Paper ID #25647FLC (Eˆ2)T: A Faculty Learning Community on Effective (and Efficient)TeachingDr. Dustyn Roberts P.E., Temple University Dustyn Roberts received her B.S. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity (2003), her M.S. in Biomechanics & Movement Science (2004) from the University of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She is passionate about translational research and engineering education.Prof. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the
/4for PhD level.2. Description of the ProgramThe first idea was to design a program of under graduation level, full time students, etc but afterdiscussions the team chose to start with a graduation program Master and/or PhD level due to thenecessity to provide professionals qualified to solve highly complex social problems at thepresent.The curriculum has been designed for the students to understand the basic mechanism of thesociety in a deeper level in order to avoid stereotyped ideas. It includes economics and sociologybesides basics of national law system, public policies, planning and environmental issues, amongothers.At graduation level the program is offered to civil, industrial engineers as well any otherspecialty once it is a new area
formulation,efficient application of software features, and communication of their findings in a report format.An effective pedagogy is developed to assist students with problem formulation while enforcinganalytical skills and guiding writing reports. I have utilized pedagogy tools such as handoutswith specific guidelines and extensive examples, in-class discussions, homework assignments,and a final project to enforce report writing and analytical thinking. Moreover, I stress theimportance of analyzing the software’s solutions further to obtain more useful information.Though writing a “Report to a Manager” has been an element of my OR courses since 1999, thenew approach has evolved in the last three years. This new approach is aimed at
AC 2010-932: INTEGRATING HANDS-ON DESIGN EXPERIENCES INTO THECURRICULUMRichard Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Richard Goldberg is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. He is also the Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Curriculum in Applied Sciences and Engineering, which houses the undergraduate BME program. He teaches several instrumentation courses and senior design. His primary interest is in rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology for people with disabilities.Robert Dennis, University of North Carolina Bob Dennis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chair of Applied
Page 24.1074.5courses. In fact, it was the outcomes assessment results from the School of Engineering thatmotivated the proposal that landed this grant. The SFIP is a response to the students’suggestions that more practical problems should be included in the curriculum to provide contextto the theory presented in the classroom. Also, the institution itself, as a norm, sponsors innovation and the pursuit of excellence sothat the SFIP is conducted within a social system in which the upper echelons of leadershipsupport it. This is fortunate as, regarding this point, Everett Rogers starts his book [4,page 1]with the following quote by Niccolo Machiavelli from The Prince (1513): “There is nothingmore difficult to plan, more doubtful of
AC 2011-2179: THE DESIGN PROCESS AS AN APPROACH TO UNDER-STANDING ENGINEERING AS A PROFESSIONRebecca N. Macdonald, University of Alabama NSF GK-12 Fellow, Doctoral student in Civil EngineeringBeth Todd, University of Alabama Dr. Beth Todd is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Alabama. Page 22.1438.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Design Process as an Approach to Understanding Engineering as a ProfessionIntroduction and BackgroundThe importance of furthering science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) in
optimization problem: maximize student learningwhile minimizing the grading time. In this paper, we provide advice for new faculty on how toimprove grading efficiency without sacrificing its effectiveness; in other words “how to savetime while grading”.Tips are presented for different types of student work found in engineering courses. For eachtype of graded activity, we encourage the faculty member to think about grading before handingit out to students. Poorly designed questions or assignments can lead to unnecessarily long anddifficult grading. We also suggest methods that reduce the time spent on grading student workbut still accurately assess the students’ progress. Overall, the techniques presented in this paperare designed to help to make the
AC 2007-627: NEW FACULTY, UNDERGRADUATES, AND INDUSTRYCONTRACTS: OBSERVATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED FROMENGINEERING PROFESSORSJames Squire, Virginia Military Institute Dr. James Squire is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute. He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the United States Military Academy in West Point, NY and served in the army as a Military Intelligence officer during Desert Storm. Although his PhD is in electrical engineering, he completed his doctoral work in a biomedical engineering laboratory at MIT and has interests in analog and digital instrumentation, signal processing, biomechanics, patent litigation, and cardiology. At
Session 2464 Approaches to Computational Materials Science Juri Filatovs, D. M. Pai, S. N. Yarmolenko and J. Sankar Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures Department of Mechanical Engineering North Carolina A&T State University Greensboro, NC 27411Abstract There is an increased application of materials computation in the selection, microstructuralanalysis, simulation, and testing of materials. This is creating a new mode of approaching, andteaching materials science. There is needed
2006-1168: EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT PEDAGOGICAL TECHNIQUESJohn Marshall, University of Southern MaineJune Marshall, St. Joseph's College JUNE MARSHALL received her doctorate from North Carolina State University and is Director of Education at St. Joseph’s College in Maine. Her specialization is learning strategies focusing specifically in cooperative leaning and character education. Page 11.514.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Effective and Efficient Pedagogical TechniquesThe purpose of this paper is to identify and describe teaching tools and techniques thatwill help new faculty
forms.4. Continuing the Cycle of Improvement and Innovation within the Community of Practice The success of the reengineering has seen the course enrollment jump to over 900students in Fall 2014. In the spirit of WIDER, the community is now translating these practices Page 26.1303.8to a follow-on “Data Driven Discovery” course at the sophomore level. This new course,serving as a practical approach to a CS2-style curriculum, enables students to understand the datastructures necessary to do analytics on increasingly complicated data sources: structured text,images, social graphs, tabular data, and more. In the same way that
the Texas A&M University in 1993. His research interests include the mechanics of nanostructures, the dynamic crack propagation in thermoelastic materials, and engineering education. Page 13.84.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Problem Centered Approach to DynamicsAbstractWhen teaching dynamics, one of our goals is to expose future engineers to a variety of real-worldproblems and modern engineering tools. Historically, we have done this via example problemsworked in class and homework problems we assign to the students. On the other hand, the theoryassociated with new ideas was
Paper ID #19886Teaching Ethics in the Context of Engineering Courses: A Blended Approachof Theory and PracticeDr. Geoff Pfeifer, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Geoff Pfeifer is Associate Teaching Professor of Philosophy at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He teaches and publishes in the areas of social and political philosophy, applied ethics, and global justice. His work has appeared in Human Studies, The European Legacy, and The Journal of Global Ethics. He is also the author of a number of book chapters as well as The New Materialism: Althusser, Badiou, and ˇ zek (Routledge, 2015). Additionally he is co-editor of
Paper ID #17363Comparison of Spatial Visualization Skills in Two Approaches to Entry-LevelGraphic CoursesDr. Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University Faculty member in the Department of Engineering Design, Manufacturing, and Management Systems (EDMMS) at Western Michigan University’s (WMU). Co-Director of the Center for Integrated Design (CID), and currently the college representative to the President’s University-wide Sustainability Com- mittee at WMU. Received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Design from University of Wisconsin- Madison and received an MBA from Rutgers University. His B.S. degree was in
manufacturing. Ongoing improvement of manufacturingoperations and strengthening manufacturing innovations is in line with Robert Reich’sforewarning. This paper explores these issues by examining current manufacturingprograms in engineering and technology within the context of the new realities inAmerican manufacturing.Examples of Global ExpansionA series of articles [8][9] in the Detroit Free Press outlined how various automotivecompanies, including General Motors (GM), are approaching global trade. Thecompanies are embracing India as a vast new market and a source of technical talent. Page 10.1068.2India is a large underdeveloped automotive market
worked in the industry as Senior Embedded Software Engineer and Project Lead for new product development projects. She has been involved in different stages of the product development starting from understanding customer needs to design and development. Ameek has a Bachelor of Engineering (Computer) and Master of Science (Management of Technology) from National University of Singapore. Her research interest is improving the innovation process for multidisciplinary teams.Prof. Ming Po Tham, National UNiversity of SIngapore THAM Ming Po is a Professor in the Division of Engineering and Technology Management in the Fac- ulty of Engineering in the National University of Singapore. His research focuses on team dynamics
design process, whilestudents actively engage in research and problem solving activities within a team setting. Theapproach presented here is part of the new re-design of the engineering curriculum at MasseyUniversity in New Zealand. Some of the challenges of implementation, and best practices,are shared in this paper.The need for a new approachResearch and new trends in engineering education clearly emphasise the importance ofpractical application of theory, creativity and innovation as key skills required for problemsolving. The world has changed rapidly in the last decade and major changes such asglobalisation, technological advances, inter-connectedness, and accessibility to informationinfluence the way current and future generations of
Ureli’s p-h diagram analysis of basic steamcycles, extends p-h diagram analysis to entire steam cycles including throttle valves and steamturbine adiabatic efficiency. Additionally, we present a pedagogical approach to gas turbineengine analysis through the introduction of a p-h diagram developed for air. To our knowledge,our further extension of the p-h diagram approach to quantitative gas turbine analysis in aclassroom environment is new in engineering pedagogy. We find that the p-h diagram approachis more digestible to students and allows for a deeper understanding of the limitations imposedby the first and second laws of thermodynamics.The p-h diagram approach was implemented in a thermodynamics sequence with a large numberof students and
AC 2011-1893: USE OF HIPELE APPROACH IN A SPLIT-LEVEL CHEM-ICAL ENGINEERING ELECTIVE COURSEAdrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Technological University in 1998. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedi- cal microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER award; her group has published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Lab on a Chip, and had an AIChE
of entrepreneurship,students will be better able to develop engineering solutions that address customers’ needs in anincreasingly global marketplace. This in turn will positively contribute to their career success.Nevertheless, there is continued debate regarding how best to impart entrepreneurial skills and anentrepreneurial perspective to engineering students at the undergraduate level.The most common approach adopted by a growing number of universities is to introduceentrepreneurship courses into the engineering curriculum. Today, over 125 engineering collegesin the United States offer programs which prepare and motivate engineering students to createnew businesses5. There are many reasons why a university should teach entrepreneurship
note that with respect to the students, no resistance tothis approach was noticed.Furthermore, instructor reflection about the implemented PSLEs allowed her to be aware of thesemetacognitive processes, their impact on her students’ learning, and its potential in order toincorporate more of such activities in several senior courses in chemical engineering. Sherealized that instructional activities implemented along each problem enhanced students’conceptual and procedural knowledge, promoting students’ metacognitive awareness. Based onthe assessed problems and especially on the final project, it was noted by her that encouragingthese skills is valuable to improve learning and student problem-solving performance.AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge
Paper ID #33666WIP: Effectiveness of Different Reflection Approaches for ImprovingMastery in an Engineering Laboratory CourseMs. Amy N. Adkins, Northwestern University Amy N. Adkins is a PhD candidate in Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University. She received her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Northwestern and her B.S. in Engineering Science from St. Mary’s University in San Antonio. Her technical graduate research is focused on utilizing novel imaging techniques to quantifying adaptation of muscle architecture in humans. She also desires to implement innovative teaching, mentoring, and hands-on problem
important as course modalities hybridize and proliferate. This paper would appealto new and experienced instructors, program assessors and coordinators, administration, and ingeneral, curriculum developers.Background and RationaleCOVID-19 radically altered the landscape of higher education, which for many institutions,resulted in the adoption of a hybrid-flexible (Hyflex) lecture model. In traditional, pre-pandemicimplementations of Hyflex, the mode is defined as “class sessions that allow students to choosewhether to attend classes face-to-face or online, synchronously or asynchronously,” creating atruly blended learning environment [1]. On-the-ground implementation of Hyflex at The Citadeland other US institutions has been more nuanced and
Paper ID #16192STEM-Discovery – An Integrated Approach to DESIGNDr. Heath Tims, Louisiana Tech UniversityDr. Kelly B. Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr Kelly Crittenden is a member of Louisiana Tech University’s Integrated STEM Education Center (ISERC), and the Harrelson Family Professor of engineering. He earned his PhD and BS in BioMedical Engineering in 2001, and 1996 respectively. Dr Crittenden’s interests lie in K-12 outreach, developing project-driven curricula, and product design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 STEM-Discovery – An Integrated Approach to
Paper ID #31000Rationale and Design Approach for Full-scale Experiential LearningOpportunities in Structural EngineeringDr. J Chris Carroll P.E., Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Dr. Carroll is an Assistant Professor and the Civil Engineering Program Coordinator in Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology at Saint Louis University. His experimental research interests focus on reinforced and prestressed concrete, while his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll is the chair of ACI Com- mittee S802 - Teaching
AC 2011-2160: A HANDS-ON APPROACH TO DEMONSTRATING HARD-WARE/SOFTWARE TRADEOFFS IN AN EMBEDDED SYSTEM DESIGNJeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Jeanne Christman is an Assistant Professor in the Computer Engineering Technology Department at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her expertise is in the area of Embedded Systems Desgin and System on a Chip. She is also actively involved in recruitment and retention of females in engineering technology.Eric J Alley, Rochester Institute of Technology Eric Alley is a 2011 graduate of the Rochester Institute of Technology with a degree in Computer Engi- neering Technology. His RIT career includes working as a teaching assistant for many core curriculum
Paper ID #31294Faculty feedback on hub-based approach to national dissemination oflow-cost desktop learning modulesKatelyn Dahlke, Washington State University Katelyn Dahlke received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Iowa State University in 2013. She received her M.S. and Ph.D, in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2019. She completed a postdoc doing hands-on engineering education research at Washington State University. She will be a faculty associate at the University of Wisconsin Madison starting in Summer 2020.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof
Paper ID #15948Multidisciplinary Game-based Approach for Generating Student Enthusi-asm for Addressing Critical Infrastructure ChallengesMr. Timothy R McJunkin, Idaho National Laboratory Timothy R. McJunkin is a Senior Research Engineer at Idaho National Laboratory in the Energy and Environment Science and Technology Division, since 1999. He has also served as an adjunct instructor at Idaho State University, teaching control systems and resilient controls systems. Prior to joining INL, he was a design engineer at Compaq Computer Corporation in Houston Texas. Mr. McJunkin is the principal architect of the Grid Game
on this material in general,respectively. Our digital-logic course is titled Digital Operations.separate course with the digital-logic course, called Digital Operations, as a prerequisite. Thepresent paper describes our approach and its benefits.OverviewOur curriculum requires three digital courses of all our ECE students: Digital Operations,Programmable Devices, and Microprocessor Design. The Digital Operations course is aprerequisite to Programmable Devices, which in turn is a prerequisite to Microprocessor Design.We are in a quarter system. Digital Operations is a four-credit lecture course taken in the first(fall) quarter of the first year of studies. Programmable Devices is a two-credit lecture–labcourse taken in the second (winter
and discussed.Introduction/MotivationLouisiana Tech University operates on a quarter calendar but awards semester credit hours(SCH). This is accomplished by extending the meeting time for classes. For example, a 3 SCHclass will typically meet for 75 minutes three times a week, or for 110 minutes twice a week for10 weeks. One advantage this affords is students majoring in engineering and other STEMprograms can begin in Precalculus without being behind in their curriculum, leading to benefitsin retention [1]. This and other contributing factors have led to Precalculus serving as a gatewayfor most incoming freshmen into engineering and other STEM programs.In the 2022-2023 academic year, well over 50% of incoming students in the College