroductionMotivationIn 2018, record numbers of students applied to internal research funding for summer researchprograms at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Due to the one-on-one mentoring andcollaborative environment at Rose-Hulman, research experiences provide quality learningopportunities for students to improve critical thinking skills and prepare for future careers inresearch or industry. However, students may be the sole student working on a research projectsuch that the work can be lonely, and faculty have the burden of training an undergraduate student– in many cases an underclassman – to perform research in
focused on exploring the scienceand engineering of prosthetics. Students conducted research, designed a prosthetic limb, developeda materials list and budget and created a prototype limb based on their design. Participants alsoconducted several smaller experiments throughout the course where they were asked to generate ahypothesis and collect and analyze data to demonstrate use of the scientific method.Program participants spent nine full days on campus during the summer experience. Studentsexplored transportation systems research and engaged in extended learning opportunities includingcampus tours, industry tours and presentations from invited guest speakers. The summer researchexperience focused on the Engineering Grand Challenge, Restore and
fostering more connections to the industry stakeholders,integrating curricula, and enhancing the overall faculty experience (Besterfield-Sacre, Cox,Borrego, Beddoes, and Zhu (2014). A positive classroom experience can lead to furtherinteractions with a professor, which is especially important when considering that students aremore likely to seek advice from a professor than a peer when attempting to determine the bestpath toward success in an engineering course (Meyers, Silliman, Gedde, & Ohland, 2010). Inother words, if undergraduates have had a valuable experience during lectures, they may seek outthese same instructors for assistance after class (e.g., office hours); they may also be more likelyto want to talk to these instructors about
and where do we go from here?” Human Resource Management Review, early access, 2018. [6] M.‐I. Sanchez‐Segura, M. Hadzikadic, G.‐L. Dugarte‐Peña, and F. Medina‐ Dominguez, “Team Formation Using a Systems Thinking Approach,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 35, no. 4, 2018. [7] M. Borrego, J. Karlin, L. D. McNair and K. Beddoes, “Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, Nov., 2013. [8] F. Morgeson, M. Reider, & M. Campion, “Selecting individuals in team settings: The
. The students make 3-4 puzzles using Arduino hardware, laser cut or CNC milled parts, and inspiration from course content. They also choose a theme and story to link the puzzles together with a narrative. 3) Each class works collaboratively together to make one big, traditional escape room. In this project, students are divided into small groups and larger committees. The small groups make two puzzles, a fabricated object (cabinet, skee ball machine, mirror maze, etc.), and a 3D printed object linked to their puzzle. The committees help link all the groups together by deciding the flow of the puzzles, the narrative of the room, the look and design of the room, and the marketing of the room to the local
Research Scientist/Engineer at NorthWest Research Associates. Jeremy believes that curricula should be student-centered and embedded within an engaged, collaborative community who un- derstand the broader, societal implications of their work. He aims to achieve this through the design of project-based and experiential curricula, including a recent redesign of the Computer Engineering pro- gram. He serves on several committees including the steering committee for the Faculty Senate. He also leads ABET accreditation and coordinates assessment for the Computer Engineering program. Jeremy’s research is in space physics and electrical engineering, including atmospheric electricity, radio wave propagation, and digital signal
Institute of Technology Amy R. Pritchett is the Davis S. Lewis Associate Professor in the Georgia Tech School of Aerospace Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Creating and Validating a Model to Support Aerospace Engineering Students’ Coordination of Knowledge about a DesignIntroductionAs a general field, design symbolizes the "conception and realisation of new things".1 However,engineering design differs from other design areas (e.g. graphic, industrial, and software design) in theenhanced complexity involved with clarifying and defining engineering products. Engineering designcan also be defined as a structured approach to developing, validating, and
few aspects. Similarly, Simon’s utterance does not explore or invite a responder to explore theplethora of constraints, local and international politics, and the various political, industrial,regulatory, and other networks that a policy maker might need to navigate in thinking about thisissue. Stronger claims about perspective taking, we think, would require speakers to make visiblethese additional actors and their relationships, and bring out the multiple, at times contradictory,epistemic and/or moral stances that actors embedded in these scenarios take.However, we don’t mean to make any argument that our participants are deficient in any way intheir ability to take perspectives. Our claims are more attached to how these few minutes
State Polytechnic University - Pomona Todd Coburn is an Assistant Professor of Aerospace/Mechanical Engineering at California State Poly- technic University Pomona, an FAA DER, and a stress/structures consultant. He joined Cal Poly Pomona in September of 2012 after a 25 year career at the Boeing Company and restarted his consulting work around that time. His work at Boeing included the structural analysis of aircraft and rockets. His last seven years at Boeing he managed the large and expanding commercial aircraft strength analysis team in Long Beach, California. He holds a PhD in Engineering & Applied Industrial Mathematics from Clare- mont Graduate University, MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering and
Paper ID #17187Cross-Validation of a Global Citizenship Scale: Constructs for EvaluatingUndergraduate Engineering PerspectivesRachel Roberts, University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Rachel completed her Bachelor’s degrees at the University of Wyoming in International Studies and Span- ish, spending a semester in Guatemala interviewing business owners and local residents in Antigua as part of a project to understand conflicts over the growing ecotourism industry. She also completed a Masters with the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences at the University of Washington, collaborating on
summarized and evaluated the status of public educationin the nation and the resulting diagnosis and opening line in their report was that “Our nation isat risk.”11 The study calls for reform of the nation’s educational system and for higher qualityeducation and cites the need for global competitiveness in the wake of technologicaladvancement from foreign countries. Citing industry and commerce concerns and the need toremain a leader in the expanding global economy, the study highlighted indicators of risk to thenation, reporting statistics in educational performance either below standard or not far reachingenough across the U.S. population. The findings were summarized in the following problemareas: curricula, expectations for graduation
. Finally, studentscalculated a total score for each concept by summing the total of all weighted scores in thatconcept's column.The product with the highest score was declared the winning concept. In the event of a tiebetween concepts, or when the difference between column totals for a pair of concepts was notlarge enough to reliability discriminate between their respective qualities, the students werecalled upon to establish some other criteria upon which a final decision could be justified.Figure 8. Scoring Matrix Used to Select the Winning Design ConceptThe final stage of this project was design refinement, which students accomplished byconducting a series of critical design reviews, drawn from the principles of industrial design(ID), design
. 508-518, 2006.[26] R. Bailey, “Effects of industrial experience and coursework during sophomore and junior years on studentlearning of engineering design,” Transactions of the ASME, vol. 129, pp. 662-667, 2007.[27] A. Saterbak, T. Volz, “Assessing knowledge and application of the design process in a first-year engineeringdesign course”, in American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings of, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[28] A. Saterbak, M. Embree and M. Oden, "Client-based projects in freshman design," in American Society ofEngineering Education, the Proceedings of, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[29] A. Saterbak and T. Volz, "Assessing design capabilities following a client-based freshman design course,"in 4th First-Year Engineering
2008. Licensed as a professional civil and structural engineer in California and Wash- ington. Seven plus years of industry experience in the field of structural engineering. Approximately 13 years of teaching experience in undergraduate engineering. Page 26.776.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Incorporating the Finite Element Method with Photoelasticity as a Useful Modern Engineering Tool to Enhance Learning of Deformation Concepts Qin Maa, Louie Yawb a, b Edward F. Cross School
environmental engineering, a depart- mental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students and accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ideaLAB promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. Fridley has advised 32 masters and doctoral students to completion. His former students have moved into leadership positions in industry, public service, and academia.Dr. W. Edward Back, University of Alabama Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Director, Center for Sustainable Infrastructure