institutional mission would require approval from the SUNYBoard of Trustees, the New York State Board of Regents, and ultimately the Governor.Changes in mission are very rare. In fact, there had been only one other such request inthe past decade. The college consulted with various representatives from business and industry whoserved on Farmingdale’s dozens of Advisory Committees. The other SUNY campuses onLong Island - Stony Brook, Old Westbury, and the community colleges were kept fullyinformed from the early stages. Old Westbury expressed some concerns about theproposal since it was also re-evaluating its identity. All other campuses supported themission charge
teaching interests include first-year Intro to Electrical Engineering, and upper-level communication sys- tems and digital Signal Processing courses. Her research areas focus on statistical signal processing for wireless sensor network applications and secure communications in wireless networks. Page 26.1307.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Real-time Real-life Oriented DSP Lab ModulesAbstract:In this paper, we present a sequence of engaging lab exercises that implement real-time real-lifesignal/data acquisition, analysis, and processing using MatLab, LabView
technical challenges in creating functional vision, control,and communication subsystems and integrating them into a working whole. The scope ofthis project is large enough that it requires a multidisciplinary team since no individualstudent can complete it working alone. Participants receive technical guidance as well astimely instruction on teamwork and project management. We describe how the RobotRacer project and the associated course are structured, detail the resources that arerequired, and present results that suggest that this culminating project is particularlyeffective in preparing our Electrical and Computer Engineering students for engineeringpractice and in giving students confidence in the application of their
throughout their on-boarding and (2) educational cultures that impact the professional formation of engi- neers, which was funded by the National Science Foundation. Both projects have been published in the Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education. He has also served as a series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops related to higher education administrators’ work experiences. Sean is also actively engaged within mentoring activities, and has served as an advisor to multiple student leadership organizations including Beta Theta Pi, which he has received both campus and international awards for his service and mentoring to the Purdue chapter.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
teach- ing both undergraduate and graduate design and education-related classes at Stanford University, she con- ducts research on weld and solder-connect fatigue and impact failures, fracture mechanics, applied finite element analysis, and engineering education. In addition, from 1999-2008, she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). Sheppard’s graduate work was done at the University of Michigan.Ms. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a fourth-year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First-Year Engineering Program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with realistic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE
theoretical schema for each item. Following Table 1 is a summary of results from eachof the 17 items of note. Discussion of results is included in tandem with results to ease withkeeping track of which results were being discussed.Table 1. Summary of PCFA flagged items for each scenario Scenario 1 — “Housing Quality” 2 Items Flagged A Student team is tasked with evaluating the integrity of housing Scenario structures in an impoverished community. Results may identify unsafe Summary dwellings, but could also have a negative impact on the financial well being of those living there despite their existing
2008-2009 academic year, a pilot lab course was developed and offered at Cal Poly forconstruction management and engineering students. The course curriculum focused on integratingthe course content of mechanical electrical and plumbing systems with regard to design,construction, and coordination issues commonly found among specialty contractors. As notedabove, the integrated curriculum model described by Hauck and Jackson5 has the potential toprovide tremendous opportunities to engage teaching strategies far beyond the common lectureapproach typically utilized in many single subject courses. Various methodologies such ascooperative learning require students to be active participants in their own education2. Therefore, totake advantage of the
issue can be observed as frequent questionsabout expectations or discontent about this change of learning approach. Depending on the learner’s culture, their approach to group work andcollaboration with the peers may be impacted by the degree of individualism versuscollectivism and masculinity versus femininity they value. Autonomous, self-determinedlearning assumes certain level of individuality and assertiveness, which arecharacteristics of masculine cultures. At the same time, if the heutagogical environmentis constructed in such a way that the learner will have to depend on the community oflearners to make successful decisions about the process of learning, their degree ofcollectivism or femininity orientation will have an
, process, react loop.Using sensors and sensor data in engineering classrooms has become increasingly beneficial forengineering education. As pointed out in a paper by Arsenault, et. al., hands on, sensors andsensor data motivates students to pursue science and engineering disciplines as well as associatedcareer paths [1]. Lessons in the classroom quickly become more interesting [2] and engaging[3].Current students are generally not tinkerers like many engineering students of the past and lack adeeper appreciation for these devices. In addition, the industry approach of replacing instead ofrepairing has only exacerbated the problem. While there is tremendous attention from bothacademia and industry in these devices and machines, there is a general
Evaluates ethical dimensions of issues that may occur in professional practice f3 Interacts with others in the community in a professional manner.i i1 Able to use resources to learn new materials without guidance i2 Seeks sources for continuing education purposes i3 Accepts personal responsibility for learning & of the importance of life-long learningEnvironmental engineering programUndergraduate Environmental Engineering (ENE) program at the authors’ institution graduatedits first batch in 2011. For an ENE student, the formal learning and experiences on ethics andprofessionalism are channeled through the following: 1. Course work 2. Internship and work experiences 3
challenging to address the issues surrounding girl education in certain contexts, especiallywhen the cultural differences of the stakeholders are not handled properly. Our partners at PlanInternational initiated an endeavor that focuses on educating girls around the globe. Theirframework places the students as equal stakeholders in their programs, this allows the girls tobuild their confidence and become “central drivers of change” [19]. This socioecologicalframework is meant to support the girls in impacting their communities and eventually thesocieties they live in. Our engineering design curriculum is one of the many way ’s girls in ruralSub-Saharan African can become dynamic members of their communities. Increasing theparticipation of girls in
, educational research, corporate training management anduniversity assessment staff or administrative faculty. The engineering education faculty at VPIhave a diverse set of research interests including, “Assessment, cultural change in engineeringeducation, perceptions of rigor in engineering education research, development of engineeringeducation as legitimate field, design of effective engineering courses and curricula, impact ofactive learning and project based activities on student learning and retention, and the creation oflearning environments and design projects to support a diverse student population25.”Utah State University (R1 Research Extensive) has established a Department of Engineering andTechnology Education and offers a B.S. in
This paper aims at identifying the key design factorshands-on activities facilitate active, experiential, and that affect the performance of simulation games forcollaborative learning with fun elements. Many simulation teaching systems engineering concepts. By reviewinggames have been developed in the past, but not all are designs of several existing simulation games, the analysisequally effective. How to design a simulation game that is of strength and weaknesses of these games revealseffective and easy to implement? This paper attempts to important design factors to be considered. These designidentify the key design factors that affect the performance factors are further analyzed to verify their impacts
that are based around the same product to concentrate on boththe college freshman and high school student. In 1995, our current Deputy Department Head,COL Stephen J. Ressler, wrote and developed the West Point Bridge Designer Program toprovide a tool to simulate and introduce students to the engineering design process. The programwas first introduced into our undergraduate Statics course and has since been expanded.In 2002, in recognition of the celebration of the West Point’s Bicentennial, the first West PointBridge Designer Contest took place. The purpose of the contest was to provide middle schooland high school students a realistic and engaging introduction to engineering. The goals were toprovide each contestant with an opportunity to
. A business investing resources to develop • Poor governance and execution.a solution must be pragmatic about the product developmentapproach. Our research paper presents a framework to aid Driving innovation requires teams and a well-organizeddecision-making within this context. It involves considering development approach. Many of the modern world's mostattributes such as delivery cadence, risk, degree of innovation, and impactful creations were invented by passionate innovatorsrequirements certainty. Knowledge of the impact of these working in teams [3]. Teams rely on qualified science andattributes on project outcomes will help educate engineers to
purposes.California, USA. Serving a small community of 20-30 middle and high school-aged youth, TheClub offers after-school programs. In 2019, the author became deeply involved as a youthmentor within The Club's community, forging swift connections with staff, youth members, andmentors. The MERIT program engages youth in public schools, introducing them to the fields ofscience and engineering. Participants included Mexican American youth, former Club andMERIT participants, volunteer facilitators, and graduate students. The study's participants exhibited diverse educational backgrounds and careeraspirations. Former members of the Club were: Aaron, a freshman in a prestigious university'sphysics program; Antonio, a transfer student pursuing electrical
administration of the intern’s experience;c. The student intern’s employer (“sponsor firm”) is actively engaged in management and execution ofmajor construction projects and conscientiously mentors the student intern;d. The student, the university, and the sponsor firm all share a common goal: highly effective studentlearning through authentic involvement, ande. The student appreciates the importance of learning from, and the benefits of succeeding in, the internshipexperience.Internship work periods typically are scheduled so that the student can complete the university course ofstudy in the normal (say, eight semesters in residence) time. In the internships on which this study is based,students can be assigned to work locations anywhere in the U.S
Mindset, Engineering, Engineering Technology1. IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) funded FLiTE scholarship program [1] at WesternCarolina University (WCU) aims to provide opportunity for engineering and engineeringtechnology students with financial need to build qualities of the entrepreneurial mindset that maycontribute to their value as future professionals or to their launch of technology startupbusinesses. The program brings together student scholars from across disciplines in a vertically-and horizontally-integrated learning community to engage in technology invention ideationsupported by and mentored through interactions with business leaders, subject matter experts,and campus resources.The NSF grant which supports the FLiTE
, including high school students, undergraduate and graduate students, and practicing engineers and scientists • Regular opportunities through middle school and high school to reconnect with program peers and role models at reunions, as a staff member, or through other university programsFrom the perspectives of Camp Reach participants in one study (Demetry & Sontgerath, 2013),the program elements with the most lasting positive impact were returning to the program as astaff member, the prevalence of role models, and the teamwork infused in all activities.The selection of Camp Reach participants was designed to enable creation and tracking of aControl group. The application requires only an essay; no measures
attitudes I exemplify for students can have longer lasting impacts than all the informationand skills I can cram into a course.18When I taught math at a public high school, I saw that personal growth and development wasseverely lacking. The current (over)emphasis on standards and accountability crowds outopportunities in these areas for the sake of adequate progress in the measured content. This issimilar to the challenge facing engineering education of broadening an already full curriculum toproduce a more well-rounded engineer.19Using practices from spiritual traditions to design engineering coursesJ: I've been inspired by a friend and colleague's dissertation on teaching engineering to Tibetanrefugees in India. She used a curriculum designed
and facilities of a Center Bold yet achievable• Frontier investigations across and/or within disciplines (“Transformative”, “Grand Challenges”) Legacy• Promote organizational linkages capitalizing on cyberinfrastructure Partnerships• Integrative learning and discovery for (U.S.) students Broad set of career paths• Engage and develop nation’s talent, including groups underrepresented in STEM research and education Diverse STEM workforce• Foster science/engineering in service to society Knowledge Transfer, new research areas, instrumentation, technologies Example: I/UCRC Pre-‐competitive Research Portfolio: cooperative ly defined & funded on shared value Ideas, Industry
andcommunity service, while allowing undergraduates to take on a complex, real-world problemwith social, political and economical aspects. The goals of the first project will be discussed andrecommendations for achieving the most from this type of course format will be provided.IntroductionResearch has shown that experiential project-based learning provides context for materiallearned in the classroom and engages students in their own learning, resulting in enhancedunderstanding of technical material and its application. Allowing students to work together inteams and the opportunity to work closely with faculty and other professionals has also beenshown to improve learning and the desire to continue learning. 1,2,3,4,5 With this in mind, theCivil and
for US mechanicalengineering students going to Germany for a summer research internship in English, versus USmechanical engineers going to the same location for two semesters of engineering coursework inGerman. Their benchmark population is US mechanical engineering students engaged insummer research internships in the US: Working abroad one summer in Germany is sufficient tosignificantly grow the awareness of differences in US and German cultural images, and theawareness of US cultural tendencies. Extending this experience to a year does not measurablyincrease this growth. The summer abroad significantly increases the factual knowledge ofGermany and the awareness of German cultural tendencies, and extending this experience to ayear
high tech entrepreneurship have been consummated and Florida Tech studentshave secured career-enhancing opportunities with established and start-up companies as interns,co-op students, or permanent positions as founders, advisors or technical experts.Conclusions:The initial impact of the Engineering Entrepreneurship course series and experientialEntrepreneurship activities on the Engineering Management program at Florida Tech has beenremarkable. Page 10.544.11 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering
by Chinese-American,Anglo-Indian, or Latino writers [15]. Code-switching can take on various forms, but in this paper,we define it as the use of both Spanish and English in bilingual communication. This showcasesthe intricate linguistic dance that bilingual speakers engage in, which reflects a blend of linguis-tic choice and cultural narrative. This phenomenon is especially prominent in communities whereboth languages are woven into the social and cultural fabric, allowing individuals to fluidly navigatetheir bilingual identities [16], [17]. Beyond simple language mixing, code-switching incorporatesa sophisticated amalgamation of grammatical structures, cultural cues, and contextual relevance,highlighting the cognitive dexterity of bilingual
[10]. The students were tasked with completing a semester-longproject that had them identify all of these things. The project consisted of a request for proposaland four deliverables. The first deliverable involved identifying a need in the community andhow solving this need would benefit the stakeholders. The second deliverable was a designproposal where the students presented their approach. Deliverable three was a demonstration ofthe bench-top prototype they made to solve the need. The prototype had to use the board, at leasttwo sensors, and a motor. The final deliverable was a full report, including a value propositionstatement based on the NABC frame work, such as “Our (product) helps (specific users with aneed N) who want to (achieve
. Pimmel, “EvaluatingVirtual Communities of Practice for Faculty Development,” J. Fac. Dev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31–40, Jan. 2016.[4] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year-Long FacultyDevelopment Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ.,vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 168–181, 2009.[5] D. Carpenter, K. Hayes, C. Ward, and A. Gerhart, “Assessment and Evaluation of aComprehensive Course Modification Process,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship,vol. 2, no. 2, 2011.[6] A.L. Gerhart and D.D. Carpenter, “Campus-wide Course Modification Program to ImplementActive & Collaborative Learning and Problem-based Learning to Address the EntrepreneurialMindset,” Proceedings of the 2013
his suggestions for my teaching, I asked Mentor to make another visit to my class in Mar., he agreed.• I visited a 400+ level class taught by Mentor. I got to see (from the students point of view) how some of the effective teaching techniques used by Mentor was working - e.g., engaging student in solving problems in a stepwise manner. As part of the class, Mentor provided tips to the students on the upcoming exam. This included review of problems, discussion on problem types/variations that could show up on the exam. This review class, in my view, was putting the students at ease and focusing them on the topics/contents they need to pay attention to for the exam.• It was good. Saw how my teaching can be improved, and
, 200623). The intent was to improve preparation of engineeringstudents to enter the profession. The study by Lattuca, Terenzini & Volkwein (2006) 24 indicatethat the EC2000 was having a positive impact on engineering education, including the teachingof basic science, math, and engineering science skills. However, the study did reveal that post-EC2000 students were experiencing ”somewhat chillier diversity climate” than pre-EC2000students. Notwithstanding, according to ABET (2005) 25, “accreditation criteria do not addressthe cultivation of a diverse learning environment, and its Board of Directors heard very clearlyfrom its constituents that it should not mandate diversity goals as part of its standards.” (p13) Assuch, the imperative to