engineering education and theworkplaces thereafter is expanding the fields’ cultural and dualistic ways of thinking aroundgender. This is a large task, but it includes educating engineers about dualistic social constructionsof gender and sexuality and the ways in which the macroethics of the field intersect with genderequity. This means that until it is common to recognize and include the broader spectrum of genderinto engineering spaces and conversations, we are still missing the mark on gender equity by along shot.Aligned with findings from scholars [14], I see the engineering field still holding tight to a social-technical divide, or the assumption that the more technical aspects of engineering should and arebetter off being separate from more
. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include techni- Page 24.630.1 cal communication, assessment, accreditation, and the impact of pen-based technologies on learning and teaching. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education, IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among
Brook University, and SUNY Office of Provost. He received A.T. Yang award for the best paper in Theoretical Kinematics at the 2017 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference and the MSC Software Simulation award for the best paper at the 2009 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC) . He is the recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Teaching by Stony Brook University and the winner of the 2018 FACT2 award for Excellence in Instruction given to one professor from the entire SUNY system. He also received the 2021 Distinguished Teaching Award from the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Mid-Atlantic Division. He has been twice elected as a member of the ASME
analysis to inform library support," Performance measurement and metrics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 81-92, 2020, doi: 10.1108/PMM-12-2019-0056.[19] M. Besterfield-Sacre, M. F. Cox, M. Borrego, K. Beddoes, and J. Zhu, "Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans," Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 193-219, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20043.[20] R. Brent and R. M. Felder, "A model for engineering faculty development," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 234-240, 2003.[21] D. Schaefer and T. Utschig, "A review of professional qualification, development, and recognition of faculty teaching in higher education around
engineerbefore going back to school and pursuing engineering education. My education and career inengineering took place in predominantly white, male settings. Because of the privilege Iexperience as a white person and the sheltering of experiences that my privilege offers, I haveundergone a massive amount of learning to identify systems of oppression embedded in theculture that may limit others in the profession. My goal with my research is to explore norms inengineering to understand and identify systems of oppression embedded in the culture that maylimit marginalized communities in the profession.Author 2: I am a gay, white, able-bodied, cisgender man with tenure in Engineering Education.My work centers on the ways we create change in engineering
been supported in part by NASA through the UCF’s Florida Space GrantConsortium, Award No. NNX10AM01H. Additional funding has been provided by the SmallBusiness Administration, grant SBAHC-10-I-0250, and by the National Science Foundationunder Award No. 1129437. Thanks go to FGCU’s Computer Science and Software Engineeringstudents, Nicholas Alteen, Abraham Baquero, Mike Bizub, Sam Caguana, James Carroll,Vincent Giannone, Matt Grojean, Nathan Hart, Austin Hughes, Jessel Serrano and TylerThomas, for their contributions to the development of respective experiments and projects.References1. National Science Board, A National Action Plan for Addressing the Critical Needs of the U.S. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education
Paper ID #46443Ungrading and Student Motivation: Assessing the Impact on Student Productivityand Allowing Room for Point TotalsDr. Luke Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Luke Landherr is a COE distinguished teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in using comics as novel teaching tools, alternative assessment through ungrading, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Ungrading and Student Motivation: Assessing the Impact on Student Productivity andAllowing Room for Point
Paper ID #36994Project-Based Learning Success in Fundamentals of Fluid MechanicsProf. Elizabeth ”Elisha” M.H. Garcia Ph.D., PE, United States Coast Guard Academy Elizabeth ”Elisha” MH Garcia, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut. She has taught at the USCGA for over a decade. Her research interests include analytical fluid-structures interactions, DEI in pedagogy, and concept mapping. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Project-Based Learning Success in Fundamentals of
Engineering at the University of Alberta. His research focuses on leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) in engineering education and exploring their applications in structural engineering. Mohammad’s work primarily revolves around artificial intelligence, smart infrastructure, and bridge monitoring through crowdsensing techniques. He is particularly passionate about integrating advanced AI-driven solutions into structural health monitoring to enhance infrastructure resilience and efficiency.Mohamed Sabek, University of Alberta Mohamed Sabek is a Ph.D. student in Construction Management and Engineering at the University of Alberta. He is the lead developer of the AI-driven grading framework presented in this paper, which
contemporary engineering challenges. By offering acomprehensive overview and in-depth insights into materials essential for both academic studyand future professional endeavors, the CEM course prepares students to meet the diversedemands they will face in their careers [3].The concept of ownership in learning encompasses crucial aspects, such as a profound sense ofconnection, active participation, and personal investment in the educational journey [4].Establishing this sense of ownership is useful for enhancing students’ learning potential andfostering success in various educational settings [5]. To truly internalize ownership, studentsmust grasp specific learning objectives and possess clear, well-defined targets, acting as guidingposts delineating
approaches and engineering leadership concepts within theengineering curriculum, both internally at our own institutions, and more broadly as members ofnational engineering education communities of practice such as the Canadian EngineeringEducation Association (CEEA), the CEEA Sustainable Engineering Leadership and Management(SELM) special interest group, the National Initiative on Capacity Building and KnowledgeCreation for Engineering Leadership (NICKEL), Graduate Attribute Continuous ImprovementProcess (GACIP), Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering (CSChE), the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) and the ASEE Engineering Leadership DevelopmentDivision (LEAD). We are instructors with both industry and academic experience who
engineering educators can easily adapt this methodology, provided in detail in this paper, to implement in any engineering course by modifying the questions (example questions provided in Appendix A).MethodsPre-design ProcessIn April 2022, faculty within the Texas A&M University (TAMU) mechanical engineeringdepartment formed teams and responded to an internal departmental solicitation requestingproject proposals implementing teaching innovations in undergraduate classes, preferably withmultiple sections, under the National Science Foundation (NSF) Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) grant. The authors’ proposal aiming to improve student learning byincorporating Bloom’s Taxonomy-based questions within assignments in Fluid
Oriented Interdisciplinary STEM Education Research Group of the Institute for the Future of Education at Tecnologico de Monterrey. He collaborates with the Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Andres Bello in Chile. He is National Researcher Level 2 in Mexico. His research lines are interdisciplinary STEM education, social oriented education, conceptual understanding, active learning, assessment tools, and faculty development. Dr. Zavala was appointed to the editorial board of the PRPER (2015-18). In the AAPT, he was a vice-presidential candidate, member of the Committee on Research in Physics Education, member and chair of the International Education Committee, and elected member of Leadership Organizing Physics
Paper ID #48060Pollution Prevention Through Popcorn: An Introduction to Life Cycle AnalysisEmma Marie Padros, Rowan University Chemical engineering student at Rowan University set to graduate in May 2025. Upon graduation I am to work for CECO Environmental as a Project Engineer I, under their Peerless Emissions Control Brand. On campus I am a part of the D3 women’s swim team, social media manager of the American institute of chemical engineering (AIChE) club, a member of the society of women in engineering (SWE), and the national college athlete honor society (Chi Alpha Sigma).Marcella McMahon, Rowan UniversityMr. Barnabas
stakeholders’ social interaction and software productivity from an SIF perspective.Dr. Nan Niu, Mississippi State University Nan Niu is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at Mississippi State University. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science in 2009 from the University of Toronto, where he specialized in requirements engineering for software product lines. His current research interests include informa- tion seeking in software engineering, requirements engineering, program comprehension, and software engineering education. He is a member of ASEE and a senior member of IEEE.Dr. Donna Reese, Mississippi State University Donna S. Reese received her BS from Louisiana Tech University and her MS and
-Year Course.”[2] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., and Wolfe, H., 2004, “Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 93(2), pp. 105–115.[3] Rae, D., and Melton, D. E., 2017, “Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in US Engineering Education: An International View of the KEEN Project,” J. Eng. Entrep., 7(3).[4] Farina, J., Dillon, H., Levison, R. D., and Ralston, N., 2020, “Increasing Student Curiosity with Cooling Systems,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education.[5] Bieryla, K., Schulz, N. A., Levison, R. D., and Dillon, H. E., 2020, “Play-Doh and
, M. Koro-Ljungberg, D. J. Therriault, and I. Krause, “Undergraduate students' beliefs about engineering problem solving,” J. Eng. Educ. vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 560–584, Oct. 2016. http://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20150[14] U. Asogwa, M. W. Liberatore, T. R. Duckett, and G. A. Mentzer, “Student attitudes when solving homework problems that reverse engineer youtube videos,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, Jun. 2020. http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--35220[15] J. Alvarado, “Design your own thermodynamics experiment, a problem-based learning approach in engineering technology,” in 2006 ASEE Annual conference, Chicago, IL, USE, Jun 2006. http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--791[16] S. L. MacKinnon and B
Paper ID #42489Work-in-Progress: Development of a Domain-Agnostic Standards Curriculumin Partnership with a Medical Device ManufacturerDr. Michael Gordon Browne, The University of Illinois Chicago Clinical Assistant Professor teaching engineering design, medical device quality and regulatory processes, innovation, and entrepreneurship to University of Illinois at Chicago Biomedical Engineering Students and Medical Students the University of Illinois College of Medicine Innovation Medicine Program. Research interests focus on the emulation of realistic medical device design in education and the quality assessment of
waste processing plant. Final report preparation for the sponsor was completed bysummer of 2024. The two chemical engineering students who participated in the project served as paidresearch interns advised by faculty in chemical engineering. RPI strongly encouragesundergraduate students to spend a semester away from traditional studies, pursuing internships,independent study experiences, or research experiences. The two students satisfied their“semester away” requirements by participating in the project. Both students also completed oursenior capstone design courses, working on design projects unrelated to the present work.Chemical engineering program educational outcomes were met through our standard core designcourses, while the
lecture*: Integrating Engineering Education and community service: Themes for the future of engineering education. Journal of engineering education, 95(1), 7-11.Beddoes, K. D., Jesiek, B. K., & Borrego, M. (2010). Identifying opportunities for collaborations in international engineering education research on problem-and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, 4(2), 3.Egresitz, J. (2022). Science fiction no longer: augmented reality and the technology engineering education classroom. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 81(5), 16-21.El-adaway, I., Pierrakos, O., & Truax, D. (2015). Sustainable construction education using problem-based learning and service learning
. Page 12.979.18 4. I would recommend the workshop to teachers whom I know. 5. I was able to apply my workshop experience to improve my teaching. 6. The technical information in the workshop enhanced my understanding of important science topics. 7. I was able to apply what I learned to enhance the education of my students. 8. As a result of the workshop, I better understand how engineers and scientists contribute to enhancing human knowledge of the universe. 4.0 Teacher's Response Average Response* 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Southeastern Section Conference, 2024.[13] S. W. Crown, “Improving visualization skills of engineering graphics students using simple javascript web based games,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 347–355, 2001, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00613.x.[14] M. I. S. Guntur, W. Setyaningrum, H. Retnawati, and Marsigit, “Can augmented reality improve problem-solving and spatial skill?,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, Jul. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012063.[15] C. Papakostas, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, and C. Sgouropoulou, “Exploration of Augmented Reality in Spatial Abilities Training: A
Paper ID #42792Effectiveness of Active Learning Methods on Students’ Self-efficacy, LearningMotivation and Academic Performance in Numerical Methods in MechanicalEngineeringDr. Golnaz Mirfenderesgi, The Ohio State University I am an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University. I have been teaching Numerical Methods and Mechanics classes such as Statics, Mechanics of Materials, and Dynamics since 2018. my research interests lay in the area of engineering education, numerical modeling, optimization algorithms, and machine learning methods with the
seemed to be a gamble haspaid off in more ways than were ever expected or anticipated.Looking into the future reveals that the Technological Literacy course will continue to expandand grow. Each time the course is offered it is different incorporating new material, ideas,innovative approaches, and additional exhibits. This trend will continue because the project is along way from completion. There are still many new creative ways to promote TechnologicalLiteracy that can be used.Bibliography1. Boyer, E. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York, NY: Harper and Row.2. Frederik, I., Sonneveld, W., & Vries, M. (2011). Teaching and Learning the Nature of Technical Artifacts. International Journal of
and Biomolecular Engineering from Cornell University, and his MS in Chemical Engineering Practice and his PhD in Chemical Engineering from MIT. His current research interests include developing engaging learning activities and building students’ intuition and conceptual understanding. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Do growth mindset interventions work? Observations from a case study in a chemical engineering core courseIntroduction Designing and analyzing processes to manufacture products for the benefit of the society andthe environment is the main role of a chemical engineer. When designs fail to meet the specifiedgoal, it can be quite frustrating and
. Chemical Engineering Progress, 2023. 119(May): p. 49-55. DOI: https://www.aiche- cep.com/cepmagazine/may_2023/MobilePagedArticle.action?articleId=1876571&app=fa lse#articleId187657112. Jackson, A., C. Mawson, and C.A. Bodnar, Faculty motivation for pursuit of entrepreneurial mindset professional development. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2022. 5(3): p. 320-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/251512742098851613. Bosman, L. and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. 2018, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing14. Kern Entrepreneurship Engineering Network. Engineering Unleashed powered by KEEN. 2024 [cited 2024 January]; Available from: https://engineeringunleashed.com
by the American Society for Quality (ASQ). He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Construction Engineering at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. He earned his M.S. in Civil Engineering (MSCE) from Purdue University. Additionally, he holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering (BSCE) and an M.S. in Construction Technology from the National University of Engineering, Lima, Peru. Beyond academia, Rojas has extensive international experience managing construction projects in Peru, Bolivia, and the United States. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Surviving the Storm: An Assessment of Natural Hazards Experiential Learning Activities
the Missouri Public Service Commission. She has been recognized nationally for her leadership abilities receiving the coveted Patricia Byrant Lead- ership Award from the Women in Nuclear, the Region IV Leadership Award, the University of Missouri Chancellor Award and the Ameren Diversity Awards. Janese recently chaired the first WINNERS Contest for K-12 to Save the Earth from the Giant Asteroid Contest. Janese received degrees in History, Civil Engineering, and Mathematics, a Masters in Education and Environmental Engineering and a PhD in Nuclear Engineering.Dr. Charles Lyndell Weaver III, University of Missouri - Columbia
). Project Leader (1987-92). Principal Researcher (1992-95). Specialty Products Business Leader (1995-99)Hseen BaledMichael McMahon ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Team Building Games to Reinforce the Training of Chemical Engineering Students in Team Skills Based on Collaboration LeadershipIntroductionTeam building games or activities are popular at work [1] - [3], and college [4]. Team games arecreative activities that simulate team performance at relatively simple and engaging tasks butoffering practice and reflections to apply to real job situations. They can be used when starting anew team project or sometimes later to address conflicts, to encourage positive attitudes, or tounveil new
-anonymously had upon personal and team effectiveness. His research is an original work (initiated by himself), which was funded by the BYU college of engineering. The contents of this paper are a condensed version of his thesis. Tay- lor, his wife Judy, and five children recently moved to the Washington, DC area where he is currently employed with Clark Construction.Dr. Rollin H. Hotchkiss P.E.,D.WRE, F.ASCE, Brigham Young University Page 24.543.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Evaluating the Effects of Non-Anonymity on Student