youth.Our project’s focus on strengthening belonging through the use of youth participatory actionresearch (YPAR) in technology-rich spaces to develop deliverables iteratively, cater to theserecommendations. As shown technology and makerspaces provide opportunities to create physical artifactsthat build personal connections with engineering and technology [10], [11], [12], [13]. Howeverthere have been unequitable uses of said spaces and resources for youth from underservedcommunities that place youth at a disadvantage compared to their more privileged peers [1],[14], [15], [16]. Therefore the use of YPAR in technology rich spaces, youth may use researchmethods to make sense of and address social problems impacting their communities [17
public sectors. Thevarious programs in the department emphasize the application of engineering and technologytheories to solve real world problems. For this reason students are engaged in hands-onactivities beginning with their first semester and do not wait for several semesters or years toexperience real engineering activities. During the last three years tremendous efforts havebeen made to modify and update the curricula of all the department’s programs.Due to the rapid growth of the department in the last few years, the department has embarkedon a mission to include distance education (DE) capabilities in its various courses. Toaccommodate this, various components of the courses have been devised as stand alonemodules woven together through
emphasis on power systems,electric motor fundamentals, battery design and interaction, and system controls. Industry hadindicated they could teach specifics not learned in classes, if the students could both bring afundamental understanding of the topic and be self-directed learners, so the course learningobjectives emphasized these skills over deep knowledge; this also meant, unfortunately, that wedecided not to take action on the responses to Question 3 to develop specializations within theHEVE program, but rather allow employers to engage graduates as they found the need to.Serving as a map of the intersections of course learning objectives and industry interests, Figure5 demonstrates how these courses were laid out. Note that some overlap in
ethical questions that arise from those effects. Design and Systems covers the nature of technology, the engineering design process by which technologies are developed, and basic principles of dealing with everyday technologies, including maintenance and troubleshooting. Information and Communication Technology includes computers and software learning tools, networking systems and protocols, hand-held digital devices, and other technologies for accessing, creating, and communicating information and for facilitating creative expression.”and three practices: “Understanding Technological Principles focuses on how well students are able to
are multiple factors thataffect the experience of graduate students as they transition from their previous identities to therole of researcher and scholar. Our review of the literature paired with our personal experiencessuggest that there are several factors that affect these three aspects of graduate student identitydevelopment. First, students are more likely to develop a stronger graduate student identity when theyfeel more competent in their disciplinary and writing skills (Burt, 2014). In a study thatinvestigated the impact writing had on graduate student identity, graduate students shared thatthey often feel ashamed of their work and compare themselves to their peers (Del Toro, 2017).Students were afraid to share their work in
classrooms, they often do not have the timeor resources to implement engineering lessons. A more ‘interdisciplinary approach,’ whereby atechnological spin is added to other subjects, and vice-versa, can allow teachers to addengineering without drastically altering their lesson plans. This can add to the hands-on natureof the lessons as well, making engineering fun for students.”The pop-up book immersion engaged teachers in such active, hands-on, constructive experience.Our intention was to model an inquiry-based teaching and learning climate for the teachers inwhich experimentation, discussion, and collaboration were central. The use of inquiry-basedteaching methods occupies a prominent position among recommendations for reform andimprovement of
cultures, he could have spoken ofdisciplines. That would have been the more conventional choice. Discussions of this generaltopic often use the word discipline and then assume that the disciplines are defined in anepistemological manner.Epistemology however did not drive the historical development of the various academicdisciplines. In antebellum America, colleges were small, with several hundred students beingviewed as a large enrollment. The antebellum college usually offered just one degree, a B.A.degree, which was implemented by a lock-step curriculum focused on classical studies.(Science was a recent addition.) There were no departments and no disciplines. Faculty reporteddirectly to the President and were generally hired not because of any
professionally and ethically in multi-disciplinary teams, tocommunicate orally, and in writing concerning technical documentation [2-4].The professional component requirements specify subject areas appropriate toengineering but do not prescribe specific courses. Students must be prepared forengineering practice through the curriculum culminating in a major design experience Page 7.280.1based on the knowledge and the skills acquired in earlier courses. The design experienceProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationshould
expose students to principles of social sustainability andengineering ethics. It was also noted that owner’s increasing desire to have zero accidents ontheir project sites may lead to owners to demand that PtD be performed on their projects in thenot too distant future. As some schools have found when adding sustainability and BIM to theircurricula, implementation of a new topic may take much longer than desired, so the sooner long-term change is started, the better.Perhaps the most compelling reason to teach PtD is that it aligns with the values espoused by thecivil engineering community. Adding PtD into civil engineering curricula will convey tostudents, the design professionals and contractors we partner with, and our owner clients that weare
various academic backgrounds including engineering education,electrical engineering, computer engineering, civil engineering, environmental engineering andbiology. This team meets on a weekly basis and is responsible for the continued developmentand expansion of the LEWAS and maintenance of its outdoor field site and indoor lab space. Anumber of in-class and out-of-class exercises and modules using the LEWAS and its data havebeen developed and implemented, as part of an ongoing NSF project6, in various courses atVirginia Tech and Virginia Western Community College (VWCC)1,2,6-12. Because one of thegoals of the LEWAS Lab is to expand the usage of the system to different institutions around theglobe including both educational and data measuring
integrated teaching and research effort. The executiondetail of the integration is discussed in this paper.Research projectTo foster new research and scholarship at Texas A&M University, the T3: Texas A&M Triadsfor Transformation seed-grant was initiated in 2018 by the university. It is a multidisciplinaryprogram that is a part of the President's Excellence Fund designed to further Texas A&MUniversity's commitments to the three pillars of advancing transformational learning; enhancingdiscovery and innovation and expanding impact on our community, state, nation, and world.Faculty members were required to form “triad” of three members to apply for funding of $30,000for each project. The university is investing $100 million for the next 10
on creating and maintaining an educational environment thatfosters early, ethical, and systematic engagement in this scientific revolution [9]. Therefore, itis essential to equip students and society with the knowledge and skills necessary toparticipate effectively and responsibly in an AI-driven world [4].Regarding the contemporary importance of Artificial Intelligence, the Artificial IntelligenceIndex Report 2023 by Stanford University [10] evidences notable growth in this field.According to this report, from 2010 to 2021, there has been a substantial increase in AI-related publications, growing from 200,000 in 2010 to almost 500,000 in 2012, includingarticles in academic journals, conference contributions, works in repositories, and
have been labeled or unlabeled, using a range of methodologies that include supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning. GenAI demonstrates its expertise in generating many types of material, including text, graphics, and audio, which allows for the production of unique and significant results [3].5. Collaboration with Industry Partners: a. Foster collaboration with construction companies and technology firms to provide students with internships, co-op opportunities, or access to real datasets for AI- related projects. Hands-on experience is crucial for understanding practical AI applications [6].6. Research Initiatives: a. Encourage students and faculty to engage in
communicate their ideas and validate their solutions. As in the real world, a major portion of the battle is to explain what one did and why others should believe it works. Since there is no one solution to any problem — there can be no answer key other than what the students themselves create.d) The “low threshold” philosophy allows and encourages early development of practical design experience. This complements coincident attainment of specific domain know- ledge and the development of analytical techniques.e) The “no ceiling” philosophy allows limitless expansion, ensuring that the more able students are continually challenged and ensuring that no student will run out of problems to
some fromforeign programs with no capstone design course. At the other end of the spectrum have beenpracticing industry engineers with considerable experience, some taking the course throughdistance-learning technology from their workplace. Some students have never taken a course thatdidn’t have analytical homework problems. Other students have little patience for conceptualmaterial that cannot be directly applied. The wide spread of student backgrounds has been botha challenge and an opportunity. The diversity of student backgrounds can be properlyexploited to lead to a rich learning community where less experienced students learn fromseasoned practitioners, who themselves learn by teaching. Two examples illustrate this point.In a lecture on
process to meet desired needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modem engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.Each program must have an assessment process with documented results
biometric testing togain insight and evidence into the biases that may exist among faculty and students engaging inengineering environments. Specifically, informed by literature on microaggressions and implicitbias, an eye-tracking paradigm is used to draw evidence on existing biases related to sexism,ageism, racism, ableism, and classism. In this study, when prompted, participants are asked toselect from a pool of options based on the information presented in a specific scenario. Duringthis selection, the participant's eye movements, specifically their fixation regions and times, arecollected to later correlate with their chosen selections. Preliminary findings from this studyfound individual specific implicit biases to exist. The insights of this
the same course material, including the ISBL modules. Theonly difference between the two groups is the course delivery mode, where one group is taughtremotely through synchronous online sessions, and the other is taught in person in a traditionalclassroom setting. We collect data on demographics, prior preparation, motivation, experientiallearning, usability scale, and self-assessment of learning objectives based on Bloom’s taxonomy.We then perform statistical comparisons to investigate the impact of delivery mode when ISBLmodules are used. We use the comparison results to test the hypothesis that ISBL modules willhelp maintain remote students’ motivation and learning outcomes compared to in-person students.The results show no statistically
, usually by way of a computer. Computer use is often required inthe engineering classroom, and while there has been research on the use of computing technologyto augment the learning environment with pedagogical tools,1,2,3 we still know little about how thecomputing tools that are presented as “tools of the trade” impact students’ perception ofengineering problem solving.4 Understanding how these tools shape the problem solving processis important because familiarity with the tools can have a profound affect on students’ ability tobe successful in class, even though tool proficiency may not be an explicit learning objective orpedagogical goal. In other words, by not addressing the intrinsic complexity of the toolsthemselves, instructors may
steady state andwe plan to expand into graduate programs and related areas of research. By fall 2003 a newfacility will be in place supporting the faculty, staff and students involved in these programs. Weplan to continue the 20% annual growth and we plan to manage that growth through cooperation,coordination and communication across the many disciplines that choose to be engaged in thedevelopment of our entrepreneurial environment. Page 8.821.9 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationLehigh University
not able to be offered virtually.These two projects were replaced with reserve projects while the majority of other projects weremodified by faculty mentors to be achievable in a virtual program. During the program,participants established work and communication schedules with their specific faculty mentorsor mentor graduate students. Program directors facilitated this establishment of mentor-participant interactions through periodic, pre-program communications with mentors andparticipants. REU Site program group meetings and activities were adjusted to occur morefrequently but for shorter durations. Typically, in in-person programs, weekly group meetingsincluded round-table discussions and a research, skill, or guest speaker seminar in one
10Following the implementation of the aforementioned game improvements, LangQuest can bedeployed on a small scale in classrooms to assess effectiveness. The primary focus will be on higherlevel elementary to junior high students who possess at least a basic knowledge of the target language.It is in these scenarios that LangQuest is designed to work most effectively and will have the highestpotential of making an impact. We will incorporate the learners feedback in our following iterationsof the game. ConclusionIn summary, this paper illustrates a simple yet innovative solution to language education in the formof a gamified language-learning program. This language learning program is meant to
education as it can limit the engagement orinvolvement of an educator with the students [11]. The COVID-19 pandemic pushed educators to conduct emergency remote teaching, withhands-on laboratory and skills-based workshops disrupted. The inability among educators toshift to online learning and create meaningful learning in their courses, along with the lack ofavailable remote or online laboratories and simulated technology-based skills training, exposedthe stark gap between engineering education requirements in the 21st century and what HEIscurrently have. Therefore, well-designed and planned pathways to transformation must beadequately studied to bridge the gap in engineering education to transform educatorseffectively in a sustainable
ABETaccreditation visit.II. How EAC contributes to ABET 2000 ComplianceEthics enters into the ABET 2000 accreditation process particularly in criterion 3f and 3h of thewidely discussed a-k criteria of outcomes and assessment for all engineering programs. Thesestate that all engineering graduates must have: · an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (3f) · the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (3h).Ethical considerations are also relevant to criterion 4, which states that all engineering studentsshould have a "major design experience"… based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework and incorporating
. This approach would offer a dual perspective, combining students' fresh, academicviewpoint with seasoned professionals' practical, field-based experience. Such an approachcontributes significantly to the study's robustness, providing a more nuanced comprehension ofthe training platform's effectiveness and its potential impact on real-world engineering practices.By addressing these aspects, future research could pave the way for more sophisticated VR-based training methodologies customized to meet the evolving demands of construction sitesafety and incident reporting.References[1] “Number and rate of fatal work injuries, by private industry sector.” Accessed: Jan. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/charts/census-of-fatal
Prestige (f7) sub-factorsas they relate to STEM education. Based on a survey of high school and college students, sheproposed 14 factors that influence male willingness to enroll in STEM colleges, includingfinancial salary (f6) and prestige (f7). Similarly, she determined that factors such as theinvolvement of parents and other family members (f8) and friends (f9) significantly impact theFamily (f8) and Friends (f9) sub-factors [1, p. 39]. However, El-Bahey and Zeid found thatparental advice (f8) and peer influence (f9) were not among the top influential factors [1, p.70]. For the Communities (f11) and Religion (f18) sub-factors, most researchers agree thatthe dominance of males in almost all STEM fields greatly influences the willingness
Intent’, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376213.Niloofar KalantariNiloofar Kalantari is a PhD student / Graduate Research Assistant at George Mason University.Her research focuses on Human Computer Interaction, Wearable Health, and Social computing.Dr. Sarah WittmanDr. Sarah Wittman, Assistant Professor of Management at George Mason University’s School ofBusiness, her research explores people’s transitions within, across, and beyond organizationalboundaries; their organizational impacts; and the social, technological, and learning supportsystems .Dr. Vivian MottiDr. Vivian Genaro Motti is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Information Sciences andTechnology at George Mason University where she leads the Human-Centric Design Lab (HCDLab
, organization.Soft skills accounts for more than half of the CSFs, top three most important success factors forAsian women working in New Zealand construction industry are soft skills namely, sense ofresponsibility, communication skills and networking skills. The success factor sense ofresponsibility is a “characteristic of personality”, which can be learnt and developed throughtraining and personal experience. Since project involves the collaboration of different parties anddifferent professional, effective communication is a key driver of such kind of collaboration.Therefore, effective communication skills women developed can have major impact on thesuccess of projects[16].Networking is about “developing lasting relationships for mutual gain and creating
engagement. Underst. Sci. New Agendas Sci. Commun. 40–67 (2009).Appendix I: Survey Questions Society and emerging technologyPlease try to answer the questions in the order in which they appear, as with each question you will getmore information about the research discussed in the survey. The information provided would have acumulative effect on your decisions from one question to the next.A new emerging technology holds great promise for improving quality of life for patients with "XYZ"disease. The data published by an authorized health research organization shows that in 5 years, 2 out 100people will be suffering from "XYZ". Would you support or oppose research in this emergingtechnology
spot”between customer viability, technological feasibility, and business viability, ideally creating avaluable design with high innovation and impact [2].Second, bio-inspired design is the development of technologies to improve the environment orhuman’s quality of life. Focusing on bio-inspired design is "an integrated approach to teachingbiotechnology and bioengineering to an interdisciplinary audience," [3], which can create arelevant and engaging learning space. It allows engineering instructors and engineering students,alike, the opportunity to explore how holistic assets can support innovation, deepening the needfor interdependence between academic disciplines with cross-disciplinary connections betweenthe arts, science, and engineering